Palestina, erresilientzia (36)

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1807069131247673526

PalMedia@PalBint

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1808324358206586912

oooooo

Howard Beckett@BeckettUnite

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1808195047491256363

oooooo

ooo

The Labour Party sold out 50 years ago

(https://www.thomasfazi.com/p/the-labour-party-sold-out-50-years)

By the mid-1970s, Labour had already discredited Keynesianism and set up the conditions for the legitimisation of neoliberalism — and for Thatcher’s all-out attack on the working class

Thomas Fazi

Jul 04, 2024

Millions of British voters will head to the polls today to elect a new House of Commons and government. Labour is slated to win by a landslide, though not for its own merits or those of its lacklustre leader, Keir Starmer — but simply because people are desperate to get rid of the incumbent Tory government. That said, it’s unlikely much will change: the Labour Party today is little more than a more culturally progressive (i.e., worker) version of the Conservative Party; on all major economic and foreign policy issues, the two are virtually indistinguishable: pro-war, pro-NATO, pro-Israel and neoliberal to the core. Unfortunately, the Labour Party lost its way a long time ago, well before Starmer — or even Blair — came along. The roots of Labour’s rightward shift can be traced all the way back to the crisis of the 1970s.

By the early 1970s, the post-war Keynesian “class compromise” had already started to unravel: one the one hand, a dramatic decline in capital’s profit margins — as a result of increased international competition, the rise in imported material costs, weak productivity growth and, perhaps most importantly in terms of its political consequences, militant wage pressure — led to an intensification of the distributional struggle between labour and capital in the context of stagflation; on the other, an increasingly militant working class began to link up with the new counterculture movements of the late 1960s — community groups, welfare rights groups, black and women’s groups, anti-war groups, etc. — in struggles that demanded not simply more pay or more government expenditure, but that challenged the bureaucratic and authoritarian forms of capitalist power, and “threatened to provide the foundations for transcending capitalism” itself, as David Harvey wrote.

This provoked an increasingly desperate and alarmed response on behalf of the ruling elites. It is against this backdrop that, in the early 1970s, the newly elected Conservative government of Edward Heath (1970-4) attempted to resolve the crisis by directly confronting the power of the unions: the Industrial Relations Act of 1971 was an attempt to dismantle the existing institutional apparatuses of industrial relations and smash the bargaining power of the unions once and for all. But this provoked mass opposition, radicalising the class struggle and bringing the workers into direct confrontation with the state. Following a series of disruptive mining strikes — including a month-long general strike — Heath eventually called an election for February 1974 to obtain a mandate to face down the miners’ demands, but lost to Labour by a small margin, leading to the re-election of Harold Wilson, whom had been prime minister between 1964 and 1970.

1974–9: how labour took it upon itself to manage the capitalist crisis

The new Labour government and the miners reached a deal shortly thereafter and the strike was ended, but this simply exacerbated the ongoing distributional struggle. As already mentioned, in Britain as elsewhere the oil crisis had bolstered the monetarist mantra, even among the ranks of the Labour Party. This had widened the rifts between the various factions within the party, which was becoming increasingly polarised. On the one hand, the Labour left was becoming more powerful and strongly rejected any attempts to curtail the power of the unions. On the other, the number of Labour monetarists, who were closer to the Tories than to their colleagues on the left on macroeconomic policy, was on the rise as well, especially within the parliamentary wing of the party. As Aled Davies noted, it was the new chancellor [i.e. economy minister], Denis Healey, who “did most to further the ‘monetarist’ cause in British public discourse” once the Wilson government was re-elected in ’74.

Not everyone in the Labour Party shared the chancellor’s views, however. At the Labour Party’s 1973 annual national conference, an ambitious 123-page policy manifesto was unveiled, Labour’s Programme for Britain. The document, which was largely the brainchild of Tony Benn, Ian Mikardo and Michael Foot, all staunch left-wing members of the party, outlined a socialist vision for Britain. The programme had two major planks. First, the creation of a National Enterprise Board (NEB), which would buy up private firms in the national interest. The aim was to use these enterprises as vehicles for investment planning to spawn higher productivity and sustained economic growth, and more generally to revitalise an industry that had waned under the poor management of British capital. Michael Foot was quoted in the Guardian as saying that the programme was “the finest socialist programme I have seen in my lifetime”.

Three days later the 1973 Arab-Israel War broke out and the OPEC embargos began, triggering a chain of events that would end up steering the Labour Party — and Britain — in a very different direction. But that was to come later. While there was strong resistance within the Labour Party’s National Executive Committee to accepting the programme’s full agenda, the left faction succeeded in garnering its support at the 1973 national conference.

When Harold Wilson assumed office, in February 1974, he appointed Tony Benn, a key proponent of the programme, as secretary of state for industry. In his book, That Option No Longer Exists: Britain 1974–76, John Medhurst provides a detailed account of what happened in the months that followed, when the left came close to implementing a radical socialist economic strategy. Benn wasted no time in drawing up a White Paper for an Industry Act commensurate with Labour’s programme, but the document was significantly watered down by Wilson, especially with respect to the NEB’s proposed right to influence the direction of existing firms and impose a statutory framework for economic growth. Benn tried again by drawing up a paper designed to set the Industry Act in the context of a wider Alternative Economic Strategy, which argued for reflation, price and import controls to protect nascent and struggling British industries, public ownership of major financial institutions, and the tackling of systemic inequalities through progressive taxation and social spending. It too was blocked.

By the time the NEB was set up under the 1975 Industry Act, its remit had been modified. Its primary role was now that of providing funds for industrial investment. To the left the NEB was a disappointment. Nonetheless, the 1975 Industry Act, did go further than any previous legislation in increasing the state’s role in industry. In many ways, the painstaking legislative action on the creation of the NEB had brought to the fore the fundamentally incompatible visions of the right-wing and left-wing factions of the Labour Party. On the one hand was Wilson (and the rest of the party leadership), increasingly under pressure from an establishment that recognised in Benn’s industrial strategy an existential threat to its power and privileges; on the other was Benn himself, an eloquent and effective socialist in a vital ministerial position who had support across the extra-parliamentary left and trade union movement. Clearly, the party — and Britain — were at a crossroads, and ripe for a reckoning. By this point, the British ruling elite was apoplectic. Andrew Glyn recalls that the Times ran various articles calling for “a co-ordinated defence against industrial action or wholesale nationalisation” and discussing scenarios in which the armed forces would be called in to break strikes, which could escalate to a situation where “normal legal administration is impossible and the only authority left is the military commander”.

By this stage, it was clear that a solution to the crisis within the narrow limits of the social-democratic framework (such as the one attempted by Wilson in the mid-1960s) was not an option. A radical resolution one way or another — either on labour’s terms or on capital’s terms — was inevitable. From a socialist perspective, as the Labour left argued, this meant: (i) bringing a larger share of production under public ownership; (ii) expanding the government’s role of employer of first resort (thus reducing the ability of capital to use unemployment as a blackmail tool); and (iii) implementing capital/import controls to manage the country’s balance of payments. The leadership of the Labour Party had no intention of permitting such a development, however. The European Economic Community (EEC) referendum of 1975 provided the opportunity for the leadership to inflict a comprehensive and decisive defeat on the left. The overwhelming victory of the “yes” vote gave Wilson the perfect opportunity to sideline Benn — who had campaigned against the EEC, fearing (correctly) that Treaty of Rome competition clauses threatened the Industry Act — by moving him to the much less influential Department of Energy.

This all but killed the impetus for radical reform. The Labour leadership, in fact, had come to the conclusion that the only way out of the crisis was to restore the profitability of capital. This required it to use its indissoluble link with the leaderships of the trade unions to discipline the working class. In other words, Labour took it upon itself to use the apparatus of the state to manage the capitalist crisis on behalf of capital — which is what the neoliberal counter-revolution was all about, really. However, in doing so it painted itself into a corner: increasingly engulfed in monetarist ideology and at odds with the more radical sections of the working class, and with no alternative strategy for managing the economic crisis, the government desperately needed the support of key sections of capital.

By the mid-1970s, however, capital — in the UK and elsewhere — was firmly committed to overcoming the Keynesian political-institutional framework, which it saw as a barrier to its own reproduction. Thus, even though by early 1976 Britain appeared to have weathered the OPEC storm quite well, the British financial-corporate lobby, supported by powerful free-market think tanks such as the Institute for Economic Affairs, started mounting an increasingly aggressive anti-government campaign. The financial press was relentless in its criticism of the government. In this context, we can better understand the events that led to James Callaghan’s infamous 1976 speech, which marked the party’s break with Keynesianism and precipitated the collapse of Keynesian legitimacy, paving the way for the rise of the neoliberal right.

