GAZA: hiltzaileen eta esperantzaren artean (29) eta Scott Ritter

Azken bolada honetan ikusi dugunez (Israel, AEB eta NATO zale estatu guztiak errudun, Palestinaren genozidioan izeneko sarreretan), onik, deus gutxi espero daiteke NATO-ko estatu kide guztietatik…

Guk GAZA segituko dugu aipatzen.

oooooo

@tobararbulu # mm@tobararbulu

Aipamena

Elon Musk@elonmusk

abe. 18

Exactly right. ALL government spending is taxation.

The government either taxes you directly or, by increasing the money supply, taxes you through inflation.

Segida

MK71@MK71GA

Georgia’s entry into the EU will be a mistake. Georgia will have to give up a significant percentage of its production, which means Georgia will have to subsist on EU subsidies, which would in turn mean the loss of Georgia’s independence and sovereignty. Georgia must pivot toward BRICS. World’s largest populations and markets are now in BRICS. Georgia will benefit greatly from such a political and economic alliance.

oooooo

Discussion with

@Alice_Weidel

Aipamena

ELON CLIPS@ElonClipsX

urt. 9

Here’s the full conversation from earlier today between Elon Musk and Alice Weidel, co-chairwoman of Germany’s AfD party. Use the timestamps below to easily navigate the different topics.

1:09 General presentation of the AfD

2:14 Germany’s destructive energy policy

12:21 Germany’s obnoxious bureaucracy

16:24 Germany’s failing education 1

9:51 Germany’s unreasonable immigration policy

24:22 Theft crime in California

28:37 Hypocrisy of German politicians towards Elon

31:38 Free speech as a precondition to democracy

34:04 AfD is the opposite of the Nazi party

38:49 Ukrainian war needs to be ended soon

44:53 Protecting Israel and Jews in Germany

49:50 Three steps to solve the Israel-Palestinian conflict

56:23 Mars is needed to extend civilization’s lifespan

1:01:38 Timing of the Mars expeditions

1:03:38 Building a self-sustaining city on Mars

1:05:18 Going to other Star Systems

1:08:20 Does God exist?

1:11:03 Elon’s philosophy of curiosity

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1877454219827098052

(1:14.08 m.)

oooooo

Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter

ooo

Scott Ritter | “Trump Will Administer The Last Rites Over NATO’s Corpse” PT1

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuiQYoJgYs4)

Scott Ritter | “Trump Will Be The Man That Administers The Last Rites Over NATO’s Corpse”

Transkripzioa:

0:00

conversation I am joined by the one and only Scott Ritter Scott Ritter is a former un weapons inspector and weapons

0:06

of mass destruction whistleblower Scott welcome to the show man how you doing this morning you’re doing all right I’m

0:12

doing okay thank you thank you for joining me man um I was telling the

0:19

audience back during um when Joe Biden first got in um there were concerns that

0:27

there was coordination or there was a lack of coordination or lack of knowledge um or communication between

0:33

the United States and Russia and that they had the Geneva Summit I was at that

0:39

Summit I had the opportunity to cover that Summit um for the station and you know as I was telling the audience when

0:45

Joe Biden came out that Summit there were all of these agreements there were all of these talks about what they were going to do um and I got to be honest I

0:53

had just started at the network I was somewhat optimistic listening to them coming out saying hey these guys say

1:00

like they’re saying the same thing and then fast forward not so much where Joe Biden has gotten to the point where he

1:06

escalated to a certain level of absurdity even to the point of seemingly

1:11

trying to um or handicap Donald Trump as he comes into office I want to

1:17

bounce to the Ukraine war for a bit but I do want to get to that part Putin has said he’s open to having these talks

1:23

with Trump trump has said he’s open to having these talks with Putin more likely than not these talks are going to take place

1:30

what is going to be the main point of contention here how do you think in fact before I get to that point I want to go

1:35

back for a bit I want to go to the war first and I want to build up to that because doesn’t quite make sense to go in that direction

1:43

um zalinsky is doubling down in curse and I have yet to find the

1:48

military significance of this attack he’s getting thousands of people killed

1:54

in an area that seemingly has no military significance what is the point of this

2:01

well remember that war is an extension of politics by other means so um if you’re looking for a

2:07

military um significance in terms of you know is this an brilliant flanking

2:14

maneuver that’s going to surround Russian forces and cause the collapse of no that’s not what this is this is a

2:21

very very expensive uh Gambit on the part of the ukrainians politically though this this

2:28

is this attack has extreme strategic potential for Ukraine at least from the

2:33

way the ukrainians and I believe they’re British Masters I believe this is part of Britain’s you know the the Brit MI6

2:41

and the British U general staff have a plan in place that they’re implementing

2:47

um you know keep Ukraine in the fight that’s the whole purpose how do you keep Ukraine in the fight how do you prevent

2:53

Ukraine from collapsing and one of the the the concepts is to

3:00

enable Ukraine to leverage um specific actions and

3:06

capabilities um into negotiating potential uh that would

3:12

Empower um Donald Trump to be more aggressive against Putin rather than

3:18

Trump coming into a um a negotiation you know looking and saying well Putin Putin

3:23

has all the cards you know so I’m going to be a little defensive here and uh you know take what I can get but understand

3:30

that Putin has the advantage I can’t push back uh the idea is to enable Trump

3:36

to say you know to Putin hey you you’ve lost your own territory K I mean you you

3:42

know you you can’t just expect you know you tell us to deal with military

3:47

realities well the military reality right now is that Ukraine occupies part of KK and if you want this war to end

3:55

based upon military realities then the line’s going to be that you lost Russian territory and you’re apparently can’t

4:01

take it back um so you know yeah Vlad

4:06

how you want to do with how do you want to deal with this now you know we’re offering you an opportunity to bring it into the war but this that’s the fantasy

4:14

world that the British and the ukrainians live in the reality is if you ever tried to pull that with a Russian

4:20

negotiator they’d say uh well Deli let’s let’s let’s continue please we to you we

4:27

shall continue this uh this this this this war and we’ll see how it ends um

4:34

that’s the advantage Russia has because no matter how you play this out um you know Russia is going to win but

4:43

politically I mean the ukrainians advanced in August and here we are in January and they’re still in KK um it’s

4:50

not a you know militarily significant thing in fact they’ve burned up their

4:57

reserves but they’re trying to play for the political angle that empowers negotiations by focusing on you know

5:06

Putin’s own rhetoric uh that you know he’s ready for negotiations but it must

5:11

deal with the present realities and the present reality that Ukraine is trying

5:16

to present is we occupy part of kers well Russia said they’re not going

5:22

to negotiate around this issue of curse at all and at the this point these people seem to be encircled and on top

5:30

of that like talking about the military realities kovo has fallen patros is

5:36

being surrounded um Russia is clearing out the dumbass it seems that within

5:42

2025 dumbass is going to be cleared Ukraine as you pointed out this

5:47

is very expensive where are we on the battlefield currently in regards to the

5:53

dyamics of the war I mean on the battle battle field

6:00

all advantages acrew to Russia um they continue their violent um assaults on

6:08

Ukrainian defenses and they’re having greater and greater successes all along

6:13

the line of contact as the reality of the fact that Ukraine lacks meaningful

6:19

reserves capable of plugging holes or launching effective counterattacks basically all the ukrainians can do

6:26

right now is is delay um put up enough resistance to slow down the Russian

6:32

Advance before they are compelled to withdraw back or die um and that appears

6:37

to be the the play that’s repeating itself all along the the battlefield the

6:43

the Russians you know are you know they’ve gone from this past summer I remember ukrainians mocking the Russians

6:50

uh yeah great you you’re you’re advancing your great Russian army is advancing hundreds of meters a day at

6:56

this rate it’ll be you know 2056 before Russia you know reaches

7:03

the the Border things like that I mean they’re like Yay the Russians are doing so good but they missed the point the

7:10

the the game wasn’t territorial acquisition the game was attrition to

7:17

wear the ukrainians down to the point that you’ve reached just this situation where the the ukrainians are on the

7:25

verge of collapse um and you’ll see is is the Russians you know if they take

7:31

forros and I believe they will um the road to chromator is wide open the road

7:37

I mean you’re you’re at some point in time when these Fortress cities fall there’s nothing

7:44

behind them and uh and then you’re going to see instead of you know because today the Russians are advancing you know

7:50

kilometers a day um and at some point in time when when it collap you’re going to see the Russians Advance tens of

7:56

kilometers a day um and that suddenly that’s it once the

8:02

ukrainians leave their what is basically still a cohesive

8:09

defensive line even though the Russians are able to achieve you know specific

8:14

superiority at specific points on the line there still is cohesion on the part of the ukrainians the Russians don’t

8:20

have free hand remember everything that the Russians are accomplishing is being done through the sweat and blood of

8:25

Russian soldiers Russian soldiers aren’t waking up the morning have a cup of tea say oh jolly good boys let’s go for a

8:31

stroll today and see how far we can get uh they’re they’re waking up and there’s ukrainians waking up in trenches and in

8:37

tree lines and in basements and the Russians have to go in and dig them out they have to call in the the aircraft

8:43

they have to call in the the artillery and the ukrainians are calling in their own artillery and sometimes their own

8:49

aircraft um and it’s a war it’s bloody it’s violent there’s casualties on both

8:54

sides you know so even though you know we sit here and say well the Russians have the advantage on the front line and all that

9:00

stuff if you’re the Russian soldier there in the front line all you know is

9:05

you know yeah you’re advancing but they’re fighting back that if you make the wrong move you’re dead there’s

9:12

minefields every once in a while those fpv drones get through and apparently that’s the scariest thing in the world

9:18

to be um the target of an fpv drone is you hear the buzzing sound come in and your powerless to do anything and you

9:24

know it’s a new concept of War um you know the Russians are experiencing this

9:30

this is not easy people need to understand what’s happening on the front line even though the Russians are is not

9:36

easy there’s nothing easy about this but the Russians have the ability to M it

9:41

one thing the Russians are very good at is rotating forces uh because combat is

9:48

I mean it’s it’s exhausting for these guys for the ukrainians you know they’re coming in they’re not getting effective

9:54

rotations their troops are coming in they’re stuck in a defensive position they’re just becoming physically

10:00

exhausted to the point where they’re almost zombie like uh the Russians fight to that point of exhaustion then they

10:06

get rotated out and the next unit comes in and the people that rotate out get to go to prepared positions where they get

10:12

to sleep they get to eat some of them get to go home on leave uh you know they get they they rejuvenate themselves

