Scott Ritter (11)

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

ooo

Transkripzioa:

Hello and welcome to this edition of Ritter’s Rant. You know, John Lennon once famously wrote or sang, or both, give peace a chance. And what a wonderful concept. Give peace a chance. All we are saying is give peace a chance. And one would think that people would rally around this cause. I mean, when

President Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. He was giving peace a chance. And yet the iron angst that has emerged from a certain segment of the political elite here in the United States, matched only by the angst and ire that has emerged from the president of Ukraine and his European supporters,

has drowned out the not only the lyrics to the song, but the basic concept. It seems so many people are hell bent on continuing this war, continuing the killing that’s going on between Ukraine and Russia. And they’re quick to transfer blame for any perceived failures to Trump. And of course, to Russia, who

according to the narrative produced by these people, is to blame for everything. But the reality is far different. It seems that Donald Trump, who is famously known to be unpredictable, says one thing in the morning, does something else at night, has ridden out the storms. when, you know, that was created when Volodymyr Zelensky showed up in Washington,

D.C., accompanied by the seven horsemen of the apocalypse. You know, these British leaders who strode in as if they were going to make demands on an American president they expected to, you know, vacillate. But Donald Trump stood strong, didn’t vacillate. At the end of the day, Zelensky and the Europeans were sent packing,

being told in no uncertain terms that they would have to learn to get along with Vladimir Putin and to basically bend the knee to the Russian demands. And if they refused to do so, the United States would not turn its ire on Russia, but on them to walk away from this conflict and leave Ukraine alone.

the mercy of the Russians and Europe to clean up the mess that they made and live with the consequences of their bad decisions. Give peace a chance. Look, we live in a world where, I mean, this time last year, there was a greater than 50 percent chance of the United States and Russia having a nuclear war.

That’s not me saying it, although I said it over and over again. That’s the conclusion reached by the Central Intelligence Agency that monitors these things. Joe Biden refused to talk to Vladimir Putin in the United States was working hand in glove with the Europeans to pour money and resources into sustaining the Ukrainian military machine,

knowing that they weren’t going to beat the Russians, knowing that the end result was just the destruction of his equipment. and the deaths of Ukrainians. I mean, the estimates of Ukrainian death now, you know, it used to be that people would deny the scope and scale.

But I mean, now we’re talking about between 1.2 and 1.8 million dead Ukrainians. And not too many people are saying that that’s far-fetched. For what? For what reason? For what purpose? None whatsoever. Ukraine’s been given an opportunity to bring it into this fighting to save what’s left of the Ukrainian army,

send them home so they can rebuild their country and, you know, reunite with their families. Europe’s been given a golden chance to walk away from failed policies that have destroyed their economy, left them in a shambles. you know, creating a Europe that is anything but unified and NATO that is anything but, you know,

capable of doing its core mission, the protection of Europe. It’s not Russia is blamed for this. It’s Europe. It’s Zelensky. It’s the United States. But at least the American president today is trying to make amends to do the right thing to bring this conflict to an end.

Realistically, not the kind of pie in the sky, you know, stuff that people like, you know, Kellogg, the retired general, was trying to impose on Donald Trump, but reality-based stuff, the kind of stuff that Vladimir Putin’s been saying all along. Putin doesn’t want to occupy Ukraine. Putin doesn’t want to invade Europe. All Putin wants is peace.

He’s willing to give peace a chance. So is Donald Trump. The question is, why isn’t anybody else? Well, that’s my rant. Next time a thought crosses my mind, I’ll be sure to let you know. Thanks.

oooooo

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

Report from Russia

https://open.substack.com/pub/scottritter/p/report-from-russia?r=1vhv3f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

The Author on Red Square

I have just returned from Russia, where I spent eight days engaged in some of the most intensive citizens diplomacy I have ever undertaken. According to my hosts at the National Unity Club, our work set off an “information atomic bomb” in Russia, with the videos of the some 30-plus interviews I conducted getting millions of views and generating positive feedback from all those who watched them.

The visit coincided with President Trump’s historic Alaska Summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. I had planned my visit well before President Trump dispatched his special envoy, Steve Wickoff, to Moscow, and thus it was pure serendipity which found me ensconced in the Russian capital for the week leading up to the meeting between the US and Russia leaders.

The success of this trip was a vindication of not only the critical importance of citizen-to-citizen diplomacy in breaking through the wall of mistrust that has been constructed through the Russophobic policies that have defined US-Russian relations over the years, but also the tools I have chosen to employ in my ongoing effort at providing an antidote to the intellectual poison of Russophobia, and in particular the podcast The Russia House with Scott Ritter that I have been publishing on a Telegram channel dedicated to the project, and on my Substack page.

The National Unity Club and Team Ritter outside the Genatsvali Restaurant in Moscow

The Russia House with Scott Ritter is a collaborative effort between me and Alexandra Madornaya, my Moscow-based partner/producer. The objective of The Russia House was to provide a forum where I interview leading Russian thinkers to present the Russian reality to a western audience. Early on in my discussions with the National Unity Club about the nature of our joint work during my visit to Russia, I proposed that we use The Russia House as the theme for the interviews they were proposing, and they agreed.

The Russia House played host to the interviews organized by the National Unity Club and was critical in opening a window into the fascinating complexity of modern Russia. The interviews were streamed live to a Russian audience using Russia’s YouTube and Facebook analogs (RuTube and VKontact, respectively), as well as my X channel. The recordings are currently being prepared for an English-speaking audience and will be released on my SubStack over the course of the coming days.

The author interviews Lieutenant General Apti Aloudinov

The involvement of both the National Unity Club and Alexandra were essential to the success of this trip. But the reality is that this trip could not have taken place without the support of those who contributed so generously to the Waging Peace and Project 38 projects. This trip to Moscow was a continuation of the Waging Peace effort that first began back in 2023, when I first travelled to Russia. Although put on hold when my passport was seized and the FBI raided my home last year, the change in policy priorities that occurred when Donald Trump won the November 2024 Presidential election created the conditions where I was able to obtain a new passport and travel to Russia without fear of governmental intervention. The costs associated with the visit I just made are considerable, and as such well beyond my independent capacity to underwrite. The donations made by those people who support the goals and objectives of both the Waging Peace and Project 38 efforts, enabling The Russia House to capture so many distinctive Russian voices and make them available to a broader American audience, and by making citizens diplomacy resonate with the Russian leadership, opening up doors that could very lead to future actions that support the arms control objectives of Project 38.

I have been invited back to Russia in November of this year, where I anticipate a similar level of activity as occurred this past week, only at a higher level of participation—in short, transitioning from the advisory level of policy making into that of the principal decision makers. I have also been asked by the National Unity Club to help them unite with American podcasters who have embraced the notion of the “family of podcasts” which has allowed my ideas and those of others to resonate with audiences that rival and/or surpass those of the mainstream media.

Author addressing the Festival of New Media outside Moscow

Journalistic integrity and independence are greatly enhanced when one can demonstrate financial independence. This is what the generous donations of supporters has enabled with this recent trip. I am hopeful that this generosity will continue so that the planned trip to Russia in November becomes reality, furthering both the Waging Peace and Project 38 efforts.

We are turning the corner on Russophobia, and as such creating the potential for a future where Americans can live their lives free from the fear of their demise at the hand of nuclear weapons. Tune into The Russia House with Scott Ritter on Telegram and X and empower yourself with knowledge about the reality of Russia today. And continue supporting the furtherance of this mission of peace through your kind donations.

Thank you. We are making a difference.

oooooo

ooo

For the Children of the Donbas

(https://scottritter.substack.com/p/for-the-children-of-the-donbas?r=1vhv3f&triedRedirect=true)

In this special edition of the Russia House, I had the distinct pleasure of interviewing Yana Lantratova, a member of the Russian State Duma.

Scott Ritter

Aug 20, 2025

Earlier this week the President of the European Council, Ursula von der Leyen, asked President Trump to help “make sure the children of Ukraine” are returned to their families. President Trump responded in a way that gave credence to the allegations put forward by Ursula von der Leyen. But these allegations are lies. The truth rests in the heroic actions of people like Yana Lantratova, who risked their lives to rescue children trapped in homes and villages shelled by the Ukrainian army, their families killed, their tiny bodies broken and bleeding. Yana saved their lives. Russia saved their lives. This is the truth. And this interview is essential for telling this truth to the American public.

ooo

Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter

FOR THE CHILDREN OF THE DONBAS

In this special edition of the Russia House, I had the distinct pleasure of interviewing Yana Lantratova, a member of the Russian State Duma. Earlier this week the President of the European Council, Ursula von der Leyen, asked President Trump to help “make sure the children of Ukraine” are returned to their families. President Trump responded in a way that gave credence to the allegations put forward by Ursula von der Leyen. But these allegations are lies. The truth rests in the heroic actions of people like Yana Lantratova, who risked their lives to rescue children trapped in homes and villages shelled by the Ukrainian army, their families killed, their tiny bodies broken and bleeding. Yana saved their lives. Russia saved their lives. This is the truth. And this interview is essential for telling this truth to the American public.