Sounding the death knell of Keynesianism: Callaghan and the 1976 IMF loan

The troubles started in March 1976, when the left wing of the Labour Party defeated a public expenditure White Paper calling for the immediate freezing of public expenditure and setting out plans for cuts over the 1977–9 period. Bitter divisions within the party came to the fore once again. These were exacerbated by the growing influence and pressure exerted by the monetarists on chancellor Healey, who clearly also saw the White Paper as a means to “reassure the market”, in today’s parlance, by demonstrating the government’s commitment to reducing the deficit. Following the defeat of the White Paper, the markets became hysterical: a large-scale sell-off of sterling began, which rapidly lost value against the dollar. Furthermore, as the Wall Street Journal had advocated just a few months earlier, financial markets began refusing to buy British government bonds “until, in their view, the government had ‘put its house in order’”. This became known as the “gilt strike”.

It is quite clear, in retrospect, that this was not just a technical, “neutral” decision taken in reaction to Britain’s economic fundamentals — which were, in fact, improving — but a deliberate move to put pressure on the government to curtail public spending and retrench the welfare state. As the pound began to slide, despite a massive foreign currency loan from the IMF and foreign central banks, James Callaghan — who replaced Harold Wilson as prime minister in 1976 — portrayed the predicament facing Britain as one where the country had no alternative but to introduce harsh spending cuts and to resort to further external funding to “avoid a continuing slide in the exchange rate”. This was not the case, however: Britain could have chosen to challenge the speculators by letting sterling float cleanly and resorting to capital/import controls and improved planning, which would have largely eliminated the need for foreign capital inflows. By refusing to follow this route — for reasons of ideology or ignorance — Britain effectively created its own foreign currency funding crisis.

Against this background, in December 1976 the new chancellor, Denis Healy, sent his infamous “letter of intent” to the IMF — released to the public only in 2005 — agreeing to a programme of harsh spending cuts and monetary restraint in exchange for another loan. Upon news of the loan-cum-conditionalities, speculation against the pound abated. In the letter, Healey eschewed any notion that Britain would move to restrict capital flows or trade. This was a watershed moment for Labour, reinforcing a change in policy orientation away from full employment and social welfare towards the control of inflation and expenditure. Political commentator Peter Riddell wrote in 1983 that all the elements of what would become Thatcherism were already contained in Healey’s letter. The government’s official line was that it had no other choice because it had “exhausted its recourse to potential sources of financing other than the IMF”. In fact, these concerns about the lack of foreign reserves were all in the context of their commitment to sustain a given level of the pound. The “funding” concerns would have vanished had the government allowed the currency to fully float.

There are two dominant interpretations of the event: one that sees it as the moment in which the Labour Party, and Britain as a whole, capitulated to the demands of the Americans, effectively surrendering control of British economic policy to the IMF; and another one that sees it as the moment in which the British left was forced to acknowledge the harsh realities of globalisation. They are both wrong. While it is certainly true that from the 1970s onwards the IMF (and other Washington-based institutions) increasingly morphed into tools of US economic imperialism, and that the US government feared that Britain’s ongoing crisis would undermine “assumptions of political stability” and threaten US interests in the region the reality is that the terms of the loan imposed no constraints on the government that it had not already adopted voluntarily.

In fact, Callaghan had already explicitly rejected Keynesian full employment policies in his infamous address to the party conference in September 1976 — several months before the IMF application. The speech is said to have “effectively sounded the death-knell for postwar Keynesian policies”, and to have “served the monetarist cause for years to come”. It is also touted by some as the moment at which the British left finally “faced up” to the reality of the growing irrelevance of the state in the face of global economic forces.

In fact, as a 1977 US Congress briefing acknowledged, Labour’s leadership had long wanted to move in the direction now being recommended by the IMF, but had not been able to override the opposition of the party’s left wing: “they therefore secretly welcomed being put in a position of appearing to have no choice but to carry out the deflationary policies being dictated from outside Britain’”. That is, the IMF loan, far from imposing harsh conditionalities on a reluctant but powerless government, actually provided the government with the perfect alibi with which to head off mounting political opposition, by presenting austerity as the only way forward. The IMF, of course, was more than happy to be of support. It was, in other words, one of the first examples of depoliticisation — a strategy that in subsequent years and decades would become commonplace across all advanced countries, whereby politicians can reduce the political costs of unpopular policies by “scapegoating” international institutions.

In other words, though alternatives to austerity (such as Benn’s proposal) did exist at the time, they were no longer perceived to exist. This leads to the disquieting conclusion that the Labour-led British government of the mid-1970s was the first government effectively to break with the Keynesian consensus (excluding Germany, which never really subscribed to Keynesianism in the first place) and embrace monetarism-morphing-into-neoliberalism, not due to outside imposition or external constraints, but of its own volition. This, in turn, paved the way for Thatcher.

As world inflation began to rise at the end of the decade, the “social contract” that had reconciled the unions to wage restraint in exchange for job growth and redistribution finally broke down, leading to a massive wave of strikes, particularly in the public sector, during the so-called “winter of discontent”. Having failed to resolve the distributional struggle (either one way or the other), discredited the Keynesian ideology, and legitimised monetarism, Labour effectively set up the conditions for the social-democratic “austerity lite” to be refined into an all-out attack on the working class by Thatcher, who was able to appeal to the public’s mistrust of statism and bureaucracy, and growing frustration with union power, to advance a radical anti-labour and (seemingly) anti-statist agenda.

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1808105520890290615

oooooo

Pelham@Resist_05

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1808244973432983557

oooooo

The West’s monkey business against Russia has turned into a complete fiasco.”

Iran Observer@IranObserver0

Hasan Shahine@hassanchahineuk

Jeremy Corbyn@jeremycorbyn

The Cradle@TheCradleMedia

Chris Hedges@ChrisLynnHedges

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1808207537516237074

oooooo

Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinklle

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1808239845057216994

oooooo

Our interview with Prof. Mearsheimer: https://rumble.com/v4npq8r-prof.-

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1808064115002224775

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1807800783305322533

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1808036313586688066

oooooo

Israel’s military leadership wants a cease-fire with Hamas in case a bigger war breaks out in Lebanon, security officials say. It has also concluded that a truce would be the fastest way to free hostages.

Israel’s top generals want to start a cease-fire in Gaza, even if it means Hamas stays in power for now. This is causing a rift between the military and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who opposes a truce that would let Hamas continue to exist.

Underequipped for further fighting after Israel’s longest war in decades, the generals also think their forces need time to recuperate in case a land war breaks out against Hezbollah, the Lebanese militia that has been locked in a low-level fight with Israel since October, multiple officials said.

A truce with Hamas could also make it easier to reach a deal with Hezbollah, according to the officials, most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive security matters. Hezbollah has said it will continue to strike northern Israel until Israel stops fighting in the Gaza Strip.

“The military is in full support of a hostage deal and a cease-fire,” said Eyal Hulata, who served as Israel’s national security adviser until early last year, and who speaks regularly with senior military officials.

“They believe that they can always go back and engage Hamas militarily in the future,” Mr. Hulata said.

“They understand that a pause in Gaza makes de-escalation more likely in Lebanon. And they have less munitions, less spare parts, less energy than they did before — so they also think a pause in Gaza gives us more time to prepare in case a bigger war does break out with Hezbollah.”

It is unclear how directly the military leadership has expressed its views to Mr. Netanyahu in private but there have been glimpses of its frustration in public, as well as of the prime minister’s frustration with the generals.

Until recently, the military publicly maintained that it was possible to simultaneously achieve the government’s two main war goals: defeating Hamas and rescuing the hostages captured by Hamas and its allies during the Oct. 7 attack on Israel.

Now, the military high command has concluded that the two goals are mutually incompatible, several months after generals began having doubts.

Source: The New York Times

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1808266650837569843

ooooooo

Supporting Palestine in the Modern World | Sami Hamdi | Miftaah Circle

Bideoa: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozPEEFLV5EE

Sammy Al-Hashimi highlights the resilience and struggle of the Palestinian people against oppression. He draws parallels between historical struggles and the current fight for justice, emphasizing perseverance, the power of words, and global solidarity.

