Pentagonoaren azken triskantzak (29)

WAR: NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg revealed that Russia offered not to invade Ukraine if the alliance would agree to deny Zelenskyy membership. Our refusal triggered the war – we are complicit.

ira. 20

Rather than put Nazi apologists and killers on trial, Vladimir Zelenskys Government have put them on stamps. The reality of a deeply corrupt State, disproportionally influenced by the ideology of mass killers and Fascism is now undeniable, even to the client Western Media

Chay Bowes@BowesChay

ira. 19

Zelensky decides to play “lets pretend” at the UN General Assembly, manufacturing a deluded geopolitical reality to a half empty auditorium

No mention of the 300k men dead and infinite injured due to his deluded total victory fantasy No mention of Peace or settlement.

Nothing

Dimitri Lascaris@dimitrilascaris

ira. 19

Zelensky is coming to Canada.

He’ll ask for more money from Canadian taxpayers.

He’ll tell us that Ukraine is fighting for our freedom, that it can defeat Russia and that this war was unprovoked.

It’s a pack of lies.

This proxy war was provoked, and Ukraine cannot win it.

oooooo

Aaron Maté@aaronjmate

ira. 19

Zelensky is both proxy war spokesman and professional hostage. He had a peace deal with Russia in April 2022, but shady dealings behind the scenes by his US-UK overlords — coupled with longstanding threats from Ukraine’s far-right — led him to back out.

ira. 19

“Preserving press freedom is essential. A journalist like Julian Assange cannot be punished [for] informing society in a transparent and legitimate way”

-Brazil’s President Lula Da Silva at the UN General Assembly

If you come to the US, address the UN and beg for more money, you should at least have enough respect to put on a suit

I know Zelensky is an actor, but this role is getting old BTW why is he still begging,

I thought they were winning

ira. 19

BRICS is an alternative strategic platform for boosting cooperation between developing countries as traditional institutions of international economy management lose credibility, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said: https://vk.cc/cr11u9

ira. 20

ira. 19

Iranian President: “The world is changing and moving to a new world order, and this way is irreversible.” “The project of Americanizing the world has failed.” he said.

Lord Bebo@MyLordBebo

ira. 19

“The US, with 5% of the world’s population, consumes 80% of the opioids produced in the world”

China says US is a druggie

ira. 20

Yes, everyone knows that Ukraine has long been one of the most corrupt countries on the planet. But keep quiet. The only people stressing about it are Putin apologists

oooooo

Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinklle

ira. 20

I hope Russia liberates every last square inch of Ukraine.

John Pilger@johnpilger

ira. 20

In 2011, NATO (Britain, US & others) destroyed the modern state of Libya. Public services were a principal target. Lies were told; more than 10,000 people were killed. Now add the 10,000 killed at Derna, whose dam maintenance was a casualty of the attack.

ira. 20

The Brazilian media were outraged by Zelensky’s behavior during the UN General Assembly. Yesterday, during the speech of President Lula Syply and his team, they pointedly did not applaud Brazil. At the same time, Lula read, unlike Zelensky, a truly powerful speech about the collapse of modern liberalism. The behavior of the Ukrainian delegation was perceived as an insult, after which Lula canceled the planned meeting with Zelensky.

https://t.me/vicktop55/17183

Bideoa, hemen: https://twitter.com/i/status/1704452346703421781

oooooo

ira. 20

S.L. Kanthan@Kanthan2030

ira. 20

China catches the US spying with a malware known as the “Second Date” that was developed by the NSA (who else?).

US agencies have been hacking servers of Huawei and other Chinese tech firms since 2009. Who’s stealing IP from who?

ira. 20

It is really can led to peace faster than anything else!

ira. 20

Today I’m putting congressional leadership &

@POTUS

on notice that I will oppose any effort to hold the federal government hostage for Ukraine funding. I will not consent to expedited passage of any spending measure that provides any more US aid to Ukraine.   https://apnews.com/article/congress-ukraine-funding-zelenskyy-mccarthy-9bced4d9a8c16ae5bf148f640b6f2c31

DD Geopolitics@DD_Geopolitics

ira. 20

ira. 19

@BrianGr28212234

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

Proof that some crimes go unpunished, while others are manufactured.

I wish you the very best in your treasonous desire to serve Nazi Ukraine until your last dying breath.