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1958148295026675732

(1:01:47)

oooooo

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

Ritter’s Rant 043: Patience

(https://scottritter.substack.com/p/ritters-rant-043-patience?r=1vhv3f&triedRedirect=true)

Whether it is in the cause of peace, or in service of telling truth, sometimes narratives need time to mature. All we need is a little patience, and good things will come.

Scott Ritter

Aug 20, 2025

Transkripzioa:

Hello, welcome to this edition of Ritter’s Rant. Today’s thematic is patience or the lack thereof. What I’m referring to is, well… Today on my Substack and on my telegram channel, the Russia House, we published an interview between myself and Yana Lantrodova,

a member of the Russian Duma and somebody who I view as a hero for her work in rescuing children under combat conditions in the Donbass. The interview is self-explanatory. I don’t need to recount what happened there. But because of that interview, it was well-received in Russia,

and I was approached on how to turn her story into something that would be understood by an american audience um you know i basically said that the russians aren’t very good at information warfare they have one of the best stories imaginable and uh you know why isn’t she a household name not only in russia but

around the world long story short um there was an agreement to move forward with a um in tentative fashion with a hollywood type approach to telling her story and I committed to helping write a screenplay for this. Now, this was supposed to be secret.

The only reason why I’m talking about it now is that the cat’s out of the bag. Today there was a press conference where issues pertaining to Ukrainian illegal arrest of clergy and Russian opposition figures came to the forefront. somebody in the, in the press conference just let it out that I was going to be doing this. Um,

and I always feel that, you know, rather than the deny or, or, or, you know, pretend just to confront it head on. Yeah. I’m going to write a screenplay. Um, I wish people had had the patience to wait for me to write the screenplay before they talked about it,

because now there’s a whole bunch of pressure on me to, uh, to do it right. But this is such a compelling story, an easy story to tell that I think it can be done. And the idea is to turn the screenplay over to the Russian side, and then they will find the talent.

Russia is full of talent to turn the screenplay, to fix it up, but to turn it into something, a vehicle for telling Yana’s story. But it’s like this is sort of an allegory for this whole process. You know, Putin met with Trump and they had a meeting in Alaska where they talked about the potential of peace.

And here we are just a few days out and everybody’s just screaming that why hasn’t peace broken out all over? But it’s a process. It takes time. People need patience. You don’t want to jump the gun. You don’t want to write the end of the story before you’ve even got past the beginning. Patience. Peace takes time.

And telling compelling stories take time. It requires a lot of work. It requires a lot of effort. It doesn’t happen on the first go around. You know, I imagine this screenplay is going to be received and then torn apart and rewritten and reworked until… At the end of the day, a better story comes out.

I have no problem with that. I view myself as part of a team, not a team of one, but a team. Then there will be a team approach to telling Yana’s story, just like there’s going to have to be a team approach for making peace between Russia and the United States, between Russia and Ukraine, a reality.

It takes time. The first effort doesn’t survive. People will look at it. People will rip it apart. People will rewrite it. People will reassemble it until at the end of the day, you get a final product that is acceptable, that will do the job, but not just do the job half-heartedly. One of the

The big problems with this Russian-American peace process is that the United States, pressured, I guess, by Europe, has been seeking to shortcut the process, get a ceasefire, as if a ceasefire is the end all. The ceasefire is just the beginning. If there was a ceasefire, it’s a beginning. The Russians said the ceasefire doesn’t solve anything.

It’s a comprehensive peace plan that solves things. And so… The Russians were able to convince the United States to drop the concept of a ceasefire and move straight into a comprehensive peace plan. That’s the first rewrite. And there will be more rewrites. Right now, the United States and Europe are talking about, you know, security guarantees.

You know, and their initial draft talks about Article 5-like protections. There will be no Article 5-like protections. This isn’t going to happen. Article 5 is a unique clause in the NATO alliance that doesn’t apply to Ukraine. You know, they can call it Article 5, but the reality is it will be something far different because, you know,

Article 5 implies that Ukraine is going to be left with a 700,000 strong NATO trained army. russians have said that that’s unacceptable there will be demilitarization 50 000 strong no nato weaponry no nato structures um which means that europe’s fantasy of projecting nato power into europe into ukraine is a non-starter um will there be

peacekeepers in ukraine probably will they be from europe absolutely not um But this is a process. It’s going to be worked out. And I look forward to the process of writing the screenplay. I really do. I’ve blocked it out. I have a narrative in mind. And I’m going to put pen to paper and make this thing happen.

And then I’m going to turn it over. And I’ll bet you a dime to a dollar or a copec to a ruble that within a week, they’ll have torn it apart and reassembled it and come up with something new, something better. That’s what a process is all about. We have a process of telling a compelling story.

And now we have a process for peace. And they both require patience. Anyways, that’s my rant. Next time a thought crosses my mind, I’ll be sure to let you know. Thanks.

oooooo

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

The Man Behind the Medals

https://open.substack.com/pub/scottritte

ooo

The Man Behind the Medals

(https://scottritter.substack.com/p/the-man-behind-the-medals)

For years now I have been asked by numerous people to interview Deyan Beric, a Serbian military officer now serving in the Russia Army.

Scott Ritter

Aug 21, 2025

Fighting under the nom-de-guerre Deki, Beric became a legend in the early years of the Donbas conflict, serving as a sniper and intelligence officer whose exploits made him one of the most heavily decorated soldiers of the conflict. His story has been told through a documentary film, “A Sniper’s War.” In this interview, I had the chance to see past the uniform and medals, and delve into the essence of the man himself.

ooo

Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter

The Man Behind the Medals

For years now I have been asked by numerous people to interview Deyan Beric, a Serbian military officer now serving in the Russia Army. Fighting under the nom-de-guerre Deki, Beric became a legend in the early years of the Donbas conflict, serving as a sniper and intelligence officer whose exploits made him one of the most heavily decorated soldiers of the conflict. His story has been told through a documentary film, “A Sniper’s War.” In this interview, I had the chance to see past the uniform and medals, and delve into the essence of the man himself.

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1958449749004091759

(43:01 m)

oooooo

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

Mr. Prime Minister: The Ukraine conflict from the eyes of Mykola Azarov https://open.substack.com/pub/scottritte

oooooo

The Chameleon: Military insights from an Afghanistan veteran

The Russian perspective is often missing from any broader conversation about issues that normally unite a diverse audience.

Scott Ritter

Aug 22, 2025

In this interview, I delve into issues pertaining to how Russian society treats its veterans from a veteran of the Soviet Union’s war in Afghanistan, Franz Klintsevich, a special forces officer who commanded a unit known as “the Chameleons”

ooo

The Chameleon: Military insights from an Afghanistan veteran The Russian perspective is often missing from any broader conversation about issues that normally unite a diverse audience. In this interview, I delve into issues pertaining to how Russian society treats its veterans from a veteran of the Soviet Union’s war in Afghanistan, Franz Klintsevich, a special forces officer who commanded a unit known as “the Chameleons”.

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1958912295997702166

(55.56 m)

oooooo

oooooo

A Fighter’s Heart

https://substack.com/@realscottritt

ooo

Transkripzioa:

Welcome to another special edition of the Russia House. I’m here in Moscow, courtesy of the National Unity Club. They’ve been perfect hosts, and we’re hosted by Itartas. We’re in the historic headquarters of Itartas, downtown Moscow, a place where You know, important news has been reported over the years. Important stories.

And today we’re going to cover a story that should be very important, especially in the West, but maybe hasn’t attracted the intention it should. And it’s the story of how humanity is abused by conflict. And this is a very personal story because today I’m going to be talking about it with my guest, Maxim Randovsky. He is a…

mixed martial arts fighter. I’m very afraid of sitting across from me. I don’t want to get you angry. So, you know, if I say anything wrong, give me a warning. But MMA fighter from Ukraine. You’re a Ukrainian. Is this correct?

Yes. I was born in Kiev. I am from Ukraine. Presently, I am a citizen of Ukraine. Of course, getting also Russian citizenship. Right now, I didn’t do any actions towards it. But in the near future, I’m thinking about it. I will be active.

But when you fought, you identified as a Ukrainian. A proud Ukrainian.

You were proud to be Ukrainian.

Of course. But for me, it doesn’t matter what flag is raising up. For me, there are different things that matter. That’s our culture, our history, our faith that we share, as you know. Right now, there’s a huge run after the Orthodox Church on a Ukrainian territory. There’s some persecution that takes place. It really doesn’t matter.

The flag, there are more important things than the flag. That’s what I’m trying to say.