10:19

until it’s their turn to be rotated back in so the Russians maintain effective rotations to keep this this pressure

10:26

going the ukrainians you know they’ll they’ll they try to do rotations but you know it’s very difficult with the

10:32

Russians you know having superiority in the air um Russians having intelligence

10:37

superiority you know Gathering the intelligence about how the ukrainians are moving their troops so the Russians

10:42

are doing a better job of breaking up Ukraine that’s just another factor into how difficult this is for the ukrainians

10:49

because not only do they have insufficient resources but they their the resources they do have are just

10:54

exhausted they’re they’re tired their equipment isn’t wellmaintained um it’s

11:00

that’s why they’re being pushed back every single day um I want to play I want to get into

11:07

some of the larger politics of this for a moment um there has been talk I want

11:13

to play this clip this is Donald Trump and you know this is the first time that I’ve heard somebody actually speak about

11:19

Ukraine in a sane rational way um and it gives me a bit of hope that Trump is

11:26

going to try to stick to his word in regarding to end the war I mean the question is always how I want to get

11:31

your take on this statement this was in one of his recent press conferences so

11:36

you know a big part of the problem was Russia for many many years long before Putin said you could never have

11:44

NATO uh involved with Ukraine now they’ve said that that’s been like written in stone and somewhere along the

11:51

line Biden said no they should be able to join NATO well then Russia has somebody right on their doorstep and I

11:57

could understand their feeling about that that but there were a lot of mistakes made in that negotiation and

12:03

when I heard the way that Biden was negotiating I said you’re going to end up in a war and it turned out to be a

12:08

very bad war and it could escalate that war could escalate to be much worse than it is right now

12:15

never well my view is that it was always understood in fact I believe that they

12:21

had a deal and then Biden broke it uh they had a deal which would have been a satisfactory deal to Ukraine and

12:27

everybody else but that Biden said no you have to be able to join

12:32

NATO give me give me a take on that I mean for one it’s sayane it’s rational

12:39

it’s the first time I’ve heard somebody in the political space say something that was actually true in the sense but

12:45

give me your take on it well first of all Donald Trump has to be careful he’s gonna get banned from YouTube

12:52

um because I me saying the same thing U is one of the reasons why I got banned

12:58

from YouTube forbid Trump talk about bcha and um and you know and he comes

13:03

out and says well Ukraine did it oh you’re done you’re toss man you can’t no too much truth too much truth um look

13:11

it’s what he’s saying is factually accurate and um the fact that he not

13:17

only recognizes it but is articulating this publicly is a big deal because you

13:23

know reality um that’s the reality that’s going to shape his approach to

13:29

discussions with um with the Russians exactly um I I I always have to push

13:34

back on this and remind people that Trump was after all president from January 20th

13:40

2017 up until January 20th of 2021 and

13:46

um what did he do to stop uh NATO expansion in Ukraine he inherited a very

13:52

aggressive policy from the Obama Administration um now I know that he had

13:57

talks with zalinski and and you know there was you know he disrupted the flow of arms until he

14:05

got assurances about a corruption and things of that nature got him impeached remember the perfect phone call um but

14:12

you know United States had a operation on way since

14:18

2015 um through 2022 there’s four years in there where Trump was President where NATO’s job was

14:25

to train the Ukrainian Army to be prepared to physically remove the Russians from dbas

14:32

this was done by NATO while Trump was President uh so I I think there’s you

14:39

know when when he is criticizing the bid Administration it’s fair to criticize them but he’s ignoring the fact that he

14:45

had four years to affect change so that American policy wasn’t uh the expansion

14:53

of NATO and Ukraine because that was the policy under Trump and he didn’t change that policy now I got some push back

15:00

from other people when I brought this up and they rightfully say that you know what did you want Trump to do the moment

15:06

he came in office he was attacked by the Democrats by the Republicans by Congress everybody Russian collusion Russian

15:12

collusion Russian collusion you know this fake FBI investigation the whole

15:17

thing it made him it made it difficult it didn’t give him much maneuver room so

15:22

there is that and we and we don’t know what the dynamic was inside team Trump

15:28

about Russia how felt constrained we also know that his own National Security team um you know vinman on the National

15:35

Security Council and uh Cella the CI this Rogue CIA operative the deputy

15:41

National Intelligence officer were conspiring probably illegally and unconstitutionally with each other and

15:48

with Adam Schiff to um to to bring down so his own team was stabbing him in the

15:54

back it was so there were a lot of constraints so I think this one it’s probably best to give Trump a pass on

16:02

those four years and and not get bogged down in that and focus on where he’s at today because he has made this is a a

16:10

big deal that the president of the United States is saying what he’s saying right now because it is reality and when

16:18

the Russians want to sit there and say we need to talk about the president reality and one of Russia’s you know

16:23

fundamental demands is Ukraine will never be part of NATO and how that you

16:28

know how you guarantee that through treaty Etc is a big part of bringing this conflict to an end so this is a

16:35

this is a very very big statement um and and and it also shows that Trump is

16:41

listening to people I don’t know exactly who’s getting through to him I um you

16:46

know Keith Kellogg this didn’t come from Keith Kellogg this came from somebody else

16:53

somewhere else and I I don’t want to name names but I will name one uh dougas

16:59

McGregor is somebody who has influence who has in the past uh his voice has

17:05

been um you know accessible to Trump as a in an advisory capacity and if you

17:10

take a look at you know the things that Douglas McGregor has been saying about Ukraine and this issue you’ll see now

17:17

that it there’s there’s some alignment with where what Trump is saying so uh either Trump is listening to him

17:23

directly or Trump is somebody else close to Trump is and Advising Trump but it seems that Trump is starting to

17:30

develop an awareness about the reality of this conflict so much so that he’s no longer talking about solving the war

17:36

with one phone call um he acknowledged today that uh you know the conflict may

17:41

not be resolved for six months which is a very accurate statement because even if you begin negotiations with the

17:48

Russians today understand there will be no ceasefire the Russians um will continue and you’re either going to give

17:54

the Russians what you what they want at the negotiating table or U the Russians are going to take it militarily and I

18:01

think the reason why this is going to take six months is that Trump is going to Trump needs to not just convince the

18:09

Russians to bring it into the war but needs to convince NATO Europe and um and

18:14

Ukraine uh the need to bring it into a war on terms acceptable to Russia and

18:20

Trump one of the cards Trump may play is as as NATO and in Europe and Ukraine

18:25

resist uh Trump basically say well then you know it’s your job to stop the

18:32

Russians we’re not going to stop the Russians we’re not intervening we’re not escalating we’re telling you what needs

18:38

to happen here because of this reality you continue to articulate policies that seek to inject NATO into Ukraine see

18:44

this is fatal to Nato and in and the fact that Trump has come out and recognized this is fatal to Nato and

18:51

European efforts in Ukraine all of which hinge on eventual NATO membership um

18:57

yeah that not going to happen now and so with if you can’t achieve that then why

19:03

are you continuing to pour resources in um and it’s going to take some time for

19:09

Europe and NATO to be compelled to make these decisions but it’s it’s not it’s

19:15

not a one phone call job anymore in Trump’s mind he recognizes the complexities and he recognizes the

19:22

realities we’ll see this you know he’s not president yet all we have is words

19:27

we don’t have any action has he put together a team capable of taking his

19:32

words and turning it into effective policy we’ll find out oh that is the

19:38

question I’ll give you another name RFK Jr um you know when he’s spoken about the war and apparently he listens to

19:44

Alexander mccurtis um who Echoes many of the same sentiments so yes somebody is

19:50

clearly in his ear this is the most articulate I’ve heard him on this there is one thing though did do you think did

19:57

Europe and the US Sleepwalk into this or did they go into this intentionally and the reason I

20:03

asked this so William Burns had the memo net means net and in the memo I’ve shown

20:09

and read this memo before but just for the audience members who have never seen this memo this was the Wikileaks Memo by

20:16

current CIA director William Burns this happened in 2008 it says Ukraine and Georgia’s NATO aspirations then only

20:22

touch a raw nerve in Russia it engenders serious concerns about the consequences for stability in the region not only

20:29

does Russia perceive encirclement and efforts to undermine Russia’s influence in the region but it also fears

20:35

unpredictable and uncontrol consequences which would would seriously affect Russia’s security interests experts tell

20:42

us that Russia is particularly worried that strong divisions in Ukraine over NATO membership with much of ethnic

20:49

Russian Community against uh membership could lead to a major split involving

20:56

violence or at worst a civil war or in that eventuality Russia would have to decide whether to get involved whether

21:03

it wants to or not basically that’s the decision it doesn’t want to have to face and yet it’s stuck with that decision

21:11

when William Burns put that out in 2008 everything in MMO effectively came to pass and they kept pushing and they kept

21:19

pushing did they push intentionally knowing full well that this was going to provoke a war with this idea that either

21:27

Russia allows that circum take place um or they get involved into a war but

21:33

either of these eventualities are perfectly okay from the standpoint of the West like meaning was the policy

21:39

that cynical where they understood that the war was most likely going to take place I believe the answer is yes that U

21:46

that the that this very conflict that burns is warning about here uh was the

21:53

objective and I I’ll tell you why I I believe it first of all we we have the history of CIA involvement in Ukraine

22:00

that goes back to you know 1948 um where they made common cause with galin’s uh you know the former

22:07

German intelligence forces that operated in the East who had connectivity with step on Bandera and maintained a

22:14

connectivity with the organization of Ukrainian nationalists the CIA made common cause with this group to begin

22:20

supplying weapons training Communications Etc to further this Insurgency so we’ve always sought to use

22:28

violence as a means of undermining soviet/russian authority in Ukraine uh when the

22:35

Banderas were defeated uh 1954 55 um the

22:42

we the CIA went on to the long game we began uh funding uh Ukrainian

22:47

nationalism um using groups in diaspora hundreds of thousands of bists fled to

22:54

you know England Australia the United States Canada and used these groups in

23:00

diaspora to feed money and literature back into uh Ukraine to continue to

23:07

empower Ukrainian nationalism not because we believed in the glory of Ukraine but because we were waiting for

23:14

that moment when these nationalists will be able to move and take over um in 2004

23:21

2005 if you remember there was the color Revolution George Sor orange Revolution

23:26

and the you know who who Yenko became the president but

23:32

who won the the election yanukovich Bingo and yanukovich is the Russian the

23:38

part of the Russian political reality not Russia Russia but the ethnic Russian political reality that’s where his Bas

