Israel, AEB eta NATO zale estatu guztiak errudun, Palestinaren genozidioan (15) eta Scott Ritter

Hasiera berria / A new beginning

Oso argi geratu denez, Palestina-ren aurkako eraso guztiek helburu bakarra daukate: genozidioa. Ezin da beste modu batez definitu.

Beraz, hemendik aurrera, genozidioaz arituko gara. Ea egoera eta epe berri batean sartuta gauden, to know whether we are in a new time or not.

***

****

“I SWEAR TO BE LOYAL TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PALESTINE” SIGNED BY ISRAELIS WHEN EMIGRATING FROM EUROPE IN THE 1930s

oooooo

Lord Rothschild Claims His Family Created Israel

Bideoa: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUpZT5hEh8Q

oooooo

maria@maria_mhr07

Alison Weir reveals the secret of Israel’s creation:

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1807269838907224331

oooooo

Read the resolutions text here: https://www.un.org/unispal/icj-and-question-of-palestine

ooooooo

Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis@DrLoupis

The occupation of Palestinian land began 107 years ago today, in 1917.

The Balfour Declaration, issued by the British government on November 2, 1917, expressed support for the establishment of “a national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine.

This declaration was conveyed through a letter written by then-Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild, a prominent figure in the British Jewish community.

The declaration states:

“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

This date represents the first official support for Zionist goals, ultimately leading, 30 years later, to the establishment of the State of Israel on occupied Palestinian land.

The Balfour Declaration played a significant role in shaping more than a century of ongoing war and chaos in the Middle East, culminating in the establishment of an Israeli state on Palestinian territory in 1948.

Today, the Balfour Declaration, in its outcomes, is seen as the foundation for the ongoing genocide, which in the past year alone has resulted in the death of more than 40,000 Palestinians, reflecting a failure to protect the historical and human rights of the Palestinian population in the region.

oooooo

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuK97E07b2Q)

?La creación del Estado de Israel no responde a un desarrollo lógico de la historia, sino que la creación de este Estado es fruto de las confabulaciones políticas internacionales en las que participaron gustosamente los sionistas. Theodor Herzl fijó una hoja de ruta para crear el Estado judío y sus seguidores continuaron su legado. Antes de la creación de Israel en mayo de 1948, los británicos pusieron la primera piedra con la Declaración Balfour, la cual permitió crear el Hogar Nacional Judío, pero ¿cómo se gestó la Declaración Balfour? Quedaros hasta el final porque en este video os voy a hablar sobre la Declaración Balfour y todo lo que hubo detrás de esta promesa británica. ?

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1855599445863223457

oooooo

The Mother of All Talk Shows with George Galloway@MoatsTV

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1858842659668046077

oooooo

Trita Parsi@tparsi

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861505581854433466

oooooo

Muhammad Shehada@muhammadshehad2

COMBATE |@upholdreality

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861566350407135280

oooooo

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861500726679056646

oooooo

Ryan Rozbiani@RyanRozbiani

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861515765410635888

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861375599467446664

oooooo

Clare Daly@ClareDalyIRL

Gabe@GabeZZOZZ

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861482245292195870

oooooo

Chris Hedges@ChrisLynnHedges

oooooo

Chris Hedges@ChrisLynnHedges

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861549839734980681

oooooo

Ahmed Eldin@ASE

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861507404053025210

oooooo

oooooo

Richard@ricwe123

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861446390586445984

oooooo

Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

Not only did Ukraine never have physical possession of these weapons (Russia did), all of these weapons were returned to Russia by 1996.

Russia isn’t going to give them back. Any “official” who stated this as a possibility shouldn’t be in government, which leads me to believe no such statement was made.

This is yet another example of the New York Times just making things up in order to stir up tension with Russia.

oooooo

Abby Martin@AbbyMartin

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861141934812864559

oooooo

@zei_squirrel

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861210359761076360

oooooo

Khalissee@Kahlissee

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861425427295715467

oooooo

Elon Musk@elonmusk

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861525935692063179

oooooo

BRICS News@BRICSinfo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1861411618824867895

oooooo

ooo

Arab Leaders sends SHOCKWAVES to USA & Israel following US ceasefire veto!

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vidzvDPa9Wo)

The UN Security Council meets in New York City to discuss the Middle East crisis, focusing on the Palestinian issue and the humanitarian impact of the ongoing conflict on Monday, November 25.

The meeting comes after the US vetoed a resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, which had the backing of 14 Council members.

Last week, the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, alleging ‘war crimes’ and crimes against humanity – the claims strongly rejected by Israel.

Discussions are set to highlight the escalating violence, including Israeli airstrikes in Lebanon, the ground offensive in Gaza, and a deepening humanitarian crisis. The agenda is expected to address access to aid, the release of hostages, and the role of UNRWA in aiding displaced Palestinians.