I agree with you. But the point I’m trying to make is that when you fought, you fought for Ukraine as a Ukrainian. But when you trained, you trained for the love of the sport. You trained with people who could help advance your skills. And my understanding is that you at one time trained with Ahmad. Why?

Why did you pick Ahmad to train with?

That’s a very interesting question, because I have never trained with Ahmad Club. It never took place. I took participation in Daghestan sports meeting. Mr. Magomedov, the father of Habib, and he’s an ex-champion of USC. At that platform, I was taking part. Yes, among my friends, I do have Chichens. We communicate well. We’re friends.

I was in Grozny, but only for one day. But I was never training. I never took trainings with the Chechen Club Ahmad.

Well, the reason why I mentioned that, and we’re going to discuss something now that may be painful, and I apologize for that. I first saw you on the Internet, on a video, a horrible video, and you were being beaten. tortured, abused by Ukrainian nationalists. And they were mocking you because they claimed that you had trained with Ahmad,

that you were more Ahmad than you were Ukrainian. But this is the danger of the internet, is that the information isn’t always correct. But the point is, for the simple love of the sport, for simply training with people who also love the sport as much as you did,

You were somehow singled out as being unpatriotic to Ukraine by people whom I wouldn’t call Ukrainian patriots. Could you, and again, I don’t want to recreate something that’s unpleasant, but could you discuss how it came to be that you were captured by, I believe it was Azov persons, and why they treated you the way they did?

It happened to me not because I did something, but because I did not refuse from my roots, from my faith, from my culture. I didn’t change the blades. I didn’t change the shoes. That’s the saying, saying that I didn’t betray anybody. And a lot of people, unfortunately, now, they’re zombied, and people change.

And I didn’t change the camps. I know exactly where I come from. I know my family tree. And due to that, because of that, I was always standing on the principles. I didn’t turn my face 180 degrees. And people like this are not comfortable for them.

What they want are the people to obey them, do what they say.

And, of course, Ukrainian propaganda began this campaign a long time ago. It’s not after 2022 and not after 2014.

In the beginning of 2000, I was a small kid. I was just a boy. Remember, we had President Yushchenko as a president of Ukraine. And you could – I was really a kid. I think I was 12 years old when he became a president. And we were watching how they rewrite the history,

how there’s changing all the principles of the – Of course Even then I couldn’t understand what was going on how come it takes place if I was raised I had one heroes that I followed what I believed in and now They call them betrayed The the ones who betrayed and they take out their monuments.

I couldn’t find out why it was taking place You know in the West in the United States

When people mention Azov, or Adar, or Kraken, or any of these other names, when we mention Bandera, what we’re told is it’s just a small part of Ukraine. You exaggerate their influence. You exaggerate this. You allow a handful of bad apples to define a noble country. But you mentioned Yushchenko.

And you mentioned, I mean, he made Stepan Bandera the national hero of Ukraine. Is Banderism just a small part of Ukraine, or is it a larger problem that everybody should be concerned about?

Very good and important question. Thank you for asking. Without any doubt, I’m not saying that all Ukrainians are Nazis. But I think, unfortunately, from 3% to 5% radicals, they are there. They popularize the Nazism. Bandera is the hero for them. Hitler is their hero. And we could go on. Do they have the power and authority?

Yes, they have their authority. It’s so supported by the government, by the government structures, by the authorities. That’s not propaganda. I watched it with my own eyes personally. I went through it all.

And of course, counting in that small percent, it’s small.

Nevertheless, one radical. It’s more dangerous than 1,000 real citizens.

My observation also is that it’s not just the one radical that’s dangerous, but it’s the silent majority that allow the one radical to be heard. Again, I don’t mean to be insulting to anybody, but I watched videos of common Ukrainian citizens being saran-wrapped to telephone poles, had their faces painted green, and nobody intervened. Nobody stopped to help.

People either walked by indifferently or they actually cheered on, slapped people, spanked people, humiliated people. These weren’t radical Azov people. These were average Ukrainians. Why? Why are the Ukrainian people tolerant of this kind of abuse of humans? Is it because the Ukrainians hate Russia so much that they allow people to have

their face painted green and to be insulted this way?

Concerning hate for Russians, I want to emphasize this. Ninety-nine percent of all the Ukrainianization was built on Russophobia. You have to understand that it’s very important. Concerning the people’s attitude, unfortunately, they are being scared. They have fear in their hearts. They don’t have the right to speak a word or for their faith or to voice something out.

When there was a revolution took place, the active participants were the people from the near football soccer ultra movement. Of course, I had a chance to have, to meet them, to talk to them. stopped having any connections with them, with their political views. It’s connected with, first of all, that they were putting Hitler and Bandera as heroes.

Though I am a citizen of Ukraine, I’m born in Kyiv. My roots go there over 100 years. Nevertheless, I’m ethnical Russian, because before, earlier, we never separated. My grandfather, he is from Chernykov district. Then it was Russian Empire. And then the first one who moved to Kyiv was my great-grandfather.

He was a political activist from the revolution, from Kazan. The peasants attacked their house, beat them up, and the story is being repeated, unfortunately. But in the other time, The point is that people are afraid. People are scared. This is the cornerstone. And they’re intimidated.

And those football, soccer fans there, and whoever is in that team, people are afraid. One word. And you’re gone.

Look, you’re a sportsman of a very high degree. You have soccer clubs. They’re sportsmen, and you have the fans of the soccer clubs. You have your own fans, Mick Smallcher Art fans. What is it about football that allows people who should be similar to gravitate towards radical nationalism? Why, for instance, aren’t you a radical nationalist?

You’re a fighter. You’re violent in a controlled way. Why aren’t you a radical nationalist? I mean, what makes you different than the football club members of Kharkov, who became the heart and soul of the Azov movement?

Probably I was blessed enough where the propaganda could not take me in. They couldn’t buy me after the situation and the torture that took place in my life. Yes, they were trying to hire me during all that time when I was on the territory of Ukraine.

Always many people told me that here, say something bad about Russia, judge them. the special operation, and so on.

But I was faithful to my principles.

Of course, it’s connected, first of all, with I was interested in a history, especially in the history of my family tree. And I know that I have a lot of relatives on Ukrainian territory, modern Ukraine. Here in Kazan, Nizhny Novgorod, exactly on Friday, I’m going to To my uncle, it’s his birthday.

I will see him for the first time. And I think that I did not forget. My roots play as a key role.

We know you were beaten. We saw it on the video. You were abused horribly. Two questions. The first one is the easy of the two. How did you get out of Ukraine? How did you become free of the Azov people? How did you make your way to Russia?

After I was bitten, the videos that you watched me, that was just the beginning.

I was just a drop in the sea what I went through.

After that, I was taken to the Militia Department. Then the real torture started there. I think I can say I went through hell. I was shocked with electricity. They beat on my heels. I have a trauma in my head. My ribs were broken.

Then I lost consciousness.

They put ice water on me, and I came back.

It wasn’t difficult as physically. In my mind, it was difficult.

And after that, I was passed on to, right there, to the Special Services of Ukraine. I wasn’t able to think about anything. I was depressed emotionally, depressed. They gave me some kind of paper and said, you have a choice.

Either you’re going to sign this paper, or we’re going to send it to Azov base.

And we all say goodbye to you, that they would not let me leave. Of course, I signed the paper. I didn’t even read it. I think something was about the partnership or agreement to deal with them, whatever it was. They were trying to build a game of a good and bad policeman.

But we all know that they’re acting all together. That’s all one team. political slavery of people. Their interests are only in money.

It’s like a junta.

They take it above their faith and culture. You know, I’m going to repeat that many times. This is my principles. This is what I live with. They put money above their faith and their principles. And after that situation, I was taken home. But I understood clearly that they put me out everywhere. I was a betrayer for everybody.

And of course, they would never give me a second chance. I could not come out of the house safe.

And at that moment, another guy, he’s gone now. He’s dead. My friend, he got connected with me.

And he said, listen, you have to leave. He went to Vinyasa. It was a horrible time. I was always sitting home from one apartment to another apartment to a third apartment. Plus, they stole everything from me. I had no money. I had nothing to my name. They took out. registered weapon that I had on my name.

I had to sign a paper, a claim that if they would kill somebody, you understand, they would put it on me. We know what it would end up with. They stole the money, old coins I had. You know, usually just like thieves, regular thieves. And after that, once I left to Vinita,

why I found out that he was trying to hire me.

It’s kind of funny story. I saw how in Telegram,

it’s a funny story, he was trying to recruit me, and I said that Rindik, we have him, but though he was a friend, a showing of friend, but when I analyze everything here, you know, we have, you know, they kept saying the same thing, you got to open your hearts, orcs,

and continue to repeat the same words about Russia, like orcs. And the key moment was I called Artyom Dmitruk. You probably know him. We started chatting. He was very surprised. He said, are you still in Ukraine? After the whole situation I had, I’m trying to find a way out because I’m concerned about my safety.

