Mundu multipolarra versus unipolarra
NBE (Nazio Batuen Erakundea) gaindituta, ICC (NAPE) (International Criminal Court) alboratuta, eta Mossad nagusi… aspalditik gainera…
******
Stop saying history will judge them, judge Israel now. With ICC judges.
******
ICC (international Criminal Court) NAPE (Nazioarteko Arlo Penaleko Epaitegia)
International Criminal Court judges refuse to be bow to Trump’s sanctions as he tries to exempt Israeli and American officials from the rule of law: “We are not going to be intimidated.”
******
Why don’t European governments ever speak about Israel’s nuclear weapons? And how can they pretend to care about human rights in Iran, when they impose sanctions that hurt ordinary Iranians?
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028518864783573371
oooooo
JFK demanded to inspect Israel’s Dimona nuclear reactor in 1963.
He even threatened to cut U.S. aid to Israel.
He was assassinated later that same year.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028370346055717188
oooooo
“The Mossad killed Kennedy because they were so upset over what he did to Ben-Gurion.”
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028359512760135818
oooooo
George Galloway@georgegalloway
INTERVIEW: This is a regime change operation the US lost with first six missiles striking Tehran
We have lost this war, says Scott Ritter.
The Iranian regime will not be toppled or changed.
And the US and Israel will be compelled to sue for peace Follow #MOATS 530 X:
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028545939267281131
oooooo
BREAKING: 
ISRAELI FALSE FLAGS FOILED Tucker Carlson reveals that Qatar and Saudi Arabia caught Mossad agents planting BOMBS to MASSACRE locals.
lsraeI is trying to start a larger WAR.
It is parasite in the region.
It’s time to let it lose.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028607173975064975
oooooo
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil
That’s What it Means to Have Balls
It’s a kind of psychopathy because they’re killing people wantonly.
They’re killing schoolgirls. 150 schoolgirls bombed by Israel.
30-year project of madness that has cost us trillions and trillions of dollars.
This is MADNESS!
Netanyahu’s a MADMAN!
Trump, let me add, is an utter DISGRACE to our nation.
ISRAEL is a absolutely rogue, MURDEROUS NATION.
He and the madmen in charge in the United States have brought us into this.
They are systematically destroying our country as they are destroying the Middle East.
If you ask why do the roads not work and the bridges not work in the United States.
Why is infrastructure falling to pieces?
Why are living standards stagnant or declining?
It’s because we spend trillions of dollars in war.
Why is China advancing so rapidly, so effectively?
Why does the United States have not one mile of fast rail?
China just completed its 50,000th kilometer, approximately 30,000 miles of fast rail.
Because China doesn’t go to war.
The United States is in NONSTOP WAR.
Undeclared wars, about the cost to our society, the loss of freedom of being ruled by a military state, which we are, of being in partnership with a absolutely rogue, murderous nation, which is Israel, which thinks a little bit beyond its means because it thinks it has the United States to do all of its work for it.
Trump, let me add, is an utter disgrace to our nation.
Utter disgrace. He lied to us every word about America first. His whole premise was we’re not going to do this. And he did exactly the opposite of what he said. He did exactly the opposite of what the American people say.
Of course, Congress is dead for all intents and purposes.
It doesn’t matter whether it’s Johnson or Schumer.
They’re useless, these people.
They’re all in the Zionist lobby payroll.
They have squandered our wealth.
They have squandered our strength.
It’s absolutely shocking, disgraceful, dangerous, bankrupting our country.
And Trump lied.
Lied every word of what he was going to do.
***Jeffrey D. Sachs is a world-renowned economics professor, bestselling author, innovative educator, and global leader in sustainable development.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028601683928883257
oooooo
JUST IN: 
California Gov. Gavin Newsom asks why US and Israel slaughtered 160 young girls in a school in Iran:
“We have to reconcile why our bombs or Israeli bombs were used to kill children, young girls at a school.”
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028608377102705055
oooooo
Tucker Carlson on Iran:
Last night in Qatar and Saudi Arabia, authorities arrested Mossad agents planning on committing bombings in those countries. Now, that’s weird. It doesn’t make any sense.
Why would the Israelis be committing bombings in two Gulf countries which are also being attacked by Iran? Aren’t they on the same side? No.
Israel wants to hurt Iran and Qatar and UAE and Saudi and Bahrain and Oman and Kuwait. And they’ve succeeded.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028597230605603121
oooooo
America and Israel want us to believe that their murder of Iran’s supreme leader was a wonderful feat of intelligence, etc.
However, it sounds highly likely that he was in his home, waiting in the full expectation he would be killed—and they played right into his hands.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028475168956280894
oooooo
Trump and Israel just killed over 150 people, most of them young schoolgirls at an Iranian elementary school.