On second thought, I won’t waste any flowers on your grave.

Have your friends post it’s location so I can piss on it when I visit post-conflict Ukraine…unless, of course, your grave site in in part of the expanded New Russia, in which I’ll oversee the exhumation of your remains so they can be scattered to the four corners of the world, to be forgotten like the odious cause you serve.

You genuinely suck as both an American and a human being.

ira. 20

@Angry_Staffer

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

It’s superficially fascinating, in the way one watches a slowly unfolding car crash, that you opted to engage at this level. I mean, a former White House staffer such as yourself should a) show a modicum of restraint, and b) run the numbers before committing to a narrative.

But then I dug deeper into your online persona, and realized what you are—a whiskey drinking Soi Boi whose identity has been formed by progressive Democratic domestic politics (I had to throw in that dig—reading your foreign policy and national security takes made your lack of expertise in those fields quite obvious.)

So rather than the standard “fuck you, asshole” comment your ignorant sophomoric reference to pedophilia would normally rate, I’ll just say how sorry I feel for you and your ilk, to have been led so far astray by your false prophets that you lost touch with the basic fundamentals of what it means to be an American.

But, then again, you initiated this moment. So, with all the sincerity I can muster, fuck you, asshole.

PS: GenZ isn’t going to save your ass. Your time, thankfully, is done. I hope you grabbed enough White House souvenirs to last you a lifetime.

Noctis Draven@DravenNoctis

ira. 20

ira. 20

As a Senator, Biden supported Bush’s war of aggression on Iraq.

U.S. troops are now in Syria in violation of international law.

Annually, the U.S. gives $3.8 bn in military aid to Israel, a serial violator of international law.

Yet Biden lectures the world about aggression.

oooooo

Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinklle

ira. 20

Zelensky is the ISIS of Europe. Full interview on my YouTube.

Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter

ira. 20

youtube.com

Zlatti71@djuric_zlatko

ira. 20

German experts proposed a peace plan for Ukraine, – Berliner Zeitung According to experts, Ukraine cannot defeat Russia on the battlefield, even with the support of the West. The conflict threatens to escalate into a large-scale war between Russia and NATO, which neither side wants. They also believe that the longer the conflict continues, the more casualties there will be and the more difficult it will be to achieve a just and lasting negotiated peace.

A three-point plan without preconditions is proposed. The first stage involves a ceasefire. The second is peace negotiations chaired by the UN Secretary-General and the UN High Commissioner for Peace and Security in Ukraine. And finally, maintaining peace through the European security architecture so that Ukraine’s geostrategic position no longer plays a key role in the rivalry between the United States and Russia.

@Slavyangrad

Victor vicktop55@vicktop55

ira. 20

A “cruel ending” is approaching for Zelensky, American journalist Jackson Hinkle said in an interview with RT:

“The Ukrainian counter-offensive, during which 71 thousand people died, is a suicide mission.”

According to him, on the streets of Odessa, Lvov and Kiev, people should protest against the actions of the government, which sends their husbands, fathers, brothers and sons to the front.

But this is not happening, because the SBU will send them “to imprisonment or even worse,” the journalist added.

https://t.me/vicktop55/17164

Bideoa, hemen: https://twitter.com/i/status/1704398779783283074

oooooo

Laurence Fox@LozzaFox

Bideoa, hemen: https://twitter.com/i/status/1704401513789935741

oooooo

George Galloway@georgegalloway

19 h

INTERVIEW: This war is all about people getting rich in Washington while thousands die on the battlefield. Combat veteran Col Douglas Macgregor doesn’t hold back Follow

@MoatsTv

@DougAMacgregor

#Ukraine #Zelensky #UN

21 h

Germany increased the volume of purchases of Russian oil through India 12 times.

During Zelensky’s UN speech, numerous delegates left the auditorium (pic 1) leaving the hall half empty, but Ukrainian TV edited the video to show a packed hall, but accidentally showed Zelensky(14sec) apparently listening to himself (pic 2)

Remarkable

oooooo

Dimitri Lascaris@dimitrilascaris

ira. 21

My latest: Ukraine’s much-hyped counter-offensive is, as John Mearsheimer explains, a “colossal failure”. The humane response to this calamity is to seek peace by mutual compromise. By refusing to negotiate, Zelensky dooms Ukraine to destruction.