Transkripzioa:

0:05

when I first came to Michigan it was -4° celus which is the correct term for

0:11

degrees I understand here in America everything is just bigger you want to make everything bigger if you see it

0:17

small you make it bigger and you decide to make so I noticed that with Fahrenheit I think that when you saw the

0:23

actual temperature of you know 45 degrees you said no no we’re American we got to make it bigger

0:30

and in Texas everything is much bigger than everywhere else thank you very much for having me

0:36

thank you for hosting me thank you for bringing me to Michigan it’s nice to see Michigan in the summer it’s nice to see that Sunshine

0:43

actually does come out here sometimes when you do these

0:49

speeches over and over again on the same topic it’s hard to find a way to repackage

0:55

it because the topic itself doesn’t change

1:01

we started off 9 months ago after October 7th and before October 7th for the last

1:08

70 years we saw the same content over and over again ethnic

1:16

cleansing Slaughter arbitrary Detention bulldozing

1:21

of homes J we saw all of these various different events take place over and

1:28

over again and and we make the same speeches over and over again but I fear

1:33

that sometimes we get to a point where we’re not tired

1:39

of trying to call an end for this genocide we’re at a point where when we

1:46

hear it we heard the speech before let’s move on to another thing another issue

1:52

because I’m tired of hearing it over and over again I wish Palestinians could just

1:58

switch the channel and and go to a different topic instead of waking up

2:03

in finding children with their heads blown off one of the darkest ironies is when

2:11

the Israelis lied about it it made front page news for a whole week wall to–all

2:17

coverage but when the Israelis did it it didn’t go any a single headline on any

2:23

of the mainstream news whatsoever before I start this I’d like

2:28

to categorically state the views expressed by Sami the son of

2:34

Muhammad Alim ham are sami’s own they do not reflect M they do not reflect those

2:40

who invited me they don’t reflect those of the organization or the Masid or or or or or the the people who are hosting

2:46

me here in Michigan or those who attended these are Sami views alone brace

2:54

yourselves I think it’s worth starting with a political situation as it is at the moment in terms of what’s happening

3:01

in the land of the prophets today in the hington post it

3:07

was reported that there is a leak from the White House that Biden is not going

3:12

to impose a red line for any potential military action on the part of the Israelis in Lebanon because Netanyahu

3:19

and the Israelis badly need a victory that they are unable to achieve in Gaza

3:25

and they badly need to offer a victory to an Israeli population that is angry

3:31

that for all of the destruction in Gaza there is no material gain there’s no

3:36

land to settle in there’s no land that’s been stolen the Palestinians have not

3:42

left and the Palestinians aren’t leaving and Israeli soldiers are dying in the

3:48

process for a land that does not belong to them this is too much of a price to pay for a land that does not belong to

3:55

us Netanyahu you have failed and until you produce a price for us we demand

4:01

that you cut that you are toled from power and elections are held the protests in Tel Aviv are not against the

4:08

genocide they are against the price that they are being made to pay for the genocide which is the death of Israeli

4:16

soldiers Biden initially said I don’t want you to go into Lebanon because I

4:23

don’t want to midle East War so close to the elections because Americans will punish me if American solders are killed

4:30

in any new conflict in the region because American public opinion has shifted they’re no longer entertaining

4:35

the idea of Foreign Wars anymore bring our boys home America First what are we doing abroad and that’s why they are

4:42

winding down a lot of the conflicts it’s why Trump withdrew troops from Syria it’s why Obama withdrew troops from Iraq

4:49

the American Appetite is no longer conducive for war so Biden is saying to Netanyahu please please can you find a

4:57

way to end this war I’m willing to support you but you’re hurting me domestically Netanyahu is saying I don’t

5:03

give a damn because if you lose the other side will still support me some of you might be thinking Sam you’re

5:10

painting a picture that Israel is losing but all I see is genocide and all I see is Palestinians

5:15

dying so I came prepared with what I like to callah

5:21

non-muslim sah non-muslim is authentic non-muslim sayings and traditions that

5:28

reinforce what I am about to say because I am aware that sometimes psychologically when a Muslim who looks

5:35

like you says something it is Hadith M because I look like you and I need to

5:40

reinforce myself not with bukari and Muslim that we’re used to reading about like a where it’s spiritual but doesn’t

5:47

apply publicly but with two eyes are you non-muslim to reinforce that which you

5:52

will not give credit to the traditional text and sources

6:00

but I need non Muslim to convince them of these points and it’s not my fault it’s

6:06

theirs I’m actually serious but in any case inah nonm

6:12

Muslim in the book of analysts John meim meima I think that’s

6:19

his name gave a lecture in Australia in which he argued that there are a series of points that prove that Israel is

6:27

losing the reason why Israel attacked Palestine after October

6:33

7th is because Israel was taken by surprise that an attack took place at a time in which Netanyahu believed the

6:40

Palestinian cause was about to be obliterated in the week before October 7th and the views expressed are sami’s

6:47

own they don’t reflect anybody else my friends they joke they say Sami always gives a talk as if it’s the last time he

6:54

will ever be invited to speak into a microphone and I confess it’s true

7:00

the week before October 7th a country

7:06

somewhere in the Middle East it has some religious standing of

7:14

importance the leader of this country told Fox News that we are ready for

7:19

normalization we are getting closer every single day and we are ready to normalize in exchange

7:26

for whoever said Palestinian State you can leave he didn’t say that he said in exchange for a pathway to a Palestinian

7:33

State we will give full normalization in exchange for a pathway in that same week

7:39

Netanyahu shook hands with the leader of a country that has a history of

7:46

Sultans then he stood at United Nations he held up a map and in this map he had

7:51

completely erased Palestine and said this is the future of the Middle East

7:57

then can television in the book of Israeli media the chapter of can television they asked the UN

8:04

Israeli ambassador to the UN

8:09

will your government agree to normalization with Muslim nations and he

8:15

replied and said that the normalization of Israel with the holiest sites of

8:22

Islam means the complete Arab abandonment of the Palestinians and the government will

8:30

certainly sign on it because they know this too so Netanyahu moved troops from the

8:37

border of Gaza to the West Bank to prepare to invade the West Bank because

8:43

he was reassured that Muslims will do nothing Muslims will not move Muslims

8:50

will not punish Muslims will continue to prioritize Comfort over Justice because

8:57

Netanyahu believes in the Hadith that one day the hearts of the Muslims will be afflicted with Wan and they will hate

9:04

everything associated with sacrifice when he moved those troops to

9:10

the West Bank in preparation to invade the West Bank then October 7th

9:16

happened the reason why they kept asking people to condemn October 7th is because

9:22

Israelis and those who support them are used to slaughtering civilians for them

9:27

it’s not a condemnable Act they have done it for 78 years in Palestine they

9:33

have done it in Vietnam they did it in Iraq they did it in Afghanistan it is

9:38

normal which is why they demanded that you condemn civilians that defend

9:44

condemn the killing of civilians because for them it’s a normal thing it’s unusual for somebody to condemn the

9:49

death of civilians they forgot in the Muslim tradition that when the prophet Muhammad s alaihi wasallam sent KH to a

9:57

tribe and khed transgressed and blood money was owed the prophet

10:03

Muhammad wasallam put his hands up and said Allah I am innocent of what KH has

10:10

done Muslims never hesitate to condemn the killing of civilians but under international

10:18

law the killing of civilians is abominable and condemnable the act of

10:24

trying to take back land that belongs to you is not and is a right INR Ed in

10:30

international law which recognizes Israel as the occupying power over

10:37

festine the reason why I start with this is when Netanyahu was taken by surprise

10:43

the reason that Israelis were so angry was Netanyahu you promised us that as we

10:49

steal land that be that does not belong to us you promised us we would not have

10:54

to pay a price for it you promised us you will deal with the Palestinians

10:59

you promised us you would slaughter them and ethnically cleanse those lands you promised us the Palestinians the

11:06

rightful owners of the land you promised us that the homeowners would not come back you promised us the homeowners

11:13

would not try to come back you promised us that our theft would be protected your government must be toppled because

11:20

you broke the pact of Thieves so Netanyahu went into gazah and

11:27

started bombing it into Oblivion but he had a problem the only gift that the Israelis

