Mundu multipolarra versus unipolarra
NBE (Nazio Batuen Erakundea) gaindituta, ICC (NAPE) (International Criminal Court) alboratuta, eta Mossad nagusi… aspalditik gainera…
******
Stop saying history will judge them, judge Israel now. With ICC judges.
******
ICC (international Criminal Court) NAPE (Nazioarteko Arlo Penaleko Epaitegia)
International Criminal Court judges refuse to be bow to Trump’s sanctions as he tries to exempt Israeli and American officials from the rule of law: “We are not going to be intimidated.”
Statement by Foreign Minister @EspenBarthEide: “Norway condemns the decision made by the Israeli security cabinet to expand Israel’s control over the occupied West Bank”
Read full statement
ooo
Statement by Foreign Minister Eide on Israel’s decision to expand control in the West Bank
Date: 11/02/2026
‘Norway condemns the decision made by the Israeli security cabinet to expand Israel’s control over the occupied West Bank’, said Minister of Foreign Affairs Espen Barth Eide.
‘A unilateral Israeli decision aimed at changing the status of these areas is not valid under international law. The decision is contrary to Israel’s obligations under international law, and it undermines the possibility of a peaceful solution and a Palestinian state. The decision will make life even more unbearable for the Palestinians. We fear that Israel’s actions may lead to more unrest and violence — in Palestine, Israel, and the rest of the Middle East.
’We urge the Israeli authorities to respect previous agreements made with the Palestinians and to refrain from actions that violate international law’, said Eide.
oooooo
“Anti-Semitism is a trick, we always use it. We bring up the Holocaust and call people anti-Semitic if they criticize Israel.”
Confession of Former israeli Minister
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021547263290404871
oooooo
Israel is demolishing the West Bank
in front of the world
And there is no response
It’s never been ‘defence’
It’s always been racism
It’s always been ethnic cleansing
It’s always been a land grab
Sanctions against now.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021503933492101512
oooooo
Saul Staniforth@SaulStaniforth
Last year a UN commission of inquiry concluded Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. This was Nav Pillay announcing its findings:
“The Genocide Convention was born out of humanitys darkest chapters. Today we witness in real time how the promise of never again is broken”
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021474513125622113
oooooo
Israel is the epitome of evil. There will be no peace in the world until it’s been dismantled & Zionism has been crushed. Yet @BBCr4today gives airtime to Zionist propagandists to peddle without challenge, phoney claims about a surge in anti-Semitism, which is a dirty low-down lie
Aipamena
Sarah Wilkinson@swilkinsonbc
ots. 11
The israelis kill rescue workers live on air, while not one single western media outlet has reported or broadcast this footage, says @Fx1Jonny
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021475822209728710
oooooo
ISRAELI SOCIETY CAN’T HIDE IT’S GENOCIDE IN GAZA ANYMORE
More and more IDF whistleblowers are talking now, they are psychologically damaged and spiritually annihilated by what they have done to the native Palestinian population in Gaza. Zandland docs did a very good job getting some these on record. This is small tip of iceberg…
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021747327749267659
oooooo
Ron Paul on Israel: “Why does Israel need our help? Israel should take care of themselves. Israel has 200-300 nuclear missiles. They can take care of themselves. Why do we have this automatic commitment that we’re going to send our kids and money endlessly to Israel?”
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021685555793154183
oooooo
Acknowledge the Gaza Genocide
The UN Commission found Israel guilty of four out of five acts specified in Article 2 of the 1948 Genocide Convention against Palestinians
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021780398359859412
For too long, Britain has blindly followed the United States as it indulges in disastrous imperial fantasies around the world. It’s time to forge a different path.
My piece for @M_Star_Online.
ooo
Britain needs its own foreign policy – to rupture the principles of domination and imperialism
JEREMY CORBYN calls on Britain to break free from Washington’s shadow and champion an independent foreign policy grounded in international law, solidarity and peace

Campaigners gather for the Stop the War Coalition’s ‘No War On Venezuela’ protest outside 10 Downing Street, London, over the US attack on Venezuela and the capture and detention of its President Nicolas Maduro by US forces, January 5, 2026

13 February 2026
I AM VERY proud to be attending and speaking at this year’s Latin America Conference. It is difficult to think of a more pertinent time for us to come together to strengthen our solidarity with the peoples of Latin America.
It has been one month since the United States bombed Venezuela and kidnapped its president. The British Prime Minister has still not been able to acknowledge a fact that was obvious to us all: invading a sovereign nation and abducting its head of state is illegal.
It’s not that the former human rights lawyer didn’t understand. He understood full well — and chose to desecrate the meaning of international law to protect the vanity of Donald J Trump.
Even though Nicolas Maduro is still imprisoned in a United States jail, much of our political and media class have chosen to forgive and forget. For many of them, there was nothing to forgive to begin with.