Clare Daly@ClareDalyMEP

16 h

Lots of people have asked for @NATO Secretary General @jensstoltenberg‘s reply to my intervention. Too long to upload to Twitter. Below is a sample. As I said: rhetoric and reality running in opposite directions. You can watch the whole hearing here: https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/committee-on-foreign-affairs_20230907-0830-COMMITTEE-AFET

Bideoa, hemen: https://twitter.com/i/status/1704860857002250519

Aipamena

Clare Daly@ClareDalyMEP

Clare Daly@ClareDalyMEP

16 h

Also, for everyone who’s been parroting since Feb 2022 that Russia’s invasion is “not about NATO,” was “never about NATO,” has “nothing to do with NATO,” here it is from @NATO Secretary General @jensstoltenberg:

Russia “went to war to prevent more #NATO close to [its] borders.”

Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinklle

14 h

YouTube has suspended me for 7 days for visiting the memorial of Wagner’s Yevgeney Prigozhin. Here is the full video:

Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter

11 h

youtube.com

THIS Is Why The Ukraine Counteroffensive Is Failing! W/ Scott Ritter

Ukraine’s vaunted “spring counteroffensive” has now dragged into the fall and doesn’t appear likely to

Chebureki Man@CheburekiMan

17 h

Full text of Lavrov’s speech at the UN Security Council, covering the history of Washington’s proxy war against Russia, as well as UN corruption and the organization’s failures to uphold its own laws and values.

***

Mister Chairman.

Mister Secretary General.

Colleagues.

The existing international order was built on the ruins and colossal tragedy of World War Two.

Its basis was the UN Charter, the key source of modern international law.

Largely thanks to the UN, it was possible to prevent a new world war fraught with nuclear disaster.

Unfortunately, after the end of the Cold War, the collective West, led by the United States, independently assumed the rank of arbiter of the destinies of all mankind and, overwhelmed by a complex of exclusivity, it began to increasingly ignore the legacy of the founding fathers of the UN.

Today, the West turns to statutory norms and principles selectively, from case to case, solely in accordance with its selfish geopolitical needs.

This inevitably leads to the weakening of global stability, to the aggravation of existing ones and to the ignition of new sources of tension.

The risks of global conflict are also growing.

It is precisely in order to stop them, to direct events in a peaceful direction, that Russia insisted and insists that all provisions of the UN Charter be respected and applied not selectively, but in their entirety and interrelation, including the principles of sovereign equality of states, non-interference in their internal affairs, respect for territorial integrity and the right of peoples to self-determination.

The actions of the United States and its allies indicate a systematic violation of the balance of requirements enshrined in the UN Charter.

Since the collapse of the USSR and the formation of independent states in its place, the United States and its allies have rudely and openly interfered in the internal affairs of Ukraine.

As US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland publicly and even proudly admitted at the end of 2013, Washington spent 5 billion dollars on cultivating politicians obedient to the West in Kyiv.

All the facts of the engineering of the Ukrainian crisis have long been known, but they are trying to hide them in every possible way in order to cancel the entire history before 2014.

Therefore, the topic of today’s meeting, proposed by the Albanian Chairmanship, could not have come at a better time, and it allows us to restore the chronological chain of events and precisely in the context of the attitude of the main actors to the implementation of the principles and goals of the UN Charter.

In 2004-2005, in order to bring a pro-American candidate to power, the West sanctioned the first coup d’etat in Kiev, forcing the Constitutional Court of Ukraine to make an illegal decision to hold a third round of presidential elections not provided for by the Constitution of this country.

Even more unceremonious interference in internal affairs was evident during the second Maidan in 2013-2014.

Then a whole series of Western travelers directly encouraged participants in anti-government demonstrations to take violent actions.

The same Victoria Nuland discussed with the US Ambassador in Kyiv the composition of the future government that the putschists will form.

At the same time, she pointed out to the European Union its real place in world politics from Washington’s point of view.

We all remember her obscene two-word phrase. It is significant that the European Union swallowed this.

In February 2014, characters selected by the Americans became key participants in the bloody seizure of power, organized, let me remind you, a day after an agreement was reached under the guarantees of Germany, Poland and France between the legally elected President of Ukraine and opposition leaders.

The principle of non-interference in internal affairs has been trampled on many times. Immediately after the coup, the putschists declared that their absolute priority was to curtail the rights of Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine.