As I mentioned earlier, they would never give me a second chance. And Artem helped me to leave Vinice to Odessa. In Odessa, I was sometime with him. And then I found some possible exits. These were gypsies. They took me out definitely for some money. That’s the first time I’m sharing this truth, because earlier I had to,

in my social network, said that I came out on my own. Because it’s connected with being in Europe or in a territory of Ukraine, they would never hear me.

In Moscow, in Russia, I don’t feel myself Ukrainian in Moscow.

I feel myself – I am my own among my own. I see that people are ready to hear me here and listen to me. And here, of course, the second part of the story. Once I was in Moldavia, the situation that happened to me, the people that were the pro-humanitarian thoughts and principles,

one of them connected with me. He is from France. I want to say many things. I’m not going to say his name because time will come whenever that comes. He gave me a ticket from Moldova to Paris. He met me there. I was not shaved. I was not cut. I had to grow a beard.

I had long bridges, long shirt sleeves. It was very hot. And after that, he helped me. Do you know this time I was living with him at his house? He helped me with the paperwork and whatever was needed. In France, I didn’t go after comfort.

But to be restored, I just have to have some time to be back here in Moscow. I feel like I’m home. I came back to my Slavic people every Sunday. I can go to church. I can, you know, I can talk to people heart to heart.

So this is the way, this is the path I had during this time.

It’s a very brave path. The second thing I wanted to tell you, I come from a military background, and my specialty in the military required me to be prepared if I were taking captivity. And so there’s a special training they put you through where you are given information, you’re told you can’t tell the information,

and then they proceed to torture you, beat you, abuse you, to try to get you to tell this information. The important lesson that came out of this training is that every man has a breaking point. No man is a rock. And it was important for us to learn this so that we didn’t put ourselves through unnecessary torture.

We were told we needed to hold on to certain information for a certain period of time. And then we could begin to release it in bits and pieces, inaccurate, whatever, but to make the torture go, to lessen it. The most important thing, though, is we never lose faith with our core values, who we are, what we are.

We never betray our nation. Betraying information, signing a piece of paper, it’s nothing. That’s what I want to pass on to you. You didn’t betray anybody when you signed that paper. You went through more than any human being could possibly be expected to go through. And you’ve stayed true to your values. You’ve stayed true to your God.

You’ve stayed true to your family, to your faith. So you have nothing to be ashamed of. You have everything to be proud of. It’s an honor and privilege for me to talk to you. Are the Russians trying to learn from your experience? Because it seems to me that your experience, if you were an American,

I’d be taking you to these people and having them talk to you on how to incorporate the lessons of your experience into our training and what you went through and how we can simulate that, etc. I don’t know if you can talk about that, but are you sharing your experiences with the Russians?

Because a soldier is a soldier. It’s important that soldiers know that stay true to who you are, and you’re the perfect example of that, but don’t take it to the extreme where they’re going to kill you.

This is what I can say. With the faith in the Lord Jesus Christ and God, the road will be blessed. All the time I was tortured, I was praying. I was afraid. Of course I was afraid. You know, sometimes it’s hard for me to remember this moment.

But with that faith in my heart, I was able to go through it. This is probably the key moment. Of course, the risks of what I’m speaking right now, they’re there. It would be easier not to remember it, not to get into the past, not to get through emotions and just as hard psychology-wise and concerning betrayal.

I think it would be a betrayal to be quiet because right now we’re speaking for those whose mouth is being shut. They’re being continually tortured, illegally kept. This is it.

What are you doing now? Are you training? Are you continuing to train? It looks like you’re doing some tussling here and there. Are you staying in shape? Do you plan to get back into the ring? What’s the future hold for Maxine?

In 2017, I finished my sports career. But when I left Ukraine in 2022, I had to socialize in a way. And, of course, the best way – the sports, go to the gym. Some months later, I was having – at the international tour on Brazilian jiu-jitsu. And finally, on jiu-jitsu, my arms were broken, my hand was broken.

And the same day, with one hand, I was on a grappling. I took the first place. with a broken arm, then a long-term rehabilitation, restoration in Europe. It’s more difficult in Europe. I came here already with a trauma, and very quickly I was able to rehabilitate because there are special sports centers for rehabilitation.

And at the moment, I have relaunched my career. I changed the specialty. I am having a sponsorship on grappling on Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. In 2024 and beginning of 2025, they were quite good. I became a champion of the world on the purple belts on Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu in Abu Dhabi, Master 1,

and plus four times European champion also on colored belts of Jiu-Jitsu and grappling. So I continue, yes, to keep my shape. I continue to fight. And as I said earlier in 2017, I finished that career. And morally, I’m ready. In my mind, I’m ready. This is not my main path in the life.

Yes, it makes me stronger physically. But I think that there are things that are more important, even like us sitting and talking. You know, you cannot compare the two. It’s a lot more important. But I continue to practice yes, because, you know,

simple things I always say that in my networks that four things that we have to be developing. That’s physically, intellectually, spiritually, and socially.

Well, you are a living example of all of those things. I am very inspired by your story. I’m inspired by your faith and motivated by your physical fitness. If you ever have time in the future to train an old fat Marine on some of the skills,

I’d be honored to go in the ring with you just for training purposes. Nothing more serious than that. But I want to thank you, Maxim, for joining me today on this discussion. It’s been a very important discussion. I hope people listen to your story and learn from your story as I have. You are

a prime example of what a human being should be, what a man should be. And it’s been an absolute pleasure talking with you.

Thank you very much. I’m glad that we’re here and that we’re together not putting the walls but building the bridges. The truth in the long term will always win.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this has been a special edition of the Russia House with a special guest. Thank you very much.

oooooo

Citizen Diplomacy

Russophobia is a disease of the mind. Citizens Diplomacy is the cure.

Scott Ritter

Aug 22, 2025

Pavel Balobanov and I shake hands in Moscow, August 2025

We, the People of the United States of America, are the custodians of our Constitutional Republic. Through our free and democratic processes, we elect officials to represent us in government, and through these very same processes, backed by the rule of law, we hold these same officials accountable for what they do in our name. The processes of good citizenship, however, are not defined by passivity, limited simply to participation in elections, but rather dynamic actions that promote constant engagement across the full spectrum of issues that define our collective daily existence. Good citizenship sets the standards through which we hold elected officials accountable, and good citizens lead by example. This applies to both the domestic and foreign policies being implemented in our name.

The issue of Russophobia in America today should be a concern for us all. Russophobia is designed to exploit the ignorance of the American people by promulgating falsehoods about the reality of Russia that are designed to generate fear, fear which is then exploited by those whom we elect to support policies which postulate Russia as the eternal bogeyman. This mage is then used to justify defense spending and national security postures that have put the United States on a highway to hell that can only end with a nuclear Armageddon. In short, Russophobia represents an existential threat to the security of the United States and the entire world. It is one of the most dangerous threats facing the American people today, and yet it is fostered by mainstream media, academia and the permanent bureaucracy of government, all of which are deeply infected with the intellectual poison produced by Russophobia.

The antidote to this poison is knowledge and information that can only be garnered through direct contact between the American and Russian people.

This is where citizen diplomacy comes in.

I have been actively engaged in citizen diplomacy with Russia since April 2023, when I first travelled to Russia to promote the cause of peace through nuclear disarmament. At that time, I engaged in the practice of repairing trust between the American and Russian people “one handshake at a time.”

The Challenge Coin I brought with me to Russia in May 2023

I shook many hands during this trip.

I returned to Russia in December 2023 to bring in the New Year, promoting the concept of “Waging Peace” by learning more about the Russian reality, and bringing that reality back with me to the United States, where I sought to share it with anyone and everyone willing to listen and learn.

The poison of Russophobia, however, runs deep in the blood of the United States, and my efforts at conducting citizens diplomacy were deemed a threat by the administration of President Joe Biden, which sought to criminalize my efforts, dispatching the FBI to my home under the false pretext that I was acting as an agent of the Russian government. The Biden State Department revoked my passport, deliberately preventing me from travelling to Russia in the summer of 2024, where I planned on engaging in citizens diplomacy on a scope and scale greater than previously practiced.

I refused to be intimidated by this obvious lawfare being waged against me and the cause of peace I promoted. While I fought to get my passport returned, I continued to engage with the Russian people, attending several functions at the Russian Embassy (including a piano recital, and both Russia Day and Victory Day celebrations).

Shaking hands with Russian Ambassador to the United States Alexander Darchiev

I shook many hands during these visits.

I also worked with a Russian counterpart, Pavel Balobanov, to resurrect the landmark 1985 “Spacebridge” organized by the late American journalist, Phil Donahue, and his Soviet counterpart, Vladimir Pozner. One June 18, 2025, Pavel and I conducted a three hour “Citizens Summit” bringing together an American audience in Kingston, New York with a Russian audience in Saint Petersburg, Russia.

