Nazio Batuen Erakundea (NBE) eta Nazioarteko Arlo Penaleko Epaitegia (NAPE) (48)

Mundu multipolarra versus unipolarra

NBE (Nazio Batuen Erakundea) gaindituta, ICC (NAPE) (International Criminal Court) alboratuta, eta Mossad nagusi… aspalditik gainera…

******

China News@ChinaENX

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031189699579023606

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031099520314945996

oooooo

Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinklle

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031278891575525615

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031096791739855119

oooooo

Al Mayadeen English@MayadeenEnglish

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031148530929213489

oooooo

Rick Sanchez@RickSanchezTV

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031050123099185505

Aipamena

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031041475299913742

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031121599101853805

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031111523511251314

oooooo

matrixbot@thematrixb0t

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2030961849810739510

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031000469577809972

oooooo

Douglas Macgregor@DougAMacgregor

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031266750927437936 m

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031179480388288945

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031014638062555143

(56: 35 m)

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2030923136846180654

oooooo

Simon Ateba@simonateba

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031039362431857003

oooooo

Aleksey Berezutski @aleksbrz11

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2030947144438354225

oooooo

Brainless Partisans @BPartisans

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031244231348535527

oooooo

?￰ﾝﾘﾰ?￰ﾝﾘﾳ?￰ﾝﾘﾯ?@OopsGuess

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2030686125816189289

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031177203073868269

oooooo

Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031011923869815080

oooooo

Rick Sanchez@RickSanchezTV

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031251716893524400

oooooo

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil@ivan_8848

oooooo

Fractured Light@FracturedLight0

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031166406721478999

oooooo

DD Geopolitics@DD_Geopolitics

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031106537440292876

oooooo

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031041067215180153

oooooo

Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinklle

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031125672475672827

oooooo

Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2031126632337973739

Aipamena

Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

Bideoa :https://x.com/i/status/2031121599101853805

Aipamena

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1qKVmQwOXNmxB

(52: 23 m)

oooooo

Alfred de Zayas@Alfreddezayas

ooo

March 10, 2026 Comment on RON UNZ ON STATE TERRORISM

RON UNZ ON STATE TERRORISM

Ten days ago a sudden surprise Israeli attack inflicted a terrible, decapitating blow upon the leadership of the Islamic Republic of Iran, successfully assassinating the country’s top military commanders, its chief nuclear weapons negotiator, and nearly all of its most prominent nuclear scientists. Many of these victims were killed in their own homes together with their family members by explosive drones or missile strikes that sometimes destroyed entire apartment buildings, causing many collateral civilian deaths.

No such sudden massive wave of public assassinations against the top leadership of a major nation had ever previously happened, and the resulting war with its salvos of retaliatory Iranian missiles against Israel has now also brought America into the conflict.

Among other things, these events conclusively demonstrated the near-total control that Israel and its political partisans have achieved over the entire Western global media. Iran was in the midst of ongoing negotiations with the Trump Administration over its nuclear program, so Israel’s sudden strike was obviously an unprovoked attack, totally violating all international laws. Similarly, the assassination of so many of Iran’s military leaders and civilian scientists also broke every existing rule of international warfare. If any other country in the world had committed even a small fraction of these crimes, it would have been universally condemned in the strongest possible terms by every international body and subjected to the harshest international sanctions, quite possibility including coordinated military action to remove its regime and bring its political leadership to trial.

But since Israel’s fervent supporters completely dominate the global media, they can easily transform black into white and up into down. Thus, the bizarre result of this illegal, unprovoked Israeli attack upon Iran was a wave of public statements strongly sympathetic to Israel made by European and American political leaders from President Donald Trump on down, thereby demonstrating that all these powerful, once independent nations had merely become subservient vassals to the Jewish State.

Last year, I noted that more than a half-century ago something similar had happened in the aftermath of the 1967 Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty:

I’ve often suggested that our media functions as a powerful tool of mind-control, not too dissimilar from what might be found in the plotlines of classic science fiction. After spending weeks or months immersed in such a controlling narrative, thinking independent thoughts let alone completely breaking free becomes a very difficult undertaking. For most individuals, the whisper in the back of their skulls overwhelms their logical reasoning, while their emotional reactions are turned on or off as if by a switch.