Transkripzioa:

0:00

the United States fundamentally rejects

0:02

the international Criminal Court’s

0:03

decision to issue arrest warrants for

0:06

senior Israeli officials we have been

0:09

clear that the ICC does not have

0:12

jurisdiction over this matter and we are

0:14

deeply concerned by the prosecutor’s

0:16

rush to seek arrest warrants as well as

0:19

troubling process errors that led to

0:22

this

0:23

decision moreover this decision does not

0:26

make the pursuit of Peace any easier

0:30

the representative of Algeria has asked

0:32

for the floor to make a further

0:33

statement I give them the

0:38

floor thank you Madame

0:44

President

0:45

I asked for the floor

0:49

to respond to

0:55

some allegations

1:00

I will not even stoop down as low to

1:03

respond to this was exploited by the

1:07

representative of by that representative

1:11

who is speaking a language

1:15

that is

1:18

immoral I will not even be

1:21

responding to

1:24

[Music]

1:27

allegations by some

1:31

that are not even

1:38

Humane a response to to a blood someone

1:43

who’s bloodthirsty and who kills women

1:45

and children does not deserve to be made

1:48

at this table a response to a person who

1:53

everyone here in

1:54

headquarters and around the

1:58

world is witnessing a genocide

2:02

perpetrated against a population that is

2:11

defenseless continues to uh uh hold fast

2:15

to the hope of a international

2:19

intervention and

2:22

certainly does not deserve to have a t a

2:25

voice here at the

2:27

table and they deserve have a voice at

2:30

this table and as an independent state

2:32

in the United Nations thank you I thank

2:35

the representative of Algeria for their

2:37

statement colleagues can I just remind

2:40

that this is an official meeting of the

2:42

security Council and all participants

2:44

are expected to observe appropriate

2:47

standards of tone and

2:49

conduct the permanent Observer of the

2:52

Observer state of Palestine has asked

2:54

for the floor to make a further

2:55

statement I give him the floor

3:00

I’m terribly sorry Madame President for

3:02

taking the floor

3:04

again but uh I

3:09

think uh a representative of an

3:12

occupying

3:14

power that has his government and his

3:19

army killed more than

3:22

44,000 Palestinian civilians and

3:26

possibly 10,000 more under the rubbles

3:31

and injured more than

3:34

100,000 Palestinian civilians most of

3:37

them are women and

3:40

children does he really has the

3:43

credentials or The credibility to speak

3:47

about the Palestinian people and his

3:50

concerns about

3:51

them he represent a government the head

3:54

of it is a war criminal in which which a

4:00

warrant of

4:01

arrest by a very important Court Global

4:06

Court the

4:07

IC has issued that warrant of arrest for

4:11

him

4:13

and the entire membership of the IC

4:17

including all members of the European

4:20

Union all the states who are friends of

4:24

the state of

4:25

Israel announced in the name of Mr Bell

4:29

the their foreign minister that all

4:32

member states of the European Union

4:34

member of the

4:36

ICC and

4:39

others said that they honor and respect

4:43

the independence and the position of the

4:46

IC and even today the 15 members of the

4:50

security Council the representative of

4:53

the occupying Authority the

4:55

representative of those who committing J

4:58

genocide

5:00

was not listening to anyone of you

5:04

because all of them they said to you

5:07

stop the crimes Stop The Killing stop

5:10

the starvation send assistant to the to

5:14

the Palestinian people in Gaza including

5:17

in Northern Gaza don’t stop the

5:20

humanitarians from conducting their

5:22

business you don’t listen you listen to

5:26

the noise in your head but you don’t

5:28

listen to the distinguished member of

5:31

the security Council who are some of

5:34

them advising you with a solidarity with

5:38

you and you don’t even listen it’s

5:40

either your way and the highway and it

5:43

is going to be the way of the

5:45

International Community the security

5:48

Council and you are going to be running

5:50

on the highway you do not have

5:52

credibility you don’t listen and they

5:56

keep telling you the same messages still

5:58

you don’t listen

6:00

listen to them listen to international

6:03

law listen to what the UN stands for

6:07

don’t try to change things and to tailor

6:10

a system which is a system completely in

6:14

contradiction with what we all agree to

6:17

that will never happen wake up listen to

6:20

the International Community listen to

6:22

Justice listen to fairness listen to the

6:25

people who want their hostages to be

6:28

released not to be killed in daily basis

6:32

cease fire cease fire now hundreds of

6:35

million of people are saying that in all

6:38

corners of the globe listen to them

6:40

including in Israel including Jews in

6:43

the United States of America and their

6:45

youth in universities and uh colleges

6:49

they’re telling you ceasefire ceasefire

6:52

now this is how the hostages will be

6:54

released you’re not listening to anyone

6:56

you’re listening to extremism to itic

6:59

ISM to the extremist in your government

7:02

to the extremist in your society and

7:04

therefore you are perpetuating this war

7:07

and we will all of us led by

7:11

international law succeed in either

7:14

making you listen and understand or

7:17

forcing you to listen as all people like

7:21

you in the past were forced to listen to

7:24

the will of the people in all corners of

7:26

the globe and international law and the

7:29

security Council thank you Madame

7:31

President I thank the permanent Observer

7:34

of the Observer state of Palestine for

7:37

his statement I reiterate to all

7:40