11:33

would tolerate is annexation of land but annexing land means you have to take it

11:39

manage it and use resources to control it but ethnic cleansing and I should

11:46

caveat I’m no expert I’ll say that I’m not an expert in ethnic cleansing but in

11:52

my analysis of ethnic cleansing ethnic cleansing is an expensive process when you enter a land that’s not

12:00

yours in 1948 when you kick out 700,000 Palestinians they don’t all go in one

12:06

place 2,000 go here 5,000 go here 10,000 go here 5,000 it’s manageable you go

12:13

area by area kicking out people and they go to different territories because there are territories for them to go and

12:20

run too but when 78 years of ethnic cleansing happens you find you you’ve

12:25

created a situation where 2 million people are now in a short strip of land

12:31

with the sea behind them and they border blocking them where do you tell those 2 million to go when you send in the

12:38

settlers to live amongst those 2 million people those 2 million people are the legitimate homeowners and we all know

12:44

ftin you’ve all dealt with them stubborn Subhan Allah

12:51

the are people of the land of of festine we all dealt with Palestinians

12:56

before they’re not the easiest bunch palestin don’t give up they’re resilient they resist they stand for what’s right

13:03

they keep going 78 years they don’t stop they keep moving in the name of Allah

13:08

and his messenger Palestine Never Dies it keeps going because the festini are a

13:14

blessed people by Allah subhah wa tala take

13:20

beer so these Palestinians when the settlers go in and they start to occupy land the settler is not amongst 10,000

13:27

or 1,000 Palestinians he’s in between 2 million Palestinians 1 + 1 equals 2 what

13:33

do you think the Palestinians do I didn’t intend that rhyme but it worked what do you think they do the

13:38

Palestinians resist when they resist what does the Israeli expect Netanyahu

13:43

to do they don’t expect Netanyahu to give the land back to the homeowner they

13:49

expect him to slaughter the homeowner so Ariel Shon in 2005 when he withdrew from

13:55

Gaza he didn’t withdraw because he wanted to give the land back he withdrew because he couldn’t deal

14:01

with the 2 million Palestinians because you only have three ways to deal with them you either give

14:07

them equal rights but if you give them equal rights you expose to the world that the Palestinians are the people of

14:14

the land because suddenly you realize that democratically they win the parliament democratically they win the

14:20

Premiership democratically they win the presidency democratically the land goes to the people of the land we can’t give

14:27

them equal rights the second choice is apartheid aarz is

14:32

expensive 2 million people constant you know mon constant fighting it’s too

14:37

expensive I can’t keep going in AR sharan says I’ll withdraw I’ll do a concentration camp I’ll build a wall but

14:44

to satisfy the Israelis I will allow permission for music festivals to take place at the walls of the Concentration

14:51

Camp of the largest open air prison in the world according to Human Rights Watch and David Cameron the former prime

14:58

minister of the United Kingdom non-muslim that’s the reference you can find it

15:05

there when Netanyahu enters Gazza he has a problem the situation hasn’t changed there’s still 2 million Palestinians in

15:12

Gazza he can’t impose a part too expensive so he tries ethnic cleansing

15:20

blinkin betrays all of the climate change policies that they Hood Hoodwink us with he flies more than 10 15 times

15:27

on those planes it’s a long journey I do it I’ve done it quite often last six months this place is

15:35

far he goes to the Middle East to speak with the leader of a country that used

15:42

to build pyramids I’m not saying which one I’m not saying which one I don’t

15:47

want to get anyone in trouble I don’t want to get anyone in trouble I don’t get any organization in trouble he says to him open the Border

15:55

oh Ally of ours open the Border so you can help us facilitate ethnic cleansing

16:02

you helped us destroy their tunnels you helped us to blockade them you helped us

16:07

to suffocate them now we’re asking you to help us to exterminate and ethnically

16:12

cleanse them now the Ally sits there of this country they have a sphinx as

16:19

well and says to himself

16:29

and says to them I have lent my support in things before but I’m not opening the

16:35

Border this time why because I’m not stupid

16:41

kazzy if I open the Border Palestinians enter the Sinai Peninsula right and they

16:48

set up camps but we know the Palestinian we know the

16:53

Palestinian stubborn people they don’t give up they don’t lie down they don’t

16:59

give up their territory they keep resisting for what’s right what belongs to them and their laws and their rights

17:06

guaranteed under international law what comes out of those tents once they set

17:11

up in sin for algorithm purposes we will only do a bit of acting

17:17

E when those start coming out of the camps as they do from the camps of Lebanon in what international law

17:24

recognizes as legitimate resistance what do you think the Israelis will

17:30

do they will cross the border when they cross

17:36

the border and they attack this land that has pyramids and sphinxes and

17:45

extortion at tourism prices just just forgive me for

17:52

it when they invade and the president of this country

17:57

comes to Washington and says please intervene they’re invading my territory do you think he’s going to get any

18:03

support in the White House do you think he’ll get any support from Europe will he get any support from anywhere what

18:10

will be said instead we need an international peacekeeping force that will administrate this area it needs to

18:16

be taken out of your control and handed as a demilitarized zone for international peacekeeping force and you

18:22

lose your territory so ethnic cleansing is an impossibility so your next

18:27

suggestion is genocide slaughter them kill them the problem with genocide is

18:33

although it was an attractive proposal in the beginning because these Palestinians in your eyes are subhuman

18:40

they are animals Donald Trump today accused Biden of being a Palestinian and a very bad one as if it was a slur or

18:46

something that is insulting Biden did a really bad job in the debate today I don’t know what the Democrats

18:53

are thinking the views expressed are sami’s own they don’t reflect anybody here I’m

19:00

in trouble the next option is genocide but

19:05

the problem with genocide is nobody’s going to give a damn about the Palestinians so bomb them kill them

19:12

slaughter them blow sidra’s legs off blow 300 bullets into hind go and

19:19

Massacre the kids Women and Children of Palestinians the problem with genocide for the Israelis is they are suddenly

19:25

stunned and shocked that people care about Palestinians guys I don’t

19:31

understand why are you upset that we’re slaughtering these people they are animals they are barbarians the reason that people are

19:38

caring is not necessarily because they are Palestinians it’s because for the first

19:44

time they discovered who Palestinians are and they saw the reality of the apartheid regime because of Tik Tok may

19:52

Allah protect preserve and Elevate Tik Tok and render it good service for this

19:57

um and above sat mean in Philadelphia somebody said to me very angrily and said to me we’re making

20:04

Dua for Tik Tok in the Masid huh I told him what’s wrong with it brother he said Tik Tok is fit he had

20:10

his arms Tik Tok is fitna I told him sh he says don’t shush me I said shush I’m saving you what do you mean you’re

20:16

saving me I said don’t say publicly Tik Tok is FNA he said why when you tell people Tik Tok when you say publicly Tik

20:22

to is FNA you are telling people you taught your algorithm to show you FNA which means you searched for FNA so the

20:28

algorithm knows to show you FNA because Tik Tok is designed to show

20:35

you only what you like it’s designed to show you only what you prefer if you

20:41

search Quran it shows you Quran if you search Hadith it shows you Hadith but if

20:46

you search Kanye West house party it shows you all these other things I didn’t search Kanye West house party

20:53

just for the record my friend had it on his Tik Tok wait man is on the religion of his

20:59

companions a guy I know my Tik Tok for the record for those

21:05

who are upset my Tik Tok if you want I can help you with the algorithm my Tik Tok shows me zinedin zidan 2006

21:11

semi-final of the World Cup when he humiliated Brazil it shows me Ronaldinho flip flap in sakur it’s actually

21:16

football but sakur you guys call it yeah it shows me the West African brother I don’t know if you’ve seen him he runs every morning he does jogging but he

21:23

records himself while he’s running yo bro don’t forget

21:28

Allah is always there don’t worry bro and you go

21:36

retweet my Tik Tok algorithm shows me the chiropractor got a back problem I’m a Cairo and then you have to put your

21:42

headphones in and increase the volume so you can hear the click and now it’s wonderful that’s my

21:48

Tik Tok but as a result of Tik Tok may Allah protect and preserve and guide it Singaporean CEO Singapore is not China

21:54

China is there Singapore is here I know some Congress people are geographically ched and you know in any case but as a

22:01

result of Tik Tok and the decentralization of media Tik Tok became the source of dawa not dawa in the deic

22:08

perspective which is you know we limit it to cupcakes and Eid in the park and which is all relevant I’m not denouncing

22:15

it I’m denouncing your inability to see dawa the other side of dawa which is the activism involved in convincing the