23:44

is that was not the result that the CIA wanted Vladimir Putin is in power we

23:51

need to bring him down at that time remember 2004 2005 that’s when we’re empowering the navales the nvs of we

23:58

creating this fake Democratic opposition in Russia and we want to trigger that we

24:04

we trigger that with the color revolution in Ukraine which is a CIA back operation where we enabled groups

24:11

to come out and and demonstrate and we brought down an election won by

24:16

yanukovich um and we put in this nationalist group but they failed and uh

24:24

by 2008 what burns the the reality of Burns in 2008 is that there’s going to be an election in Ukraine in

24:31

2010 and the ethnic Russians are going to win and that means yanovich you see

24:37

they may have defeated him at the they didn’t defeat him at the polls they stole an election they brought in this

24:42

nationalist who tried to make step on Bandera national hero guys that’s the sort of the tell here where people that

24:49

that’s not really a problem really the new leadership said step on Bandera is a

24:54

hero of they made hero of Ukraine that was the first thing they did B go so it tells you their priorities and where

25:00

their motivations are and yet yanukovich came back and won in 2010 and

25:07

that was a big problem because at that point in time this UK anti-russian cabal

25:14

in the United States and again I just want to remind you there is a Russian Mission Center at the CIA whose job is

25:22

to bring down Russia when I say bring down Russia their job is to create the

25:27

conditions where Russia has economic collapse societal collapse political

25:33

collapse the end of Russia to break Russia up into its constituent parts that’s their mission that’s their job oh

25:40

yeah it was their job under Donald Trump too and he didn’t stop it um I just want to point that out when the CIA created

25:46

20 bases inside Ukraine many of those bases were put in during Donald Trump’s

25:52

Administration um so you know he he again that’s why I

25:58

have trouble giving him a total pass because it’s like well boss you you did this but

26:04

um 2014 wasn’t just the maidon to put in a

26:09

nationalist government this is what people have to understand what happened in

26:14

2014 was supposed to be the political destruction of yanukovich and

26:22

his party the and and and then to move on to destroy once and for all the

26:27

political viabil of the ethnic Russian population of Ukraine the Ukrainian nationalists

26:34

declared war against the Russians and it’s a war that isn’t it it’s more of

26:40

cultural and ethnic genocide as opposed to actual physical genocide although

26:46

they weren’t opposed to killing Russians but the idea was to eliminate the Russians as a political force that could

26:52

challenge this government that the United States wanted to put in that would facilitate NATO NATO moving into

26:59

Ukraine why to create the conditions of a war a war by proxy a war that NATO

27:09

would provide the weaponry and the training and Ukraine would provide the Manpower and they would chew the

27:15

Russians down to achieve not Ukrainian that that’s the other thing we never did this to get

27:21

Ukrainian uh you know a wonderful glorious Ukraine it was Ukraine was just a tool to be burned up in a war of proxy

27:30

to bring down the Russians we were going to sacrifice Ukraine uh all along and we

27:35

have successfully sacrificed Ukraine uh but this has been the strategy all along

27:41

and again look at the dates that I’m talking about this this begins in 2014 uh the fighting goes at the 215

27:48

that’s when mensk Accords comes in Trump becomes president 2017 if Trump understood all this all he

27:56

had to do is say implement Minsk but under the Trump Administration they maintained the line put forward by the

28:04

the the the Germans and the French and the ukrainians that Russia is not you know Russia’s the problem we’re not the

28:10

problem but it’s not Vladimir Putin who’s come out and said yeah our entire approach to Minsk was a fraud a sham we

28:18

were buying time to do what invade Ukraine no Putin was like we want peace

28:25

we we want Minsk to be implemented we’re not out for territorial acquisition we’re not absorbing the domas we’re

28:32

saying the dombas is part of Ukraine all you have to do is protect the rights of the Russians the rights of the Russians

28:39

but that was never the plan that’s why they could never go because the plan was to eradicate the rights of the Russians

28:44

to nullify Russians as a political force in Ukraine that was the plan that was

28:50

the American Plan German plan French plan it was always a sham always a sham

28:56

Minsk Russia didn’t want that but that you know that’s that’s the history going on here this was always about creating a

29:03

war again the US Army put out a slide uh you know describing what they were doing

29:08

in terms of the training and they brag about it they point to the base they say we train one battalion of Ukrainian

29:14

troops every 55 days here then they have an arrow so they can go and fight the

29:20

Russians here and I’m like well that’s sort of like and that slide was made under the Trump

29:26

Administration uh so you know this has always been the goal and objective the plan is going along

29:33

perfectly except for one thing Russia’s not cooperating I mean when Russia has you

29:39

know the entire West sanctioned it Russia must cooperate and collapse economically Russia how dare you stand

29:46

up and and actually improve your economy uh socially Russia must collapse

29:52

socially the the the the society must turn against its leadership and recognize this conflict as a illegal

29:59

Invasion but that didn’t work Putin just won an election last year that was dominating in terms of the approval that

30:06

he has of the Russian people for what he’s doing in Ukraine it’s not that they want this war to go on forever they want

30:12

this war to end but they’re not going to let this war end on terms that aren’t acceptable to Russia politically how can

30:18

Russia allow this this this 25y year reign to continue I mean my God it must

30:24

collapse as Joe Biden said that man must go well Joe bye-bye you’re gone he’s

30:30

still there um so you know the Russians just aren’t playing the game right their

30:36

military isn’t supposed to be winning um they’re they’re they’re supposed to be trapped right now in this war that that

30:42

is is just chewing up resources and demoralizing the Russians and bankrupting the Russians and putting

30:48

Putin in a political corner and Russia is supposed to be shaking at its foundations so that when Donald Trump comes in he Huffs and he Puffs and he

30:55

blows the house down that ain’t happening this ain’t straw this ain’t wood this is a brick house that Russia

31:01

has built and the big bad wolf can’t blow it down and um and NATO has lost

31:06

the big gambut and this was an all-in gambut this isn’t this is that do you ever watch you you know the Vegas poker

31:13

texam H stuff on TV every once a while yeah you know the one where the GU

31:19

you know got his sunglasses on and he I don’t don’t I don’t think they can smoke at tables but you know he’s sitting

31:24

there and finally he’s looking at his car saying Owen all in it’s all everything the whole

31:30

thing and every oh my God all in well NATO went all in on this there there’s

31:37

there they this isn’t something where you know you you lost a little pot and you and you pull back and you and you

31:43

NATO went all in and when they lose it’s the end of NATO and uh I I honestly

31:49

believe that NATO is not long for this world Donald Trump will be the man who administers the last rights over the

31:55

NATO corpse

oooooo

ooo

Trump’s First 100 Days: Russia and Iran

(https://www.energyintel.com/00000194-4f76-d625-ab9e-dfffbf1c0000)

Published:

Fri, Jan 10, 2025

Author

Scott Ritter, Washington

ss565304656-people-donald-trump

Evan El-Amin/Shutterstock

On the presidential campaign trail in 2024, Donald Trump articulated a foreign policy agenda that blended classic isolationism with old-fashioned “big stick” diplomacy predicated on the notion of “peace through strength.” The geopolitical situation that gave birth to this policy amalgam, however, altered in the weeks after he was elected — in particular, the fall of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and perception of Russian and Iranian vulnerability have opened the door to new policy considerations. This new post-election reality paves the way for potential policy breakthroughs on Russia and Iran in the Trump administration’s first 100 days in office.

Prior to the final collapse of the government of al-Assad on Dec. 8, the transition team of US President-elect Trump was focused on the need to convince Russia that it was in its best interests to agree to an immediate cessation of hostilities in Ukraine and on how to prop up a faltering Israel in a way that could pressure Iran into walking away from its nuclear program.

The sudden demise of the Al-Assad regime, however, brought new perceptions of Russian military overextension and Iranian weakness, opening the door to policy formulations that allowed the Trump transition team to assume a more assertive posture.

The ‘Single Phone Call’ Myth

At the close of the Republican Party National Convention on Jul. 18, Trump announced that he could “stop wars with just a telephone call,” declaring: “I will end every single international crisis that the current administration has created, including the horrible war with Russia and Ukraine.”

Trump’s notions of grandeur — combined with the tone-deaf pronouncements of his designated foreign and national security policy nominees, including Keith Kellogg, a retired lieutenant general tapped to be Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine, and Michael Waltz, Trump’s pick for national security adviser — produced plans for a cessation of hostilities in Ukraine predicated on Russia agreeing to a freeze in the fighting and the establishment of a line of demarcation based upon the disposition of troops at the time of any cease-fire taking effect. The proposal, drafted by Kellogg, also kept the door open for Ukraine’s eventual Nato membership, along with the deployment of Nato forces in Ukraine as part of a post-conflict peacekeeping force.

In the days and weeks following his election as president, Trump was confronted with the consequences of the Biden administration’s decision to grant Ukraine permission to use US-supplied Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) missiles against targets inside Russia. Moscow responded by employing a new strategic ballistic missile, the Oreshnik, in retaliation and approving a new nuclear doctrine that lowered the threshold for nuclear weapons use by Russia. This strong Russian reaction made any future effort to strong-arm Russia to the negotiating table problematic.

However, the rapid fall of al-Assad in Syria, and the uncertain fate of the Russian military garrisons stationed there since 2015, brought a fresh assessment of Russian military capability colored by the Syrian debacle. This assessment held that Russia was both humiliated and overextended and that Russian President Vladimir Putin was looking for a way out of the Ukraine trap he created for himself by invading that nation in February 2022.

Unfortunately for Team Trump, this assessment proved wrong. During his annual end-of-year press conference on Dec. 26, when asked about the Trump plan for the cessation of hostilities premised on these new assessments, Russian President Vladimir Putin rejected it out of hand. Ukraine, sensing that the incoming Trump administration responds to strength, has launched a new offensive in the Russian Kursk region to reshape the battlefield realities. Initial assessments suggest this has stalled.

This may open the door for a more pragmatic and realistic assessment of the situation in Ukraine when the Trump administration takes office Jan. 20. If so, there might be a pathway toward a negotiated settlement of the conflict. Otherwise, the prognosis is for a continuation of a war of attrition until a point when Ukraine’s ability to defend itself collapses.