And now Netanyahu says he and Trump are “SAVING THE WORLD.
” Saving it from whom? Children in classrooms?
The world is watching the footage—do you think they’re buying that narrative?
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028518362590949709
Aipamena
Trump’s betrayals aren’t new — just ask Iran.
Russia’s Lavrov told me Trump said a deal was basically done after the Alaska talks.
Maduro reached out with an olive branch — the U.S. president answered with a kidnapping.
Who still believes in U.S. diplomacy after Trump torched global trust?
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028509750296490047
Aipamena
Rick Sanchez@RickSanchezTV
mar. 2
Keir Starmer said the UK won’t be involved in a war on Iran.
Now he’s greenlighting U.S. jets using British airfields to strike Tehran.
What changed? A late-night call from Trump? Quiet pressure from Washington? Whatever it was, it clearly wasn’t leadership. When did “not
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028501227344949627
oooooo
just now on ABC News – UN Special Rapporteur
“It’s crystal clear that these are illegal attacks on Iran by the US and Israel. They amount to the international crime of aggression … This is one of the clearest violations of the most fundamental rule of the post-World War order since 1945, which is not to aggressively attack other countries”
“All countries who genuinely care for a rules-based international order, which Australia says it supports, really need to stand up and protest this kind of lawlessness. It’s not just about breaking international law, this also makes the whole world less safe”
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028652703090643132
oooooo
Douglas Macgregor: A New World Emerges: Iran Will Win & Israel May Not Survive
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028704209399361985
oooooo
Israeli Intelligence Officer Ari Ben Menashe confirms that Netanyahu is blackmailing Donald Trump:
“American Government is trapped by the Israelis. Jeffrey Epstein was one of their tools to trap them.”
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028403710720958709
oooooo
American analyst Jeffrey Sachs:
“If the United States were held accountable for all the war crimes it has committed, the world would be a better place.
If Israel were held accountable for the ongoing extermination we witness, it would be great if governments were truly held responsible.
But what we prefer is blaming the other side without admitting our own mistakes.”
oooooo
Professor Jeffery Sachs:
“The US and Israel are the two most violent countries on the planet.”
“The US is drunk with arrogance right now. It thinks that it runs the world.”
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028390422532510003
oooooo
By hitting the Gandhi Hospital in Tehran today, the United States has now deliberately bombed medical centers in 15 different countries since 1945.
Those countries are:
Iran 
Yemen 
Syria 
Libya 
Iraq 
Yugoslavia
Sudan 
Somalia 
Grenada 
El Salvador 
Nicaragua 
Vietnam 
Cambodia 
Laos 
Korea
ws.com/us-bombing-hospitals-yemen-history-war-crimes/289368/
oooooo
IRAN’S BANKING DEFIANCE: THE LEAK CRACKING GLOBAL CONTROL
One of the real reasons for the US-Zionist war against Iran goes far beyond surface-level politics or nuclear fears—it’s a calculated strike against a nation daring to defy a shadowy global financial empire. As revelations tie post-9/11 invasions to banking control, Iran’s unyielding stance reveals the true stakes: a programmable money system poised to monitor and manipulate every aspect of life.
THE ROOTS OF RESISTANCE
The Iranian central bank firmly rejects Western central banking networks orchestrated by the Rothschilds and Warburgs and opposes integration into a system designed for programmable currencies.
This defiance traces back to 2001, when General Wesley Clark revealed plans to invade seven countries—Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran—not for terrorism, but for their independent banks blocking a global control framework.
PROGRAMMABLE MONEY UNMASKED
Programmable money isn’t just digital cash; it’s coded with rules that enforce compliance, like blocking gas purchases if you violate lockdown zones tied to your digital ID. 
Central bankers gain unprecedented power, shifting from monetary policy to dictating fiscal rules via AI, eliminating “leakage” from non-compliant systems.
Iran’s oil flows to China bolster BRICS autonomy, creating alternative payment networks that bypass sanctions and erode the interoperable control grid.
THE BRICS CHALLENGE
BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa—are building independent systems, with Iran’s resources amplifying China’s freedom from Western constraints.
These “leaks” frustrate the rollout of global digital IDs, where any holdout nation undermines the entire agenda of unified, rule-enforced finance.
A victory over Iran would also be seen by the Western Rothschild banking system as a victory against the efforts of the BRICS nations to find an alternative to the dollar system. Iran’s resistance is also resistance against the Epstein elite of the West, which has been able to leave its mark on the world thus far. HT: YouTube Tucker Carlson Network
#ProgrammableMoney #IranResistance #BRICS #GlobalControl #FinancialFreedom #SurveillanceGrid #HiddenAgenda
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2028606527443964412
Aipamena
THE EPSTEIN CLASS – WHY WARS ARE ALWAYS BANKER SCHEMES
As the fiat currency Ponzi teeters on collapse, a shadowy elite scrambles for cover. Revelations from Epstein files and beyond expose a predator class desperate to ignite chaos. But this time, the internet changes everything—truth spreads like wildfire, bypassing their media stranglehold.