22:22

societies that you live in of the legitimacy of Justice Allah said in the Quran with regards to da

22:33

is there any better speech the one who calls to Allah does good deeds and says I am from the Muslim that’s all well and

22:39

good now let’s open the other eye and read the following aah the good deed and the bad deed are

22:46

not equal yeah Allah I’ve gone to give da with cupcakes what does the good deed and the bad deed have to do with this

22:53

topic Allah continues yeah Allah I went to give good

22:59

da I want to give beneficial da what am I pushing back against what is it that

23:04

I’m pushing that requires me to push back with that which is best why is it when I went to give da I’m suddenly

23:11

pushing back Allah tells

23:17

you for the one who is your enemy today tomorrow might become your warmest Ally

23:23

Allah are you saying that da is given also to enemies are you saying that da

23:29

is also given to those who are against us Allah are you saying that da is a

23:35

process of struggle and I was asked by a shik in New Jersy when we were sitting

23:40

in the car together we have to give proper pronunciation to these names please he said to me in the car what is

23:46

the hardest part Sami of these tours I told him the hardest part is to convince

23:52

my umah that the right path requires struggle and a price to pay

23:59

and the hardest part is convincing them that that price is worth paying the

24:04

hardest part is convincing them that the storm that is coming in the next 2 to

24:09

four years is worth weathering for the sake of punishing the one who committed

24:15

a genocide of 100,000 Palestinians the hardest part is telling my umah that

24:23

their umah was slaughtered 100,000 were killed the hardest part is telling them

24:29

that they won’t be ethnically cleansed in America regardless of who comes into power they won’t be genocided regardless

24:36

of who comes to power they won’t be slaughtered regardless of who comes to power nothing that happened to the

24:43

Palestinians will happen to them after November the hardest part is convincing

24:48

them to punish the genocide and weather a storm in which they will not pay a

24:55

price like the Palestinians PID he said to me he

25:01

said he said to me you can tell he’s from the place with the two pyramids he said to me Samy you

25:09

know on this concept of struggle I think and he’s a he’s a very good Community Builder he builds bottom up he said to

25:16

me you know Samy one thing I noticed about our community is we

25:21

teach that the Pinnacle of success is the one who studied worked

25:28

hard bought a big house bought a nice car and we point to the Comfort that he

25:34

established in the duny and say be like him this is the blessed man of Allah

25:40

this is what success in the duny looks like he said the community will read

25:47

about the state of the Prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam and they will read

25:52

that used to say that for three months three moons a fire would not be lit in

25:58

our house this community will say mashallah on the prophet and how

26:03

successful he was but my measurement of success today is that my brother here

26:09

has a three-bedroom house while I’m stuck in reting renting a studio he is better than me through material

26:15

possession even though when you read the S the prophet is better in the absence of material possession do you see what I

26:21

mean by you read the S but do the opposite conclusion of what the S encourages you in determining what is

26:28

success he said to me the reason why this is problematic here Sami is that when we teach the community that the

26:33

Pinnacle of success is comfort and that the the hikma is how to preserve the

26:39

comfort you realize Sami Islam becomes problematic for the Muslim

26:46

Community that can get you cancelled no one will host you if you ever said this

26:52

popularly the Egyptians I hate when they do this ah I said it what they do do is when they

26:59

interrupt you they don’t say shush they don’t say be quiet you’ll talk they say

27:04

and and you’re forc but what I’m saying let me finish

27:11

man he tells me Sami Islam is problematic for the community with regards to the aspect of

27:18

comfort because think about it I told them you know there’s no way you can rescue this there’s no context that can

27:24

rescue this he said wait for me the first four years of the life of the Prophet Muhammad s alai wasallam what

27:32

was his relationship like with qur what was it what was his Nick his nicknames

27:40

s beloved Noble son from a noble family I have a caravan going to Syria I can

27:46

only trust you to take it noble man from a noble family I have all this gold I

27:51

can trust only you to look after it Noble son from a noble family we are two tribes fighting we can only trust you to

27:59

resolve our issues he said all right when do his problems begin when

28:05

does his struggle begin now I can see slightly where he’s going in this but I want to see how far

28:10

he goes it begins when he gets the Revelation he says Sami does his

28:18

personality change at the age of 40 it doesn’t they know he’s still they know

28:24

he’s still so that’s not what changes what changes he gets the Revelation stands up and says end the genocide stop

28:32

the ethnic cleansing stop giving them the bombs give them Justice give them

28:39

rights muh stop burying your daughters alive treat your women well Society gets so

28:46

angry at the call for justice they begin to repress him they begin to oppress him

28:52

they begin to beat him his companions the struggle begins and the comfort of

28:57

the the first 40 years vanishes then he says to me

29:02

Sami when do his struggles

29:08

end they don’t end until his dying

29:13

breath do you see what I mean now Sami Islam tells you the Pinnacle of success

29:19

is to persevere through struggle to stand for what’s right and persevere in the struggle that is required but we

29:26

teach our children that Str struggle means there’s something wrong Islam tells you struggle is the prophetic way

29:33

we teach them struggle is the wrong way Islam teaches us struggle is the way of

29:38

s Al wasallam we say that the way of struggle means you’re doing something wrong you need to change your way

29:45

because hikma is Comfort it’s not struggle for what’s right and what’s just the reason why I mention this

29:53

is Netanyahu inaz has a problem but one

29:58

of the reasons Biden continues to support him is because Biden is now weighing up what could possibly happen

30:05

to me in November and he’s calculating Biden says to himself I have

30:12

two groups of people who are angry with me now I want to read you this from sah

30:18

non Muslim the book of X formerly Twitter chapter of Correspondence book

30:23

of Washington Post and John Hudson called

30:31

I’m just every grammatically what I’m saying everything is sound like there’s nothing wrong with it at all new analysis captures the opposing

30:39

messages Biden is receiving on Gaza from pro-israel doners who want the total

30:45

backing of Netanyahu and 133% of 2020 Biden voters who may not vote for him

30:52

due to his handling of Gaz the of this Hadith is come on guys I’m being serious

31:01

here the t is new analysis captures that

31:06

the condition that Zionist donors are imposing in exchange for their money which is the support for Israel that

31:13

condition is what might lose Biden the election in November you think that Israel is

31:21

winning in Gaza Netanyahu is about to fall and Biden is potentially about to

31:27

fall because Gazza is the graveyard of Injustice Gaza is the graveyard of

31:33

Oppression Gaza is the graveyard of what’s wrong Gaza is the moral consciousness of the world Gaza proves

31:40

that this tiny strip of land shook the whole world and it’s about to demonstrate that Justice is more

31:46

powerful than f-15s more powerful than missiles more powerful than anything

31:51

because 100,000 Palestinians die but it’s Israel that’s losing 100,000

31:57

Palestinian died it’s Israel that’s scared 100,000 Palestinians are dying

32:02

it’s Biden who is terrified scares the

32:10

oppressors for those of you watching allahar in this context means God is great and that he delivers Justice I’m

32:15

aware that allahar in the media has presented as something very different and I remember once I was on a Tunis airf flight I was flying Tunis to London

32:22

there was a Palestinian wrestler who lives in Libya who won a World Championship so we all walked in the plane mallah well done well done my guy

32:28

well done a lady walked in saw him and said masallah oh my God I can’t believe it’s you listen what you did Allah I

32:35

would say Allah but the plane won’t take off if I say so I had to make that

32:43

clarification the calculations of those who supported genocide and I promise I won’t go on too long about this I

32:49

promise I’m wrapping up soon I shouldn’t have said I promise

32:56

Anyway by believes that between these two the zionists and those who want to punish

33:02

him one group are principled people and one group are a people of

33:08

w zionists people of principle you betray Israel we will punish you the

33:17

other side you commit a genocide we might forgive you so Biden is saying I can’t offend

33:25

the people of principle I can offend the people of w because the people of w say

33:30

the hikma is to forgive genocide not to punish it the hikma is to swallow genocide because power belongs to

33:37

America not to Allah the hikma is to forgive genocide because we might struggle and suffer how will you

33:44

struggle and sa will they take your homes no will they commit genocide against you no will they kill you no how

33:50

will you struggle they’ll make me uncomfortable when I watch them on TV they might affect my job opport

33:57

unities I worked hard here s me for my house I worked hard for my money you’re

34:03

telling me to compromise it because of 100 they’re in Jenna anyway why should I punish this