A ‘Better Deal’ on Iran

When Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), in 2018, he claimed that the 2015 agreement negotiated by the Obama administration was a “bad deal” and that his goal was to negotiate a “better deal.” Central to Trump’s thesis was that the JCPOA, which ostensibly created a one-year breakout window for Iran regarding its ability to produce nuclear weapons, failed in its objective once the so-called “sunset clauses” limiting Iran’s centrifuge-based uranium enrichment capabilities began to expire.

In the nearly six years since Trump announced the US withdrawal from the JCPOA, Iran has essentially stopped complying with its obligations under the JCPOA, largely on the basis that the agreement no longer provided effective sanctions relief. Today, Iran is assessed as being only weeks away from being able to enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels, making it a de facto threshold nuclear power. This reality led the administration of President Joe Biden, according to reporting from Axios, to consider the need for a preemptive military strike prior to leaving office. It will be one of the top issues that Trump, who has declared that he will never allow Iran to possess nuclear weapons capability, will confront upon being sworn in.

The precipitous collapse of the Syrian regime, however, has injected a new geopolitical reality into the mix, especially as Iran’s moderate President Masoud Pezeshkian has indicated he is not seeking a confrontation with either Israel or the US and would be willing to enter talks on how to reduce tensions in the Middle East region. On the campaign trail, Trump declared that his goal on Iran was less about toppling the theocratic regime and more about finding a path toward the eventual lifting of economic sanctions on Iran. “I want to use sanctions as little as possible,” Trump said in comments at the Economic Club of New York on Sep. 5, 2024. “You’re losing Iran,” Trump said, referring to the geopolitical impact of sanctions on Iran’s own policy formulations. “I use sanctions very powerfully against countries who deserve it, then I take them off,” Trump added, indicating a possible policy direction toward Iran once he takes office.

The key, however, will be mitigating the circumstances that caused Trump to believe sanctions were necessary to begin with — Iran’s nuclear program. Eric Edelman, a former senior Defense Department official in the Bush administration, recently published an assessment that calls on Trump to push for early negotiations with Iran that would trade the cessation of much, if not all, of its nuclear program for the lifting of sanctions, or else face a US-led attack on its nuclear facilities. What makes such a high-risk strategy attractive to the incoming Trump administration, which will be averse to getting the US bogged down in overseas wars, is the fact that Iran appears ready to engage in meaningful talks regarding its nuclear program. If Trump can take advantage of this window of opportunity, he may at long last be able to find a pathway to the “better deal” he promised in 2018.

Scott Ritter is a former US Marine Corps intelligence officer whose service over a 20-plus-year career included tours of duty in the former Soviet Union implementing arms control agreements, serving on the staff of US Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf during the Gulf War and later as a chief weapons inspector with the UN in Iraq from 1991-98. The views expressed in this article are those of the author.

oooooo

Episode 228 Highlight: Is Elon Musk ‘Meddling’ In German Politics? W/

@RealScottRitter

&

@1860rm

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1878481458085371959

oooooo

100.000 people protesting in Bucharest after the election results were annulled. Complete silence from the EU, which did not want to see the pro-peace candidate win

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1878469316405805206

oooooo

My interview with Sabby Sabs!

ooo

Scott Ritter: NATO Is Done! (Interview)

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VchRvj83NvY)

Transkripzioa:

0:00

[Music] welcome to Sabi sabs podcast I’m your host Sabrina salvati my special guest

0:06

today you’ve seen him here before is Scott Ritter he’s a former US Marine Corps intelligence officer and a former

0:13

un special commission weapons inspector he’s also an author welcome back Scott

0:19

thanks for having me so Scott uh we are now entering into the Trump

0:24

Administration and I think a lot of people have questions more so I think about for policy uh that’s been a big

0:31

one that’s been on the radar there was recent news that was announced today Trump says that Putin’s meeting is

0:39

being set up to end the bloody mess of the Ukraine war the Kremlin said Friday

0:45

that it welcomed the president- elect’s willingness to talk and that there would be likely progress on the subject after

0:53

he is sworn in later this month so this is one of the big ones I think a lot of

0:59

people have been waiting to see because Trump said that if he was in office this war with Ukraine would have never happened uh I’m I’m still a little

1:06

skeptical about this but they have already set up a meeting and the inauguration hasn’t happened yet where

1:13

do you think this goes from here do you think that we will see an end to the Ukraine war this year 100% um it may

1:22

take six months it may take a little bit longer than that because there’s a lot of complexities to untangle number one

1:29

of which is is um you know how long it takes Donald Trump to realize that

1:34

Russia will not yield on any of the major points that this isn’t going to be a a negotiation where Trump comes in and

1:41

and gets his way um but Trump has already he made an important statement yesterday um he he said

1:50

that the this war was created by NATO’s

1:55

expansion into Ukraine now I said that two years ago got banned from YouTube it was the truth but the YouTube you know

2:02

their fact Checkers didn’t quite like that uh it’s a narrative that uh Ukraine doesn’t like it’s a narrative that the

2:08

United States under the Biden Administration like NATO doesn’t like it the European usion doesn’t like it because it’s true this is a war that

2:14

we’re responsible for the narrative right now is that Russia invaded tiny innocent Democrat loving Ukraine no ukra

2:22

the truth is Ukraine has been a tool by the United States NATO and Europe to destroy Russia and it’s been a tool

2:28

that’s been used for decades it’s not just what happened uh recently so you know Russia’s response is the old fool

2:36

around find out kind of thing meaning you know if you want to play Big Boy games you play Big Boy prices and

2:43

Ukraine started playing a big boy game and Russia said okay we’re now going to that level and that’s why we’re at War

2:50

but it’s not because Russia woke up one morning and went I’m feeling my Imperial muscles um let’s make a move on Ukraine

2:57

Russia didn’t want this war Russia did everything possible to to stop this war and Trump finally accurately because

3:04

savy I’ve said this many many times you can’t solve a problem that you don’t first accurately Define so to bring it

3:10

into the crisis in Ukraine you say you want to bring it into the war in Ukraine um then what is the problem why did this

3:17

war happen What because if this is truly about the independence of poor independ uh you know Democratic uh Ukraine

3:25

there’s one ending that we can accept but if this is about Ukraine being a tool to bring down Russia then that

3:31

creates a completely different solution and Trump is now recognizing that the

3:37

problem isn’t Russia the problem is NATO the problem is Ukraine and so that opens

3:42

the door uh for a meaningful discussion there’s another element that Trump is

3:47

going to have to address and I’m sure that’ll come up in the in the discussion is what’s the Strategic objective of the

3:53

United States because right now under Biden Administration it’s the Strategic defeat of Russia and Russia is not going

3:59

to entertain any negotiation that begins with the premise that America’s policy continues to be the Strategic defeat of

4:06

Russia so Trump will have to make um another statement um that that is no

4:11

longer our policy objective um and then I think we’re you know everything’s on

4:17

board the com complicating factors are Ukraine and NATO um you know and and

4:23

they’re going to have to be compelled to accept and and the way that Ukraine gets compelled is Ukraine must be defeated

4:29

and that defeat will happen when United States shuts off the aid uh NATO is unable to step up to the plate um and

4:38

Ukraine collapses and then you know that creates the conditions for Russia to impose its will through whatever VI

4:45

treaty vehicle there will be um that like I said that could take up to six months um Ukraine is not going to go

4:52

gently into that good night and neither is NATO we see them to now meeting in Ramstein for the what might be the last

4:59

meeting of the Ramstein coordination group to send Aid to Ukraine um reports

5:04

are saying that it’s a very uh depressed environment that everybody realizes that this is it that it’s over U that you

5:11

know whatever they thought they were going to accomplish is not going to be accomplished because next week there’s a

5:16

new sheriff in town and the sheriff ain’t playing this game shutting the game down but I I am optimistic that

5:23

Trump is going to pull this one off because it’s essential that he does Trump doesn’t have a vested interest in

5:29

Ukraine because Trump is not married to the the current um you know modeling regarding

5:36

NATO to make NATO vital and and again to revive NATO to make it the Cornerstone

5:42

Trump accurately points to Nato and says you’re the reason why we’re in this mess you know you’re why are you expanding

5:50

and the moment you start to question NATO expansion you start to dismantle the the

5:56

entire narrative that’s been created in Europe about the importance and the relevance of NATO um and Trump is doing

6:03

that right now so that’s the end of NATO I I personally believe that NATO won’t survive Trump’s first term I think that

6:09

Trump is out to kill NATO um and he will unplug from NATO and NATO will collapse

6:15

rapidly um but that’s part of this peace treaty because one of the things that

6:21

Ukraine will have to be given is some sort of security guarantees um or assurances as they’re like to be called

6:28

in this environment because guarantee means you’re guaranteeing something and we all know that the

6:33

1994 uh Bucharest um memorandum was assurances you know the one that Ukraine

6:39

always says we gave up our nuclear weapons well they weren’t their nuclear weapons uh they surrendered them because

6:44

they were obligated to do so but they always say that the West guaranteed our security Now reread the AR the the

6:51

agreement that the West gave assurances to your security but the assurances always have caveats attached and

6:56

unfortunately for Ukraine all of the caveats they were attached in 1994 were violated by both Ukraine the European

7:02

Union and NATO uh which led to the current situation but there will have to be some sort of guarantees but I think

7:08

it’s going to be Russian dictated guarantees meaning that Russia is GNA say don’t worry we got this one and you

7:14

know who’s sympathetic to this see in the west we gave short shrift when Russia said we have legitimate National

7:20

Security interests in in the Nations that surround us especially the former Soviet republics the near abroad as they

7:27

like to call it and we the United States and Europe when no these are independent sovereign states you have no right to

7:33

impose your will there’s no such thing as National interest and you don’t automatically inherit this you know who

7:39

disagrees with that Donald Trump how do we know well he’s goingon to invade Greenland and he’s going to take over

7:46

the Panama Canal so U we know that Donald Trump understands the concept of

7:52

you know National Security interest when it comes to territories AB budding the United States and I think he’s going to

7:57

be sympathetic to the argument made by Russia on in this regard especially when it comes to uh to

8:04

Ukraine so then what happens to Ukraine and and this is I think the big

8:09

question a lot of people have had once this is all over what does happen to

8:14

Ukraine they already applied to to try to join NATO and they were rejected uh

8:21

where do they what what happens to the borders and what happens to people in the

8:26

dabas well the dabas is Russian they’re already Russian lugans and donet are

8:32

independent republics of the Russian Federation along with koson and Zaria and that will not change Russia will die

8:39

before that so there’s not there will be no return of territories to Ukraine Ukraine has permanently lost Crimea and