THE BANKER’S PLAYBOOK
Wars have always been orchestrated by bankers to reset debts and evade blame. Take the Warburg brothers: Jewish bankers heading central banks in America and Germany during World War I, telegraphing moves to profit their family amid the carnage. They fund both sides, declare force majeure, and claim “the records burned” when empires crumble.
THE EPSTEIN CLASS UNMASKED
This predator elite—satanic pedophiles blackmailing leaders—feels the heat as more leaks emerge.
We now know from the Epstein files who Epstein served: Wexner has just confirmed it: the Rothschilds, as well as many politicians such as Macron and Starmer, who are puppets of the Rothschilds and their banking network.
China and Russia spotlight them as the West’s true demonic rulers, warning the world to stay vigilant.
THE INTERNET’S GAME-CHANGER
Despite owning the media, they can’t silence the flood of information online. 
Epstein files prove Pizzagate and spirit cooking real, turning global opinion against them.
Barbarians are at the gates this time—people worldwide see the real enemy, cornering the elite like never before.
No more hiding in shadows; the more truth escapes, the tighter their noose.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Wars serve bankers to burn evidence and reboot control, but the digital age exposes their game forever. This fiat collapse won’t save them—humanity’s eyes are wide open, and justice is possible. #BankerWars #EpsteinClass #FiatCollapse #InternetRevolution #RothschildExposed #GlobalAwakening
oooooo
Germany allowed the official plane of a war criminal wanted by the ICC to land in Berlin “for safety” after the same fugitive war criminal launched a war of aggression against Iran and assassinated its leader
Germany is a member of ICC, but has no regard for international law
oooooo
March 2, 2026L
Global Times: US-Israel strikes on Iran signal a ‘worrying shift in the paradigm of modern warfare’
By Global Times
Published: Mar 02, 2026
Airstrikes by the US and Israel on Iran continue, with thick smoke rising over the capital Tehran on March 1, 2026. Photo: IC
Link to original article: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202603/1356123.shtml
Editor’s Note:
“In the minds of US and Israeli politicians, disliking a regime appears to have become sufficient justification for launching an illegal war against it – a profound and worrying shift in the paradigm of modern warfare,” Alfred de Zayas (De Zayas), professor of international law at the Geneva School of Diplomacy and former UN independent expert, author of the books Building a Just World Order, Countering Mainstream Narratives, The Human Rights Industry (Clarity Press, 2021, 2022, 2023), told Global Times (GT) reporter Li Aixin after the US and Israel launched surprise attacks on Iran. What do the strikes mean? How will the war develop? De Zayas shared his views.
GT: In what ways might US-Israel military operations against Iran set a dangerous precedent under international law?
De Zayas: In the minds of US and Israeli politicians, disliking a regime appears to have become sufficient justification for launching an illegal war against it – a profound and worrying shift in the paradigm of modern warfare.
The authority and credibility of all law – whether domestic or international – depends on enforceability. If law can be violated with impunity, if there is no implementation of court judgments, and if governments fail to use diplomatic protection and other means to give meaning to the norms, we have a civilizational collapse. We revert to the times of Thucydides and the Peloponnesian War, when the Athenian general told the people of Melos, “The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” (Melian Dialogue in Chapter “Sixteenth Year of the War,” History of the Peloponnesian War)
I believe the UN Charter should be our only rules-based international order, akin to a world constitution. What is necessary is enforcement. “Business as usual” is not an option. It is for the international community to stand up and adopt countermeasures against violations of the charter.
GT: You wrote that: “We are witnessing a revolt against the UN Charter, against customary international law… It means retrogression in terms of civilization.” Could you elaborate on this?
De Zayas: The military actions against Iran are only one example of a long series of gross violations of international law by the “collective West.”
The NATO bombardment of Yugoslavia in 1999 was contrary to Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, and involved the use of depleted uranium bombs. The use of uranium bombs continued during the 2003 assault on the people of Iraq, which the then secretary general of the UN Kofi Annan correctly referred to as an “illegal war.” And in 2015, the US fired thousands of depleted uranium rounds in Syria.
The breach of international law does not invalidate international law. It only manifests the fact that the UN system is not equipped with appropriate enforcement mechanisms.
GT: How do you see this conflict between US, Israel and Iran evolving in both the short term and the long term?
De Zayas: There are many “what if” questions. I do not have the answers. I think the illegal US-Israel attacks entail a breach of international peace and security within the meaning of Article 39 of the UN Charter. This could escalate into a world war, this time involving most of the planet. A nuclear confrontation would mean an apocalypse for all of us.
