S.O.S.: Kabenzotz! Ez dago sosik!

Ez dago dirurik!

Ez dago sosik!

Enpresak LOZORROan daude!

Non ote dago dirurik?

Funtsak, funtsak, arren!

Brusela-ko funtsak, mesedez!

Gora neoliberalismoa (badakizue, gu oso ezkertiarrak gara!)

Gora gu eta gutarrak!

Dirua mesedez, arren, faborez, otoi, …

Orain dela zenbait milurteko hasi zena…

Dirua aspaldiko afera da…

Dirua aspaldiko gizakien sormena izan da, orain dela zenbait milurteko sortu zuten, non eta Sumerian…

John Maynard Keynes-ek bazekien zerbait:

“The word “modern” in MMT is deployed in the precise sense used by Keynes in his 1930 Treatise on Money, in which he describes the nation-state’s prerogative to define what money is for those subject to its laws: “This right is claimed by all modern states, and has been so claimed for some four thousand years at least.”¹

Gure egunetan ere, Randall Wray-k badaki:

Ikus Randall Wary-ren Keynes’s Approach To Money: An Assessment After 70 Years (http://www.levy.org/pubs/wp_438.pdf)

“In the TOM, Keynes argued the “money of account comes into existence along with debts, which are contracts for deferred payment, and price lists, which are offers of contracts for sale or purchase…. [and] can only be expressed in terms of a money of account.” (TOMa p. 3) He distinguished between “money and money of account by saying that the money of account is the description or title and the money is the thing which answers to the description.” (ibid) Further, the state “claims the right to determine what thing corresponds to the name, and to vary its declaration from time to time—when, that is to say, it claims the right to re-edit the dictionary. This right is claimed by all modern States and has been so claimed for some four thousand years at least. It is when this stage in the evolution of money has been reached that Knapp’s chartalism—the doctrine that money is peculiarly a creation of the State—is fully realized.” (TOMa p. 4) Finally, “the age of chartalist or State money was reached when the State claimed the right to declare what thing should answer as money to the current money of account—when it claimed the right not only to enforce the dictionary but also to write the dictionary. To-day all civilised money is, beyond possibility of dispute, chartalist.” (ibid)”

Modern Money Theory sortzaileek bazekiten ‘moderno’ hitza, gutxienez, azken 4.000 urteei zegokiela.

Beraz, MMT-ri, alegia DTM-ri begiratu behar diogu, hyperneoliberalek ez dagoela dirurik, sosik ez dagoela, aldarrikatzen dutenean, eta, erantzunen bila, Europar Distopiaren bihotzera, Brusela-ra, erreguka eta belauniko hurbiltzen direnean.

Guk geuk ere badakigu zertxobait: ikus 2021erako programa politikoa eta ekonomikoa

Izan ere, badakigu, argi eta garbi,

a) Dirurik, egon, badagoela

b) Dirua EBZ-n ‘dago’-ela, alegia, EBZ-k nahi beste diru sor dezakeela teklatuaren bidez, kostua zero izanik

Hortaz?

Beraz, gure hyper neoliberalek EBZ-k eta Europar Distopiak erabiltzen duten amua irentsi dute, osoa eta goitik behera: kea eta propaganda hutsa itsu-itsuan irentsi dute… eta orain, behin eta berriz, ‘gure’ egunkarietan irentsitakoa sakabanatzen dute, hamaika gezur handien izenetan, newspeak erabiliz.

Hona hemen, italieraz, goian aipaturiko Brusela-ko funtsen amuaren kea eta propaganda baztertzeko informazio apurra bezain onuragarria:

Recovery Fund: manuale di autodifesa contro la propaganda di regime: https://www.lafionda.org/2020/12/23/recovery-fund-manuale-di-autodifesa-contro-la-propaganda-di-regime/