Last week, the United States declared an “unusual and extraordinary threat,” authorising new sanctions and tightening its illegal blockade. Cuba has been enduring United States sanctions since 1962.
Today, Cuba already faces severe fuel shortages, with blackouts stretching daily and essential services collapsing under the weight of sanctions and depleted imports. Many people wake up in homes without electricity or running water. With these new, deepened sanctions, Cuba’s remaining oil stocks could run out within weeks. This is economic warfare, plain and simple — and millions of people will suffer.
This harm will not just befall the people of Cuba, but millions more across the wider region. Mexico, for example, is a key trading partner of both the United States and Cuba. If it continues its shipments to Cuba, it will be hit hard by the United States, which has warned that continued support could trigger tariffs on its economy. Venezuela, too, finds itself backed into a corner, forced to choose between the interests of its own people and the dictates of an empire.
Trump’s aim is so obvious: he is trying to starve Cuba into submission. Just as he confessed after the invasion of Venezuela, Trump has been clear: this siege is about regime change and — ultimately — for the theft of natural resources. It is a mistake to view Trump as a crazed madman acting with no rhyme or reason.
From the illegal kidnapping in Venezuela to the sanctions on Cuba, Trump’s actions are not the signs of lunatic. They are signs of determined and dangerous individual, driven by an unending desire to seize control and resources across the globe.
As Trump declared back in April last year, “I run the country and the world.”
Once we understand the imperial ideology behind Trump’s fantasies, it is easier to connect our solidarity with the peoples of Latin America with oppressed peoples around the world.
Take Trump’s so-called “Board of Peace” in Gaza. I call it a Board of Thieves, a Board of Rogues, and a Board of Occupation. I can’t think of anything more sickening than using genocide as a real estate opportunity.
First, the US sponsored crimes against humanity in Gaza. Now, the president wants to build luxury resorts on the mass graves of Palestinians. The future of Gaza is not up to Donald Trump, Benjamin Netanyahu or Tony Blair. That is up to the Palestinian people — and only the Palestinian people.
Deep beneath the rubble of Gaza is international law, buried by the US and Britain together. It is the same debris that allowed Donald Trump to bomb Venezuela with impunity. When the powerful speak of a “rules-based international order” — they mean rules for others, and impunity for themselves.
This weekend’s conference is an opportunity for us to, above all, strengthen our solidarity with the people of Latin America. It is also an opportunity to reflect on the kind of foreign policy we should be defending. Unlike Reform, Labour and the Tories, I think Britain’s foreign policy should be decided by
Britain, not the United States.
For too long, Britain has blindly followed the United States as it indulges in disastrous imperial fantasies around the world. It’s time to forge a different path. Now is not to the time to try and rescue a “special relationship” characterised by impunity, genocide and war.
Now is the time to forge an independent foreign policy based on international law and peace.
An independent foreign policy isn’t the same as an isolationist one. Far from it. It means understanding the changing nature of our multipolar world. When I was Labour leader, I wanted to develop an entirely new foreign policy that broke with principles of domination and imperialism. One that empowers nations in the global South — not the IMF and the World Bank — to decide their own economic future. One that forges a partnership of equals, based on co-operation and mutual respect.
A partnership of equals will not emerge without significant reform of the United Nations — starting with abolishing the veto of the five permanent members of the security council: the US, Britain, France, China and Russia. An expanded, rolling membership would help to build a more equal, responsive and democratic application of international law. If Britain wanted to be a leader on the world stage, it should have the moral courage to advocate for a system of equals, not one that allows a few powerful nations to hijack global peace.
An independent foreign policy is one that understands all of the challenges we face: global inequality, displacement and environmental disaster. Last month, the President of Chile, Gabriel Boric, declared a “state of catastrophe” after wildfires tore through the Nuble and Biobio regions. Eighteen people have been killed. Imagine if we spent as much time talking about climate alliances — and how to empower them — as military alliances. Imagine if the money we spent on killing people overseas was spent protecting the planet upon which we all survive.
We need an international strategy that unites people, working-class organisations and left parties all over the world by developing a policy which fundamentally redistributes wealth and power in order to redress the grotesque levels of inequality that reflect centuries of colonialism and imperialism.
This conference in London on Latin America is part of that process to forge a serious international strategy for peace and for justice. One that sees the Earth as something to care for, not carve up. One that builds a world for the many, not the few.
Jeremy Corbyn is independent MP for Islington North.
oooooo
Middle East Monitor@MiddleEastMnt
Online allegations about Israeli organ harvesting have resurfaced after a viral post claimed that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sought legal approval in the 1990s to take organs from deceased Palestinians for transplantation.
The claim, widely shared on social media, cites documented admissions concerning the removal of organs without consent at Israel’s state forensic institute. Those earlier revelations detailed how corneas, skin, heart valves and bones were taken during autopsies without authorisation — a practice Israeli official later acknowledged and said had ended.
oooooo
China rejects the U.S.’s persistent distortion of China’s nuclear policy, a politically motivated move by the U.S. to seek nuclear supremacy and shirk its nuclear disarmament responsibility.