A perfect example of this came in the infamous U.S.S. Liberty incident of 1967. While peacefully sailing in international waters, our naval vessel was attacked by the Israelis, whose air and sea forces killed or wounded more than 200 American servicemen, and only by chance failed in their effort to sink the ship with no survivors. This constituted America’s worst naval loss of life at enemy hands since the huge sea battles of World War II, and surely if any other nation in the world had been responsible, our swift and overwhelming military retaliation would have bombed its major cities to rubble and killed many thousands of its citizens, while perhaps also hunting down and executing all the enemy leaders who had ordered that unprovoked attack.

But instead our government completely covered up that incident at the time it occurred, and the only consequence was that the annual financial tribute we paid to the Jewish State steadily increased in size. Even when the facts finally came out a dozen years later, any outrage was confined to just a small sliver of our population, while the majority who heard the story vaguely assumed that since the media told them “nothing to see here” they should move on and pay no attention. Something that under normal circumstances might have been expected to provoke a major punitive war merely produced a few uncomfortable shrugs.

Given its large size and advanced weaponry, America stood as a physical colossus on the world stage of the 1960s, with no other country able to directly challenge our might. But we were still helpless before the nation that had attacked us because the small pro-Israel Jewish minority deployed its tools of media mind-control to transform us into powerless marionettes, jerked about by invisible strings.

Another important conclusion to be drawn from these recent developments is that the Jewish State has certainly now established itself as history’s most prolific and skillful practitioner of assassinations as a technique of statecraft, having easily surpassed the notorious exploits of that small band of heretical Muslims who terrorized Middle Eastern leaders a thousand years ago and gave their name to that lethal tactic. Any introductory history books that describe the famed Order of Assassins as the foremost employers of that craft should therefore be revised.

Although political assassinations have hardly been uncommon throughout recorded history, during the last several centuries major Western nations had almost entirely abandoned such methods, rejecting them as immoral and illegal.

For example, historian David Irving revealed that when one of Adolf Hitler’s aides suggested to him that an attempt be made to assassinate the Soviet military leadership during the bitter combat on the Eastern Front of World War II, the German Fuhrer immediately forbade any such practices as obvious violations of the laws of civilized warfare.

In a long January 2020 article, I described this traditional Western attitude, and then explained that over the last couple of decades the combination of our “War on Terror” and growing Neocon influence had dramatically changed that policy.

The 1914 terrorist assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, was certainly organized by fanatical elements of Serbian Intelligence, but the Serbian government fiercely denied its own complicity, and no major European power was ever directly implicated in the plot. The aftermath of the killing soon led to the outbreak of World War I, and although many millions died in the trenches over the next few years, it would have been completely unthinkable for one of the major belligerents to consider assassinating the leadership of another.

A century earlier, the Napoleonic Wars had raged across the entire continent of Europe for most of a generation, but I don’t recall reading of any governmental assassination plots during that era, let alone in the quite gentlemanly wars of the preceding 18th century when Frederick the Great and Maria Theresa disputed ownership of the wealthy province of Silesia by military means…

During our Revolutionary War, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and our other Founding Fathers fully recognized that if their effort failed, they would all be hanged as rebels by the British. However, I have never heard that they feared falling to an assassin’s blade, nor that King George III ever considered using such an underhanded means of attack. During the first century and more of our nation’s history, nearly all our presidents and other top political leaders traced their ancestry back to the British Isles, and political assassinations were exceptionally rare, with Abraham Lincoln’s death being one of the very few that comes to mind.

At the height of the Cold War, our CIA did involve itself in various secret assassination plots against Cuba’s Communist dictator Fidel Castro and other foreign leaders considered hostile to US interests. But when these facts later came out in the 1970s, they evoked such enormous outrage from the public and the media, that three consecutive American presidents—Gerald R. Ford, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan—all issued successive Executive Orders absolutely prohibiting assassinations by the CIA or any other agent of the US government.

Although some cynics might claim that these public declarations represented mere window-dressing, a March 2018 book review in the New York Times strongly suggests otherwise. Kenneth M. Pollack spent years as a CIA analyst and National Security Council staffer, then went on to publish a number of influential books on foreign policy and military strategy over the last two decades. He had originally joined the CIA in 1988, and opens his review by declaring:

One of the very first things I was taught when I joined the CIA was that we do not conduct assassinations. It was drilled into new recruits over and over again.