And the residents of Crimea and the southeast of this country, who refused to come to terms with the results of the unconstitutional seizure of power, were declared terrorists, and a punitive operation was launched against them.

In response to this, Crimea and Donbass held referendums in full compliance with the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 1 of the UN Charter.

Western diplomats and politicians, in relation to Ukraine, turn a blind eye to this most important norm of international law in an effort to reduce the entire background and essence of what is happening to the inadmissibility of violating territorial integrity.

In this regard, I would like to recall that the 1970 UN Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, adopted unanimously, states, “that the principle of respect for territorial integrity applies to States that respect in its actions the principle of equality and self-determination of peoples, and, as a result, having governments that represent all the people living in a given territory.”

The fact that the Ukrainian neo-Nazis who seized power in Kyiv did not represent the population of Crimea and Donbass does not require proof.

And unconditional support by Western capitals for the actions of the criminal Kyiv regime is nothing more than a violation of the principle of self-determination following gross interference in internal affairs.

The adoption of racist laws that followed the coup during the reign of Poroshenko and then Zelensky banning everything Russian, education, the media, culture, the destruction of books and monuments, the ban on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the seizure of its property, all this became a defiant violation of paragraph 3 of Article 1 of the Charter The UN is about respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for everyone, without distinction of race, gender, language or religion.

Not to mention the fact that these actions directly contradicted the Constitution of Ukraine, which establishes the state’s obligation to respect the rights of Russians and other national minorities.

When we hear calls to implement the peace formula and return Ukraine to the 1991 borders, the question arises: are those who call for this familiar with the statements of the Ukrainian leadership about what they are going to do with the inhabitants of the corresponding territories?

So, threats of legal or physical extermination are repeatedly made against them publicly, at the official level.

The West not only does not restrain its proteges in Kyiv, but also enthusiastically encourages their racist policies.

By the way, in a similar way, members of the European Union and NATO have been encouraging for decades the actions of Latvia and Estonia to defeat the rights of hundreds of thousands of Russian-speaking residents, whom they called non-citizens.

Now they are seriously discussing the introduction of criminal liability for the use of their native language.

Senior officials have officially stated that the dissemination of information about the possibility of local students taking Russian distance school programs should be considered almost a threat to national security, and this requires the attention of law enforcement agencies.

Returning to Ukraine.

The signing of the Minsk agreements in February 2015 was approved by a special resolution of the Security Council, in full compliance with Article 36 of the Charter, “supporting any procedure for resolving the dispute that was accepted by the parties, in this case Kiev, Donetsk and Lugansk.”

However, last year, all the signatories of the Minsk agreements, except Vladimir Putin, and these are Merkel, Hollande and Poroshenko, publicly and even with pleasure admitted that when they signed this document, they did not intend to implement it.

They only sought to gain time to strengthen Ukraine’s military potential and pump it up with weapons against Russia.

All these years, the EU and NATO directly supported the sabotage of the Minsk agreements, pushing the Kiev regime to forcefully resolve the Donbass problem.

This was done in violation of Article 25 of the Charter, according to which all UN members are obliged to obey and implement the decisions of the Security Council.

Let me remind you that in the package with the Minsk agreements, the leaders of Russia, Germany, France and Ukraine signed a declaration in which Berlin and Paris pledged to do a lot, including helping to restore the banking system in Donbass.

But they didn’t lift a finger.

They only watched as, contrary to all these obligations, Poroshenko declared a trade, economic and transport blockade of Donbass.

In the same declaration, Berlin and Paris pledged to promote the strengthening of trilateral cooperation in the European Union-Russia-Ukraine format for the practical solution of issues that concern Russia in the field of trade, “as well as to promote the creation of a common humanitarian and economic space from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean.”

This declaration was also approved by the Security Council and it was also subject to implementation in accordance with the mentioned Article 25 of the UN Charter.

But this commitment by the leaders of Germany and France turned out to be empty, another violation of the statutory principles.

The legendary Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Soviet Union, mister Gromyko, rightly noted many times: it is better to have ten years of negotiations than one day of war.

Following this covenant, we negotiated for many, many years.

We sought the conclusion of agreements in the field of European security.

We approved the Russia-NATO Founding Act.