The U.S.’s actions—letting the New START treaty expire, spending trillions of dollars to upgrade its nuclear triad, building a global anti-missile system and establishing forward deployment of strategic assets—make the U.S. the biggest source of disruption to the international nuclear order and global strategic stability.
Sitting on an enormous nuclear arsenal, the U.S. should fulfill its special and primary responsibility for nuclear disarmament.
ISIS was Israel
Going Underground@GUnderground_TV
ICYMI, Former Israeli Intelligence Officer Ari Ben-Menashe: Netanyahu will SABOTAGE a US-Iran deal by releasing the most DAMAGING Epstein files
‘If there’s a real deal between the Americans and the Iranians and it’s going towards that, Netanyahu will try to sabotage it.
One of the ways he’d sabotage it is by putting out Epstein material against US government officials, including Trump, and he’d put out new material not seen by the public. There are other officials, not just Trump.’
Bideoa:https://x.com/i/status/2021635061410673072
Aipamena
Afshin Rattansi@afshinrattansi
Pam Bondi says we should be talking about booming US stock market statistics instead of Jeffrey Epstein’s child-trafficking pedophilia network…at the Epstein Files hearings.
Apparently, the shocking revelations about Epstein, running a sex-trafficking network for Western elites, with overwhelming evidence linking him to Israel’s Mossad…is not important because ‘stocks are doing well’.
With each passing day, Americans realise that their elites are not only morally depraved, but view themselves as untouchable, no matter how barbaric and sick the crimes they commit are.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021633210678227396
oooooo
Putin Fact News@putinnewssource
Don’t Forget Who Stormed Berlin? Americans,British or French? It was Red Army . President Putin Gave A Reminder To Warmonger .
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021534245228097571
oooooo
Sweden condemns the recent Israeli decisions aimed at increasing Israeli control over the West Bank. These decisions undermine the viability of a two-state solution, are contrary to international law and will harm the ongoing peace efforts. Sweden strongly urges Israel to not implement these decisions.
Aipamena
European External Action Service – EEAS @eu_eeas
ots. 11
Joint Statement by the HR/VP @kajakallas and Commissioners Šuica and Lahbib on the Israeli Security Cabinet decision to amend the land registration and property acquisition procedures in the West Bank. Read more: http://link.europa.eu/T8ggnD
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021507573841637822
oooooo
In the U.S’ view, the only country in the middle east that has the right to have nuclear weapons & the most advanced technology to “defend themselves from existential threats” is Israel.
While in reality, the only existential threat to everyone in the middle east is Israel.
oooooo
Suppressed Voices@supressedvoic
This is not Hiroshima, this’s Gaza
Gaza is nearly 3 times smaller than Hiroshima, and Israel dropped ~200,000 tonnes of explosives, equivalent of ~14 ATOMIC BOMBS, on Gaza in 2 years.
Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/2021576761343959211
oooooo
Alfred de Zayas: Putin-i buruz
Back in 2007 it was still possible to hold a sensible MSC. Putin gave a concrete, pragmatic, peace-oriented speech. No one listened.
ooo
February 13, 2023
Remembering Vladimir Putin’s speech of 10 February 2007 at the Munich Security Conference
Sixteen years ago, on 10 February 2007, Russian President Putin delivered a landmark speech at the Munich Security Conference, a clear statement of post- Cold War Russian foreign policy, focusing on the need for multilateralism and international solidarity. The mainstream media did not give much visibility to Putin’s security analysis in 2007, and still fails to do so. Yet, it is worth our while to revisit that speech.
In 2007 I did recognize the implications of Putin’s speech and even distributed the text to my students at the Geneva School of Diplomacy. Sometimes I distribute the Putin speech together with President John F. Kennedy’s brilliant commencement address at American University[1] on 10 June 1963, an appeal to rationality that is as relevant today as it was then. If everyone would read it and implement what is in there, we would not be in the dangerous and tragic situation we are in today.
Allow me to quote Kennedy: “while defending our own vital interests, nuclear powers must avert those confrontations which bring an adversary to a choice of either a humiliating retreat or a nuclear war. To adopt that kind of course in the nuclear age would be evidence only of the bankruptcy of our policy—or of a collective death-wish for the world.”[2]
Sometimes I share with my students the article published in the New York Times by our diplomat par excellence George F. Kennan, in which he warned about breaking our word to Russia by expanding NATO eastwards, contrary to assurances given by our Secretary of State James Baker to Mikhail Gorbachev: “Why, with all the hopeful possibilities engendered by the end of the Cold War, should East-West relations become centered on the question of who would be allied with whom and, by implication, against whom in some fanciful, totally unforeseeable and most improbable future military conflict?…[B]luntly stated…expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era. Such a decision may be expected to inflame the nationalistic, anti-Western and militaristic tendencies in Russian opinion; to have an adverse effect on the development of Russian democracy; to restore the atmosphere of the cold war to East-West relations, and to impel Russian foreign policy in directions decidedly not to our liking … ”[3]
Bells should have rung when Putin gave his Munich speech in 2007, ten years after Kennan’s warning, in which Putin calmly expressed concern about: “the so-called flexible frontline American bases with up to five thousand men in each. It turns out that NATO has put its frontline forces on our borders, and we continue to strictly fulfil the treaty obligations and do not react to these actions at all. I think it is obvious that NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernisation of the Alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances our western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? No one even remembers them. But I will allow myself to remind this audience what was said. I would like to quote the speech of NATO General Secretary Mr, Manfred Woerner in Brussels on 17 May 1990. He said at the time that: “the fact that we are ready not to place a NATO army outside of German territory gives the Soviet Union a firm security guarantee”.