participating delegations the importance

7:42

of maintaining decorum in the

7:45

chamber the representative of Israel has

7:48

asked for the floor to make a further

7:50

statement I give them the floor thank

7:52

you Madame President in my speech I use

7:55

the facts Mr Mansour you are an expert

7:59

of blaming Israel we don’t have to come

8:01

to your event tomorrow for 77 years in

8:05

this organization you always said no and

8:07

you blame Israel for everything what I’m

8:09

trying to offer you is future to discuss

8:13

future for Palestinian in Gaza but in

8:16

order for that to happen you have to say

8:18

no not to Israel to say no to Hamas once

8:22

you will have the courage and the

8:24

ability to say no to Hamas no to

8:27

terrorism you can speak about f future

8:29

for Gaza you can speak about future of

8:32

the Palestinians that’s what I’m saying

8:34

I’m not taking your position but I’m

8:36

telling you that if you want to move

8:38

forward you have to say no to Hamas and

8:41

yes for cooperation if you want to play

8:43

the blame game you became an expert on

8:46

that you will continue to do it tomorrow

8:48

but look what you did in the last 77

8:51

years since Israel was established and

8:54

you rejected the petition plan here at

8:56

the UN look what you did personally in

8:59

the last 20 years that you are sitting

9:01

here that you always said no and blamed

9:03

Israel think about the future of the

9:05

Palestinians thank you very

9:07

much I thank the representative of

9:10

Israel for their

9:13

statement the representative of the

9:17

permanent Observer of the Observer state

9:19

of Palestine has asked for the floor to

9:21

make a further statement can I reassure

9:24

you we have listened coely to your views

9:26

and in the interest of time I will give

9:28

you the floor one final time to conclude

9:30

your remarks thank you I I thank you

9:32

very much and I apologize for taking the

9:34

floor I challenge the ambassador of

9:38

Israel I accept Security Council

9:42

resolution I accept General Assembly

9:45

resolution we recognize the state of

9:48

Israel you are not recognizing the state

9:51

of Palestine on these basis on the basis

9:54

of international law on the basis of the

9:57

charter I am willing and eager to chart

10:01

a path positive path for peace you are

10:04

the one who is refusing all these things

10:08

it’s not us our president came to this

10:11

Security Council and said many times I

10:15

am ready to negotiate the end of

10:18

occupation I am ready to negotiate peace

10:22

and two State solution living next to

10:24

each other it was on always you and your

10:28

government the rejectionist refusing to

10:31

open doors for peace you want from us to

10:35

be negated your con it legislated that

10:39

only Jews have the right to exercise

10:42

self-determination between the river and

10:44

to the Sea you completely ignored us and

10:48

you trying to say that you are for peace

10:52

and I am against peace I accept the

10:55

judgment and the position of all of my

10:58

colleagues when we go

11:00

peacefully and legally and in in a very

11:05

sophisticated way to the general

11:07

assembly asking them do we deserve the

11:10

right to

11:12

self-determination and when they give me

11:14

between

11:15

1070 170 to 180 votes saying on the

11:20

basis of the charter the Palestinian

11:22

people do deserve uh to exercise their

11:27

right to self-determination including a

11:29

two-state solution who is the one who is

11:32

working for peace and who is the one who

11:35

shredded the charter of the United

11:38

Nations from the Chamber of the general

11:40

assembly and who is the one who said in

11:43

the general assembly you are the immoral

11:47

majority in the general assembly it was

11:49

your representative then my colleagues I

11:53

accept their judgment if we go for a

11:56

voting among our colleagues our our

11:59

peers who is working for peace and who

12:02

is working for the killing of the

12:04

Palestinian people as we see it in the

12:06

Gaza Strip I think the answer is obvious

12:09

but you will not accept the Judgment of

12:12

our colleagues you want to impose on us

12:16

your judgment which is not accepted by

12:18

anyone and that’s why you are isolated

12:21

and you’re still insisting to change

12:23

that Reality by distorting the situation

12:26

trying to accuse a person who is war

12:29

working all of his life for peace and

12:31

trying to say that you are working for

12:34

peace and not the representative of the

12:36

State of Palestine that’s why I’m

12:38

telling you wake up listen to those many

12:40

of them are your friends in the general

12:43

assembly many of them are your friends

12:45

they’re telling you what you’re doing is

12:47

wrong change your behavior change your

12:49

policies so that we can have peace so

12:52

that we can end this illegal occupation

12:55

and have the two-state solution and I

12:57

will not speak anymore Madame President

12:59

president now thank you for your

13:00

patience and uh all of my colleagues

13:03

thank you I thank the permanent Observer

13:06

of the Observer state of palestin for

13:09

his

13:10

statement do you want to watch more

13:12

videos like this one if yes subscribe to

13:15

our Channel and press the Bell icon next

13:17

to it we have decided to bring videos on

13:19

something nobody talks about African

13:22

politics economy and increasing power

13:26

thanks for watching and until the next

13:28

video stay tuned tell us what you think

13:31

in the comment section like and share

13:33

the video and subscribe so that you

13:35

don’t miss any of our African videos

13:37

it’s the best way to support us

oooooo

ooo

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zU1lOcgrI0)

Transkripzioa:

0:00

I came on today one because I um believe

0:03

in what this panel is doing but um more

0:07

importantly I need to appeal to this

0:10

panel to

0:12

um help us save your lives my life and

0:15

everybody’s life um we are closer today

0:19

than we have ever

0:20

been

0:22

ever uh in the history of the nuclear

0:25

era uh since nuclear weapons were used

0:27

in Hiroshima and Nagasaki we are closer

0:30

today than ever for nuclear weapons

0:32

being used again we are literally at the

0:35

threshold of a nuclear war this isn’t

0:38

hyperbole I’m not here to scare you I

0:40

don’t give a damn what you think you’re

0:42

going to die unless we do something to

0:44

stop it this is on Full freaking

0:48

automatic Russia has lowered its

0:50

threshold for the use of nuclear weapons

0:53

uh including conditions that knows that

0:56

the NATO and the United States have

0:57

already met if Russia

1:00

assiduously adhered to its nuclear

1:02

Doctrine they would be able to use

1:04

nuclear weapons today against NATO they

1:07

have opted not to but we have already

1:10

passed that Threshold at the same time

1:12

we have a rear Admiral Branan in the

1:14

United States strategic command who

1:16

speaks glibly about the America ready to

1:19

have a nuclear exchange with the

1:21

Russians do you know what that means a

1:22

nuclear exchange it means a nuclear war

1:26

we’re ready to have one Russia has

1:28

lowered its nuclear threshold told and

1:30

America is ready to engage in a nuclear

1:32

exchange with Russia as we speak right

1:35

here any

1:38

moment right now the United States and

1:40

Europe are trying to figure out what to

1:41

do after Russia responded to their

1:44

foolish decision to allow Ukraine to use

1:47

attackman missiles and storm Shadows

1:49

missiles to strike Russia Russia has

1:51

responded with a unique missile system

1:55

an intermediate range system um which we

1:59

know very little about but what we do

2:01

know or what we can speculate based upon

2:05

past practice and what’s going on is

2:06

this missile is special purpose

2:10

built to take

2:12

out targets of

2:15

concern in NATO deployed in Europe I

2:20

believe this missile was developed on

2:23

the orders of President Putin sometime

2:25

this last summer um to

2:30

destroy the dark Eagle missile complex

2:33

at the United States is it’s a

2:35

Hypersonic intermediate range missile um

2:38

The Mark 41 uh you know agis ass Shore

2:43

um air defense system uh that was

2:46

ostensively built to deal with Iran but

2:49

we all know was built to deal with

2:51

Russia and today NATO views it as a main

2:53

stay in their air defense against Russia

2:56

um this system is designed to take that

2:59

out it’s designed to take out command

3:00

and control facilities logistic

3:03

facilities from top to bottom left to

3:05

right all of Europe using non-nuclear

3:09

payloads uh but nonetheless this would

3:12

be a Russian strike against NATO what

3:14

Russia has demonstrated is that it is

3:16

ready right now as as we speak to strike

3:21

any Target in Europe if Europe gives

3:24

them an excuse to do so um how will

3:27

Europe respond Article 5 according to

3:30

Joe B this is a sacred

3:32

obligation uh many NATO Nations have

3:34

been leaning forward waiting for an

3:36

opportunity for Article 5 because they

3:38

believed Russia was bluffing but Russia

3:40

isn’t bluffing Russia just proved it’s

3:42

not bluffing and now how does NATO

3:44

respond to this back down Retreat too

3:46

much political Capital has been invested

3:49

and there are still people in the White

3:51

House in the state department in NATO

3:55

who believe that Putin is bluffing this

3:57

was just an experimental system after

3:59

all

4:00

uh it’s not as though Russia really

4:02

means to use this Russia’s not bluffing

4:06

and if we continue to call his bluff

4:08

call Putin’s Bluff call Russia’s Bluff

4:10

there will be a nuclear war and I am

4:12

very concerned that because we are in a

4:14

very compressed timeline we have uh the

4:18

Biden Administration together with their

4:20

NATO allies admitting that they’re

4:22

seeking to Trump proof NATO Trump proof

4:26

Ukraine Trump proof this policy of the

4:30

Strategic defeat of Russia uh so that by

4:32

the time Donald Trump is sworn in his

4:34

president on January 20th he will not be

4:37

able to change any of this that means

4:40

that there’s a compressed timeline

4:41

between now and January 20th to get all

4:44

of this in place and they can’t afford

4:46

delays they can’t afford pauses they

4:48

can’t afford doubt and my concern is

4:51

they are going to aggressively move

4:53

forward forcing Russia’s hand and then

4:56

we’re going to have Admiral Buchanan’s

4:59

little nuclear exchange but there’s no

5:02

such thing as a little nuclear exchange

5:04

there’s no such thing as limited nuclear