We adopted OSCE declarations on the indivisibility of security at the highest level in 1999 and 2010.

And since 2015, we have insisted on the unconditional implementation of the Minsk agreements that were the result of the negotiations.

This is all in full compliance with the UN Charter, which requires, “to ensure conditions for fairness and respect for obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law.”

Western colleagues also ignored this principle when they signed all these documents, knowing in advance that they would not comply with them.

Speaking of negotiations.

We still do not refuse them.

President Putin spoke about this many times, including most recently.

And, I would like to remind the distinguished Secretary of State that President Zelensky signed a decree prohibiting negotiations with the Putin government.

If the United States is so interested in negotiations, then I think that it will not be difficult for them to give the command so that this Zelensky decree is canceled.

Today in the rhetoric of our opponents we hear only slogans about invasion, aggression, annexation.

They don’t say a word about the underlying causes of the problem, about how for many years they nurtured an openly Nazi regime that openly rewrote the results of the World War Two and the history of its own people.

The West avoids a substantive conversation based on facts and respect for all the requirements of the UN Charter.

Apparently, it has no arguments for an honest dialogue.

There is a strong impression that Western representatives are afraid of professional discussions that expose their demagoguery.

While pronouncing incantations about the territorial integrity of Ukraine, the former colonial metropolises are keeping silent about the UN decisions on the need for Paris to return the so-called French Mayotte to the Union of the Comoros Islands, and for London to leave the Chagos Archipelago and begin negotiations with Buenos Aires on the Malvinas Islands.

These supporters of the territorial integrity of Ukraine are now pretending that they do not remember the meaning of the Minsk agreements, let me remind you, which was concluded for the reunification of Donbass with Ukraine with guarantees of respect for fundamental human rights, first of all, the right to one’s native language.

The West, which thwarted the implementation of these agreements, bears direct responsibility for the collapse of Ukraine and for inciting a civil war there.

Among other principles of the UN Charter, respect for which could prevent a security crisis in Europe and help agree on confidence-building measures based on a balance of interests, I will note Article 2 of Chapter 8 of the UN Charter.

It enshrines the need to develop the practice of peaceful resolution of disputes with the help of regional organizations.

In accordance with this principle, Russia, together with its allies, has consistently advocated the establishment of contacts between the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the CSTO, and NATO to facilitate the practical implementation of the above-mentioned decisions of the OSCE summits on the indivisibility of security, providing, in particular, the following:

“That no single state, group of states, or organization can be given primary responsibility for maintaining peace and stability in the OSCE region, or consider any part of that region as its sphere of influence.”

Everyone knows that this is exactly what NATO has been doing: it has been trying to create its full advantage in Europe, and now in the Asia-Pacific region.

But numerous appeals from the highest bodies of the CSTO to NATO were ignored.

The reason for such an arrogant position of the United States and its allies, as everyone can see today, is the reluctance to conduct any kind of equal dialogue with anyone.

If NATO had not rejected the CSTO’s proposals for cooperation, then perhaps this would have avoided many of the negative processes that led to the current European crisis due to the fact that for decades they refused to listen to Russia, or they deceived it.

Today, when, at the suggestion of the Chairmanship, we discuss effective multilateralism, we should not forget about the numerous facts of the West’s complete rejection of any form of equal cooperation.

Consider Borrell’s statement that Europe is a blooming garden surrounded by jungle.

This is a purely neocolonial syndrome that despises the sovereign equality of states and the tasks of strengthening the principles of the UN Charter through effective multilateralism, which are brought to our discussion today.

In an effort to prevent the democratization of interstate relations, the United States and its allies are increasingly openly and unceremoniously privatizing the secretariats of international organizations.

They are pushing through, bypassing established procedures, decisions to create mechanisms subordinate to them with non-consensual mandates, but with a claim to the right to blame those who for some reason are not pleasing to Washington.

In this regard, I would like to remind you of the need for strict implementation of the UN Charter not only by member states, but also by the Secretariat of our organization.

In accordance with Article 100 of the Charter, the Secretariat is required to act impartially and it must not receive instructions from any government.

We have already talked about Article 2 of the UN Charter.

And, I want to draw your attention to its key item number 1: The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of states.

Developing this principle, the UN General Assembly, in the 1970 Declaration I mentioned, confirmed, “the inalienable right of every state to choose its political, economic, social and cultural system without interference from anyone.”