Unfortunately, the reception to Putin’s speech in the West was minimal. His warnings and predictions were not taken seriously. This is perhaps because we have a distorted perception of reality, a kind of solipsism, embedded in our self-centered world view. Most people in the West were and remain unaware of Putin’s speech or for that matter of the texts of the two proposals that he put on the table in December 2021, two draft treaties solidly anchored in the UN Charter concretising the necessity of agreeing on a modus vivendi and building a security architecture for Europe and the world.
The mainstream media bears considerable responsibility for failing to inform the public about Putin’s speech and about his repeated offers to negotiate in good faith as required by article 2(3) of the UN Charter. It is clear that NATO expansion and the weaponization of Ukraine constituted an existential threat to Russia, and that the malevolent demonization of Russia and Putin since the early 2000s entailed a menace, a “threat” of the use of force, which is prohibited in article 2(4) of the UN Charter.
As I understood it then and now — Putin’s speech was an outstretched hand to the West and proof of his readiness to sit down and talk about the new world order after the Cold War.
Michail Gorbachev, Boris Yeltzin and Putin again and again expressed their wish to turn the page on the US/Soviet Union confrontation and start a new page of cooperation for the benefit of all humankind.
There were some politicians and academics in the West who also shared the hope that finally the world could implement disarmament for development and that both major nuclear powers would reduce stockpiles and eventually ban nuclear weapons. Imagine if all the financing that went and still goes into the military, military bases, procurement of tanks, missiles and nuclear weapons became available for financing education, health, housing, infrastructure, research and development!
Humanity had a brief moment of transcendental hope. President Bill Clinton smashed that hope when he consciously broke the promises given by James Baker to Gorbachev that NATO would not expand eastward. This was short-sighted hubris, an expression of the conviction that we were the only super-power, could dictate to others what to do or not do. Western politicians gloated over the fact that Russia would not be able to do anything about our breach of trust. We cheated, as we so often cheat in international relations. I would even say that we have developed a “culture of cheating”[4], of taking advantage of the other guy whenever possible. It is perceived almost as cleverness, a secular virtue.
And yet, Russia was not threatening anyone in 1997 – Russia wanted to join the West under the banner of the United Nations and the UN Charter, which is akin to a world constitution, the only existing “rules-based international order” the world has. But the US did not share the worldview of multipolarity and multilateralism. And to this day the US still believes in its own “exceptionalism” and in the imperialist fantasies of Zbigniew Brzezinski [5] and Paul Wolfowitz.
Wise academics like Professors Richad Falk, Jeffrey Sachs, John Mearsheimer and Noam Chomsky have long recognized the colossal errors committed by American politicians from Clinton to George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Alas, these professors do not sing the song that the military-industrial-financial complex want them to sing, and for this reason the corporate media do not give them visibility.
In a democratic society the public has a right to know and must have access to all sources of information and analysis. Alas, the mainstream media in the US has engaged in Russia-bashing for decades, and has gone out of its way to denigrate Russian politicians, Russian culture, even Russian athletes. I still remember the ridiculous things that were written about Russian athletes during the Sochi Winter Olympics in 2014. I remember the negative caricatures in the press and the incessant defamation of the Russians as totalitarians. It is the artificial creation of such negative feelings toward other peoples and cultures that facilitates war propaganda and serves to justify sanctions and war crimes, all of this in violation of article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and in violation of the UNESCO Constitution.
The problem is not limited to the United States – it is emblematic for the entire West. Those professors or journalists who tried to remain objective and report in a balanced way were (and are) denounced as Putin puppets, useful idiots or (in Germany) “Putin Versteher” – as if it were somehow inappropriate to make an effort to understand Putin’s point of view, and not just swallow the skewed narrative that the corporate media sells. One would think that every intelligent person would want to understand the way Putin, Zelinski, Biden, Scholz, Macron, etc. actually see things.
True enough, many of our best minds did realize the danger posed by NATO expansion. Many understood that if we continued provoking the Russian Bear, sooner or later the Bear would respond. Back in August of 2008 when the Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, goaded by the US, decided to attack Southern Ossetia, after the decisive and proportionate response by Russia in that short war, I thought that we could have learned something. Alas, we learned nothing and continued the provocations and war-propaganda.