The US never seriously intended to withdraw from the Middle East. It sees itself as the world hegemon and that necessarily includes the Middle East. The US is desperate to save its empire, to cling to the fantasy of a “unipolar” world.
GT: In your recent post on X, you wrote, the US “is NOT ‘defending American people’ by striking Iran.” Could you elaborate on this assessment?
De Zayas: The US is putting the American people at a much higher risk of terrorism and placing the world on the brink of World War III. As an American living abroad, I am concerned about terrorism. I am also a Swiss citizen, but that does not mean I could not be targeted as an American.
Experience shows that terrorism has grown alongside the unjust “war on terror.” Violence breeds more violence. I am not alone in expressing these views that coincide with those of Professor John Mearsheimer from the University of Chicago, Professor Jeffrey Sachs from the Columbia University, and Professor Glenn Diesen from the University of South-Eastern Norway. Unfortunately, we are not being governed by rational and democratic leaders. The people want peace, but the ruling military-industrial-financial-digital-media complex wants perpetual war for perpetual profits.
In this context, it is disgraceful that the US concocted a so-called “Board of Peace.” This is not only cynical and Machiavellian – it is Orwellian. It corresponds to the “Ministry of Peace” from Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, and runs according to Orwellian principles: “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.”
GT: You also wrote: “Sooner or later the rule of law will evolve into the rule of justice. That is the course of civilization.” In light of these recent events and the apparent setbacks to international law, do you remain optimistic about this trajectory?
De Zayas: Yes, while I recognize the setbacks and join many others in condemning the crimes being committed in our name, we cannot give up on the rule of law. If we do, civilization is lost. Indeed, in chaotic times like ours, it behooves us to practice proactive optimism, which is far more than infantile hope or pious faith.
Conscious, vigorous optimism is visionary and builds on our awareness of our human identity and dignity. It expresses our faith in humanity, our resolve to be morally and intellectually honest, and our goodwill.
It is axiomatic that to be constructive and effective, we need access to all information, access to the facts and to a multiplicity of interpretations. Democracy cannot function without reliable information. Therefore, we demand transparency and accountability from our authorities, reject scams, public relations schemes, propaganda and skewed media narratives.
For example, China’s Global Governance Initiative makes all the sense in the world, but it must become better known. However, we have a major problem with the manipulation of public opinion by Western mainstream media, which not only lies to us on a daily basis, but also suppresses inconvenient information.
What should the international community do?
In the light of the misuse of the veto right in the Security Council, it is within the mandate of the General Assembly to take greater responsibility for international peace and security. It could and should adopt a “Uniting for Peace” resolution as it has done in the past when the Security Council has been blocked. And rhetoric is not going to change the US’ and Israel’s approach to international law – only economic consequences.
oooooo
March 5, 2026a
US-Israeli military action amid nuclear talks is ‘act of perfidy and aggression’: Alfred de Zayas
March 4, 2026 – 22:8
TEHRAN- In an exclusive interview with Tehran Times, Professor Alfred de Zayas of the Geneva School of Diplomacy, a renowned international law expert and former UN Independent Expert on International Order, delivers a sobering legal and moral appraisal of the unprecedented joint U.S.-Israeli war against Iran on February 28, an operation that has shaken the Middle East and reverberated across the world.
Against the backdrop of widespread airstrikes on strategic and civilian targets in Tehran and other cities that have sparked fierce retaliation and regional escalation, de Zayas examines the attack’s conformity with international law, its humanitarian toll, and the broader implications for global peace and justice.
1. The U.S.-Israeli war on Iran happened hours after Oman announced a “significant progress” in U.S.-Iran nuclear talks in Geneva. Does launching military action during active diplomacy violate the UN Charter’s obligation to pursue peaceful settlement of disputes?
The aggression violates all international norms on diplomacy, the principle of good faith, which constitutes a cornerstone of international law and civilization, more specifically, the purposes and principles of the UN laid down in articles 1 and 2 of the UN Charter. In particular, Article 2(3) was breached, which stipulates: All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered. Article 2(4) which stipulates: All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations, and constitutes the “crime of aggression” within the meaning of Article 5 of the Statute of Rome of the International Criminal Court and the Kampala Definition of 2010. It also constitutes the crime of “Aggression” pursuant to General Assembly Resolution 3314. The Nürnberg Principles, adopted by the General Assembly on the basis of a draft presented by the UN International Law Commission in 1950, prohibits what the U.S. and Israel have done. Articles 6a, 6b and 6c of the London Agreement of 8 August 1945, the Statute of the International Military Tribunal for Nuremberg, should be applied. (https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/7_1_1950.pdf )
More generally, it is an act of perfidy, which is prohibited in the Hague and Geneva Conventions.