The reaction of all involved was overwhelmingly positive.

On July 15, 2025 (my birthday) my passport was finally restored to me. Shortly thereafter, the FBI began returning property they had seized in the raid on my home. Elections matter, and the results of the November 2024 Presidential election saw the Russophobia of the Biden administration replaced by the policies of peace promoted by Donald Trump. These policies were founded in the notion that America was best served by learning to live in peace with Russia. Free speech was once again a concept protected by the government, even when the concepts promoted—such as good relations between Russia and the US—ran afoul of the Russophobic narratives promoted by mainstream media, academia, and the permanent government bureaucracy.

My week in Russia (August 9-18) was one of the most productive examples of citizen diplomacy I have ever been engaged in—and keep in mind I travelled to Iraq in September 2002, where I was the first and only foreigner to address the Iraqi parliament in a valiant but ultimately failed effort to prevent a war by getting the Iraqis to allow UN weapons inspectors to return to work. The timing of this visit was serendipitous—I landed as the Alaska Summit between President Trump and President Putin was announced, and as such I was perfectly located to take the pulse of Russian public reaction, both to the potential of the summit, and its results.

One of the messages I received repeatedly from the scores of interviews I conducted with Russians from every walk of life was how important it was to the Russian people that President Trump understood that, when it came to the issue of peace between Russia and the US, the Russian people were fully supportive of his efforts. I promised that I would do my best to relay this message to President Trump, and today I am making good on this promise.

The Poughkeepsie Peace Initiative’s Letter to President Trump

As part of my Project 38 initiative, I have brought together a team of like-minded people, all experts in their respective fields, for the purpose of helping craft a vision for arms control with Russia, built on the premise that the last remaining treaty between the US and Russia which limits the size of our respective nuclear arsenals—the New START treaty—should be extended (it expires on February 4, 2026), and that the need for limits on intermediate range nuclear forces which were lifted with the demise of the INF treaty (President Trump withdrew from this treaty in August 2019) are essential for European and global security and stability. Together with this team—former Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, former CIA analyst Ray McGovern, and MIT Professor Ted Postol—I have written a letter praising President Trump for his courage in agreeing to meet with President Putin, appraising the President of the results of my recent trip to Russia, and informing the President that this team—which we call the Poughkeepsie Peace Initiative—stands ready to support his peace efforts with Russia by engaging in citizens diplomacy for the betterment of relations between the US and Russia.

This is Citizens Diplomacy in action.

oooooo

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

1 h

The Good Neighbor

Scott Ritter

Aug 23, 2025

In this interview, I discuss the future of Russian-Georgian relations with Mamuka Pipia, the International Secretary of the Solidarity for Peace Party, a Georgian political party which advocates for good relations between Russia and Georgia

ooo

The Good Neighbor In this interview, I discuss the future of Russian-Georgian relations with Mamuka Pipia, the International Secretary of the Solidarity for Peace Party, a Georgian political party which advocates for good relations between Russia and Georgia.

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1959271463527104619

(33. 34 m)

oooooo

The Russian Bogeyman

Scott Ritter

Aug 24, 2025

Alexander Ionov has a $10 million bounty on his head, put there by the US Government, which has charged him with conspiring to have US citizens work as agents of the Russian government. Ionov featured heavily in the US prosecution of the Uhuru black nationalist movement. In this interview, Ionov tells his side of the story.

ooo

The Russian Bogeyman Alexander Ionov has a $10 million bounty on his head, put there by the US Government, which has charged him with conspiring to have US citizens work as agents of the Russian government. Ionov featured heavily in the US prosecution of the Uhuru black nationalist movement. In this interview, Ionov tells his side of the story.

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1959543585516261649

(34:59 m)

oooooo

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

8 h

The Crimes of Men

Scott Ritter

Aug 24, 2025

In this interview, I discuss the crimes committed by Ukraine against the people of the Donbas, and what Russia is doing to bring the perpetrators to justice, with Rodion Miroshnik, Russia’s ambassador-at-large for the investigation of Ukrainian war crimes.

ooo

Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter

The Crimes of Men In this interview, I discuss the crimes committed by Ukraine against the people of the Donbas, and what Russia is doing to bring the perpetrators to justice, with Rodion Miroshnik, Russia’s ambassador-at-large for the investigation of Ukrainian war crimes.

Bideoa: https://x.com/i/status/1959683626070671630

(52:56 m)

oooooo

The Man from Donetsk

(https://scottritter.substack.com/p/the-man-from-donetsk?triedRedirect=true9

Scott Ritter

Aug 25, 2025

I discuss the origins of the conflict in the Donbas, and the future of Russian-Ukrainian relations, with Alexander Kazakov, a former advisor to the first head of the DPR Alexander Zakharchenko, and a co-founder of the National Unity Club

Transkripzioa:

Welcome to this special edition of the Russia House. This is People’s Diplomacy. I want to thank the National Unity Club for organizing this. I want to thank TASS for graciously allowing us to use their historic headquarters here in downtown Moscow. But most of all, I want to thank my guest today, Alexander Kazakov.

You’re the deputy chair of the National Unity Club. Could you explain to the American audience, what is the National Unity Club? What is your role in it? And what are you trying to achieve by having me come to Russia?

Actually, in the name of the club, in the title of a club, it says it all. It talks about the unity of our people. Unity means peace. Unity is absence of conflicts that would bring to wars, whether civil wars, international, world wars. And when we talk about unity, we don’t talk just about our country,

but towards every country in the world. In the 21st century, we really don’t know how to make friends. It’s like the whole international politics is built on confrontation. The language of animus languages has a lot of vocabularies, glossaries. And the language of peace, we don’t know it.

the world, the peace in you, the peace with you and with Russians. It stopped being a problem that we need to think about it, an issue that we need to meditate upon. We created this club to begin to speak about the peace, speak about partnership, about friendship,

and to overcome this language as we’ve been enemies and it’s a language that dominates as if we speak about philosophy, right? But concerning organizational directions, you know, Scott Reader’s visit to Moscow. It’s a bright demonstration of those organizational efforts to learn again to speak about friendship and peace. We have to talk.

And we really appreciate that you have came. That’s so much time you dedicate to these conversations, these dialogues with our people, because this is exactly the fundamental parts. If you, Mr. Reiter, and Mr. Kazakov will learn not just to chit chat, but understand each other correctly. that the words that we pronounce, that we say,

both you and I would have the same understanding of that. For the international point of view, it’s a big problem. Agenda. Politicians speak the very same words, but the completely different things that we understand. For example, Ukrainian regulation. Mr. Putin has one thing. Mr. Trump has another thing. Europeans have a completely different idea in their heads.

How can you talk if the same phrase has different meanings? This is why we created this club, to talk, so we will have time to check it out. Are we clear between each other? Do we understand each other correctly? And after that, on that basement. We built another philosophy of the international law and a new world order,

world order without war. And it is possible, Scott. You are a military guy, and you can understand that better than anybody else what is peace and what is war. Soldiers understand it very well, not civilians. This is possible to build a peace without war. It’s not a utopia. It’s a reality.

And this reality of tomorrow’s day, you just have to work. You just have to make a lot of steps and give a lot of effort. And first of all, you have to, first of all, desire.

Well, thank you very much for that. Words do matter. That was actually a lesson that was given to me by a friend of mine who was a Russian diplomat when I worked at the United Nations. Words have meaning. Words matter. This conversation matters. But we also have to be careful how words are interpreted. For instance,

If I were to go to a CIA fact book about Russia and the Soviet Union around 2003, 2004, my understanding is if I was reading up on Latvia, I might come across a name, Alexander Kazakov, who’s listed as an enemy of the United States of America. Words matter.


Because having an opportunity to sit down and meet with you and talk with you, I can sincerely say, that you’re not the enemy of the United States of America. Anybody who’s a supporter of peace can’t be the enemy of the United States of America. And in my conversations with you,

I’ve never seen one instance of you irresponsibly attacking the United States of America, not even attacking. Are you critical of America? Of course, so am I. I’m sometimes critical of Russia, as I’m sure you are. Criticism is good because even your president, Vladimir Putin, has said that criticism from criticism comes identification of a problem and the

necessity of a solution. So now we have a huge problem before us, the problem of how our nations come together in peace. My president and your president are going to meet in Alaska where they’re going to talk about moving our relationships forward. From your perspective, what’s the importance of Alaska? Why Alaska? Is this symbolism?

What’s the purpose of meeting in Alaska?

When, after election in the United States, our Presidents were speaking on the phone, I always fixed the number of times that they put into the phone call. When it’s necessary, Mr. Putin can speak English. He always speaks Russian because he’s the President of Russia. But when you need to, he can speak English.