It seems that we in the West live in our own bubbles. First, we are convinced that we are “the good guys” by definition. This is an item of faith. This was drummed into my head in high school in Chicago, in college and law school in Boston. This I absorbed from the press, from Hollywood movies, from literature. The soft and hard indoctrination has been thorough, and our faculty of self-criticism remains woefully underdeveloped. Second, we in the United States are a continent separated by two oceans from Europe, Africa and Asia. We have the illusion that we are invincible. Alas, in the nuclear age there is no place on the planet that is safe.
Allow me to return to the information war and the media. Surely the propaganda that Washington and Brussels produce and disseminate by far outdoes anything that Goebbels ever did with his Nazi propaganda. And it is not just the dis-information and the skewed narratives in the New York Times, Washington Post, The Times, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, El Pais, even the Neue Zürcher Zeitung – it is the suppression of dissent, the suppression of other views and perspectives. That is precisely the reason why millions of people in the West remain so ignorant, and that is why RT and Sputnik are maligned and censored, because “Big Brother” will not allow that the public get the idea that the Ukraine conflict has a long history, that NATO is not the “good guy”. Maybe someday, when we grasp the magnitude of the war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by NATO member states in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria – maybe we will understand that NATO — originally a legitimate defensive alliance — gradually morphed into a criminal organization within the meaning of articles 9 and 10 of the Nuremberg Statute.
Notes.
[1] https://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/historic-speeches/american-university-commencement-address
[2] See also my essay https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/09/14/natos-death-wish-will-destroy-not-only-europe-but-the-rest-of-the-world-as-well/
[3] https://www.nytimes.com/1997/02/05/opinion/a-fateful-error.html
[4] https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/01/28/a-culture-of-cheating-on-the-origins-of-the-crisis-in-ukraine/
[5] The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books, 1997
Alfred de Zayas is a law professor at the Geneva School of Diplomacy and served as a UN Independent Expert on International Order 2012-18. He is the author of twelve books including “Building a Just World Order” (2021) “Countering Mainstream Narratives” 2022, and “The Human Rights Industry” (Clarity Press, 2021).
oooooo
Scott Ritter
Why We Fight (Why I Fight)
Why We Fight (Why I Fight)
A chance encounter in a Taco Bell parking lot helped revive my spirit by reminding me what my priorities are.
Feb 12, 2026
Frank Capra (right) as a filmmaker for the Department of War during World War 2
Shortly after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, on December 7, 1941, the famous Hollywood Director, Frank Capra (“Mr. Smith Goes to Hollywood”, “It’s a Wonderful Life”) enlisted in the Army, like so many others of his generation, to fulfil his patriotic duty to defend his country. Amazingly, the US military saw fit to put a round peg into a round hole, and Capra was not shipped off to the infantry, but rather put in charge of producing perhaps the most essential propaganda of the Second World War, a seven-film series entitled “Why We Fight.”
These films were deemed to be essential to the American war effort by the Chief of Staff of the US Army, General George C. Marshall, and by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who ordered the series to be released for viewing by the American public.
The films were also shown to the millions of Americans who put on the uniform of the United States military who were to be sent off to fight, and possibly die, in a foreign land. America was coming off the decade of the Great Depression, and most Americans were inwardly looking, seeking to resolve their own problems at home, and not inclined to foreign intervention. Isolationism was a prevailing sentiment, one that President Roosevelt had to constantly maneuver around as he sought to provide aid to nations like Great Britain and the Soviet Union as they fought Nazi Germany. Some 16.1 million Americans served in the military during World War Two (12% of the population.) Of these, 39% volunteered, while the remaining 61% were drafted. The “Why We Fight” film series was deemed critical in getting the minds of the majority of American soldiers who didn’t volunteer to serve to break free of their isolationist tendencies and become part of the “Greatest Generation” of Americans who went off to war to liberate Europe from the Nazi boot and punish Imperial Japan for the perfidy of Pearl Harbor.
I am of a certain age, where my childhood was marked by the kind of Capra-esque patriotism defined by the “Why We Fight” film series. Television signed off at midnight by playing the “Star Spangled Banner”, and would sign back on at 6 am playing the same. I grew up during the height of the Cold War, and lived in the era where the National Anthem was played in theaters before the start of every movie (the US Congress passed a law in 1952 mandating this in order to reinforce American values and counter the perceived threat of communism.)
And we stood up when the anthem was played.
And we placed our hands over our hearts.
President John F. Kennedy delivers his Inaugural Address, January 20, 1961
I grew up with two images staring down at me from the walls of my bedroom—one, a poster of John F. Kennedy with a quote from his Inaugural Address of January 20, 1961 (some six months prior to my birth):
“Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.”
My father was a career Air Force officer, and my mother had served as an Air Force nurse before being medically discharged.