2. Iranian Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and certain senior military officials were assassinated in the initial strikes. Your opinion please in terms of international law.
Under customary international law and numerous United Nations treaties, Heads of State and other senior officials are entitled to immunity, they cannot be targets of extra-judicial executions. Moreover, bearing in mind that there has been no declaration of war (contrary to the requirements of the U.S. constitution) and that the “use of force” by the United States and Israel constitutes international crimes under the relevant UN rules and definitions, it is not a question of a “threshold” of legality/illegality. The actions by the U.S. and Israel are an abomination, an open revolt against international law and morals, a revolt against civilization itself. If this had been a declared war (albeit an illegal war by U.S. and Israel), the Hague and Geneva Conventions would have to be enforced. Art. 37 of the 1977 Protocols additional to the Geneva Conventions defines the crime of Perfidy “1. It is prohibited to kill, injure or capture an adversary by resort to perfidy. Acts inviting the confidence of an adversary to lead him to believe that he is entitled to, or is obliged to accord, protection under the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, with intent to betray that confidence, shall constitute perfidy. The following acts are examples of perfidy: a) the feigning of an intent to negotiate under a flag of truce or of a surrender…”
3.Iranian sources say at least 1040 Iranians, mostly civilians, have been killed so far. What legal obligations do attacking states have when civilian casualties occur in densely populated urban centers like Tehran?
The 4th Geneva Convention of 1949 and the First Additional Protocol of 1977 are designed to protect civilians in time of war. The two key principles of international humanitarian law — the principle of distinction between combatants and noncombatants, and the principle of proportionality have been grossly violated. These violations generate both civil and penal liability. Accordingly, the responsible politicians and military should be indicted by the International Criminal Court for violations of articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Statute of Rome. The International Court of Justice should, in an advisory opinion, set an appropriate level of reparation to Iran and compensation to the victims.
4. The U.S. and Israel cited “imminent threat” justification. Given the ICJ’s nuclear weapons advisory opinions, can preventive strikes ever satisfy Article 51’s “armed attack” requirement?
No. There is no right to “preventive self-defense” — not under article 51 of the UN Charter, nor under any provision of international law. On the contrary, there is an absolute obligation to negotiate, and that is precisely what was happening. Negotiations do not mean “take it or leave it”, nor do they mean “surrender”. Negotiation means compromise, quid pro quo. Article 2(4) of the UN Charter prohibits not only the use of force without UN approval, but also the threat of the use of force. Everything that the U.S. and Israel were doing before the attacks on Iran already violated Art. 2(4) of the Charter, that was the case in June 2025 and in March 2026. The non-existence of a right of preemptive self-defense was much discussed in 2003 when U.S. President George W. Bush and the “coalition of the willing” attacked Iraq, an invasion and bombardment that occurred on the false pretext of alleged Iraqi “weapons of mass destruction”. The issue was settled in international law, and the then UN Secretary General clearly stated that the war on Iraq was an “illegal war”. Alas, no one was held accountable for the multiple violations of the UN Charter and of Articles 5, 6, 7, and 8 of the Statute of Rome. This did NOT make the 2003 invasion, occupation and spoliation of Iraq legal. The principle ex injuria non oritur jus clearly tells us that out of a violation of law no new rights can emerge. The tragic situation only confirms that the UN still does not have effective enforcement mechanisms, and that the international community is complicit, because we have tolerated the cancerous growth of a “culture of impunity”. Art. 51 of the UN Charter stipulates: “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.” This article applies ONLY after “an armed attack” has occurred. That means that Iran has the right of individual and collective self-defence. The U.S. and Israel have no such right. But even when Article 51 is invoked, it does not legitimize all-out war. The responsibility lies with the UN Security Council. Thus, Article 51 only allows a state to repulse an attack, is temporary, and it does not liberate that state from the limitations of international humanitarian law.
5. Secretary-General Guterres called the strikes a “squandered chance for diplomacy”. When the Security Council is paralyzed, what concrete legal mechanisms can uphold the Charter principles against unilateral force?