In this regard, we have serious questions about the statements that our distinguished Secretary General made on March 29 that, “autocratic rule does not guarantee stability, it is a catalyst for chaos and conflict, and strong democratic societies are capable of self-correction and self-improvement. They can stimulate change, even radical change, without bloodshed or violence.”

I can’t help but remember the changes brought about by the aggressive adventures of strong democracies in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and many other countries.

The honorable Antonio Guterres went on to say, and “that democracies are centers of broad cooperation rooted in the principles of equality, participation and solidarity.”

It is noteworthy that all these speeches were made at the so-called Summit for Democracy, convened by President Joe Biden outside the UN, the participants of which were selected by the American administration on the basis of loyalty, and loyalty not so much to Washington as to the ruling Democratic Party in the United States.

Attempts to use such peer-to-peer forums to discuss issues of a global nature directly contradict paragraph 4 of Article 1 of the UN Charter, which sets out the need, “to ensure the role of the UN as a center for coordinating actions in achieving common goals.”

Contrary to this principle, several years ago France and Germany proclaimed an alliance of multilateralists, into which they also invited only those who are obedient, which in itself again confirms the reluctance to get rid of the colonial mentality, and the attitude of the initiators to the principle of effective multilateralism, which is on our agenda today.

At the same time, the idea of the European Union as the ideal of that same multilateralism was inculcated.

There are now calls from Brussels to expand the EU’s membership as soon as possible, including, in particular, the Balkan countries.

But the main pathos is not about Serbia, not about Turkey, which have been conducting hopeless negotiations on joining the EU for decades, but about Ukraine.

Claiming to be an ideologist of Euro-integration, Borrell recently did not hesitate to speak out that the Kiev regime should be accepted into the European Union as soon as possible.

Allegedly, if not for the war, this would have taken years, but this can and should be done without any criteria.

Serbia, Turkiye and others will wait.

And Ukraine needs to be admitted into the European Union out of turn.

By the way, at the same Summit for Democracy, the Secretary General declared:

“Democracy stems from the UN Charter. The first words of the UN Charter – we the peoples – reflect the fundamental source of legitimacy: the consent of those under control.”

It is useful to correlate this thesis with the track record of the Kiev regime, which launched a war against a huge part of its own people, against those millions of people who did not consent to govern themselves to neo-Nazis and Russophobes who illegally seized power in the country and buried the Minsk agreements approved by the UN Security Council, thereby undermining territorial integrity of Ukraine.

For those who, contrary to the UN Charter, divide humanity into democracies and autocracies, it would not hurt them to answer the question of which category they classify the Ukrainian regime in?

I’m not expecting an answer.

Speaking about the principles of the UN Charter, the question arises about the relationship of the Security Council with the General Assembly.

The Western collective has been aggressively and for a long time pushing the topic of abuse of the veto right, and, through not entirely correct pressure on other UN members, it achieved a decision that after each use of this right, which the West is increasingly deliberately provoking, the corresponding topic should be considered at the General Assembly.

This does not pose any problem for us.

Because Russia’s approaches to all issues on the agenda are open, we have nothing to hide, and it is not difficult for us to state this position again.

In addition, the use of the veto is an absolutely legitimate tool provided for in the UN Charter in order to prevent the adoption of decisions that would be fraught with a split in the Organization.

But, if the procedure for discussing cases of the use of the veto at the General Assembly is approved, then why not think about those Security Council resolutions that were not vetoed, which were adopted, including many years ago, but which are never implemented, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 25 of the UN Charter.

Why doesn’t the General Assembly consider the reasons for this state of affairs, for example, with regard to Security Council resolutions on Palestine, and on the entire range of problems of the Middle East and North Africa, on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as well as on resolution 22-02, which approved the Minsk agreements on Ukraine.

The problem associated with sanctions regimes also requires attention.

It has already become the norm that the Security Council, after lengthy negotiations, in strict accordance with the UN Charter, approves sanctions against a specific country, and then the United States and its allies impose additional so-called unilateral restrictions against the same state, which have not received approval in the Security Council and are not included in its resolution as part of the agreed package.

In this same series, there is another glaring example: this is the decision just taken by Berlin, Paris and London, through their national legislation, to extend the restrictions on Iran that expire in October, which are subject to legal termination in accordance with resolution 22-31.