The concept of service to the nation permeated everything we did as a family.
Later I was able to read the whole inaugural address, and it struck me that as important as those words were, the context in which they were presented was equally, if not more, important:
In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility — I welcome it.
I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it — and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.
My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.
Thus, the context of the words that I woke up to every morning wasn’t simply the concept of service itself, but rather service in the defense of freedom in its hour of maximum danger.
And the context wasn’t simply service to my nation, but service to all mankind.
“The way that we talk to our children becomes their inner voice.”
This is the mantra of child psychologists, a reality which permeates everything about childhood and who we become as adults.
I was literally conditioned from childhood to serve my country and all of humanity.
The Code of Conduct for the Armed Forces of the United States
The other poster was the Code of Conduct for Members of the US Armed Forces, with the first paragraph presented in larger bold text in order to stand out:
I am an American fighting man. I serve in the forces which guard my country and our way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense.
During my childhood, my father deployed to Turkey as part of a NATO nuclear reaction force, where F-100 Super Sabre aircraft stood strip alert duty with nuclear bombs loaded under their belly.
He spent a year in Vietnam with the 10th Air Commando Squadron (the Skoshi Tigers), proving the combat effectiveness of the F-5 fighter.
He deployed to South Korea in the aftermath of the USS Pueblo incident.
He helped oversee the “Vietnamization” of the South Vietnamese Air Force in the aftermath of the US withdrawal from South Vietnam.
He was central to the bringing on line a CH-53 helicopter which played a critical role in the evacuation of US Marines from Koh Tang Island in 1975, potentially saving dozens of lives.
He advised the Turkish Air Force during the height of the Cold War.
He served on the front lines of the Cold War in West Germany, part of a US contingent of forces deployed to defend NATO from the Soviet Union.
For twenty years, from 1964 to 1984, my entire life was wrapped up in the service my father performed to his country.
And because of the example he set for me, as soon as I graduated from High School, at the age of 17, I enlisted in the United States Army.
To serve my country.
I later transitioned to the Marines, where I was commissioned as an officer.
The rest is history—29 Palms, Votkinsk, Desert Storm, and Iraq.
These are the events and places that shaped my adult life, all built on the foundation of my childhood experiences which defined not just the notion of service to country and humanity, but the duty as a citizen to perform such service.
For me, it was never a question of choice, but a matter of duty, of obligation.
Even today, this is what drives me—the duty and obligation of service to my country and to all of humanity.
As John F. Kennedy requested of me and my fellow Americans on that fateful day in January 1961.
This is why I fight.
This is why I broke my back trying to prevent a war with Iraq premised on lies I was empowered to disprove.
This is why I spoke out against the efforts to portray Iran as a nation seeking to acquire a nuclear weapon.
This is why I have fought against the disease of Russophobia
And the Genocide of Israel.
And the scourge of nuclear weapons.
This is why I openly advocate for arms control and disarmament.
When I look back on the years I have spent jousting after the Windmills life has placed before me, summoned to the fray by a bugle I alone seemed to hear, I am struck by how futile it all has been.
I did not stop the war with Iraq.
Iran continues to be accused of pursuing a nuclear weapon, despite all evidence to the contrary.
America remains deeply infected with the disease of Russophobia.
Israel continues to commit genocide against the people of Palestine.
The Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty I helped bring into this world has been abandoned.
And, lastly, the very concept of arms control and disarmament has been betrayed by the lapsing of the last remaining arms control treaty between Russia and the United States, New START.
Theodore Roosevelt in France, April 1910
Like many, I seek solace by reading words of wisdom offered by the great men of history. Over time, I have been drawn to the words of President Theodore Roosevelt in what has become known as “The Man in the Arena”:
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.
Today I am overcome by the reality that I have spent myself in a worthy cause, failing greatly while daring greatly.
It is not a good feeling.
For a long time, I operated under the illusion that these existed in isolation, a stand-alone poem intended to inspire on its own volition.
But being possessive of a curious mind, I did the research necessary to discover that this was but an extract from a much longer presentation, a speech entitled “Citizenship In A Republic” which Roosevelt delivered at the Sorbonne, in Paris, France on 23 April, 1910—more than a year after leaving office.
Like John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address, context is everything, and Roosevelt’s speech contains much context for those willing to read it in its entirety. For example, Roosevelt’s “man in the arena” doesn’t stand alone, but rather in contrast to others Roosevelt singles out for derision and disdain”
Shame on the man of cultivated taste who permits refinement to develop into fastidiousness that unfits him for doing the rough work of a workaday world. Among the free peoples who govern themselves there is but a small field of usefulness open for the men of cloistered life who shrink from contact with their fellows. Still less room is there for those who deride of slight what is done by those who actually bear the brunt of the day; nor yet for those others who always profess that they would like to take action, if only the conditions of life were not exactly what they actually are. The man who does nothing cuts the same sordid figure in the pages of history, whether he be a cynic, or fop, or voluptuary.