Secretary-General should have called the strikes unlawful acts of aggression, gross violations of the UN Charter, a frontal attack on international law and civilization. Guterres uses euphemisms and lacks the courage to call a spade a spade. To this day he has failed to call the genocide in Gaza a genocide. The Security Council has been paralyzed by the U.S. misuse and abuse of the veto power to shield Israel from responsibility and sanctions. The U.S., of course, would shield itself from any resolution against the U.S. itself. The General Assembly can and should take its responsibilities under articles 10-12 of the Charter and adopt a “Uniting for Peace” resolution, giving it a broad mandate to act to promote international peace and security and to adopt pertinent resolutions, e.g. to impose sanctions on the U.S. and Israel. The GA has adopted such resolutions in the past in connection with the wars in Korea, Egypt/Israel and the Congo. The General Assembly can and should adopt a resolution under Article 6 of the Charter to expel Israel from membership. Art. 6 stipulates: A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. Even if the U.S. would block Israel’s expulsion in the Security Council, the adoption of such a resolution by the General Assembly would have enormous value and would encourage states to BDS — boycott, divest, sanction — both Israel and the United States. Rhetoric is not going to solve the problems created by the unlawful U.S. and Israeli actions. Only massive economic consequences. Thus all BRICS countries, all members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, all members of the Non-Aligned Movement, all members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization should BDS the U.S. and Israel. China should sell its trillion dollars worth of U.S. Treasury Bonds. Other countries should similarly sell their U.S. Bonds. Everyone should divest from U.S. and Israeli companies. NO country should be buying airplanes from the U.S. — no more F-16 or F-35 no more Boeing 737, no more products from Lockheed/Martin, Raytheon, General Motors, General Electric, Caterpillar, etc. And no one should be selling “rare earths” to the U.S. or Israel, no more lithium, no more lanthanides, sandium[Ps1] or yttrium. The U.S.-Israeli war against Iran is not just against Iran — it is against the entire planet. It is an imperialistic and neo-colonial war. The Global Majority must act now or suffer the consequences later.
oooooo
@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu
Ritter’s Rant 079: Stupid is as Stupid Does
Transkripzioa:
Hello and welcome to this edition of Ritter’s Rant. Today I’m going to be borrowing a line from the Tom Hanks classic movie, Forrest Gump. Stupid is as stupid does. And yes, I’m probably referencing a number of people who currently reside in the administration of Donald J. Trump, the 47th President of the United States, who just yesterday,
I believe, declared that only route available to iran is unconditional surrender he also declared that he uh was going to be the man that’s picking the next leadership of iran um you know sort of a glib way of uh referencing the fact that he is behind the assassination the
murder of ali khamenei the supreme leader of iran um a man who It wasn’t just involved in the governance of a sovereign nation that had been subjected to a surprise attack by Israel and the United States. Just a little footnote for all those people out there that are interested in history. On December 7th,
the American people collectively bow their heads and recall the day of infamy, the day when the forces of Imperial Japan carried out a surprise attack against American naval forces. and Air Forces in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. I grew up in Hawaii. I’ve been to Pearl Harbor. I’ve been to the Pearl Harbor monument.
And I understand, you know, the solemn reality of that. Our nation was betrayed. Our nation was attacked. Our nation was stabbed in the back. We went to war to defeat those who perpetrated that attack. And, you know, so here we are, the United States claiming to have the high moral ground. And yet we have embarked on
doing the exact same thing. We are the modern day incarnation of imperial Japan. And Iran now has a day in infamy that they get to reflect back on the day when the United States and Israel attack them while promising diplomacy. I mean, we can roll in perfidy as well, you know, laying out the white flag,
telling people we want to negotiate, telling people we have a a diplomatic off-ramp. And while the Iranians in good faith negotiate this diplomatic off-ramp, we stab them in the back. We bomb them. We murder their leader. It’s not just that he was the leader of a nation, though. He was the leader of… of the faithful,
12-er faction of the Shia faithful, people who believe in Vilayati Faki, the ruler of the supreme jurisprudence, dating back to the religious philosophies of Ruhollah Khomeini, the first supreme leader of Iran, the man who perpetrated or put in motion the uh Islamic revolution that led to the creation of the Islamic Republic of Iran
which exists today that we’re currently at war with this is a long way of bringing up the fact that uh we didn’t just murder anybody we murdered you know a man that is revered by millions of people as you know, their supreme religious figure. This is like murdering the Pope for the Catholic faithful.
This is like murdering the Archbishop of Canterbury for those who buy into the Episcopalian Church. This is like murdering Kirill, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church for those, you know, Orthodox Christians out there. This is a big deal. This isn’t done by some terrorist group. This isn’t Al-Qaeda or ISIS out there carrying out acts of terrorism.
This is the United States of America doing this. stupid is, as stupid does. You see, one of the things that Donald Trump has claimed in carrying out this horrific act of betrayal, violation of international law, this initiating point of a war of aggression, an illegal war of aggression, which again, for those historians out there,
we just have to refer back to Justice Jackson, who was the prosecutor in the Nuremberg trials that put Nazi criminals on trial and had several of them executed. A war of aggression was the supreme war crime, he said, because from that, all other crimes emanate in the United States is now guilty.
of carrying out an illegal war of aggression against Iran. Stupid is as stupid does. But killing Ali Khamenei isn’t just dumb. I mean, it’s insane. First of all, we claim that we want to eliminate the regime. That’s the purpose of this. I mean, Donald Trump is talking about handpicking Iran’s future government. Good luck, Donnie.
