Kazetari batek:
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/04/warren-mosler-a-reading-list/
Kazetari horren iruzkinak:
Warren-en erantzuna, kazetari galduaz:
Randall Wray-k aferaz:
http://www.economonitor.com/lrwray/2013/07/05/warren-mosler-mmt-deficit-lovers/
Kazetariaz:
“Lowrey is a lazy reporter as this would have been easy to check; or she came to the story with a bias, trying to paint MMT as silly.”
Defizitaz:
“It is not that we “love deficits”. It is that we hate dishonesty.”
NYTimes-ez:
“One wonders if her famous NYTimes Nobel winning economics columnist colleague put her up to this”.
[Wray Paul Krugman-ez ari da. Hala Mosler-ek nola Wray-k behin baino gehiago azpimarratu dute P. Krugman-ek ez duela DTM ulertzen.]
Stephanie Kelton-ek aferaz:
http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2013/07/the-buzz-over-mmt.html
“The notion that MMT has no academic footprint is astonishingly inaccurate, for there are, quite literally, hundreds of publications including: peer-reviewed articles, books, chapters in edited volumes, encyclopedia entries, working papers, policy briefs, etc. in print. Suggesting otherwise supports the general tenor of the NYT piece — i.e. MMT is an Internet phenomenon that hasn’t been vetted through traditional peer-reviewed channels. That is patently false.”
http://mikenormaneconomics.blogspot.com.es/2013/07/dean-baker-reconciling-modern-monetary.html
Stephanie Kelton-en iruzkina:
“The quote attributed to me wasn’t remotely close to anything I actually said. The notion that MMT has no academic footprint is laughable. There are literally hundreds of articles in peer-reviewed journals, books, chapters in edited volumes, etc. This was a(nother) deliberate attempt to cast MMT as a kooky Internet phenomenon. Anyone else wonder why the NYT would send a reporter and a photographer all the way to St. Croix (yes, they physically went there) for a story about a silly little Internet theory? I suspect they know it’s much more than that.
… In other words, they just made shit up.”
Marshall Auerback-ek aferaz:
“…it is wrong to characterize MMT practitioners as “deficit lovers”. It is more accurate to describe them as dismissive of the deficit phobias which are taken as a given in our policy discussions in Washington, Brussels, Berlin, and other parts of the world.”
M. K. Gandhi-k zioena:
“First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. And then they attack you and want to burn you. And then they build monuments to you.”