8:47

the four territories of noo Russia new Russia including the donbas lugansk and Donetsk Ukraine has to be careful not to

8:54

lose more and I’m concerned that Ukraine will lose more that part of this uh

8:59

peace deal understand this Ukraine as it currently exists will not exist once this peace deal is done sininsky is

9:05

finished there will be a new government um the Russians will dictate this government the government will required

9:11

to be put in a a a new Constitution that Outlaws uh the political parties of

9:17

Ukraine today there will be a period of three to five years of occupation where Russia re-educates people and and

9:24

reforms people before elections are had to elect a new Ukrainian government that will be approved by the Russians this this is what losing a war looks like

9:31

there will not be a Ukraine the way you know it today zalinski will either be dead or in Exile and all of his

9:37

politicians will either be captured in prison or you know living in a think tank environment in the west uh you know

9:44

waxing philosophically about how the West betrayed them but um there will be no Ukraine uh not the way we know it

9:51

that’s what people don’t understand all this talk of people about freezing the conflict about you know peacekeepers all

9:57

when Russia wins this war whether they win it at the negotiating table or on the battlefield or

10:03

combination of of the two there won’t be a Ukraine as you currently recognize it Russia won’t accept it um it and so

10:11

that’s the reality and I think Trump is going to go along with this wow well you said the part I think

10:18

a lot of people need to hear because people are talking about this as though Ukraine is going to be able to move

10:24

forward or uh they’re going to get some type of win which I think you and I talked about this a long time ago that

10:29

like there was no way that Ukraine was going to be able to win anyway and the US government was trying to find a way to uh Russia you mentioned NATO

10:38

and and that is something I want to discuss as well there have been many talks I mean I

10:43

I attended a protest that said to you know dis dismantle NATO NATO’s got to

10:49

go what happens to Nato if if like after

10:54

this because this is something that has been in place for quite some time and how do you think other countries in the

11:01

west will feel about that

11:06

well let’s start with what happened to Nato with the collapse of the Soviet Union the end of the Cold War NATO lost

11:12

its reason to exist there was literally no reason for NATO to continue but the United States uh used it as a vehicle to

11:21

uh solidify American control not only over Western Europe but the newly independent Eastern Europe we wanted to

11:27

expand NATO to bring these nations under our wing to prevent Russia from um using

11:33

its past historical relationships to continue to impose its will on these nations as part of Russia’s so-called

11:40

near abro we wanted to weaken Russia and we weaken Russia by taking away its

11:45

former um you know allies and and and such that was what NATO expansion was

11:51

about NATO also became a tool of not

11:56

just European power but in Europe NATO was supposed to be about protecting Europe but became an ex

12:02

a tool for expanding European power and they did that two ways one was to um get

12:09

involved in cleaning up um the historical mistakes of Europe the Balkans Yugoslavia NATO was heavily

12:17

involved in the dismemberment of Yugoslavia and the imposition of European will over uh the Balkan Nations

12:25

um and and we saw that manifest itself in 199 9 where this defensive Alliance

12:31

NATO engaged in an offensive war of aggression against the European nation Serbia a lot of people have forgotten

12:37

that NATO bombed a European Capital NATO bombed a European Capital that tells you

12:43

that NATO is fundamentally broken fundamentally broken and then NATO went

12:48

on in 2011 and carried out a war of aggression against Libya to overthrow a regime in Libya that’s led to Absolute

12:55

disaster there NATO helped facilitate 20 years years of you know incompetence in

13:02

Afghanistan um and that was the overextension of NATO and it proved that

13:08

NATO wasn’t what NATO thought it was see NATO thought it was a partner of the United States especially after 911 when

13:14

NATO was pressured everybody says NATO stood up and and invoked Article Five no

13:19

the United States pressured NATO into invoking Article Five because we needed the political D you know the the the

13:25

looks the the Optics of NATO coming to us we were under attack but what was NATO’s Article 5 commitment they brought

13:33

in some awax airplanes to fly over American territory as if we needed you

13:38

know Luxembourg awax with a NATO symbol on it flying over America when we have

13:43

you know it’s absurd it was symbolic and then they did something about protecting a naval BL a naval um task force to

13:51

protect Europe from migration out of North Africa total jokes nothing it’s a

13:56

nothing Burger um but NATO used Article 4 to go into Afghanistan that’s not

14:02

Article 5 that’s article four they went into Afghanistan and participated in regime change operations there that have

14:08

nothing to do with transatlantic security had everything to do with you know serving American interests and then

14:14

we got them involved in nation building and things of that nature why is a North Atlantic defensive organization involved

14:20

in nation building exercises in Afghanistan in a part of the world they don’t even understand and in the end

14:26

they were betrayed by the United States and that was the the signal to Nato that you simply

14:32

don’t matter you’re nothing you look how we abandoned and this wasn’t Trump that abandoned it is Biden and remember Biden

14:39

is Mr ah the NATO relationship is a sacred trust Article Five it’s a sacred Duty and yet when it came to Afghanistan

14:47

one minute we were passing around the 10 cup saying hey you guys got to fund this thing keep it up keep your mission going and in the same year just few months

14:53

later we left NATO and went oh sorry yeah we’re out of here you’re on your own and NATO’s like

14:59

what we just raised money we we we put a lot of political Capital into extending

15:04

this Mission and now you’ve run and now we have to leave and it looks horrible and so nato in in August of 2021 was a a

15:14

entity that was demoralized and in danger of collapsing and then Ukraine we

15:21

use Ukraine to unify NATO to rejuso existence and Nat NATO becomes this

15:26

aggressive Force working with Ukraine to help bring down Russia this defeat and

15:31

NATO has been defeated by the way it it didn’t work is the end of NATO NATO can’t survive this uh it will begin the

15:39

internal collapse of NATO but what will accelerate that is Donald Trump for

15:44

instance telling nato in the after first of all that they have to leave Ukraine that there is no future of NATO and

15:49

Ukraine that’s a huge blow to Nato who has said we you know all Stenberg and

15:55

now ruy NATO has you know the inherent right of expand mantion that you can’t Russia doesn’t get to dictate who gets

16:02

to join NATO or not well Russia just dictated it at the point of a gun and you lost you back down so that’s a

16:09

problem but then the other problem comes when Trump says and America is going to be withdrawing um a lot of its support

16:16

we need you to step up and fund this you need to go up to 5 per. what NATO countries can do that Germany can’t

16:23

France can’t England can’t they can’t afford that and when they can’t afford it then you’re going to get political

16:30

discussions internal to these nations about is this what we want to do and that’s the death of the European Union

16:37

when Germany starts saying what’s good for Germany when France starts saying what’s good for France that’s the end of

16:44

the European Union so this is killing two birds with one stone Trump is going to take down NATO and take down the

16:49

European Union both of which he blames for getting us involved in this ridiculous exercise in Ukraine and he’s

16:56

going to succeed um you know both of these institutions there’s an election I

17:02

think in February 12th or so in Germany um alternative for Deutschland political

17:09

party U might win and if they win they have said we are withdrawing from the

17:15

European Union wow they withdraw from the that’s

17:20

it if the thing that makes the European Union viable is German Central

17:26

Banking and if you take Germany out of that that’s the end of the Europe that’s the end of the Euro and you’re going to

17:33

see Nations going back to their own uh currencies and that that’s it NATO

17:38

you’re already seen let me just give you show you how ridiculous NATO is right now Trump made some statements about

17:46

Greenland and he said I’m not excluding the use of military force to go into GRE Greenland belongs to Denmark Denmark is

17:54

a NATO Ally Trump is talking actively about invading and occupying the soil of

17:59

a NATO Ally we now have the French foreign minister telling Trump that that will mean war between Europe and America

18:07

how healthy is NATO again remind me of how healthy NATO is right now when the United States is talking about invading

18:14

an occupying a NATO State and NATO members are talking about the potential of a war with Europe against the United

18:20

States now they’ll never go to war against us because they can’t but my point is there is no Unity Trump is

18:26

going to destroy NATO and the European Union because they deserve to be destroyed they stand for nothing they

18:32

they they they both have failed name one good thing NATO has done since the Cold

18:37

War ended you can’t name one thing Europe has done since the cold Europe is

18:43

responsible for the destruction of Europe the the the European Union is responsible for the destruction of

18:49

Europe uh their policies on open borders uh the immigration issue you know

18:54

wherever you stand on immigration I mean I’m I’m personally you know sympathetic to people who are being thrown out of

19:00

their Homeland because of you know crime and economic interest and all that but

19:06

Europe let them in with no plan and what’s happening is you get this xenophobic re response where nations are

19:13

starting to say Europe is responsible for for destroying our national identity

19:18

and the Germans are going hard right on this one saying no more immigrants we’re done with European policy France is a

19:25

disaster because of un you know unrestrained uh immigration they’ve lost control of Marseilles and other and

19:32

other there’s parts of Paris that are out of the control of the French government because of bad immigration

19:39

policies the United Kingdom is feeling it uh other European countries are all feeling this and what’s going to happen

19:45

is they’re going to start looking more out for themselves than this concept of European unity and that’s the end of the

19:52

European Union the European Union was a disaster for European States because

19:57

under the European Union you stop thinking about being a German and you start thinking about being a European

20:03

but what does being a European mean it’s a meaningless term Europe is a continent

20:08

it’s not a culture the culture is Italian the culture is German the

20:13

culture is French the culture is Danish you know that’s the culture and what the European Union was saying is that

20:19

doesn’t matter anymore we’re now this unified entity with free borders Free Labor a pole can travel across and work

20:26

and live anywhere they want to borders no longer me matter but European nations are now

20:32

waking up saying borders do matter Poland has been very clear that there will not be an immigrant problem in

20:38

Poland because they’re not going to let immigrants in that’s a complete violation of European Union policy um

20:45

wow this European Union is going to collapse it has no chance of surviving so then that brings me to this

20:51

point because I did notice um there were hints about this coming from president macron who’s also on his way out but uh

20:58

he made a statement last year that he wants to know why France always has to

21:05

follow the United States He said why do we have to follow them why can’t we make decisions based on what’s best for us

21:12

but he was talking about Europe uh collectively he was saying like why do we have to follow the lead of the United

21:17

States and I was like uh oh people are starting to ask that question right um so there’s that and then when you talk

21:23

about the the EU what would that mean for foreign policy decisions because

21:28

I’ve spoken to people like Claire Daly who was a part of the EU and she’s was very vocal to stand up on the floor in

21:35

the EU to push back against all of these wars what does that mean now because I I