Yet Pollack notes with dismay that over the last quarter-century, these once solid prohibitions have been steadily eaten away, with the process rapidly accelerating after the 9/11 attacks of 2001. The laws on our books may not have changed, but

Today, it seems that all that is left of this policy is a euphemism.

We don’t call them assassinations anymore. Now, they are “targeted killings,” most often performed by drone strike, and they have become America’s go-to weapon in the war on terror.

My article quoting Pollock primarily focused on the long history of Israeli Mossad operations, and although I drew my material from some seventeen different books, the centerpiece of my discussion was Ronen Bergman’s magisterial 2018 volume on that subject. I would strongly recommend that work as the single best starting point for gaining an understanding of Israel’s policy of assassinations and other lethal covert activity.

The book reviewed by Pollack was Rise and Kill First by New York Times reporter Ronen Bergman, a weighty study of the Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence service, together with its sister agencies. The author devoted six years of research to the project, which was based upon a thousand personal interviews and access to an enormous number of official documents previously unavailable. As suggested by the title, his primary focus was Israel’s long history of assassinations, and across his 750 pages and thousand-odd source references he recounts the details of an enormous number of such incidents.

That sort of topic is obviously fraught with controversy, but Bergman’s volume carried glowing cover-blurbs from Pulitzer Prize-winning authors on espionage matters, and the official cooperation he received is indicated by similar endorsements from both a former Mossad chief and Ehud Barak, a past Prime Minister of Israel who himself had once led assassination squads. Over the last couple of decades, former CIA officer Robert Baer has become one of our most prominent authors in this same field, and he praised the book as “hands down” the best he had ever read on intelligence, Israel, or the Middle East. The reviews across our elite media were equally laudatory…

The sheer quantity of such foreign assassinations was really quite remarkable, with the knowledgeable reviewer in the New York Times suggesting that the Israeli total over the last half-century or so seemed far greater than that of any other nation. I might even go farther: if we excluded domestic killings, I wouldn’t be surprised if Israel’s body-count greatly exceeded the combined total for that of all other major countries in the world. I think all the lurid revelations of lethal CIA or KGB Cold War assassination plots that I have seen discussed in newspaper articles might fit comfortably into just a chapter or two of Bergman’s extremely long book.

As I emphasized last week, over the past seven years I have published a long list of articles presenting the overwhelming evidence pointing to Israel and its Mossad as playing the central role in both the assassinations of the Kennedys and the 9/11 terrorist attacks against our country. All my major factual claims in those articles have been carefully analyzed by Deep Research, the most powerful AI available, and they have been judged completely accurate. Those interested in the matter should read some of those articles and the corresponding AI fact-checking reports and decide for themselves:

• How Israel Killed the Kennedys
  Ron Unz • The Unz Review • March 24, 2025 • 11,500 Words
  Fact-Checking “How Israel Killed the Kennedys”• 15,300 Words
• American Pravda: Remembering the 9/11 Truth Movement
  Ron Unz • The Unz Review • September 11, 2023 • 9,800 Words
  Fact-Checking “American Pravda: Remembering the 9/11 Truth Movement” • 21,700 Words

However, even if none of this accumulated evidence implicating Israel existed, I think that anyone carefully reading the Bergman book with an open mind would quickly come to a rather similar conclusion. Bergman’s text provides not the slightest hint of any Mossad role in those infamous attacks against our own country and its national leadership, but he does describe some strikingly parallel incidents.

For example, 9/11 skeptics have sometimes argued that it would have been extremely difficult for any plotters to have placed the necessary explosives inside the WTC towers. But in my article I summarized Bergman’s account of how Israeli Defense Minister Ariel Sharon launched a huge wave of false-flag terrorist bombings in Lebanon during the early 1980s, culminating in what he intended would be the total destruction of a crowded sports stadium.

Under Israeli direction, large car bombs began exploding in the Palestinian neighborhoods of Beirut and other Lebanese cities, killing or injuring enormous numbers of civilians. A single attack in October inflicted nearly 400 casualties, and by December, there were eighteen bombings per month, with their effectiveness greatly enhanced by the use of innovative new Israeli drone technology. Official responsibility for all the attacks was claimed by a previously unknown Lebanese organization, but the intent was to provoke the PLO into military retaliation against Israel, thereby justifying Sharon’s planned invasion of the neighboring country.