34:09

genocide Biden believes that in November it is more likely that Muslims will

34:15

forgive genocide than zionists will forgive the Betrayal of Israel and for

34:20

those of you who think Samy you’re exaggerating this in sah nonm Muslim in the chapter of press

34:25

conferences Biden was asked 3 four months ago Mr

34:30

President aren’t you worried like that those who are angry at Gaza will like

34:37

punish you he said no they said why and it’s almost as if he quoted Hadith you’ll see

34:43

what I mean he said the other side wants to put the Muslim ban so I know they will vote for me what

34:50

Biden meant was yeah you stupid journalist don’t you

34:56

understand these Muslims for them the idea that Auntie Hala can’t get through the border is more terrifying than the

35:03

slaughter of 100,000 Palestinians the idea have you seen the plane prices to

35:08

fly to see Auntie Hala you want me to pay that to see aunti Hala and punish genocide in the

35:17

process I work hard I want Auntie Hala to visit me so I will forgive

35:24

genocide here in Michigan you did something called the uncommitted vot Don’t Clap

35:29

yet it was a phenomenal event in non Muslim in the

35:35

book of news in the chapter of Reuters Biden’s campaign manager said on the night of the uncommitted

35:42

vote that the damage to our support is far greater than anything we

35:48

imagine a group of Muslims the next day they wrote an article they heard what the campaign manager said they wrote an

35:54

article and said yeah campaign manager wait wait wait uncommitted doesn’t mean we’re abandoning you it just means we

36:00

want to sit with you we want to talk to you man we want to show you pictures I

36:05

know you’ve seen them but we want to show you them Biden the next week went on CNN the CNN presenter because he

36:12

doesn’t know the Hadith about wh he thinks that the hearts are stronger of Muslims he doesn’t know about the Wen

36:18

yet the CNN presenter says Mr President uncommitted 100,000 you only have

36:24

154,000 majority in Michigan 100,000 could mean 200,000 300,000 in November

36:29

you might lose Michigan are you not worried they will punish you for he said to Biden said to the presenter no

36:37

they’re not telling me that they’re going to abandon me they’re saying Hey Joe you just got to do something

36:43

man they’re not saying they’re abandoning me they’re putting their faith in me that I know what I’m doing

36:49

when I Slaughter Sidra when I bury hind when I Massacre the children in the

36:57

hospital building when I blow up the heads of the children the Muslims know I have a hikma

37:04

in what I’m doing when i’m supporting the Israelis and they know the other side doesn’t have my

37:19

hikma he says I know these

37:24

Muslims they can watch a massacre of 100,000 th000 and still say forgive

37:33

him they can watch her legs blown off and say forgive

37:40

him they can watch the slaughter the heads blown up and say forgive him because we’re too comfortable in our

37:48

homes yes

37:55

Samy he says I know Biden says I know them better than you yesy zionists won’t forgive me Muslims

38:04

will zist won’t forgive me Michigan will he

38:17

says some of you might be saying and I’m aware I’m pushing the

38:23

time and I promise this is the final stretch I promise I promise to behave I promise they gave me half an hour

38:35

only there’s a reason shook the world shook the world because when the

38:41

Palestinians called out and said they’re killing us please raise our voices they

38:47

said said raise our voices said raise our voices Pia said I beg you raise our

38:54

voices the Palestinian said I beg you say something oh do something say something move

39:02

move we all saw the videos and we said these wretched Muslim rulers who do nothing the share come on society see

39:10

the H see the truth and American society heard the H and they heard the

39:15

truth I’ve seen things over the past eight months that the um has achieved that I thought it could never

39:24

achieve for me the is as much a political book as it is a spiritual book

39:30

and I will say the separation of politics and spirituality is a very Western concept Islam never had it we

39:36

imported it and we became theic in the process but in any case some of you would be saying Samy

39:43

what more can we do please forgive

39:50

me some of you would be saying Samy you’ve spent the last8 N months telling us our voice our voice our voice I’m

39:56

tired of hearing the same thing over and over and over again to those people of w

40:02

I say to them it is your voice that changed the

40:07

world in the SE of the Prophet Muhammad sallallah alaihi wasallam and I know there is somebody in

40:13

America I gave a talk in America and one of the brothers stood up and said Sami you keep telling us to read I don’t read

40:19

Kazi so I told him okay I’ll do movie references he said give me movie references so I’ll do movie references

40:25

just for the JAMA the if you want to read go read if you don’t want to read I’ll give you the movie references there

40:30

is a wonderful movie called The Message by must it is about the life of the Prophet

40:36

Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam and it is based on the seed of the Prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam there is a scene in it where Abu Talib

40:42

is lying on his deathbed and Abu Talib says to the leaders of quray all Muhammad wants from you is one

40:49

word the leaders of the quray they say if all Muhammad wanted was a word we

40:54

would have given him a 100 words the problem is the word that he wants this man has no Army this man has no wealth

41:01

this man has no media but as a result of his word Kamala Harris defends Zionism

41:06

while her daughter raises money for festine as a result of his word Tua Carlson says we need to cut funding for

41:13

the Israelis as a result of his word Candice Owens Rebels against the daily wire and threatens the Israelis and says

41:19

to P Morgan you’re a coward because you don’t call out the Israelis as a result of his word Matt Walsh comes out and

41:26

says the definition of anti-semitism is nonsense it makes the New Testament illegal as a result of his word Trump

41:33

supporters in his rally they chant genocide Joe genocide Joe genocide Joe

41:38

and Trump turns around and says then I wrong then I wrong as a result of the word of the Prophet Muhammad s. wasam

41:47

Biden is falling in the poles not because of economy not because of what he’s doing domestically he’s falling in

41:54

the PO because people are unhappy that he he’s supporting genocide in Gaza the

41:59

reiter’s article I know I’m Muslim so my view is mut in your eyes so let me bring

42:06

you sah non-muslim in the book of media chapter of Reuters it says and

42:12

Republican word Democrat pollster they said that the shocking

42:17

thing about the polls is Biden is falling oh in the polls over an issue

42:23

where American troops are not dying it’s not an issue where Americans have a vested interest meaning he’s falling in

42:31

the polls because Americans hear your DA they see your videos they saw your

42:37

content and all of the millions that Israel spent to win their hearts you

42:42

broke it for free that PR strategy of millions the umah broke it for free and

42:48

this is why you see Tik Tok may Allah protect and preserve it you see all these white faces Samantha Jeff and the

42:56

like all of them supporting festine because when they heard the da their hearts flipped Abu sufyan said if all

43:03

Muhammad wanted was a word we would have given him a 100 words the problem is the word that he once threatens to topple

43:11

every genociding leader who supported the genocide in Gaz that’s the word of

43:17

the Prophet Muhammad s alaihi wasallam some of you will say Samy you

43:23

come as a motivational speaker I think that’s the greatest insult I’ve heard I’m not a motivational speaker I’m a geopolitical r analyst I assess Dynamics

43:30

and I explain how they affect things when you read the S like a many of you will

43:38

pity but when you open the other eye you will see the parallel with

43:44

today is brought before the leaders of qur they say to him why have you abandoned the ways of our forefathers do

43:51

you not see our missiles do you not see our military might do you not see how many Palestinians we killed do you not

43:58

see our material superiority what does the the Muhammad Sall alaihi wasallam

44:05

what does he have that you believe is greater than our material superiority

44:10

Amar says he says we have Humanity every man is born equal om says equal is the

44:18

is b equal to me is he equal to the Israeli is bil equal to mear says yes um

44:26

says come bil whip him and show him the power of our superiority bil stands with

44:33

the whip Amar tells him bil hit me Trump is scary Bel hit me the system is

44:40

frightening bil hit me they will make you pay bil hit me you will suffer if

44:47

you don’t bil bow your head you will suffer if you don’t bil they will do

44:52

horrible things to you in the next four years yeah bil hit me me and forgive the

44:58

genocide yeah bil bil throws the whip on the floor um says

45:03

Rebellion when they drag bil it’s not that Oma is strong Oma is hitting bil

45:10

but he’s not the one who is strong Oma hits bil harder and harder not because

45:16

bil is weak but because Oma is terrified if American see that Bel doesn’t care

45:23

about the invincibility of the Zionist if he doesn’t care about APAC Lobby if

45:28

he doesn’t care about what the Israelis are doing if he’s not scared of their power if he stands for what’s right if