21:41

remember when they agreed to allow the leopard tanks go into uh

21:48

Ukraine H how does that work like if the European Union collapses what does that

21:54

mean for foreign policy matters when it comes to a vote

21:59

well what we go back to pre-european Union Europe where um Germany was

22:05

Germany France was France now they had NATO that provided you know collective

22:11

security but German foreign policy was independent um not subordinated to

22:20

you know whatever this European thing is you go back to that and for from and

22:26

this is why it’s attractive to Trump um you know I spent a lot of time uh studying

22:35

leader like Putin uh Putin has been a project of mine since he came into power and I I study his words I study you know

22:42

his history his background just to try and understand you know what he’s thinking in in the direction he’s trying

22:48

to take Russia it’s it’s important to have that level of comprehension uh Trump people tend to be dismissive of

22:55

trump you know they they judge him based upon superficialities uh and in many ways he’s a a character

23:01

that lends himself to that um I mean I don’t we don’t need to get into the textual detail but we are aware of the

23:08

NBC tape where he was on a bus talking with somebody and he made some comments about how he treats women U very crude

23:16

comments and you know that tends to dominate our thinking process about

23:22

Trump a very crude simple individual but

23:27

if you want to know Trump watch The Apprentice watch The Apprentice what did

23:35

Trump do in The Apprentice because this is Trump’s show he’s the one that you know organized it and and directed

23:42

people are working for a you know a an objective that everybody seems to want this case it was you know a quarter of a

23:48

million dollar salary job promoting one of Trump’s properties and they’re competing but what Trump did is he

23:54

organized them into teams and they’d compete against each other do you understand the genius of that

24:00

move how do you how do you control people how do you dominate people and how do you learn about

24:06

people other than putting them in the teams and then putting them against each other and then’s watching this he got

24:12

thats school that’s a business and then and then he and then he takes the losing

24:18

team and he sits down and he dissects why they lost he he he compels them to you know

24:25

think about the dynamic and he’s learning from that too this is a learning process for Trump he’s he’s not

24:31

just educating them but he’s learning about them and then he fires one of them and then he goes back and he makes two

24:37

new teams he starts the process all over again this is how Donald Trump thinks so

24:43

now Trump wants to deal with Europe it’s very difficult for Trump to

24:48

deal with individual European nations and he learned this when he was president the first time because you

24:54

have NATO and the European Union always getting in the way whatever he wanted to do you know Nation to Nation got

25:02

Complicated by NATO and by the European Union Trump’s perfect Europe isn’t a

25:09

singularity but a team of Nations competing against one another and Trump

25:15

will play Apprentice with Europe and that’s what he wants to do he wants to get Italy to compete against Germany and

25:21

then look at the two then fire one of them and pick the other one that’s how he’s going to control Europe Europe will

25:27

become the you know a a a more complete vassel of the United States macron was correct

25:33

in many ways he recognized that Europe as it’s currently configured had totally subordinated itself to the United States

25:39

but that included NATO and the European Union uh macron was talking about the European Union redefining itself as an

25:47

independent entity European entity free of American domination but you can’t the

25:53

European Union always grew married to the NATO concept you can’t separate the

25:58

European Union from NATO and NATO is 100% American control that’s why macron spoke about the need to create a

26:04

European Defense Agency you know common defense but you can’t have that and NATO

26:10

you can’t afford to have two defense entities like that so it was always unrealistic uh you know mro rightfully

26:17

understood the problem but never had a solution to that problem um because he

26:22

was always married to this notion of a European Union that fundamentally is is

26:29

unsustainable and Trump knows this and I think Trump is now going to come in and you know we we’ll see I mean the proof

26:35

isn’t the pudding he’s not even president yet but I I believe that one of his big objectives is not only the

26:42

dismantlement of NATO but the dismantlement of the European Union so that he can play Apprentice with Europe

26:47

and maybe he’ll do a new TV show called a you know Apprentice Europe we’ll

26:53

see no this is all this is all really interesting um I did talk about his

26:58

remarks about Greenland to me it’s just I I don’t think that’s going to happen um I did hear from uh a representative

27:04

from Greenland she was on the news recently and she said the majority of people in Greenland do not want this to

27:09

happen there’s also this this piece that a lot of people are leaving out you know China does have investments in Greenland

27:17

and I feel like that’s the real reason why he wants to consume Greenland and

27:23

nobody’s asking the question about what happens to the benefits of the people that live in Greenland so for example they have universal healthcare in

27:29

Greenland uh I from what I understand I think Denmark pays for that so my question is like again nobody’s asking

27:37

these questions like if he we were to acquire Greenland what does that mean for the benefits of the people in

27:42

Greenland is the US or taxpayers are we gonna have to pay the health care for people in Greenland so again I I don’t

27:49

think that’s that’s going to happen but people need to start asking those questions and ask like what is this really about and like what matters the

27:56

most which is that it seems like regardless of the political party both parties really want to go after China

28:02

and they want to uh I think suppress China’s economic gains and same thing

28:08

with the Panama Canal what did they say he said why is the Panama Canal you know doing business with China but Panama can

28:14

decide to do what it wants and that’s that’s another thing so when I hear him make these statements that he doesn’t

28:21

rule out military force but he hopes it doesn’t come to that with Panama I’m like what what is happening like what

28:28

like let me let me let me push back just a little bit I mean I I support your your heart on this one because it’s

28:35

horrible to think of the United States invading and occupying Greenland or Panama Canal I think he’s going to do it

28:41

um I think it’s going to happen very soon you really think so 100% first of

28:47

all with Panama we have a neutrality treaty and it just dependent upon how the United States deter you know interprets Panama’s violation of

28:54

neutrality uh Trump is making a case I disagree with the case that China’s control of the ports but you know they

29:00

have Hong Kong based management companies in there his concern is that

29:06

with China in control of Port operations if the Chinese Communist party ever gave the order that these Chinese companies

29:11

could shut down the Panama Canal and that’s you know 70% of American Container traffic goes through the

29:17

Panama Canal 40% of all of our shipping goes through the Panama Canal and Trump is making the case that that we can’t

29:24

give China that option and so to prevent China from ever being able to do this hypothetical which is improbable to

29:30

begin with uh Trump is going to he will order the US military to invade and occupy the Panama Canal sighing a

29:36

violation of the neutrality treaty and because nobody the United States is not held accountable to any standard of

29:42

international law we’ll get away with it and Panama won’t resist because Panama knows what happened in 1989 when just

29:49

cause came in and what we did to Panama to get rid of norga um and I I just

29:54

think we’re in that world right now and on Greenland there’s 44 th000 people in Greenland um I think if we got into a

30:01

bidding war with Denmark we will win that bidding war and we will get the Greenland population to say that they

30:06

want independence uh that there will be a referendum uh and that the United States will take over uh control of the

30:13

security of Greenland until which time that referendum is held and there’s nothing Denmark can do about it and

30:18

Trump knows this um we already occupy Greenland we have American troops on the

30:23

ground in Greenland um and if the D Danish government makes any effort to interfere with that we will site

30:29

National Security interests and we will send more troops in there I think Trump is totally committed to this and there’s

30:35

nothing anybody can do to stop it nothing that’s the sad thing Denmark has an army of 17,000 what are they gonna do

30:42

is France really gonna go to war against the United States to prevent America from occupying territory it already

30:48

occupies in 44,000 I think the United States could come up with a uh with an

30:53

agreement that um that provides for all the services over a period time that the

30:58

Dan that the the citizens of Denmark have I’m just saying that um I I think

31:03

Trump is dead serious on this one and here’s the reason why it’s not about you know you know China has two uh

31:10

concessions mining concessions but they’re not they’re not being developed China wanted to do something with them

31:16

they’ve had some problems uh Wayne the problem is the geography of Greenland

31:21

and the Eng Global the climate change which is thawing the arctic ice cap and

31:27

making Transportation along the Northwest Passage suddenly viable and opening up territories for uh you know

31:34

mineral exploitation there’s a lot of wealth up there Russia has the advantage right now in terms of you know how it’s

31:42

projected its influence in the region Russia put a flag on the North Pole saying that it belongs to us um you know

31:48

we challenge that but Russia’s asserting itself already and Russia is also the

31:54

dominant power in the area because of its U Icebreaker Fleet I mean no nation has ice breakers

32:00

like Russia so the only nation right now that can make Northwest Passage viable consistently is Russia China wants to

32:08

assert it’s it’s talking about creating the You Know Arctic Silk Road it wants to come up and use these sea Lanes is

32:14

part of their um you know their their their supply chain dominance um and

32:20

that’s why Trump when you talk about green he’s talking about shipping we got Chinese shipping shipping shipping shipping shipping he doesn’t want that

32:27

and the best way for him to control that is to make Greenland the United States now projecting American territorial

32:34

interests into these very Waters where the United States can now control shipping and control a lot of the

32:41

economic development taking place that’s what he wants he views China moving into the Arctic as an existential threat to

32:48

the United States I’m not agreeing with all of his analysis I’m saying that’s how he’s thinking and therefore it’s a

32:55

100% certainty that he’s going to take over Greenland that’s a 100% but that’s just

33:03

more intervention and and that’s more intervention well he’s trying to create Fortress America that’s what he’s trying

33:09

to do wait till you see what he do one thing we’re not talking about is Peru because the Chinese aren’t stupid

33:16

they’re actually some of the savviest people out there um on when it comes to global economy they recognize their own

33:23

vulnerability in the Panama Canal I mean you know Trump is paranoid about China shutting down the Panama Canal but the

33:29

Chinese are very aware of the fact the United States can shut down the Panama Canal anytime it wants to um and now you

33:36

know China who is dependent upon the flow of shipping and stuff you know sees disruptions so the chines gone in and

33:43

built a port facility in Peru a multi-billion dollar Port facility that’s actually just opened up I think

33:49

they just last month uh the Chinese president was there so was Biden for a different thing but they opened up the

33:55

port and the Chinese are now in there building rail Lin connectivity from this port into Brazil into Ecuador into the

34:01

neighboring countries so that they can achieve the goal because Brazil is an

34:06

Atlantic country Brazil doesn’t have Pacific interface but China is going to

34:12

land in Peru and then move into Brazil and bypass the need to go through the Panama Canal and then the the Caribbean

34:20

which is an American controlled Lake you know to work their way down the coast they’re just going to land in Peru and

34:26

shoot their stuff over by rail that’s a threat I can guarantee you by the time

34:32

the Trump Administration has Consolidated itself in Greenland and in Panama that Trump is going to say that