Since the PLO stubbornly refused to take the bait, plans were put into motion for the huge bombing of an entire Beirut sports stadium using tons of explosives during a January 1st political ceremony, with the death and destruction expected to be “of unprecedented proportions, even in terms of Lebanon.” But Sharon’s political enemies learned of the plot and emphasized that many foreign diplomats including the Soviet ambassador were expected to be present and probably would be killed, so after a bitter debate, Prime Minister Begin ordered the attack aborted. A future Mossad chief mentions the major headaches they then faced in removing the large quantity of explosives that they had already planted within the structure.

If the Israelis could successfully plant tons of explosives in the sports stadium of a hostile Arab country, they could certainly have done the same in the WTC towers, which were owned and controlled by Larry Silverstein, a fervently committed Zionist, whom they could have easily manipulated into enabling that operation.

Although Bergman’s book was extremely long and detailed, in reading it I quickly recognized that it was far from comprehensive, almost certainly excluding a great deal of important material probably known to the author. Indeed, at one point Bergman himself emphasized that his book was written under strict Israeli censorship, so that even if he knew the truth about certain important matters, he wouldn’t have been able to publish it.

In that regard, I noticed that virtually all of the major Mossad operations that Bergman recounted were already familiar to me from the decades I had spent closely reading the New York Times every morning. I found it quite implausible that six years of exhaustive research and so many personal interviews would have uncovered so few additional incidents that had not already become known and been widely reported in the international media. Instead, it seemed far more likely that either the author or his Israeli censors chose to avoid reporting those important Mossad actions that had not already long since come to light.

Indeed, some notable omissions in Bergman’s coverage were quite apparent to anyone who has even somewhat investigated the topic, and these began in the early chapters of his volume, which included coverage of the Zionist prehistory in Palestine prior to the establishment of the Jewish state.

Bergman would have severely damaged his credibility if he had failed to include the infamous 1940s Zionist assassinations of Britain’s Lord Moyne or U.N. Peace Negotiator Count Folke Bernadotte. But he unaccountably failed to mention that in 1937 1933 the more right-wing Zionist faction whose political heirs have dominated Israel for the last half-century assassinated Chaim Arlosoroff, the highest-ranking Zionist figure in Palestine. Moreover, he omitted a number of similar incidents, including those targeting top Western leaders. As I wrote last year:

Indeed, the inclination of the more right-wing Zionist factions toward assassination, terrorism, and other forms of essentially criminal behavior was really quite remarkable. For example, in 1943 Shamir had arranged the assassination of his factional rival, a year after the two men had escaped together from imprisonment for a bank robbery in which bystanders had been killed, and he claimed he had acted to avert the planned assassination of David Ben-Gurion, the top Zionist leader and Israel’s future founding-premier. Shamir and his faction certainly continued this sort of behavior into the 1940s, successfully assassinating Lord Moyne, the British Minister for the Middle East, and Count Folke Bernadotte, the UN Peace Negotiator, though they failed in their other attempts to kill American President Harry Truman and British Foreign Minister Ernest Bevin, and their plans to assassinate Winston Churchill apparently never moved past the discussion stage. His group also pioneered the use of terrorist car-bombs and other explosive attacks against innocent civilian targets, all long before any Arabs or Muslims had ever thought of using similar tactics; and Begin’s larger and more “moderate” Zionist faction did much the same.

The early Zionists seem to have had a record of political terrorism almost unmatched in history, and in 1974 Prime Minister Menachem Begin even boasted in a television interview that he had been the founding father of worldwide terrorism.

Alfred de Zayas@Alfreddezayas

ooo

oooooo

ooo

March 11, 2026

Geopolitics, Human Rights and Sovereignty in a World in Crisis: Perspectives from the Global South

Geneva, March 11, 2026

Within the framework of the  61st session of the United Nations Human Rights Council , the  International Association for Human Rights and Social Development (AIDHDES) , together with various civil society and academic organizations, will organize the event entitled  “Geopolitics, Human Rights and Sovereignty in a World in Crisis: Perspectives from the Global South” , which will take place on  Monday, March 16, 2026, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at the University of Geneva (Uni-Mail, room M060) .