5:06

war once the nuclear weapons start

5:08

flying read Annie Jacobson’s book

5:10

nuclear war

5:11

scenario it quickly spins out of control

5:14

72 minutes after the first nuclear

5:16

device

5:18

explodes we are all dead that’s where

5:21

we’re at now what are we going to do

5:23

about it I mean we can have conferences

5:26

Etc I think we only have one chance at

5:30

stopping this nuclear war and that is to

5:34

get the president

5:36

elect to become actively engaged in

5:39

calling out the Biden Administration and

5:42

speaking to the American people

5:45

regardless of what you stand on the

5:46

election that took place on November 5th

5:48

there was a winner that winner is Donald

5:51

Trump and Donald Trump has articulated a

5:54

policy that seeks to end the conflict in

5:56

Ukraine and prevent a nuclear war in

5:58

Russia if you don’t believe me refer to

6:01

the article published on the hill

6:03

magazine uh authored by RFK Jr and Don

6:06

Trump Jr to people who are on the inside

6:09

of the Trump team um they wouldn’t have

6:11

published this article without the

6:13

permission and concurrence of Donald

6:15

Trump we know this is Trump’s position

6:18

the American people endorsed this

6:20

position when they gave him the mandate

6:22

to govern and yet now the Biden

6:24

Administration is operating in a way

6:27

that directly contravenes this seeks to

6:30

disrupt this seeks to make it impossible

6:34

and in doing so pushes us to the brink

6:37

of a nuclear

6:40

Armageddon how can we get him involved

6:42

how we can make our voices heard the

6:44

oldfashioned

6:45

way shouted out from the top of our

6:48

voices in Washington DC and what I’m

6:52

asking is that everybody join me in

6:54

Washington DC on December 7th I’ve

6:56

reached out to Jose Vega I’ve reached

6:58

out to others Hosea has reached out

7:00

we’re beginning to put together a team

7:03

that’s going to make this possible

7:04

December 7th two weeks we can save the

7:08

world save our life save your life by

7:11

making our voices heard if we make it to

7:13

that there’s no guarantee there’s no

7:15

guarantee that we’re going to make it to

7:16

sept December 7th and I’m not being

7:18

factious one stupid error and it’s all

7:21

over the war begins and we all die but

7:23

just in case we do make it past

7:25

Thanksgiving in case we do enjoy that

7:27

turkey dinner

7:29

we can gather in Washington DC at the

7:32

Lincoln Memorial and then march to

7:35

Congress and then March to the White

7:37

House and make our voices heard that we

7:39

are going to say no to nuclear war

7:43

that’s a hashtag that I want everybody

7:45

to start trending hashtag say no to

7:49

nuclear war get on social media and make

7:52

this happen this is it I don’t know what

7:54

else you’re going to do because you’re

7:55

going to die if you don’t do this if we

7:58

don’t find a way

8:01

to make our voices heard to let the

8:04

Biden Administration know that this is

8:06

not

8:07

acceptable this is not how we do

8:10

business this is not what we the people

8:12

want then they will continue to pursue

8:15

these policies to the detriment of

8:18

everybody and that’s really all I wanted

8:19

to say is uh keep an eye on this space

8:22

as we develop this Mission this is the

8:25

mission of a lifetime this is the battle

8:28

the battle of Our Lives if we lose this

8:32

we all die literally we all will die we

8:35

are so close to nuclear conflict it’s

8:37

not funny when you have a senior officer

8:40

in strategic command saying openly that

8:42

we are ready to engage in a nuclear

8:44

exchange with Russia do you understand

8:47

what he is saying do you understand that

8:50

a nuclear exchange means hundreds of

8:52

millions of dead

8:54

people 100 million dead Americans

8:57

minimum and they’re ready to do it right

9:01

now if you’re not angry if you’re not

9:03

scared you’re not human they are ready

9:06

to go to nuclear war right

9:09

now said he uh I want to applaud him for

9:13

Ling out the uh this this case

9:17

succinctly accurately um dispassionately

9:20

almost too dispassionately it’s not a

9:21

criticism it’s a reflection of his

9:24

professionalism except that uh people

9:27

should be changing their underwear in

9:30

fear after listening to what he said and

9:31

yet I think his soothing voice has

9:33

calmed us into believing that maybe this

9:36

was just another um you know academic

9:40

presentation it wasn’t he was laying out

9:43

uh the imminent demise of mankind

9:48

um and I I just I I I I I want to

9:52

reinforce that point um you know the the

9:56

Russian weapon that was used uh you know

9:58

the the

10:00

I’m getting ready to publish a paper on

10:01

this today if we make it um that that

10:06

breaks

10:07

down what I think it is there’s not much

10:10

literature out there but if you know the