I always fixed this time because Two of these people, Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin, as individuals, they need to work a certain number of hours on a conversation about anything. Because people need to talk. They don’t need just to talk about politics. If they have enough time, enough hours of a communication,

then you can pass on to the conversation about solutions, knowing that they understand each other equally. So I am sure at Alaska, a few hours would be spent It’s like a disposition that Mr. Putin needs to tell to Mr. Trump about Ukrainian conflict, which is a complex deal. It has historical roots.

as tied to the current world policies. You have to comprehend it deeply only then you can overcome it. It’s very clear that Trump doesn’t need a conflict in Ukraine. He’s very honest about that, but it’s not enough. He is himself in many networks and connections with influence, political connections, personal connections, financial connections.

So he has to make decisions based on that, and a lot of time has to be given to this understanding of the simple words. But you cannot do anything without that. Two presidents will be speaking, one about one thing, another one about another thing, never have an agreement. To have negotiations in these conditions, yes, you can.

But to agree on a treaty and partnership, no. You need something else above accounting, something else. So we also know it’s seen that – you can see it for your own that Mr. Trump really respects Mr. Putin as an individual. That’s definitely mutual.

And Mr. Putin said many times that he trusts Mr. Trump – he respects Mr. Trump. But the meaning, of course, there’s a symbolic. Any action on a diplomatic front is always symbolic. Any action, any activity, the place, the time, number of participants, flags, transportation, food, everything matters. It’s so diplomatic signal system.

But let’s take a look from Alaska to Alaska. Anchorage from D.C. and from Moscow have the same flight time. Okay, it’s all fair. Nobody flies more to meet the other party. It’s just equal conditions. Alaska is the north, and it’s a signal from Trump’s side, difficult signal. I would say it’s like Trump is giving an announcement.

He says, Vladimir, why are you with the global south? You are the global north. Let’s meet almost in the Arctic. You know, there’s a point in it, and it would be very important in two weeks when the Global South will meet in Beijing, when they will celebrate the World War II, the end of the World War II.

There is no symbolics that Alaska was Russian, became American. No, no, no. That’s not the deal. But the current symbolic system, yes. And plus, Alaska is – It’s like there’s America. America right as a continent that we see each day. And Alaska, we see there, somewhere there, separately.

And it’s also a signal that we have to be, we have to get away. We don’t want anybody to stand behind the door and grab us on a jacket. We have to be in seclusion. It’s very important what they will dress, what they will wear on protocol or in a freestyle.

I hope and I think it would be freestyle. That also would be . Nothing would just be. just because the point is that what they will be talking about for me and you, in particular, as people, this meeting is historical. You can say 100% now that it’s historical,

because on the conditions of the crazy turbulence of the world, the whole world, Now, the whole world is now in a state of war. Somewhere it’s physical, somewhere we have power, somewhere we have political war, somewhere economical, because sanctions and fees, it’s an element of the trading war. And your President Woodrow Wilson said that.

We’re not going to treat them with guns, but with sanctions. That’s also a war, cultural war, that is among the whole world. the fight for traditional, normal values, and all these things that are going on on the opposite side. So the whole world is a battlefield. So the only thing that they will be speaking about, really,

that’s about the peace, how to stop all these wars and conflicts, whatever possible. And of course, the meaning, without being relative to the personalities, the president of the U.S. and a head of Russia, these are two countries. that must take responsibility. They have to do that. It’s a must. It’s not a question of a free choice.

It’s a must. Because these are two countries, the only two countries, from the point of view of the military point of view, they cannot lose war. Everybody’s in the war. These two countries, they can’t lose the war just because the defeat of any of them would be the defeat of the whole world.

And we have two countries like that, United States of America and Russian Federation. These two people carry a huge responsibility. Only they can stop it. You know, I don’t worry about our President. I’m not concerned about him. I studied him for 25 years. I know his possibilities. I’m more concerned for your President because As a specialist,

I understand the difficulty of his position, which is different from the President of Russia. President of Russia, he’s got his back covered, stable, policies, economics, all clear. But it’s stable. And Trump, behind his back, he’s got a civil war. The number of people in the United States that don’t want Trump to exist tomorrow,

it’s a whole line of people. You know, he already had cases, two cases.

Trump is in a more difficult position than anybody else.

There were assassination attempts, but we believe Mr. Putin will help him.

Well, thank you for that fantastic answer. You said you’ve been studying President Putin for 25 years. In fact, you’ve written a book about President Putin. My understanding that, and I’m saying this because I think the audience needs to understand this, your book was translated into Japanese. But it’s not just any book translated to Japanese.

You’re the only Russian author who has written about Vladimir Putin whose book has been translated to Japanese. And the Japanese are very discerning. So there’s a reason why they picked you and your book to be published in Japan. You said that you’re not worried about Vladimir Putin because you’ve studied him, you understand him.

You know who doesn’t know Vladimir Putin? The American people. So I have two questions for you. From your studying, what’s the strategy of Vladimir Putin, the overall strategy? What is he trying to accomplish? There’s no way he’s going to Alaska just to shake hands with Donald Trump. He’s not going to Alaska to solve the Ukraine problem.

He’s going to Alaska for a larger purpose. What’s the strategy of Vladimir Putin? What’s his world vision

Look, Scott, you and I, today, we’re very lucky. We have three countries. They’re all – we say they’re great countries – United States, Russia, and China. Ahead of all these three world countries, today, in particular, we have people – they hate war. They are all peacemakers, both Trump, Putin and Xi Jinping.

They all want to have solutions without weapons, not with a war wage. For people not today, it’s a unique combination. And the difference between Russia and China is not a long term. You have three and a half years left till the next election. But there is a chance. Don’t remind me. So the situation is very unique.

You have to use it. But for you to use it and stop the global wars that we have today. We have to change the philosophy. We have to change the philosophical approach to the relationships between the peoples and countries. In the very core of the Western strategic thought during the last 500 years, there’s the same key decision.

And everybody knows about that. Until the end, they don’t talk about that. It’s a game with a zero sum. This is how the Western world thinks. It’s the game. Whatever you will lose, the others will take away from you. So our victories would be as much as your loss. Russia and China has already been spoken publicly.

I didn’t come up with this. At the level of the President of Russia, they already spoke to the world. Let’s refuse from this game. The game with a zero sum, it’s a road to war all the time. And another philosophy is that we can, Work. In Russian, when we say work together, partner together, there’s a,

in the beginning of the word, in the core of the word, co-labor. So you labor together, if you literally translate this word, partnership, working together in Russian language. You can work together, labor together in such a way that the profit, everybody will have the profit.

not one at the cost of the other, and then you will not have anybody who would lose. And it’s possible. This is so possible to do today. For that, we need political will, and we have it. All three of them have it. Trump has it too. It’s just difficult, more complicated for him.

You need to have political will and the objective. What are you going there for? And the will needs to be to make radical, harsh decisions. Because to get into this new age, and it’s a new age coming. We had Western age. And where that game with the zero sum was dominating.

And a new epoch is coming with the times of cooperation, co-laboring. You really have to say it like it is. Liquidate all those fires. Tension fires, they don’t allow us, including Ukraine. And that conflict does not allow us to go into the future.

It pulls us to the past in a 20th century of two world wars that we had. We have to move forward, and this is why we have to make difficult decisions. And I don’t know how can you do it otherwise. So the war is won. It has to be strict rules.

And in November last year, our President said so. So what we need to do, we just need to fulfill the terms that Commander-in-Chief said, and that’s concerning the defense of the country. So today, Ukrainian conflict is like a stone in Trump’s boot. It bothers him. and constantly spooled into those traps, political, informational.


And if we don’t solve that in such a way that Russia would feel safe, it will be a stone also in Putin’s boot. Trump loves when you need to dance a tango, you need to. How do you imagine this tango if both of them have rocks in their shoes? You got to pull them out.

Thank you. President Putin also said something else that reflects his philosophy, and I think it’s misunderstood by many Americans. He said, a world without Russia is not a world worth living in. And many Americans interpret that as a threat. I think they interpret it as a threat because we think in terms of the zero-sum

game that you spoke of. Is President Putin threatening America when he says a world without Russia is not a world worth living in? Or what did he mean by those words?

This, to the beginning of our conversation, about the language. When you’re enemies, the language is different. If the language of the animosity is dominating, we won’t understand each other. Because if I tell you, Scott, I’m going to the shop. you will see a threat that I’m going to buy a gun. If we live as enemies,

in that atmosphere, you have to understand I just went to the shop, to the store. The phrase that Mr. Putin said is like this, why do we need this world if there won’t be any Russia? That’s not about America. It’s about Putin and Russia. He said that nothing is interesting for us then.