45:35

he’s prepared to sacrifice for what’s right if he’s prepared to struggle for what’s right Americans will see it their

45:42

opinions will change the system will change Zionism will lose its influence

45:47

it will lose its power a new generation will arise it will revolutionize Society

45:53

completely Bel stop talking Bel stop resist thing Bel stop saying the message

45:59

belan stop saying the word belan stop sharing Tik Tok belan stop sharing on

46:05

social media Bel stop raising the voice of Palestinians I’m losing control

46:10

[Music] yeah was the powerful one in the story

46:16

not the not and the leaders of the qur when you read the S with the other

46:22

eye open when the Prophet Muhammad Sall

46:27

alaihi wasallam receives the command go and give da in public raise your voices

46:33

for festine raise your voices for Sudan raise your voices for what’s right go out and proclaim the message in public

46:40

the movie is epic I’ll be honest they lock arms there is no God but God and Muhammad is the messenger of God and

46:46

they go towards downtown the city center they go to the ca they go there is no

46:52

God but God and Muhammad is the messenger the City come out what’s going on what’s going on what’s this group

46:57

what are these flags what are they saying what are their slogans what’s going on the Z the qur they turn up they

47:03

take out the stones and and and they start harassing they say shush stop talking stop talking and they start

47:08

beating them up they start beating up the sahaba then in the midst of it somebody cries Hamza Hamza the movie is

47:16

epic Anthony Quinn Hamza comes in and the Hamza

47:25

says I don’t know anything about Palestine and Israel but I don’t understand what the

47:32

Palestinians could have possibly done to deserve the use of all this Force against them we’re spending 8 billion

47:40

here Iman to go and kill these images of innocent men women and children I don’t

47:47

know anything about Palestine and Israel but even I can tell there’s something weird here Abu jahel says the

47:53

Palestinians are animals the animals Hamza says well come pick on someone your own size strike me if you

48:02

dareu J says Hamza stands he’s horrified by what

48:08

he’s seen on Tik Tok Hamza stands up and says I am of the religion of Muhammad

48:14

Hamza later says when I said it I didn’t mean it I was just so horrified at what I’d seen like the American in La she did

48:21

a video in the early days of the of the genocide she said I grew up in a Zionist environment I never heard Palestinian

48:28

voices but as a result of Tik Tok because billion shared it Tik Tok put it on my feed and when I saw I can’t unsee

48:35

what I’ve seen all of my content now is pro Palestine I check her content this morning every day she does something Pro

48:42

Palestine Hamza becomes Muslim and H says I don’t believe it the drunkard who spends this time hunting in the desert

48:49

is now Muslim is now entering the religion Candace Owens is pro Palestine

48:55

all these people are changing their minds what’s going on yes yes these are all personal things this is

49:02

motivational I give you more political CU you only see things like AEL let’s open the just try and open the other eye

49:09

just I didn’t intend that rhyme but open it the prophet Muhammad sallallahu

49:15

alaihi wasallam says to the Muslims go to ABIA for there there is a land of

49:21

rule of law you will not be wrong there you have freedom of speech you will be able to convey your message without

49:28

persecution go to m go to

49:34

ab ab Nashi is the NATO Ally of qur is

49:40

the Diplomatic Ally of qures and the economic partner of

49:46

qur says these are rebels in our city can you send them back Nashi says we

49:53

have an extradition agreement of course I’ll send them back jaur says at least watch the Tik Tok video first at least

49:59

see what’s happening in festine at least let me tell you what’s going on guys I’m not joking I’m striking the parallel

50:06

between the Mercy to Mankind and to prove the S didn’t end in 632 ad it

50:12

applies today jaur says let me show you what’s happening in

50:17

phe Nashi says show me Jaffer says in the movie we worshiped gods of wood and

50:25

stone it’s in English but there’s American titles we worshiped gods of wood and stone elements of our own

50:30

manufacture the rich neglect the poor and the act by which the brother lifts his fellow brother up is described by

50:36

them as upsetting social order to this a man has come and why should we be

50:43

surprised that God sends a prophet did he not send Moses and Jesus who taught you those names who taught you those names why they are mentioned in the

50:50

Quran you can tell I watched the movie many times Nashi at the end of this Con

50:56

conversation of words no Army to threaten him no economy to bribe him no

51:03

mainstream media to convince him as a result of the

51:09

words as a result of the words looks at his NATO Ally and

51:15

announces that we need a ceasefire now not for a mountain of gold will I hand them over to you Belgium announces that

51:21

we need sanctions on Israel the EU announces we’re restoring funding to HRA Spain says we’re recognizing a

51:28

Palestinian State Ireland says we’re recognizing a Palestinian State Norway says we’re recognizing a Palestinian

51:34

State Canada says we’re restoring funding to HRA Australia says I’m not joining your alliance in the Red Sea

51:40

because of the word of Islam the word of Justice the word of what’s right there

51:46

was no Army to threaten France into calling into a ceasefire there was no economy to bribe Norway into recognizing

51:53

a Palestinian State what made them do it here it was the voice the da the Justice the

52:01

message that resonates with every F how can you see this period as weakness when

52:07

Allah gave 13 years to Mecca only 10 to Medina what was special about Mecca that

52:14

it needed 13 years it wasn’t 13 years of weakness it was 13 years of power

52:20

because when went back to Congress the Congress people said how can our Ally in

52:26

the EU supported ceasefire and the Zionist panicked and they said shut down

52:32

Tick Tock so that the people don’t hear the message of the Prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam because our

52:39

material superiority is inferior to the word of Justice truth and the prophet

52:46

Muhammad s. wasallam I have two more examples before

52:52

I finish and I won’t bore you and forgive me for taking long I’m not as eloquent as I’d like and I can’t cram it

52:57

in half an hour I know I’m going on borrowed time here but tolerate me you may not see me again after

53:06

this the prophet Muhammad S.I wasallam he knew that Islam could make

53:13

an enemy into an ally when you read the Quran we all or the S we all know the

53:19

story of defeating the Muslims and then becoming soul of Allah we love to tell

53:25

the story of he becomes Muslim takes Islam to Egypt we love to tell the story

53:31

that used to beat up the Muslims and then became Theif who led the Muslims in a golden

53:38

age we love it right when you read it like a you will ponder and react negatively

53:44

to this question when you read the SE of the Prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam he makes a Dua Allah bless

53:51

Islam with one of the two Omar who are the two Omar Omar

53:59

is he making Dua for neutrals in this Dua are there any

54:05

neutrals in who he’s called upon can you say that he’s called upon

54:11

just a minor enemy he’s called upon who people actively trying to crush him a

54:18

friend of mine sat with me in the car we were talking about this point and he said to me you know Sami I’m trying to think what’s the equivalent of today

54:24

would someone say Allah reinforce Islam Donald Trump and I laughed the way you laughed and he looked at me dead in the

54:30

face no smile no grin no smirk he said Sammy why are you laughing I told him it’s funny what do

54:37

you mean Allah reinforce Islam with Donald Trump are you mad have you lost your mind he said is that what you would

54:43

have said to the prophet Muhammad s Al wasallam when he said Allah reinforce Islam with Abu jahel and I

54:51

went he said Sammy did the S end in 632 ad in the back of your mind

54:56

and you believe it to be some fairy tales and fables that when I give you an example of how it might apply today Sami

55:02

did you not consider he said that if KH defeated the Muslims and became Muslim is there someone now on the other side

55:09

that with who’s now Pro genocide but with concerted daa the same way American public opinion is Shifting that person

55:15

can become Muslim and become our sword have you not considered it Sami or are you the the theel that you accuse other

55:21

people of Sami did you not consider there’s on the other side eloquently

55:27

defending genocide but with concerted dawa they are the ones who liberate our

55:32

equivalent of Egypt from the superpower of the Romans at the time Samy he said and I said don’t do it I know where

55:38

you’re going Samy he said please I get the point Samy Samy have you not

55:43

considered there’s a on the other side the way Omar used to

55:48

walk the streets and say whoever preaches the message of Muhammad I will beat the Daylights out of him he sees

55:54

his sister reading Quran he beats his sister for reading Quran Sami is there not somebody right now swearing to crush

56:01

the Palestinians that with a bit of DA they might not only become Muslim but lead us to the liberation of

56:08

ala I said just say I’m aaic bro you come to the end of it do you see how the C looks different

56:15

when you open the other eye but the final example and I leave you with this one because I can see the