10:12

history of Russian ballistic missile

10:14

design and and such this was a weapon

10:17

that

10:18

um

10:20

the it’s related to a weapon that the

10:23

Russians were developing the Soviets

10:25

were developing back in the early 1980s

10:27

called the

10:28

skorost and the skorost missile 15 xia

10:32

66 um was quickly developed by then U

10:38

Minister of Defense Ustinov to respond

10:41

to the planned deployment of Persian 2

10:45

missiles by the United States into

10:48

Germany the Russians were very afraid of

10:51

the Persian 2 because once you launched

10:53

the Persian 2 seven minutes later it hit

10:56

Moscow and uh the Russians we’re not

10:59

happy about that so they built this

11:01

missile the skorost which was an amalgam

11:04

of components drawn from the ss20

11:08

Pioneer the mod 3 version of the pioneer

11:12

the ss25 which was still under

11:14

development the SS 27 which was Top

11:17

Secret Under development nobody even

11:19

knew it existed um and they put it all

11:22

together in a two stage missile uh

11:25

topped with um conventional warheads and

11:28

they were going to flood Czechoslovakia

11:31

and East Germany with these systems uh

11:34

and monitor on a continuous basis uh the

11:38

Persian 2 uh bases and the moment the

11:41

Persian 2 went to the field and uh

11:44

suspect you know in in in a manner that

11:46

looks you know suspicious they would

11:48

take it out preemptively that was what

11:51

the scst was all about to preemptively

11:53

take out emerging threats um the the the

11:59

the system was nearing uh

12:02

production when the INF fact is it was

12:05

ready to go into production in March of

12:08

1987 um but in December uh Ronald Reagan

12:11

and Mikel gorbachov signed the

12:13

intermediate nuclear forces treaty so

12:14

the scos went the way of history and in

12:17

doing so the skorost

12:20

um people need to understand again I I I

12:23

keep telling people you know there was a

12:25

time when we talked to the Soviets there

12:27

was a time when we talked to the Russian

12:30

um I I spent a lot of time at the

12:33

Russian Embassy in the last two years

12:35

attending functions and talking to

12:37

anaton Antonov the Ambassador and

12:39

talking to uh Major General bobkin the

12:42

defense adese and talking to his

12:44

officers uh and having very detailed

12:47

conversations I just you know remind

12:49

bobkin was a former um when we started

12:52

talking uh he was he’s a strategic

12:55

rocket forces guy who was in an ss25

12:58

unit in Nova sers when I inspected it in

13:02

1990 um what a small world we live in um

13:06

and he was sent the United States to

13:08

help facilitate Arms Control talks how

13:10

to prevent the very crisis that we’re in

13:13

anat Antonov is an expert on the United

13:16

States he speaks English fluently um and

13:19

he uh was of course the man who

13:22

negotiated the new start treaty with um

13:25

uh Rose gut Muller um he was ready to

13:29

engage again on extending the new start

13:31

to prevent exactly what’s happening Anon

13:34

Antonov was here for seven years and the

13:36

US didn’t talk to him uh bobkin arrived

13:39

and the first thing that happened is

13:41

that the ukrainians got him blackballed

13:43

in the defense adese circuit so nobody

13:45

talked to him had they talked to him as

13:49

I did they would have gotten an insight

13:52

into how the Strategic rocket forces

13:55

felt about the INF treaty about the

13:57

start treaty about disarmament about

14:01

what gorbachov did to them um and what

14:04

how they feel that impacted their

14:05

National Security and you would

14:08

understand that they were very bitter

14:10

about this entire experience they felt

14:12

that they had been weakened by it and

14:15

that they were ready to regain the

14:18

former glory of the Soviet rocket

14:21

strategic rocket forces um if you know

14:26

anything again if you’ve studied Russian

14:27

military history soovi military history

14:29

you understand that the present day is

14:32

very much influenced by the

14:34

past so when the United States withdraws

14:39

from the intermediate nuclear forces

14:41

treaty in 2019 under President Reagan

14:45

Putin said you know we view this treaty

14:49

as being very important uh to prevent

14:52

war and so we will not develop new

14:56

intermediate Range Systems and we’ll act

14:58

as if the treaty is is in force so long

15:00

as you don’t deploy intermediate systems

15:04

into Europe of course earlier this year

15:07

and in NATO exercise in Denmark we

15:10

deployed intermediate nuclear forces

15:13

intermediate range missiles nuclear

15:15

capable to Denmark and the and Putin

15:18

said okay we’re uh we’re moving forward

15:22

and the byproduct of this is the missile

15:24

that was tested the other day um but

15:27

people don’t understand what this