That is, European countries and Britain say that the Security Council decision has expired, but they don’t care about this, they have their own rules.

All this makes it more urgent to consider the issue of ensuring that after the Security Council adopts any sanctions resolution, none of the UN members would have the right to devalue it by introducing their own illegitimate restrictions against the same country.

It is also important that all sanctions regimes through the Security Council be time-limited, since their open-ended nature deprives the Council of flexibility in terms of influencing the policies of sanctioned governments.

The topic of the so-called humanitarian limits of sanctions also requires attention.

It would be right that henceforth the introduction of any sanctions projects to the Security Council would be accompanied by the provision of assessments of their consequences for citizens through UN humanitarian agencies, and not by demagogic statements from Western colleagues that ordinary people will not suffer.

Dear Colleagues.

The facts speak of a deep crisis in international relations and a lack of desire and will in the West to overcome this crisis.

But I hope that a way out of the current situation still exists, and it will be found.

To begin with, everyone needs to realize responsibility for the fate of our Organization, and for the fate of the world in a historical context, and not from the point of view of opportunistic electoral and momentary alignments in the next national elections of a particular member state.

Let me remind you again: almost 80 years ago, by signing the UN Charter, world leaders agreed to respect the sovereign equality of all states, large and small, rich and poor, monarchies and republics.

In other words, even then humanity recognized the need for an equal, polycentric world order as a guarantee of the sustainability and security of its development.

Therefore, today we are not talking about submitting to some kind of rules based world order, but we are talking about fulfilling by everyone the obligations assumed when signing and ratifying the UN Charter in its entirety and interconnection.

Thank you for attention.

oooooo

14 h

Soon they’ll have us believing Russia nuked Hiroshima Yesterday at the Atlantic Council Awards, EU’s Von der Leyen, without mentioning US did it, talked about how the atomic bomb “raised Horoshima to the ground”. She then said “Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again

TASS@tassagency_en

15 h

Record low unemployment in Russia is an indicator of the effectiveness of economic policy, President Vladimir Putin said at a meeting of the Presidium of the State Council: https://vk.cc/cr44DP

3 h

The warmongering leader of the NATO imperialist cartel, Jens Stoltenberg, boasted that, by trying to weaken Russia in the proxy war in Ukraine, it “will make it easier” for the US “to focus also on China”. So war on Russia now will help war later on China

20 h

Russia MFA Spokeswoman: “Germany’s Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said that she was proud of her grandfather who stood his ground against the enemy in Kaliningrad. What kind of an enemy was it? Well, the Red Army, of course, the one that fought the Nazis, including Annelena Baerbock’s pride – her grandfather.

By the same token, Canada’s Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland was proud of her grandfather, Michael Chomiak, who edited a Nazi magazine in Eastern Europe before settling in the West. His granddaughter took up the torch from her grandfather, albeit at a new technological level.”

oooooo

Ivan Katchanovski@I_Katchanovski

9 h

youtube.com

FAILED OFFENSIVE – WITH ANDREI MARTYANOV AND SCOTT RITTER

FAILED OFFENSIVE – WITH ANDREI MARTYANOV AND SCOTT RITTER

https://www.rokfin.com/garlan

Lars Jorgensen@LarsDenmar

19 h

One of the most important real stores of the twentieth century. Marx, Kalecki, keynes, Mosler..

FINDING THE MONEY Film

@FindingMoneyDoc

ira. 20

@FindingMoneyDoc

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

He co-founded successful broker/dealer financial services firms and investment funds AVM and III. In addition to his work in the field of economics, he developed – and later sold – his own automobile line, Mosler Automotive. (2/4) #FindingtheMoney #MMT

ira. 20

@FindingMoneyDoc

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

In anticipation of FINDING THE MONEY’s world premiere at @woodstockfilm Festival on Sat, Sept 30th and Oct 1st, we’re counting down the days by highlighting many of the thought leaders you’ll encounter in the film and some of the behind the scenes moments that got us here. (3/4)

ira. 20

@FindingMoneyDoc

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

Director Maren Poitras and EP @MarcSmolowitz will be in Woodstock for Q&As, in addition to @StephanieKelton + more experts from the film. We hope to see you there … and stay close for more announcements, check the links in our bio, we’re coming to a city near you soon! (4/4)