Warren Mosler-en zenbait twitter

(Irakurri behetik gora)

(https://twitter.com/wbmosler/status/1266864951026745345)

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

@JohnfrmClevelnd

@PaulMeli1

eta 19beste erabiltzaileei erantzuten

Same as any other unspent income

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

@PaulMeli1

@JohnfrmClevelnd

eta 19beste erabiltzaileei erantzuten

nothing moves across your tv screen. it’s just dots going on and off. same with money.

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

@farmerrf

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

Repaying the debt = Fed debiting securities accounts/crediting reserve accounts=shifting $ from one Fed account to another as any bank does when savings accounts mature and $ shift from savings to checking. The debt already is ‘the money’-$ spent by gov not yet used to pay taxes

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

@JohnfrmClevelnd

@arthur_eckart

eta 18beste erabiltzaileei erantzuten

The example is about gov tax liabilities of, say 10, and gov only spending 9, for example.

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

mai. 29

@sarahollando552

eta

@the_tpa

erabiltzaileei erantzuten

I like to begin the story a bit before that, where the UK gov. first imposes a tax liability, payable in £ that come only from the gov or its agents, which creates sellers of real goods and services needing the gov’s spending of £ to pay their taxes.

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

mai. 29

@Gonzo_MM

eta

@farmerrf

erabiltzaileei erantzuten

The Fed credits your bank’s reserve account at the Fed (noted as for further credit to you), and that Fed liability is then an asset of your bank, and your bank at the same time credits your account on its books, which is then a liability of your bank.

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

mai. 29

@farmerrf

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

Yes, Fed liabilities are considered outside money for the member bank holding those Fed liabilities as assets of the member bank.

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

mai. 29

@csissoko

eta

@farmerrf

erabiltzaileei erantzuten

I assume this is in reference to member bank $US balances credited to reserve accounts at the Fed?

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

mai. 28

@JohnfrmClevelnd

@arthur_eckart

eta 18beste erabiltzaileei erantzuten

Productivity gains are very good things with the right policy response.

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

mai. 28

@JohnfrmClevelnd

@arthur_eckart

eta 18beste erabiltzaileei erantzuten

‘sitting on it’ leaves that much fiscal space for increased public services or tax cuts. (That choice is political.)

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

mai. 28

@PMehrling

eta

@sashi31363

erabiltzaileei erantzuten

With floating exchange rates there are no imbalances, only indifference levels.

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

mai. 28

@Adp1001

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

Irudia

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

mai. 28

@Patrick87419357

@FrancoisNLPmtl

eta 3beste erabiltzaileei erantzuten

And the US gov’s cost of funds currently near 0 makes you a profit center for them… 🙁

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosler

mai. 28

@kltblom

@farmerrf

eta 4beste erabiltzaileei erantzuten

Every bank, including the Fed, is a case of what’s known as ‘inside money.‘ Each spread sheet necessarily is in balance.

Warren B. Mosler #MMT@wbmosle

mai. 28

@farmerrf

@VMRConstancio

eta 3beste erabiltzaileei erantzuten

Yes with fixed fx policy holders of ‘new’ $ (deficit) spent have the option to convert to gold, or another currency, etc. and Tsy secs compete via rates with that option. With floating fx, tsy secs compete only with fed funds and both are fed accts. http://moslereconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/Exchange-Rate-Policy-and-Full-Employment.htm

mai. 28

@farmerrf

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

Further to the point, let me suggest that a permanent 0 rate policy is what I call ‘the base case for analysis.’ And it also promotes price stability through forward pricing channels as well as interest income channels.

Utzi erantzuna

Zure e-posta helbidea ez da argitaratuko. Beharrezko eremuak * markatuta daude