15:29

missile is this missile is the

15:31

modern-day version of the

15:33

skorost you see the Russians are

15:36

building a missile that can be pushed

15:39

forward and be ready to preempt dark

15:43

Eagle our intermediate missile uh the

15:47

Russians just put the uh Mark 41 AES

15:49

ashore on notice in Poland that is a

15:51

target the target that will destroy it

15:54

is this look at what this was this is a

15:57

missile that makes use of

15:59

not the yars which is the what the rubz

16:03

the S the rs26 which was this is derived

16:07

from use the yars first stage this uses

16:10

the cther first stage the cedar now most

16:14

people don’t know what the cedar is but

16:15

the ukrainians just came out and said

16:17

that it’s the cedar how would they know

16:19

well they have the debris and on the

16:22

debris are serial numbers and the serial

16:23

numbers show what the booster was this

16:27

is the most modern boost booster that

16:29

the Russians have um similar in size to

16:32

the RS so as it doesn’t change the

16:33

configuration of the system but it has

16:36

unique solid fuel principles that allow

16:39

the the the the missile to burn in

16:42

variable speeds making it impossible to

16:45

Target the other thing it does is it has

16:47

the U it doesn’t use traditional MBS I

16:51

keep hearing people say multiple U you

16:54

know independently targeted Warheads

16:56

that’s not what this was not at all this

16:59

is the new system the new system is

17:03

instead of a bus a plate so to speak

17:07

where the WarHeads are attached that

17:09

separates from the the the missile and

17:12

then comes in and releases the WarHeads

17:14

to their target on a trajectory though

17:17

because it’s still moving as this

17:19

happens what we have now is independent

17:23

mini

17:24

missiles that are there and they fire

17:28

themselves so the the first stage takes

17:30

it up second stage puts it in and then

17:33

you fire these independent missiles and

17:36

these missiles each one of them had six

17:38

large submunitions on them this is where

17:41

the name hazelnut comes from because if

17:43

you look at a hazelnut tree you look at

17:45

the Pod of nuts it’s exactly what you

17:49

see with these submunitions coming down

17:53

um this missile was developed

17:56

specifically to take out

17:59

dark Eagle missile arrays if you take a

18:02

look at the layout the footprint of the

18:03

dark Eagle where the radar is where the

18:05

command and Communications are were this

18:07

this missile is designed to annihilate

18:10

that people kept saying where’s the

18:12

explosion it’s not meant to be high

18:14

explosive it’s meant to be a kinetic

18:17

kill and these submunitions come down

18:20

and they will kinetically kill

18:22

everything on the ground these

18:23

submunitions come down at such velocity

18:26

that if they hit the ages of shore it

18:28

will be a smoking hole in the ground

18:31

this is what this missile is designed

18:33

Putin just put us on notice that he has

18:38

a conventional missile system that is

18:40

designed to preempt anything and

18:42

everything NATO plans on doing to Russia

18:45

and there is no NATO response there’s

18:49

nothing they can do about it this is

18:53

literally the equivalent of the most

18:55

alpha wolf in the world coming in and

18:57

pissing all over your home that’s what

19:00

Putin just did and it didn’t have to be

19:02

this way Putin said right there your

19:05

withdrawal from the INF treaty was the

19:08

greatest mistake you have ever made

19:12

because now you have compelled us to do

19:14

this and here we are we didn’t want to

19:18

be here but because of all the

19:20

provocations you’ve done we have

19:22

checkmated you and that’s the case I

19:25

don’t think the West has woken up to

19:27

what has just happened it is

19:29

over over for the West the only thing we

19:34

can

19:35

do is nuclear

19:38

war and sadly we have somebody who

19:40

believes that we can have a nuclear

19:42

exchange I just again want to reflect

19:44

have people reflect on what that means

19:45

it means the Biden

19:47

Administration is ready to sacrifice 100

19:51

million

19:52

Americans for

19:55

Ukraine the Biden Administration is

19:57

ready to sacrifice 100 million Americans

19:59

for

20:01

Ukraine and is that what we want so I

20:04

want to thank uh Professor star for his

20:06

presentation was fantastic um you know

20:09

but guys this is as real as it gets this

20:12

isn’t theoretical the reason why I went

20:13

through all this the the the the stuff

20:15

about the uh this this missile is to

20:17

point out that sometimes when people

20:19

talk about weapon systems and all that

20:21

people feel a little remote from it they

20:23

they they they don’t they don’t identify

20:25

with it because it’s something don’t