You killed Ali Khamenei. And… You killed the man that the Iranian people are now rallying around. If you thought by killing him, you would have people in the streets, you’re right. They’re in the streets, but not celebrating his death. They’re rallying around the cause, the cause of the Islamic Republic.
You’ve made it impossible, literally impossible for regime change to take place. But you also said you wanted to go to war to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons. Let’s forget the fact that for a moment that your director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, testified to the United States Congress recently that Iran didn’t have a nuclear weapons program.
wasn’t pursuing one. There was no evidence of this. And furthermore, she said, it would require a political decision that hasn’t been made, a political decision linked to a religious edict or fatwa issued by Ali Khamenei in 2003 and subsequently updated since then, which forbids Iran from developing, stockpiling, preparing, getting ready, doing anything related to a nuclear bomb.
It wasn’t just that the Iranian government didn’t want it. Islam forbade it. And the basis of this denial of access to nuclear weapons technology was a religious edict issued by Ali Khamenei. He was literally the only man standing in the way of Iran developing a nuclear bomb.
you see the perfidy that you’ve perpetrated against Iran dates back to betrayal that’s been taking place since the Islamic Republic came into being when the United States began sanctioning Iran, targeting Iran, plotting against Iran. The CIA has been actively moving to replace the Islamic Republic since 1979.
And we’re the ones that decided that Iran couldn’t have access to nuclear technology, even though Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Article 4 of the treaty clearly allows them to pursue the totality of the nuclear enrichment cycle, including, you know, the building of centrifuges and spinning up the uranium hexafluoride feedstock to the, you know,
percentages necessary to create fuel for their peaceful reactors. But we said, no, you can’t have it. We did it because Israel pressured us, but that’s That’s another story. We’re the ones behind the sanctioning. We’re the ones that have been punishing Iran for seeking that which all other
nations who are signatories to the nuclear nonproliferation treaty are allowed to have. And
Iran basically wouldn’t allow that to happen. So they decided that they would pursue a nuclear enrichment program linked to peaceful nuclear use despite the opposition of the United States, Israel, and then later on Europe and others who fell for the propaganda of the United
States and Israel that Iran was pursuing a nuclear weapons program when in fact Iran wasn’t and there’s no evidence and there never has been the evidence linking Iran to such a program. But it doesn’t matter because there was a fatwa issued by Ali Khamenei Now,
because of the continued betrayal of Iran at the hands of the United States and Israel, because this betrayal was beginning to manifest itself in an existential threat to Iran, meaning that Israel was talking about joining with the United States to eliminate the Iranian government. There was talk within Iran about maybe they should develop a nuclear bomb.
In the fall of 2024, there were many people pressuring Ali Khamenei to revisit his fatwa. There were people who were saying that Iran should… position itself as a nuclear threshold state. And they did this. They enriched their uranium stockpiles. They acquired 450 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium, still considered to be low levels of uranium,
not useful for nuclear weapons. But they’re only now one or two enrichment cycles away from having the 90% plus enriched uranium necessary to create the fissile core for a nuclear bomb. There were people that were advising Khamenei to create the conditions that would allow Iran to transfer to a nuclear weapons program should an existential threat exist.
And indeed, that appears to have occurred. While Khamenei did not reverse his fatwa, he did acknowledge that under certain circumstances, a fatwa could be reversed, could be ignored if, for instance, there was an existential threat to Iran’s survival as an Islamic Republic posed by nations possessing nuclear weapons, who may in fact threaten Iran with those nuclear weapons.
Stupid is as stupid does. We killed Ali Khamenei, and now we’re attacking two nuclear power states, the United States and Israel. And guess what? The Iranian resistance is such that we may have to use nuclear weapons to break their resistance. So now, what do the Iranians do? Stupid as a stupid does.
You see, we had entered into negotiations with Iran. ostensibly in good faith we now know that that’s not the case we never did we made the decision to attack before we began the negotiations and negotiations were purely designed to lower iran to a false sense of complacency while setting a point
on the calendar from which we would bomb a point that would take place prior to any deal being finalized now the iranians you know warned the american uh You know, negotiators, Jared Kushner, the overqualified son of Donald Trump, who has a degree in nuclear physics and has been involved. Wait a minute. He has none of that.
He’s just a corrupt real estate broker. And Steve Witkoff, who worked in the U.S. National Security Labs, does that? No, he didn’t do that either. He’s just another corrupt New York real estate broker. So we have two corrupt real estate brokers working for a president whose only background is corrupt real estate broker.