It is the final words of this passage, however, which light the fires that fuel the passion for service that defines my very being:
There is little use for the being whose tepid soul knows nothing of great and generous emotion, of the high pride, the stern belief, the lofty enthusiasm, of the men who quell the storm and ride the thunder.
I have sought to quell the storm, and to ride the thunder.
And like many a bronco rider before me, I have repeatedly failed to remain seated for the requisite 8 seconds, instead tasting the bloodied dust of defeat in my mouth, and feeling the pain of bones broken by the fall.
I have spent a lifetime speaking to “men of cultivated taste” who populate the halls of power, whether in the White House, Whitehall, Quai d’Orsay, the Kirya, Karradat Mariam, or any other place where “those who deride of slight what is done by those who actually bear the brunt of the day” reside.
I have spoken until I was blue in the face and hoarse of voice.
And I am exhausted.
This last battle, to try and save the New START treaty and the principle of arms control and disarmament which it represents, has all but broken me.
The hell with the “arena.”
And the hell with “daring greatly.”
If standing tall while beaten and bruised, covered with blood and sweat shed in vain, is what a man should aspire to, then the hell with being a man.
Outcomes matter.
Service and sacrifice independent of the reward of success is simply an exercise in narcissism, making the participant no better than those who cheer him on from the sidelines.
I have written for the most influential newspapers and magazines of the day.
Author lectures at Chatham House, July 2005
I have addressed the US Congress, British Parliament, the French and Italian Senates, the Japanese Diet, the Iraqi Parliament, the European Parliament, and NATO.
I have spoken before audiences in the greatest Universities of the United States—Harvard, Yale, Brown, Columbia, MIT, Georgetown, Oxford.
I have spoken before the Council on Foreign Relations, Royal United Services Institute, and Chatham House.
I have appeared on the most popular programs in mainstream American television.
This was my arena.
But my audience wasn’t composed of likeminded warriors for peace and justice, but rather those who “deride of slight what is done by those who actually bear the brunt of the day” and “those others who always profess that they would like to take action, if only the conditions of life were not exactly what they actually are.”
I am tired.
Physically, mentally, and morally.
My computer is filled with half-finished articles, because I can no longer muster the energy necessary to see these works to fruition.
Yesterday was a particularly frustrating day.
I started the morning trying to finish one article on the death of arms control, only to put it aside and begin a new article on the futility of diplomacy.
Neither were finished.
I did a series of interviews which garner, collectively, millions of views.
But at the end of each interview I was overcome by the futility of it all.
I might as well be standing on top of a remote mountain shouting into the wind.
I was scheduled to appear on a podcast, Ask The Inspector, at 7 pm.
I was not motivated, and even entertained thoughts of just cancelling the whole damn show.
Not for the night, but forever.
“Ask the Inspector”?
Who gives a damn.
Just more speaking with nothing happening.
Words for the sake of words, a literal self-licking ice cream cone of ego-driven delusion.
The Glenmont Taco Bell
I picked my wife up from work, and on the way home we decided to stop by the local Taco Bell to get a bite to eat before racing home so I could be seated before my computer by 7 pm.
It was a cold night, with snow falling, and the parking lot was treacherous to walk across. As I made my way over the ice-slick asphalt, I heard a voice call out from a car parked on the other side of the lot.
“Mr. Ritter?”
I can’t say good thoughts crossed my mind—I have received death threats on social media, and a simulated letter bomb in the mail. I was warned by someone closely linked with Homeland Security not to present myself in public because of the potential for being attacked by the supporters of causes I have spoken out against—Israel and Ukraine come to mind.
I started walking toward the vehicle in order to create space between myself and my wife, whom I directed toward the entrance of the Taco Bell restaurant and away from the man in the car. I transferred my wallet, keys, and phones into my left hand, looking for a place to toss them in case I had to free up both hands to deal with some form of attack.
“Scott Ritter?” the voice called out again.
I walked up to the car, checking out the man inside and scanning for weapons and passengers.
But I was quickly distracted by the smile on this man’s face. He appeared genuinely happy to see me.
“I just finished listening to you on Nima’s show!” he shouted out. “And here you are! I can’t believe it!”
Nima Rostami Alkhorshid is the host of a podcast, “Dialogue Works”, and I had appeared on his show earlier in the day.
“I listen to you all the time!” the man said.
He got out of his car, and shook my hand.
“I love what you say”, he said, looking me in the eyes. “Keep doing what you do. It means so much to me and others.”
I thanked him, and he got back into his car.
“I’m getting ready to listen to you on ‘Ask the Inspector’”, he said. “I can’t believe it! I just listened to you on Nima’s show, and I’m getting ready to listen to you in 40 minutes, and here you are, in the parking lot of Taco Bell!”
He waved as he drove off, and headed into Taco Bell, where my meal of Diet Coke and two bean burritos waited for me.