20:27

understand so I wanted to bring it in a

20:29

way that hopefully everybody understood

20:31

what’s going on what this represents how

20:33

real this missile is and what the

20:36

consequences of our actions are in

20:39

compelling Russia to develop this

20:40

missile and now the impossible situation

20:43

it’s put us in because understand it has

20:45

put us in an impossible situation a very

20:49

dangerous

20:50

situation by ex by revealing this

20:53

missile and showing his willingness to

20:55

use this Putin has literally given the

20:59

West two

21:00

options

21:03

capitulate or nuclear

21:06

war we have to find a way to find a

21:08

third option we have to find a way to to

21:11

get in between we have to find a way to

21:12

commun and this is a communication that

21:14

isn’t just amongst an American

21:17

audience we have to communicate with the

21:19

Russians now we can’t do it directly

21:22

because that’s against the law

21:23

apparently that’s the Logan act but we

21:25

can do it indirectly for instance me

21:27

talking to you

21:29

if a Russian is listening to this copy

21:31

it to another Russian and copy it to

21:33

another Russian and get this goddamn

21:36

mess excuse my language but I’m very

21:37

upset guys because we’re going to die

21:39

and I’m I sort of wanted to spend

21:41

Christmas with my family uh had big

21:43

plans for Christmas and I don’t think

21:44

we’re going to have a Christmas right

21:45

now that’s how dangerous this situation

21:48

is we have to stop it we have to pull

21:51

out all the stops we have to communicate

21:53

with our fellow Americans we have to

21:55

send the signal to Donald Trump that you

21:56

can’t just sit there and let this happen

21:59

you were elected to prevent this and

22:01

they’re going around you you must speak

22:03

out now I’ve invited Trump to come to

22:05

the rally to speak out to let his voice

22:08

be heard to Rally the American people

22:10

around him I’m not asking for a January

22:12

6th I’m asking for a December 7th it’s a

22:16

beautiful day to do it on Pearl Harbor

22:18

Day wouldn’t it be nice if we could

22:20

actually reverse the historical Legacy

22:22

of Pearl Harbor and instead of

22:24

celebrating December 7th every year as a

22:26

day when the Japanese attacked it

22:28

celebrate as the day that the American

22:30

people Sav their lives and save the

22:32

world while they’re at it and after we

22:34

do it on December 7th we can then on

22:36

December 8th reflect on the fact that

22:39

that’s when the INF treaty was signed

22:42

and maybe we can start promoting arms

22:43

control and get a new INF treaty signed

22:46

so that this new missile that the

22:48

Russians have developed can go back into

22:50

the trash heap of history and the dark

22:52

eagle goes into trash heap of history

22:54

and once again sanity prevails as we

22:57

eliminate the sing most destabilizing

23:00

weapons in the world which are these

23:01

intermediate range nuclear weapons

23:04

December 7th and December 8th could have

23:06

picked two more historically relevant

23:08

dates Let’s help make them relevant

23:11

Let’s help make let’s redefine December

23:13

7th and let’s Breathe new life into

23:15

December 8th again thank you Professor

23:19

star thank you Scott

23:21

Ritter um oh go ahead uh Steve if you

23:25

wanted to say something thanks for the

23:26

kind words I wish I was as an effective

23:28

speaker as Scott

23:30

is and um I didn’t mean to misinform

23:32

about the MS I didn’t understand that

23:34

about the new weapon system you didn’t

23:36

misinform I I I just spent the whole

23:38

night I’m I’m looking tired because once

23:41

I once I get involved in something like

23:43

this I I I can’t stop it it’s what I did

23:46

as in the Marine Corps it’s what I did

23:47

at every job I ever had once I got an

23:49

idea I just had to keep digging and

23:51

digging and digging I’ve been spending

23:53

all night putting this together and I

23:55

just hope there’s enough energy left in

23:56

my body to put it on paper and get it

23:59

published because I think it’s something

24:00

that everybody needs to know

oooooo

Bideioa: https://x.com/i/status/1861319620117803165

(10.45 m)

oooooo

We Basques do need a real Basque independent State in the Western Pyrenees, just a democratic lay or secular state, with all the formal chracteristics of any independent State: Central Bank, Treasury, proper currency, out of the European Distopia and faraway from NAT0, maybe being a BRICS partner…

Ikus Euskal Herriaren independentzia eta Mikel Torka

ooooooo

MMT: Modern Monetary Theory

Understanding how money works so that we can address climate change easily and prosperously plus address AI’s impact on humanity.

Members: https://x.com/i/communities/1672597800385921024/members

(…)

 

 

 

 

 

@tobararbulu # mmt

@tobararbulu

oooooo