We’re not going to solve anything. We get into some kind of complicated combinations. Without Russia, it’s not interesting. That doesn’t mean that if there won’t be Russia, we’re going to blow up America. No, that’s not the meaning at all. This phrase It did not include those words. It’s a very philosophical phrase.

It speaks about Russians and the Russian people. Yes, yes, we’re a historical nation. Trump, by the way, he learned that. He learned about Hitler, Napoleon. Orban helped him about that couple of nuggets. But, you know, it’s a paradox. The President, the Prime Minister of Hungary, Viktor Orban, tells to the President of the United States,

he gives him a story. of the George Kennan’s telegram. And what, they forgot about it? In America, Orban was telling them that for Russians, number one is safety. Everything else is after that. Thousands of years, nothing has changed. You probably know that in 1,000 years, we were fighting a lot more years than having the peace.

But we never went anywhere. People came against us. So yes, safety question is the number one question. Then whatever trade comes next, love, happiness, whatever that is, that comes after safety. But if you don’t understand that, And I do hope that, in Alaska, they’ll explain. But Trump says we understand that. When he said, I understand what Mr.

Putin thinks about NATO and Russians, how they treated this, has to be an understanding of restoration or deep explanation. And then, maybe then, You know, good question. Probably in America, they heard a threat in these words of Putin. I’ll tell you why. Because these words were taken out of the interview,

put it as a headlines in the newspaper, and gave their own comment to it. Tricky. And all you had to do is you had to listen to the whole one of you. He wasn’t speaking about America at all. He was speaking about Russia. And you tell me, you’re a patriot of the United States. You have world problems.

Are you interested? If there won’t be any United States, just tell me.

No. There won’t be a world without the United States.

That’s exactly what I’m talking about. That’s normal. It’s just in the United States and in Russia, there’s a responsibility. Huge responsibility. And again, from the language of enemies, we have to switch to the language of cooperation. I really hope that Trump is a lover of big deals.

will have a deal with Mr. Putin in Alaska about big deals. Really big deals, economical deals. Not to fight in Arctic for Arctic. We have to cooperate.

We spoke about the importance of words, the importance of meaning, the importance of communication, the importance of understanding. It’s a process. And we’re hoping that our leaders can embrace this process. But it’s necessary that our respective people embrace this process as well. And what we’ve done here today is provide a unique learning experience for the

people watching this program. Two people communicating. One, a former enemy of the United States. And one, a Marine officer who trained to fight Russia. We’re sitting down today talking the language of peace, not the language of war. And this is the most important lesson. Words matter, language matters, because if our two nations don’t get along,

there won’t be a world to live in. Try imagining a world without Russia and America at peace, and you can’t imagine that world. I’ve written a book. This is a book about the danger of nuclear war, but it also is about the importance of arms control. Arms control is a process of negotiation.

Negotiation is a process of conversation. Words matter. Intent matters. I believe this book is an important push towards peace. I’d like to offer to you as a gift and an expression of thanks. Thank you very much.

And in turn, I want to give you a book as a present about Mr. Putin when you study Russian language. What do you translate into English and publish there?

Well, I can tell you I’m a student of President Putin. of an American lens. It’ll be fascinating and informative to hear about President Putin through the filter of a Russian lens. So I thank you very much. And I thank the audience for joining us here today on this special edition of the

Russia House here at the headquarters of TASS, a meeting that has been put together by my host, the National Unity Club. And I’m speaking to the co-chairman of the National Unity Club, Alexander Kazakov. Thank you very much for joining us. It’s been an absolute pleasure.

Thank you, Scott.

oooooo

Ritter’s Rant 044: Justice, Trump Style

https://substack.com/@realscottritt

Ritter’s Rant 044: Justice, Trump Style

(https://scottritter.substack.com/p/ritters-rant-044-justice-trump-style?r=1vhv3f)

I don’t like John Bolton. If he broke the law, he deserves to be brought to justice. But he deserves the same right to speak out as any US citizen.

Transkripzioa:

Welcome to this edition of Ritter’s Rant. Today we’ll be talking about justice, Trump style. What I mean by this is, you know, Donald Trump made a big deal about ending the weaponization of the American Justice Department to stop using the FBI as a tool to go after political enemies. And I’m deeply grateful for this. After all,

it was the Biden administration that sent FBI agents into my house simply because I dared speak out against the policies promoting war that were being promulgated by the Biden administration, instead opting to speak out in favor of policies that made the United States and Russia friends.

The concept of friendship apparently was criminal and was criminalized by the Biden administration. And Donald Trump brought an end to that. And this is fantastic. A free speech is free speech. Donald Trump signed a number of executive orders on his first day in office that sought to bring an end to the practice of You know,

weaponizing law enforcement, weaponizing the national security establishment against those who whose speech the government disagreed with to promote free speech as a core value of the United States. All good. The other day, FBI agents raided the home of John Bolton. John Bolton is a former US government official, former National Security Advisor of President Trump during his first

administration. He’s somebody who has been a vociferous critic of President Trump ever since leaving his position. He has published a book. You know, that has been the subject of some controversy. People say that his book contained classified information that shouldn’t have been published without seeking the required government review of the book to ensure no

classified information was contained. John Bolton skipped this process. But at the time, a decision was made not to prosecute. Why? I don’t know. I can’t speak on behalf of the, you know, Biden administration, the FBI of the Biden administration. I will say that John Bolton would not be the first former government official to

publish a book that contained information that would be deemed to be classified. He wouldn’t be the first government official to forego the appropriate and legally proper clearance processes. There’s many national security lawyers who claim that The concept of a non-disclosure act is in itself a violation of constitutional rights of free speech. These are larger legal issues.

What I do know is that the decision was made not to prosecute John Bolton until now. Why now? Is there new information that’s come out that shows that Bolton has done something recently that constitutes a threat to the national security of the United States? Perhaps.

I haven’t seen the affidavit of support that’s been used to justify this execution of a search warrant against his home. Now, I’m not somebody who would naturally come to the assistance of John Bolton. I despise him. I despise him as a human being. He’s done hateful things. As a former weapons inspector, you know,

I know what he did against Bustami, the first head of the OPCW, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the threats that he made to Bustami and his family, should Bustami not… bend the knee to John Bolton. I know the lies he told about Cuba, weapons of mass destruction. I know the lies he told about Iraq.

I know the lies he told about me. No, I have no use for John Bolton. I despise him. I despise his ideology. I despise everything he stands for. I know that he stabbed Donald Trump in the back. back in his first term. I know that he betrayed Donald Trump to an extent that could possibly even be

called treasonous, the betrayal of Trump’s efforts to denuclearize North Korea. Had Donald Trump been able to see his plans to fruition, we may not have to deal with the nuclear-armed North Korea today. But no, John Bolton, together with others like Mike Pompeo, betrayed the president, stabbed him in the back, sold him down the river.

Now, I have no use for John Bolton. And if he committed crimes against the United States, I think justice should be brought to bear. But I am a vociferous defender of free speech. I may disagree with every word that comes out of John Bolton’s mouth. I may view every word he says to be hateful.

Every word he says to be, you know, so malignant as to, you know, He opens himself to be despised by people who believe in truth and who believe in justice and peace. He’s a warmonger who promotes the machinery of death. But I don’t want him silenced.


See, he has a right to say anything he wants to, so long as it doesn’t violate the law. John Bolton, like me and like other people who serve their government, signed a nondisclosure agreement about things that he became privy to. There are many things that I just can’t talk about today, nor will I ever talk about.

because I signed an agreement with the United States government. The United States government trusted me with access to information, and I’m just not allowed to talk about it. And the United States government trusted John Bolton with access to information, and he’s not allowed to talk about it too. If he did,

And his actions deviate from the established practice of Washington, D.C., because I’ll tell you right now, Washington, D.C. leaks like a sieve. I mean, people who have classified information, they’re calling up reporters on a daily basis and leaking information because it’s about politics, about influence. Knowledge is power. And people who have access to classified information, sensitive information,

have the knowledge that the media is looking for to make the big headlines. Did John Bolton leak? Probably. So did everybody else. And if you’re singling out John Bolton, then you have to ask the question, why? Was his leak so egregious as to bring genuine harm to America?

Or are you just seeking to find justification to silence the man? This is where we need to be careful. I think John Bolton is full of bad ideas. But I defend his right to say those bad ideas because I don’t fear his bad ideas. I believe my ideas are better.

And I believe that we live in a day and age where we are engaged in ideological warfare. It’s a battle of ideas. Let John Bolton speak. Let him say what he wants. He just makes a fool out of himself every time he opens his mouth.

He gives me an opportunity to demonstrate to the world just how foolish this man is, just how asinine his opinions are. Free speech gives him the right to say things and free speech gives me the right to respond. Don’t silence John Bolton simply because he says things that Donald Trump disagrees with. If John Bolton broke the law,

then the case needs to be made because we’re walking a very thin line here where Donald Trump claims that he doesn’t want the weaponization of law enforcement intelligence service to be used against American citizens like they were used against him, like they were used against me.

