Zenbait iritzi Brexit dela eta

(i) Berri onak: Brexit: bidea ireki dute

(ii) Brexit: twitterrak

Pavlina R Tcherneva@ptcherneva

Truly surreal when a country that surrendered its monetary sovereignty voted to stay #OXI but a country which kept it is voting to #LeaveEU

2016 eka. 23 (American time)

Bill Mitchell@billy_blog

Looks like it will be a great result for UK. Now British labour has to abandon its neoliberalism & provide people with a progressive future

2016 eka. 23

Anna Arqué Solsona@anna_arque

#Brexit i Referèndum independència d’Escòcia, referèndum unificació Irlanda, referèndum independència Cat.. Més Europa Pobles!! #sovereignty

2016 eka. 24

Anna Arqué Solsona@anna_arque

Els anglesos han votat Sí a la Independència d’una UE que com el regne d’espanya s’imposa a la sobirania dels Pobles #Democràcia #RUI

2016 eka. 24

Antoni Soy@antonisoy

One of the pleasures of a day like today is to see the nerves and the reactions of the economic, political and media elites #Brexit

Antoni Soy@antonisoy

Once again the English people give everyone a lesson on the meaning of democracy and national sovereignty #Brexit

2016 eka. 24

(iii) Iruzkinak:

(a) Warren Mosler-en Durable goods orders, Consumer sentiment, UK comments1

(b) Ann Pettifor-en Brexit: economists dangerously irrelevant2

(c) Lisa Mckenzieren Brexit is the only way the working class can change anything3

(ii) Zein izan daiteke hurrengoa Eurexit-ean?

Italia?

Ikus Mosler-en proposamenak EBrako ondoko linkean:

Litekeena ote eurogunean austeritatearekin bukatzea?

EB-k ezetza ematen badu, ondoko linkean lira-ra itzultzea proposatzen da:

DTM lau eskematan (euroa eta lira)

Izan ere, Warren Mosler-ek, Randall Wray-k, Bill Mitchell-ek, …. eta DTM-koek, oro har, oso argi daukate afera:

Irtenbidea edo soluzioa defizit handiagoak dira. EBk hori ez onartzekotan, aukera norberaren monetara itzultzea da4.

Eta lira berri martxan jartzeko, ikus ondoko linka: (eusko barik, irakur lira)

Ongi etorri euskoa!

Azken kasu honetan, eta dudak alboratzeko, gogoratu Islandiaren kasua:

Islandia: eredurik ereduena

Zer esan Catexit dela eta?

Katalunia: erronkarik handiena eta sakonena (ikus bertan azaltzen diren linkak ere)

Eta EHexit-i buruz?

Brexit dela eta, Syriza-k, Varoufakis-ek… eta Europan zehar dauden sasi-ezker guztiek, tartean erabat espainiarrak diren Podemos-ekoek, etengabeko jarreraz, apustuaz eta egindako aldarriz jasandako aparteko porrota eta gero, zer esango digute, baldin eta ezer badaukate esateko, EHko ekonomialariek, politikariek, kazetariek, eta oro har, progreek eta karlista berriek?

Isilik egotea? Autokritika?

Ikasiko ote dute inoiz?

Gehigarria:

Germany, USA and Canada ALL say they want special trade deals with post-Brexit Britain:

http://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/683117/US-and-Canada-lead-promises-to-maintain-trade-relations-with-Britain-outside-the-EU


1 Ingelesez: “Brexit comments:

So should Parliament follow through and somehow break their EU ties, what’s left is to (re)negotiate what I’ve read is thousands of trade related agreements. And at the rate of maybe one per year that could take quite a while…

The question then is whether current arrangements are allowed to remain pending negotiations, or if trade itself is halted pending negotiations. Seems the former is in the best interest of both sides, which is not to say that’s what they will do, of course.

As for other EU members leaving, it’s a whole lot more problematic as it would entail creating new currencies, which has not had the support of the majority of the voters in any euro area member nation. Wouldn’t surprise me if the whole thing falls out of the news cycle over the next week or so.“

2 Ingelesez: “… Economists have once again proved themselves not only irrelevant, but a dangerous irrelevance. (…)

… the British people… have rejected economics – and in particular the dominant economic narrative. (…)

It is hardly surprising, therefore, that the British public did not find the opinion of Remain ‘experts compelling’.

Remain chose to focus on the economy – to the exclusion of almost all else. All the heavyweights of the economics profession – 10 Nobel Prize-winning economists, the OECD, the IMF, the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the NIESR, the Institute of Fiscal Studies, the London School of Economics – were wheeled out to warn the British people of economic facts known, and understood apparently, only to “experts”. The Financial Times amplified their voices and repeated their dire threats and warnings over and over.

But the “experts” and the economic stories they tell, have been well and truly walloped by the result of this referendum. And rightly so, because while there is truth in the story that international co-operation and co-ordination is vital to economic activity and stability, there is no sound basis to the widely espoused economic ‘religion’ that markets – in money, trade and labour – must be unfettered, detached from democratic regulatory oversight, and must be trusted to ‘govern’ whole countries, regions and continents.

The British people have today rejected this mainstream, orthodox economics, a strain of fundamentalism that they may rightly judge has proved deleterious to their own economic interests.

The economics profession, and their friends amongst the world’s financial elites, are to blame. They engineered their own political and financial bail-outs after the grave financial crisis of 2007-9. Economists cheered on politicians and effectively urged them to transfer the burden of losses on to those most innocent of the crisis. Conservative and Social Democratic politicians with friends in financial circles, were only too happy to oblige.

Above all, economists failed the British people by “pressing on with austerity”. They stubbornly refused to once again promote the subordination of the finance sector to the role of servant, not master of the British economy, and to use governmental monetary and fiscal powers to alleviate the impact of a crisis made in the City, on the majority.”

3 Ikus https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/15/brexit-working-class-sick-racist-eu-referendum?CMP=share_btn_tw.

Ingelesez: “In the mining towns of Nottinghamshire where I am from, the debate again is about Brexit, and even former striking miners are voting leave. The mining communities are also worried about the lack of secure and paid employment, the loss of the pubs and the grinding poverty that has returned to the north. The talk about immigration is not as prevalent or as high on the list of fears as sections of the media would have us believe. The issues around immigration are always part of the debate, but rarely exclusively.

From my research I would argue that the referendum debate within working-class communities is not about immigration, despite the rhetoric. It is about precarity and fear. As a group of east London women told me: “I’m sick of being called a racist because I worry about my own mum and my own child,” and “I don’t begrudge anyone a roof who needs it but we can’t manage either.”

4 Ingelesez: The solution is larger deficits. If the European Union won’t allow a larger deficit, if they force spending cuts, if they force taxes, if they cut spending more, then the option is one, to just sit there and suffer and then watch your civilization be destroyed, or two, to do it on your own, to go back to your own currency.” Ikus Elkarrizketa W. Mosler-ekin (zenbait zipriztin- eta 3).

 

Utzi erantzuna

Zure e-posta helbidea ez da argitaratuko. Beharrezko eremuak * markatuta daude