This was not the encounter I had feared it would be—just the opposite.
His words and his demeanor awakened me from the self-pitying somnolent state I had been trapped in over the course of the past week.
And as I thought of him, his words and demeanor, I was struck that he was not alone in his appreciation of what I had been trying to accomplish.
I had travelled to New York City recently, and was trying to hail a cab when I was stopped not once, but twice, by random people on the street who recognized me and wanted to shake my hand and offer words of encouragement.
In the hotel lobby people looked over at me hesitantly, before approaching, wanting to shake my hand.
The more I thought about it, the more I realized that these were not isolated occurrences, but rather a pattern of behavior which had been repeating itself for some time now.
Cab drivers in Washington, DC.
AMTRACK conductors.
Baggage handlers at airports.
Cashiers at convenience stores.
And just average Americans on the street.
These were not people “of cloistered life”, but rather the salt of the earth, those who bore “the brunt of the day.”
They were my fellow “Citizens of the Arena”, people like me who were making a stand in defense of what was important to them.
People who had been beaten down by life, but who had picked themselves up and continued the charge.
They told me how important my words were to them.
How I was a voice of sanity in an insane world.
How my words and actions gave them hope for a better world.
People who believe in the concept of “Waging Peace”.
And to a person, they all encouraged me to continue what I was doing.
They were—and are—why I fight.
My friends and family have been there for me every step of the way in this journey of struggle and turmoil that is my life.
And they have paid a horrific price for their loyalty.
If they were the only reason why I was repeatedly stepping into the arena, then logic dictates that at some point I must stop doing that which brings them pain and suffering (remember, unjust prosecutions, imprisonment, FBI investigations and raids, and de-banking don’t just impact me, but my family.)
A wise man would pay heed to the lesson of Sir John Falstaff in Shakespeare’s play, ‘Henry IV Part 1,’ in particular Act V, Scene 4:
“To die is to be a counterfeit, for he is but the counterfeit of a man who hath not the life of a man; but to counterfeit dying when a man thereby liveth is to be no counterfeit, but the true and perfect image of life indeed. The better part of valor is discretion, in the which better part I have saved my life.”
Discretion is the better part of valor, and how indiscrete is the man who would hazard his family and friends over the false pride of ego-driven “honor”?
Save the world?
What childish conceit.
Until, of course, the “world”, in the form of random citizens, urge you to continue the struggle, in order to create a better world, one worth living in.
Thus empowered, a man might look his family in the eyes and, with the kind of courage that only comes from conviction, shout “Once more into the breach!”
Figuratively, of course.
I want to thank this kind stranger who stopped me in the Taco Bell parking lot to thank me for what I was doing.
And in the process thank everyone else who has, over the years, offered words of encouragement and gratitude.
It means more than you can possibly know.
Today I have taken an oath to myself to finish the articles that sit dormant in my computer.
I will complete the list of questions I was preparing for interviews I hope to conduct in March, when I plan on returning to Russia to continue the mission of defeating Russophobia and promoting better relations between the US and Russia, between Americans and the Russian people.
I will climb once more into the arena, my face marred by dust and sweat and blood, and raise my gloved fists to my face, challenging my opponents to resume the fight.
I am not defeated.
Because I know why I fight.
And that reason is you.
(I will be returning to Russia in March 2026 to continue the “Waging Peace” mission of countering Russophobia and promoting peace between the United States and Russia. I will be travelling with my colleague, Garland Nixon. This trip is made possible solely by the donations of those who support the work Garland and I do in the cause of peace. We are currently funded to around 50% of the anticipated cost of the trip. Any support that could be provided is greatly appreciated.)
oooooo
@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu
Ritter’s Rant 075: Millennials, We Need to Talk
Ritter’s Rant 075: Millennials, We Need to Talk
(https://substack.com/home/post/p-187870266)
The Boomers and Baby Boomers have failed society when it comes to arms control. It is time for the Millennials to step up and take over.
(11:14 m)
oooooo
Geure herriari, Euskal Herriari dagokionez, hona hemen gure apustu bakarra:
We Basques do need a real Basque independent State in the Western Pyrenees, just a democratic lay or secular state, with all the formal characteristics of any independent State: Central Bank, Treasury, proper currency1, out of the European Distopia and faraway from NATO, being a BRICS partner…
Euskal Herriaren independentzia eta Mikel Torka
eta
Esadazu arren, zer da gu euskaldunok egiten ari garena eta zer egingo dugun
gehi
MTM: Zipriztinak (2), 2025: Warren Mosler
(Pinturak: Mikel Torka)
Gehigarriak:
MTM klase borrokarik gabe, kontabilitate hutsa
Anthony Anastosi: Estatu dirua, Klase borroka
1 This way, our new Basque government will have infinite money to deal with. (Gogoratzekoa: Moneta jaulkitzaileko kasu guztietan, Gobernuak infinitu diru dauka.)