34:37

that Port um can’t be Chinese controlled and he’s going to tell the

34:43

peruvians that they have to uh they have to turn control of the port over to the United States and that’s part of Amica

34:48

he’s trying to create Fortress America he’s trying to create this blob of land

34:54

that um is American dominated in and the Chinese won’t be allowed in there and

34:59

that’s from Greenland and I believe it’s going to go down to Peru you know Argentina’s already on board Watch What

35:04

Happens this year interesting year coming up brics is chaired by Brazil and

35:10

of course brics is the ultimate geopolitical Challenge to the United States rules based International order

35:16

Etc watch the pressure that’s put on uh the the Brazilian leadership the

35:21

Brazilian government by the United States uh to um curtail uh bricks

35:28

I mean already uh under under you know under under the the Brazilian leadership

35:33

um Indonesia has become a full partner do you understand what that means one of the most populous lands in the world one

35:40

of the most strategic lands in the world in the in the Pacific uh whose neutrality we always assumed would be

35:47

there that’s why there are such a big player in the G20 in the ason uh group

35:52

Indonesia’s joined bricks Malaysia and Thailand are applying to be become bricks members the Philippines thinking

36:00

that they’re part of this Aon community that the United States is capping and everybody supporting one another is

36:05

watching these major Powers flee watch what the Philippines do in the next couple years I bet you they put

36:12

an application to Bricks too this is crippling to United States crippling to the United States and so you know we

36:20

can’t just give from Trump’s world you can’t just give the Pacific to China without protecting your own interest if

36:26

you give the Pacific to China and you give them this port in Peru and they’re able to project into South

36:32

America they’re defeating the United States and so Trump I believe is going to secure Greenland secure the Panama

36:38

Canal make a move on Peru work to overthrow um the sentiment in Brazil maybe to get Brazil out of bricks and uh

36:46

you know solidify relations with Argentina and make South America part of Fortress America that’s that that’s I

36:53

think his strategic thinking right now he usews China as the number one threat to the United States China as we speak

37:00

the Chinese foreign minister is doing his annual tour in Africa um when was you

37:06

know China is is taking over Africa economically uh so Trump’s looking at

37:12

the world map Pacific is going to China Africa’s going to China Europe’s in

37:18

total chaos Russia’s aligning with China and if you sit back and go

37:23

business as usual Greenland now becomes a base for China to project into into the Arctic sea and Peru becomes a base

37:30

for China to expand into Brazil and all that and that just leaves America

37:35

surrounded and that’s something Trump doesn’t want so when Trump says that Greenland is essential to the National

37:41

Security of the United States he believes it um and that’s why I I take

37:46

him at his word when he says it’s going to be in American territory wow wow wow this is crazy I

37:53

want it’s crazy isn’t it I’m gonna get I just want to say this because what’s going to happen savy it always happens

38:00

people listen to this and they think that I want this to happen because I’m doing an assessment they go oh Ritter’s

38:06

defending Trump I’m not I’m against all of this this runs counter to everything I believe in international law uh

38:13

dialogue debate this is a very confrontational Pro policy which and I’m finishing up an article right now I

38:19

believe Dooms us to fail because I do believe we will be successful in creating Fortress America but then the

38:25

problem is that Fortress America has to be able to viably integrate into a world

38:32

by creating a fortress America you create a trap you trap yourself and that’s I think that’s what

38:39

Trump is doing he doesn’t believe it he thinks he’s building a foundation upon which we can project but he’s trapping

38:44

himself into a world now where every other interest is going to be the rest of the world and we’re not going to be

38:50

able to hold on to South America because the history of Empires always show that

38:55

the conquered people the occup people rise up and we’re going to watch all the reversals and it’s going to be a

39:01

disaster for America so the I guess the sparkle in my eyes I’m talking about it

39:07

is just because it’s fascinating from a you know just an observer standpoint but

39:12

I don’t support what Trump’s doing I think it’s disastrous for the world I think it’s disastrous for America but

39:17

you made a comment where you said you don’t believe that he’s going to take GRE I don’t support him taking GRE but I

39:24

believe he’s going to do it I believe 100% that he’s going to do it because it’s it it melds into his vision of this

39:30

Fortress make America great again means expanding American Empire to control

39:36

sort of like a new Monroe Doctrine to control the areas around us wow well crazier things um

39:45

domestically as well because I’m I’m sure we all heard about this but these two stories in particular that I covered

39:52

it was very alarming to me the New Orleans attack attacker discussed plans to kill en joined Isis in chilling

39:59

recordings of course this is coming from uh CNN that’s the uh suspect of the New

40:05

Orleans attack there and then within 24 hours there was this cyber truck

40:11

explosion in Las Vegas and they claimed that the suspect was was Matthew lurger

40:17

although the Las Vegas uh police earlier on said they couldn’t confirm that the body that was found in that truck was

40:24

him uh I think later on they have made that confirmation these two particular stories right at

40:30

the start of the New Year to me it just seem a little too convenient and I want to hear your take on this because when I

40:37

first heard about the New Orleans attack the first thing I’m hearing from the news is that he had a Isis flag and uh

40:44

the woman from the New York Post just walks through his uh his home uh with no police uh walks through a crime scene no

40:51

gloves on her hand or anything and just points to oh look and there’s the Quran which is left open uh which has been

40:58

explained to me by Muslim friends that you never leave the Quran open if you’re not you know praying so there’s that uh

41:06

and then again within 24 hours the Cyber truck explosion outside of the Trump

41:11

Tower and the so-called Manifesto uh that he has supposedly Left

41:16

Behind What’s Happening Here both of these guys were former military does the

41:22

military have anything to do with this do you think that maybe there could be some some trauma here or some

41:28

psychological effect after their time in the military do you feel that uh a greater Source maybe behind all this a

41:35

lot of people are pointing fingers at Israel it seems a little too convenient to me but what’s your

41:41

take yeah I I I to be hon I don’t know enough to straight out say Israel’s not

41:47

behind us but my gut says Israel’s not behind us um I’m I’m the believer in you

41:53

know aam’s Razer um the most logical explanation is probably the explan the

41:59

more you have to get into conspiracy to explain something um the the more

42:05

difficult I have you know buying into it um the easiest one for me to get into is

42:12

the special forces Soldier um he he comes from a community and you know here

42:19

I’m going to get in a lot of trouble but that’s okay what the hell I I get in trouble all the time um you know the the

42:27

ction process to be a special forces Soldier is a very um substantive one

42:32

very elite one he’s clearly physically fit um but they also run you through various psychological uh tests to find

42:39

out you know your ability to withstand stress and um and to you know survive

42:45

under stress um you know the missions he he was assigned to operate he was a very highly trained special operator um with

42:52

very special skill sets and um but here’s the problem just like the Navy

42:59

Seals um have corrupted themselves by creating a culture that um attracts

43:06

psychopaths straightup psychopaths you just have to take a look at the the the seal if you remember the I think a book

43:13

was written about him called Alpha Eddie um I can’t remember his last name right now um but you know he was a murderer a

43:20

psychopath and the seals allowed this to happen and and fostered it continued to promote him and allowed him to deploy

43:26

where he murdered people he’s a murderer um but that’s the the sickness of the

43:32

Navy Seals is that they they’ve created a culture that allows this kind of sickness to thrive and I think the the

43:40

Special Forces Community has brought in a a culture of con of

43:48

conspiracy theorists people who are very intelligent but they are also very uh

43:54

politically constrained very conern conservative and

44:00

um and if not managed properly could get could allow their brains to get thrown

44:05

into things you know look at what this guy wrote about now originally when his Manifesto came out or this email came out um some people tried to say it’s not

44:14

real but the FBI come out and said no he wrote it he wrote this so that tells you

44:19

everything because this is not written by a professional special forces guy this is written by a guy who’s lost his

44:26

mind a guy who has become so paranoid um that he’s just seeing things and imagining

44:32

things and and all this stuff because not too much of that is reality based um

44:38

you know he didn’t have access to the programs that he’s talking about here you know he’s talking about you know alien spacecraft and UFOs and all this

44:45

stuff he didn’t have access to any of that um some of that didn’t even exist it’s a part of his mind when you subject

44:53

people when you create this this tool because special for forces operator is a tool you create this tool um you have to

45:01

be careful because you can break this tool you can send it you can use it so much that it breaks and you can subject

45:09

it to so much pressure the pressures that this this this operator and his

45:15

fellow operators are under is something that most Americans can’t comprehend I think he broke I think the guy went

45:22

insane um and in the end he he believed in what he was that that that what what

45:28

he was imagining was real and he tragically took his life in a in an act

45:33

outside of Trump Tower that um that that’s what I think happened I don’t see any big conspiracy you know the

45:40

connectivity between the military is Fort Bragg is home to a lot of elite units a lot of secrecy a lot of

45:47

conspiracy taking place so he lives a conspiratorial life I mean heck one of his jobs he’s trained to be what they

45:53

call jedberg that’s a guy who parachutes behind lines and works with um

45:59

indigenous peoples to create U you know resistance groups Guerilla Warfare um

46:04

you know he lives a fantasy novel life um and I’m sure he has been called upon

46:09

to do programs that are special access programs that are highly classified but he’ll only get it on a need to know

46:15

basis he’ll only get to the you know get the Glimpse but he won’t understand the whole thing and I think his mind just he

46:22

just snapped under the pressure of what was going on I think he felt betrayal in Ukraine he was involved in the training

46:28

of Ukrainian Special Forces uh people I just think he broke that’s that’s my take on it that’s a very shallow take

46:35

because I don’t claim to have in-depth knowledge of all this but when I look at who he was the training he had and what

46:42

he became and this Manifesto which has been seen as written by him he he he

46:49

went off the rails he’s that Manifesto could not have been written by a fully

46:56

functional special forces operator that Manifesto was written by a a mentally ill man um that’s how I take now the um

47:04

the New Orleans attacker you know here’s the tough part Isis has said that people

47:12

can claim to be Isis simply by making that declaration so if this was an ISIS

47:19

attack do you remember there was a shooting in um San Bernardino California

47:25

where a um h husband and wife team um went to a party um and and shot it up

47:32

and you know end up getting killed in a shootout and all that well they I believe made a video where they they

47:39

declared that they’re because that’s the key thing is you have to declare that you are you take the Creed and and you

47:44

make the statement and you become Isis and then Isis says oh yeah that’s one of us um you don’t fly the Isis flag upside