Now talking to the Iranians about their nuclear weapons program. So the Iranians put them on notice. We got 450 kilograms of 60 percent rich uranium that pushes as a threshold nuclear state. You guys might want to take this negotiation seriously because the Iranians did. And you know what they did?
They bent over backwards to make sure that they would do everything necessary. to alleviate any concern about this 450 kilograms. It was going to disappear. It was going to be diluted down. It was going to be accounted for in its totality, not just by the return of international inspectors, but for the first time,
Iran was willing to consider the presence of US inspectors on Iranian soil to confirm for themselves that the Iranians were complying. They were going to take their enrichment down to as close to zero as possible. Basically, any pathway to a nuclear weapon was going to be eliminated permanently. No sunset clauses, no aging out of this permanently.
If the goal of the United States was to get rid of Iran’s nuclear program, this was it. We had achieved it. Donald Trump had the opportunity to say, I made a better deal than Barack Obama did, which is what he wanted to say all along, if this was about nuclear weapons. But it was about regime change.
So despite the fact that the Iranians had a deal they were ready to sign that would have solved all these problems, We declared the negotiations to be a failure and then we bombed Iran. Surprise attack. Stupid is what stupid does. Now we killed Ali Khamenei.
Now inside Iran, people who believe that Iran should have a nuclear weapon are now in power. They’ve replaced Ali Khamenei. These are people now looking around as we level Tehran to the ground, as we level Iranian cities to the ground, as we attack Iran. And we’re not achieving.
They see the panic growing in Israel and the United States. They hear whispers now in Washington, D.C. and Tel Aviv about the potential necessity of using nuclear weapons. And Ali Khamenei is no longer there. His fatwa hangs, waiting to be changed. Stupid as his stupid does. If we didn’t want Iran to have a nuclear weapon,
we just gave Iran the clearest pathway to legitimizing getting a nuclear weapon. 450 kilograms of uranium hexafluoride, which had not been converted to metallic state at the time of the attack, which the Iranians were ready to turn over to the United States, is now sitting. in a secret Iranian facility,
probably co-located with 164 centrifuges of the highest quality that within a period of a week could turn this material into 90, 92,
94% enriched uranium,
sufficient to make fissile material. They probably evacuated their metallurgy facilities from Isfahan into similar facilities so they could convert the uranium hexafluoride gas into a uranium metal. And then using a simple gun design, which works 100% of the time, loaded on the warheads, which intelligence suggests the Iranians have been producing since the fall of last
year after the 12-day war. Yeah, that last 12-day war where the United States and Israel once again carried out a surprise attack using diplomacy designed to get rid of Iran’s nuclear program as cover. Stupid is as stupid does. You know, this war is going to end. Left to conventional means, this war between the United States,
Israel and Iran will end with an Iranian victory. We see the Iranians winning every single day. We see the increasing panic in the eyes of Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump and everybody else who promoted this conflict. They know they can’t win. They’re going to start talking about using nuclear weapons. And when they do, understand this.
Iran will destroy Israel. Israel will no longer exist. Iran has the capability of producing between 5 and 10, some say 11, nuclear weapons of 15 to 20 kilotons each. These are weapons as large or larger than the weapons dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. If Iran has missiles today, they can strike Israel at will, the Fatah 4.
You put a nuclear warhead on that, You’ve eliminated Tel Aviv, another one eliminates Haifa, another one eliminates any other, Damona. You can eliminate all the population centers. Beersheba in Israel will no longer exist. One of those weapons will find its way into a container on a container ship that
will make its way to an American harbor and detonate, whether it’s Boston, Baltimore, New York City. It doesn’t matter. We’re going to lose an American city with an Iranian nuclear weapon that doesn’t exist today. but may very well exist in the near future, because we killed the one man that said such a weapon could never be built.
Alikhamene, stupid is as stupid does. That’s my rant. Next time an idea crosses my mind, I’ll be sure to let you know.
oooooo
Geure herriari, Euskal Herriari dagokionez, hona hemen gure apustu bakarra:
We Basques do need a real Basque independent State in the Western Pyrenees, just a democratic lay or secular state, with all the formal characteristics of any independent State: Central Bank, Treasury,
proper currency1, out of the European Distopia and faraway from NATO, being a BRICS partner…
Euskal Herriaren independentzia eta Mikel Torka
eta
Esadazu arren, zer da gu euskaldunok egiten ari garena eta zer egingo dugun
gehi
MTM: Zipriztinak (2), 2025: Warren Mosler
(Pinturak: Mikel Torka)
Gehigarriak:
MTM klase borrokarik gabe, kontabilitate hutsa
Anthony Anastosi: Estatu dirua, Klase borroka
1This way, our new Basque government will have infinite money to deal with. (Gogoratzekoa: Moneta jaulkitzaileko kasu guztietan, Gobernuak infinitu diru dauka.)