The meeting is promoted by  AIDHDES  and has the co-sponsorship of  Maloca Internationale (an organization with consultative status before the ECOSOC of the United Nations), the Wiphalas Network, the Antifascist International, the Association of Spanish-Speaking Students of the University of Geneva, Emigrados TV , among other organizations and actors of civil society committed to the debate on the contemporary challenges of the international order.

A debate on the changing international order

The panel will bring together  geopolitical analysts, international law experts, journalists, and academics  to reflect on the profound transformations taking place in the international system and their implications for the global human rights architecture.

In a context marked by  growing geopolitical tensions, economic sanctions, energy disputes and regional conflicts , the event seeks to open a space for critical analysis on the relationship between  state sovereignty, international law and the protection of human rights , addressing how these dynamics influence contemporary global governance.

Geopolitical scenarios at the heart of the debate

The panel discussions will address some of the most relevant geopolitical scenarios of the moment, including  Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, Palestine, Russia and China , analyzing how global power dynamics impact the functioning of the international system and the application of the principles of international law.

Among the topics that will be debated are:

• the impact of  unilateral coercive measures and economic sanctions  on human rights and the right to development;
• tensions between  state sovereignty and international oversight mechanisms ;
• the role of the great powers in the reconfiguration of the international order;
• and current debates surrounding the use of human rights discourse within global geopolitical dynamics.

The role of the  United Nations and the Human Rights Council  in an international scenario characterized by increasing strategic disputes and structural transformations will also be examined.

Bideoa: https://youtu.be/617DFfX1CJg

International panel of experts

The panel will include specialists and analysts in geopolitics and international law:

• Miralys Viscalla (Venezuela) , PhD in Human Development Ecology and Master in Human Rights. Specialist in organization, monitoring and evaluation;
• Alfred de Zayas (United States) , former independent expert of the United Nations and Professor of International Law at the Geneva School of Diplomacy;
• Mayed Dibsi (Palestine) , journalist specializing in international relations at Radio Nacional de España – Radio Exterior de España
• Christian Lamesa (Argentina) , Geopolitical analysis advisor, writer and lecturer specializing in international relations for international media.

The moderation will be handled by  David López (Colombia) , an external consultant in Switzerland for human rights issues.

Perspectives from the Global South

One of the central objectives of the event is to promote an academic and diplomatic dialogue that incorporates  perspectives from the Global South  into contemporary debates on human rights and international governance.

From this perspective, the meeting aims to contribute to a broader reflection on the need to strengthen an  international order based on respect for international law, the sovereign equality of States and the right to development , at a time when the international system is undergoing profound transformations.

A space for dialogue in Geneva

The event will be held at the  University of Geneva , in parallel with the activities of the Human Rights Council, and will bring together representatives of  diplomatic missions, international organizations, civil society organizations, academics, journalists, and students .

With this initiative,  AIDHDES and the co-sponsoring organizations seek to contribute to a pluralistic space for dialogue and critical analysis on the challenges facing the international human rights system in a world marked by profound geopolitical tensions.

 

Date:  March 16, 2026
Time:  7:00 PM – 9:00 PM
Location:  University of Geneva – Uni-Mail, Room MR060
YouTube Live : If you are not in Switzerland, you can scan the QR code on the flyer above or go to the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=617DFfX1CJg

oooooo

Geure herriari, Euskal Herriari dagokionez, hona hemen gure apustu bakarra:

We Basques do need a real Basque independent State in the Western Pyrenees, just a democratic lay or secular state, with all the formal characteristics of any independent State: Central Bank, Treasury,

proper currency¹, out of the European Distopia and faraway from NATO, being a BRICS partner…

Euskal Herriaren independentzia eta Mikel Torka

eta

Esadazu arren, zer da gu euskaldunok egiten ari garena eta zer egingo dugun

gehi

MTM: Zipriztinak (2), 2025: Warren Mosler

(Pinturak: Mikel Torka)

Gehigarriak:

Zuk ez dakizu ezer Ekonomiaz

MTM klase borrokarik gabe, kontabilitate hutsa

Anthony Anastosi: Estatu dirua, Klase borroka

---