47:52

down which he did in his truck I mean um and where’s the video I mean if he had

47:58

all this preparation Quran open and all this stuff where’s the video where he’s taking the I I forget the now so I’m not

48:03

going to embarrass myself I think I know what the term is but there’s you know when you take the Creed um and and you

48:09

know there’s only you know one God name that you know and you basically now

48:15

Isis hasn’t even taken a claim for this Isis isn’t saying yeah this is one of ours you know it’s there’s just a

48:22

speculation so what happened here why did this guy do this uh yes he was in Fort Bragg um you know he was a Muslim

48:30

but I don’t see the same um

48:36

deployment scheme or job related scheme that would put the pressures on him he

48:42

seemed to make the transition to civilian life quite well you saw the video where he’s out there doing the

48:47

promotion for his business and all that that’s not a that’s a r it looks like a rational player so there’s something

48:53

here that doesn’t make any sense I don’t know how to wrap up this New Orleans uh thing I I I I have trouble trying to you

49:00

know put it into its proper box because there’s so much about this doesn’t make

49:06

why did the Fox news reporter get access to his why wasn’t she arrested she contaminated a crime scene what was the

49:14

purpose of that why was she allowed to go in there and and and and and create

49:19

narratives that cannot go to trial and that’s why I say and and

49:26

that’s why I kind of pointed fingers at Israel I was like gee I wonder if mad is behind this because that this one could

49:33

be because this one I can’t answer the the the the tragic death of the Special Forces operator I think that’s just a

49:39

case of a look there’s stuff that happens in Fort Brag that Fort Brag doesn’t want us to talk about Delta

49:45

Force operatives some of the most highly trained men in the world who are trained to you know operate covertly and and do

49:52

you know extreme things come back and and they’re bored you know what they do when they get bored rob

49:57

banks because they’re bored and there was Delta Force operators that go out and rob banks uh you know what else they

50:04

do when they get bored they murder their wives they beat them to death they abuse their spouses they don’t want you to

50:09

talk about this these are fundamentally broken people because of what we’ve done to them we’ve sent them abroad we’ve

50:15

trained them we break them we come back and we don’t we don’t fix them and they

50:20

just they break Fort Brag is a is a cesspool of um of of human tragedy that

50:27

comes from these secret communities people who are taken to the breaking point they break we don’t fix them we

50:32

pretend to fix them we bring them back we plug them back in um and and and then

50:38

bad things happen and Fort Brag is full of bad things happening and I think this is one of those bad things that happened

50:44

because of the the culture of Fort Brag or as they call I think today it’s called Fort Liberty I don’t know what

50:49

they the new name is but um I can’t make the same assessment of this this New

50:56

Orleans person it’s just it’s too weird what happened here the um I mean you

51:01

know the FBI why why didn’t they call it a terrorist act early on you know what

51:07

what kind of politics game is being played there see there’s a lot of politics involved in this so there’s

51:14

there’s something else going on in New Orleans than than that meets the eye that’s that’s where I can leave it I

51:19

don’t know enough but the fact that this lady was able to gain access to this house and isn’t under arrest and you

51:26

know being charged uh says everything because it says that nothing you saw in there was real that that was literally a

51:32

pan Village put up there to create public perception this is all about shaping public perception which means

51:38

it’s propaganda and since when do we do something in propaganda that kills is it

51:43

13 or 15 I don’t know how many the the final death count um out of New Orleans

51:49

is but you know this is human tragedy this is this man murdered you know more than a dozen people injured others

51:57

um this isn’t you know some propaganda game where you’re just manipulating information people died I want to know

52:04

why they died why he went behind the car I mean why he got the will be of a car

52:09

and drove it where he did why did he get out and engage because it’s suicide by cop he decided to go out suicide by cop

52:16

he started to engage police officers in a firefight that he wasn’t going to win

52:21

why did he do this what is the reason and the answers may have laid rested in

52:26

his apartment but not anymore because you can’t trust anything that you saw on that video it’s not usable in the court

52:33

of law wow wow this is all crazy Scott you

52:39

have an event I do want to make sure we get to discuss this you have an event uh

52:44

that’s coming up it says Scott Ritter and Ania K

52:50

uh yeah Scott Ritter uh covering Ukraine Scott Ritter interviews Through The Eyes

52:55

of uh Ania K and it looks like it says dinner discussion and book signing I

53:02

want to talk a little bit about this okay well covering Ukraine is a book that uh I published last year um and Ana

53:09

K is the U is the name of the of the the co-author she’s a podcaster from Poland

53:15

who does a wonderful podcast called Through The Eyes of Ana k um and when

53:21

the Ukraine conflict started she reached out and uh we began to do interviews on a regular basis

53:27

and I was approached by my uh publisher uh to to to do a book uh about Ukraine

53:33

um and I was struggling about the best way to to do that on a timely fashion I I was concerned about you know writing

53:41

something from scratch only to have the situation changed and I was right I mean the the situation changed uh

53:46

dramatically and you don’t want to commit a book that then no longer has relevance um but I looked at the

53:52

interviews that she and I did and I said you know there’s a book here if we go into these interviews and we take key

53:58

passages from the interviews and transcribe them and put them together we we create a compelling narrative that

54:04

takes the reader from how this war started why it started you know and then how it developed and where we are today

54:10

on the eve of trump becoming president it’s a slim volume 120 pages but you can read it that quick but you’ll have to

54:17

reread it and reread it because it’s a stock full of you know Shock full of information um so it’s a good book and

54:23

um ANUK of course isn’t in the United States so I’ve gone out and done a couple book events about this but you

54:30

know it’s that it’s that’s from my perspective we’re going to bring her to the United States she arrives on Tuesday

54:37

and um we’re going to do these three events we’re going to go to the Bronx on the 15th um you can go to Scott r.com

54:44

and and and and get that information uh it’s a ticketed event what I mean by that is when you come you’re going to get a dinner it’s an Italian restaurant

54:51

you get a dinner you get the book as part of the price of the ticket and then there’s a little bit of overhead because

54:56

we gotta somehow pay for the airline and the hotels and all this stuff but look you’re gon to get a chance to see

55:03

collaborators and talk about the process of collaborating on uh this this project

55:09

what what went into it it’s going to be a fascinating opportunity to get an Insight not only into the subject of Ukraine but the you know the process

55:17

ease of collaboration on a topic of this sensitivity and complexity then on the

55:23

19th we’ll be in Washington DC at bus boys and Poets which is a well-known venue will be at their 14th and v um

55:30

Flagship location we’ll be doing a a similar um event um and then on the 21st

55:36

we go to pipy New York um home of H farmers and chefs that’s a wonderful restaurant um I’ve done a book event

55:44

there in the past U again it’s a ticketed event you’re going to get uh one one of the best meals possible this

55:50

the the the owner and Chef John Lasik is is a fantastic man he he’s put together a a menu you’ll see the menu if you go

55:57

to the website um again you’ll get a great dinner in a great venue you’ll get

56:02

the book as price a ticket and you’ll get to um you know again watch an and I

56:08

discuss this and ask questions of us both that’s a key element of all three things but it’s a short book tour but

56:13

it’s an opportunity to bring ANUK K to the United States um and introduce her to an American audience so um if people

56:20

are interested in Ukraine and interested in supporting uh my work and the work of ANUK uh please come to um one of these

56:28

events if you’re able to that’s so awesome um that’s cool so January 15th

56:33

the Bronx January 19th DC and January 21st pipy New York and you can go to

56:40

Scott r.com for more information about that that’s pretty awesome Scott um that

56:45

you guys were able to to get her here uh often times uh both authors aren’t aren’t present well we um you know we’ve

56:53

we’ve done fundraising over the years to to do projects um and we’ve done a lot

56:59

of projects this year we we did a big one in November at the national Press Club um we did another project in New

57:06

York City I worked with Gerald Cante in September so we’ve done and we raised

57:11

money to to do that U at the end of the year any money we don’t spend um becomes

57:18

taxable uh you know if you don’t spend it then it becomes income and you you pay taxes and we didn’t raise that money

57:25

to make it income we rais that money to have a that you know to to to do things

57:30

and so we said why don’t we bring on to to the United States uh we have the

57:36

means to do that um and we’re going to lose money on this there’s there’s no doubt about this is not a money making

57:42

ven you know Venture this is about our mission of helping uh Foster the

57:48

acquisition of knowledge and information by a broader audience and it’s absolutely a unique opportunity to get

57:55

both authors together in one place and so we we had the means to do it and uh she had the availability and so we we

58:02

made it happen and we we’ve just been blessed by a Confluence of uh opportunity and means and uh we’re going

58:08

to make it happen and we will continue to do projects throughout the year uh to to raise money and do you know valuable

58:15

valuable projects such as this awesome Scott Ritter thank you so much for your time thanks for having me

58:23

hey guys this was a savy clip if you like what you saw hit that like button and subscribe

oooooo

1 h

Here we are, filled with joy, as the people cheer and shout, celebrating together. This is a night of happiness, a night that will be remembered in history. We are here, still alive, and we will rebuild this city. We will make it a city that thrives in peace, a beautiful city. Thank you to everyone who stood by our side, thank you from the bottom of our hearts. A special thanks to the free people of the world who supported us and will never forget us in the Gaza war.

oooooo

Basque Country

Irudia

Aipamena

Mohammed jawad ?￰゚ヌᄌ@Mo7ammed_jawad6

Urt. 14

Irudia

If you see this picture, reply with your Country’s Flag. Let’s see where do you support Gaza from.

oooooo

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

1 h

oooooo

Tyrone@RelearningEcon

Most finance goes back into finance, insurance and real estate rather than into productive uses. The acronym for this is FIRE (finance, insurance, real estate)” -Mariana Mazzucato

oooooo

Geure herriari, Euskal Herriari dagokionez, hona hemen gure apustu bakarra:

We Basques do need a real Basque independent State in the Western Pyrenees, just a democratic lay or secular state, with all the formal characteristics of any independent State: Central Bank, Treasury, proper currency, out of the European Distopia and faraway from NAT0, maybe being a BRICS partner…

Ikus Euskal Herriaren independentzia eta Mikel Torka

ooooooo

MMT: Modern Monetary Theory

Understanding how money works so that we can address climate change easily and prosperously plus address AI’s impact on humanity.

Members: https://x.com/i/communities/1672597800385921024/members

Utzi erantzuna

Zure e-posta helbidea ez da argitaratuko. Beharrezko eremuak * markatuta daude