56:22

time some of you will be thinking Samy came here to make us feel better about our pitiful State and the pitiful state

56:29

of the um but I want you to consider that when

56:34

became Muslim the Muslims celebrated right but the next day they were beaten up would you have said to the beaten up

56:40

Muslims oh you were celebrating yesterday become Muslim look at your sorry state today is that what you would

56:46

have said to them while the prophet is celebrating that American public opinion

56:52

is Shifting would you have been the ones to say what are you celebrating so what if Omar became Muslim is that what you

56:58

would have do you see how it’s cringeworthy now when you open the other eye and you realize the misguided

57:04

understanding of the S but I finish on this example and there are many I I love the S people say read the S as a

57:10

spiritual book or you read Quran during Ramadan for me it’s a political manual it’s what I go back to for political

57:16

analysis it’s what I go back to to understand the Dynamics that change the world for the next 1,400 years that’s

57:23

what I go back to Martin Lings has a good version at the end of the 13 years a

57:31

wise crack stood up once in front of a torque and said Sami the prophet left Mecca I told him yeah deel finished the

57:38

story why did he leave Mecca he said don’t call me deel I said finish why did

57:43

he leave mecah he said to me he left cuz he was oppressed no he

57:49

didn’t Abbas proves that he didn’t Abbas says we are ready to keep struggling with him in Mecca he didn’t leave

57:56

because of that he left because after 13 years public opinion shifted so much it

58:03

shifted so much because of the consistent da because of the consistent

58:08

calling for justice that two tribes called Al they go to the prophet Muhammad

58:15

sallallah alaihi wasallam out of nowhere and they say to him we saw what is happening and we

58:23

can’t handle it we love your

58:31

message we heard somebody call to the Iman that listen to this call and come to the call so we believe in it so they

58:38

said to him for your word that lacks an army to impose it that lacks wealth to

58:46

buy it that lacks a media to promote it that is materially inferior to the to

58:53

the qur for this message of yours we are ready to give you a city and ready to

59:00

give you an army and ready to give you wealth and what you need abas the uncle

59:05

of the Prophet is so surprised the way you would be surprised he stands up and

59:10

says wait don’t give the pledge yet don’t he says them don’t wait stop do you know what’s in this pledge

59:18

this pledge will open a path of struggle that I fear you are not capable of you

59:25

will be at odds with the system with the Zionist with the US with all you will be at odds with all of

59:32

Arabia if you are not ready for it no Muhammad doeses not need you for we have

59:37

supported him 13 years we are ready to continue supporting him the prophet didn’t leave because of the oppression

59:44

abas says we are ready to continue backing him here in Mecca they tell

59:56

yeah abas we know that once we embark on this path of justice and raise our

1:00:01

voices for festine we know a storm is coming we know we’re going to struggle

1:00:06

for the next four years we know it’s going to be tough and it’s going to be difficult we know there may be

1:00:14

isolation we know there may be difficulty we know that we might suffer

1:00:20

continuously in the process but ftin is worth it AB

1:00:27

is worth it yeah ABB muhamad is worth it yeah

1:00:32

ABB Islam is worth it yeah Abbas Sidra is worth it yeah

1:00:39

Abbas hind is worth it yeah Abbas re is worth it yeah

1:00:45

Abbas the Palestinians are worth it yeah Abbas they are worth it w they are worth

1:00:53

it w they are worth it yeah we are ready to give

1:00:59

our and the message of justice and all the suffering that comes with it my father called me 10 days

1:01:07

ago me and my father we have a general Lieutenant relationship my father doesn’t praise often my mother

1:01:19

does my father doesn’t do that stuff when I first got my break on mainstream media my video went viral and the media

1:01:25

were quoting Sami Hamdi Middle East expert says I was very proud I wanted my parents to be proud of me right as anybody would right I went home after

1:01:33

the interview mother

1:01:38

comes and may he use you for the and I’m proud of you and may in you always be a

1:01:43

voice for justice thank you Ma thank you Ma you kiss her on the hands and everything whatnot but I’m waiting for

1:01:50

Baba wait for thean

1:01:55

ahbar allahar [Music]

1:02:10

[Music]

1:02:28

[Music] so you still have three minutes

1:02:38

[Music]

1:02:54

[Music]

1:02:59

how [Music]

1:03:18

[Music]

1:03:26

[Music]

1:03:40

[Music]

1:03:53

ill

1:04:06

in these last three minutes when I walked into my father my father didn’t say anything he just looked down on his

1:04:11

Twitter he has like 400,000 followers on Twitter he likes to go through the comments I don’t know why and Chelsea

1:04:17

were playing on the football team on the TV Saker I told him B he said he didn’t

1:04:22

say anything I said to him um who who’s playing he said this a stupid game Chelsea against

1:04:28

somebody after 5 10 minutes I got frustrated so I went on uh TV today he goes now

1:04:37

that you mention TV I was watching your interview why do you talk like somebody’s chasing after you why can’t you speak calmly you know

1:04:44

calm like my mother shouted from the other room he talks like you hey he talks like

1:04:51

you my father called me 10 days ago so I saw Baba on the phone when mama calls me

1:04:56

I answer easy Baba calls Alum Baba Sammy how are you alhamdulillah how

1:05:03

is America alhamdulillah Samy I was watching one of your talks in America I heard you tell the story about

1:05:10

abas and the pledge of but Sam you didn’t finish the story I said Baba what do you mean I didn’t finish the story

1:05:16

you didn’t finish the story Baba I got to the point they said to abas we’re ready to struggle yes but the Crux of

1:05:22

the the Crux of the whole story is in the next part Baba what’s the next Samy think about it what did they

1:05:30

askam after they told abas were ready to give the pledge I said Baba what did they ask Samy think back to the story

1:05:37

they asked sallam a question I said Baba I’m Wrecking my brains what did they ask

1:05:42

him what am I missing Samy listen to me w w means he’s in a good mood listen to me w means my son Samy they

1:05:50

askam what is our reward and I went oh you know the way that you ask me Samy

1:05:57

what will happen to us if we punish genocide they are saying what will happen to us if we support you what’s

1:06:03

our reward Sami this is the Crux of the issue what did Alam reply Sami I told

1:06:10

him Baba I they replied he goes and he interrupted me he goes yes Samy

1:06:16

understand the significance yes Samy if s Al wasallam had said to them yes that your reward is

1:06:23

Theif will always be from would anyone have blamed him no one because they gave

1:06:29

him support if he had said to them Sami the pearls of Persia and Rome will be

1:06:34

yours and yours alone would anyone have blamed him yes Sami I said no Baba they

1:06:39

wouldn’t they gave him the support Sami what didam say to an this is the Crux of the

1:06:47

point about standing for what’s right and just and embracing the struggle what

1:06:53

did he promise them yesi tell me my son I said to me

1:06:58

Ababa all he promised them was and they said Allah that’s enough

1:07:05

for us the struggle is worth it not because of the promise Sami paints for

1:07:11

you in the next four years the struggle genocide is worth punishing for Jenna

1:07:16

it’s worth punishing for what’s right it’s worth punishing for justice it’s worth punishing in the name of Allah

1:07:23

it’s worth punishing in the name of what’s right it’s worth punishing in the name of Justice Allah and Jenna are

1:07:29

worth more than anything in this D and that’s why Allah after trying to

1:07:35

convince you of the scenarios and convince you that it’s worth punishing genocide if none of the D things

1:07:42

convince you then imagine we have a chance to punish

1:07:48

genocide let it be that when we meet our beloved in Jenna S.I wasam when we meet

1:07:54

him in F when we meet him in that Gathering don’t you all wish for it when we meet him in

1:07:59

that gathering with his blessed face and he asks us which generation we’re from do you want to be the ones to tell him

1:08:06

Yol we had the chance to punish genocide but we were worried about Muslim ban

1:08:11

will you be the ones who tell him Yol Allah we could have punished genocide but we built good homes and comfort in

1:08:17

the dun you should have seen it at didn’t extension it was phenomenal or will you tell him y Allah I was so

1:08:23

desperate to see you so desperate for J so desperate to do what’s right I was ready to give

1:08:29

the to sit with you my beloved Prophet Muhammad s wasam and he will say B you

1:08:36

have been blessed come it is time to go where are we going why Allah is about to

1:08:42

reveal his Veil free free Palestine from The River

1:08:52

To The Sea Palestine will be free Salam