But now it appears that he might be doing the exact same thing against one of the most vociferous critics of the Trump administration. And that’s John Bolton. If that’s the case, I simply can’t support it. Anyways, that’s my rant. Next time an idea crosses my mind, I’ll be sure to let you know.

oooooo

A Conspiracy of Injustice

https://substack.com/@realscottritt

A Conspiracy of Injustice

(https://scottritter.substack.com/p/a-conspiracy-of-injustice?r=1vhv3f)

Scott Ritter

Aug 25, 2025

In this episode of the Russia House, I interview Konstantin Yaroshenko, a Russian commercial pilot kidnapped by US agents, tried and convicted in a US court on manufactured conspiracy charges, and who served 12 years of a 20 year sentence before being exchanged for an American citizen being held by Russia. A grim assessment of the injustice of the American justice system.

Transkripzioa:

Welcome to this edition of the Russia House. It’s people’s diplomacy being carried out in downtown Moscow in the headquarters of Itaratas. I want to thank the National Unity Club for helping organize this, and I also want to thank my guest today, Konstantin Yaroshenko. Thank you very much for joining me.

This is going to be a different kind of conversation because, I mean, your story is as fascinating as it is tragic. But I think it’s important when we speak in this day and age of improving US-Russian relations that we understand that one of the reasons why US-Russian

relations are strained is because of politics and the politics that leads to the destruction of human beings. Your story is one of a pilot. who was arrested by the Drug Enforcement Agency of the United States in Liberia, Africa, I think 2010. You were accused of trafficking narcotics. They brought you to the United Stat

They ran you through a trial that I don’t believe was fair or just. And then they imprisoned you. I think you received a 20-year sentence. And you served 12 years of this sentence in a federal prison before there was a prisoner exchange. You know, just roughly speaking, we’ve got to clear this up. Were you trafficking narcotics?

Were you guilty of the charges that were proffered against you?

Scott, thank you very much for inviting me, allowing me to give you some details. You said that there was some kind of investigation, that I was arrested, so I want to get back to 2009. And I was not arrested, because arrest is some legal procedure, okay?

agency on the drug trafficking,

drug enforcement agency, when they were performing illegal operation both on Liberia territory, Guinea, Ukraine, they prepared the facts ahead of time, the evidences, they cooked the facts. When I was trying to get the fairness, not to be legal, but to be fair, who am I? Not myself, but all other citizens of Russian Federation that on many,

many political reasons were followed by American law.

When in 2010,

I was kidnapped, right? They pursued me from Monrovia, Liberia’s capital. There were three days of abuse. So I would give him some kind of information. I went through torture. I refused. I said no. I don’t know myself how I lived through it. It was from 28th to 30th of May.

Illegally, I was taken out of that territory with a abuse of all the norms of international law. A huge operation, special operation took place at the money that American taxpayers paid for. You know, simple citizens, they don’t know how much money they spent to support these special forces. I think this is criminal money.

At least DAE is criminal. And when at the court, I was saying, check me out. Check who I am. Who is Mr. Yerushchenko Konstantin? I never hid myself. I didn’t do strange flights, illegal flights. Please, check me out. When we gave all the data to the court, check me out where I was, what I’ve done,

who I worked for, and how and when. It’s not a secret. Yes, I worked a lot in African countries. That’s not a secret. I worked in Guinea, Angola. That’s not a secret. I brought passengers. I brought cargo, humanitarian help. evacuated citizens when they had unstable times.

It was in Guinea.

But American government, DAE and a prosecutor’s office, they didn’t need that truth. They wanted to get the objective that they were going after. And they just wanted one thing. for me to become their agent, cooperate with them, given lies against other citizens of Russia. And what was it done for? To discreditate Russian Federation.

in the government of Russia, in front of the whole world.

I’m a very small chain link on this huge chain. But, you know, they missed the American authorities, you know, FBI, CIA. Huge money is spent for those organizations. So you have so much money. You have all the means to check out who I am and what I do. It’s not so difficult.

See, from the end of the 80s, see, now it’s not difficult, but it wasn’t needed. So American authorities, you know, I’m always saying that American citizens, please open up your eyes. What American powers, what American authorities do to you. People are being judged for lies for Hundreds and hundreds of years. How do you even comprehend it?

We have 2.5 million people in the prisons of the United States were illegally accused. That’s 25% of all the people, all the criminals in the world. Are the people so criminal that you have so many? I spent with them 12 years. I spent with those people years. I understand who they are, and I understand American citizens.

Of course, there’s a lot of difference among Americans, but there’s a lot of workers, simple workers there. from South Carolina, from center. They’re good workers, laborers, simple people, and they were put in jail for 40 years or longer. But I think the system is rotten there. It just can’t be that.

Such a huge population is staying in jails. More than that,

as a federal service treats the prisoners.

You know, it’s not spoken about in mass media of the world. They show Russian jails. Look how bad it is there in Russia. When I was accused, I went back home, and I visited our jails, and I was shocked how the conditions The conditions of the people in the jails are much better than in the United States.

You can talk a lot about different things and what is American law, right, and how it works. I think you need to change it, not the state law. It’s more or less good. But federal law, it has to be changed and open the eyes of the people, because a lot of American mass media,

they don’t say what is going on. They, in a system of justice, so-called system of justice, because justice in the federal system, it does not exist in America. I knew it on my own skin when I was kidnapped. When they started, they cooked a case against me and falsificated a criminal case against me,

and they put me in jail for 20 years, 24 years, actually, because four years was a probation period, right? So totally 24. Praise God for, I’m so thankful, our government that they were fighting for me from this horror, from this jail where I was. in American jails.

It’s not that –

Of course, I’m very mad about that. I’m very upset. You know, I never hurt them or American people or American government. You know, I was criminal. Okay, this is my responsibility. I’ve visited many countries, whether with myself, with my flighting team. I said, guys, come on, friends, we are the territory of another country. Watch what you do.

Watch the laws that are there. Make sure you behave yourself well. Whether, think about it, you’re like an African country, completely different rules, completely different roles or Muslim country. Watch out where you are. So when I started to prove and catch in the lies that prosecutors, when they were swearing in the courtroom, I’m proving the court.

He said, the prosecutor is lying. They’re lying huge. It’s not just a little bit. You know, he didn’t do anything. Lie, falsification, manipulation, that’s all okay. It’s norm for them. Not the law or court. And then the appeal court, court of appeals, they agreed to what was done.

So the system of justice in the United States is rotten, at least on a federal level. And great attention should be given to it by American people. Their eyes need to be open. Tell them the truth. Whether truth is bad or good, it doesn’t matter. You have to know the truth,

not just in the United States and not in Russia, but everywhere else. Come on, let’s speak the truth of what has taken place, not hide things, some moments, and manipulate by the brains of the citizens.

Well, first of all, thank you very much for sharing that. I understand it’s not easy to talk about these things. Just so you know, in America we have, you’re correct to note that the American people are ignorant about the justice system. our symbol for justice is Lady Justice with a blindfold because justice is supposed to be blind.

She carries the rule of law and she carries the scales of justice and they’re supposed to be balanced by truth. But that’s not the case. We have so many people who at one time in their life are to be tough on crime, about justice. You have nothing to fear. You’ve done nothing wrong. You have nothing to fear.

The system of justice is good, et cetera. And then they find themselves under the microscope of the Department of Justice. And then they go to trial, and they realize how absolutely corrupt the court system is, how the prosecutors control everything. And then they go to prison, and they come out, and suddenly they’re all about reform.

Oh, we must reform the prison system. It’s horrible what we’re doing to these prisoners. The system of justice is broken. It was broken before you were accused, but you chose to be ignorant of it. So this is why your story is important. It’s important for the American people to understand that the American system of

justice is fundamentally flawed, and you are a case of that. But it’s also important to note that I’m looking at a very strong man here. I’m not looking at a broken man. is designed to break human beings, to break them down. Especially in your case, my understanding is the U.S.

government wanted you to testify against other people, to give testimony. And one of the reasons they were so harsh on you was to try to break you, to get you to testify, and you didn’t break. We talked before this interview, and there were two aspects of your life that I think people need to understand. First of all,

You were a Soviet Marine. And I believe Marskola Pajota, whether you’re American or, it’s a different breed, a different kind of character. So you are a man of steel. You have a steel core. But maybe the most important thing is the ring on your finger, the support of your family and your wife.

You were married with kids when you were arrested. Today, you’re still married to the same woman. You still have the same family. You’ve stayed united. Tell me about these two things about your life, because I think it defines who you are, and it also tells us so much about who you are as a person. I mean,

you’re a quality human being, a man who has been tested by the Marines, a man who married a quality woman who stood with him side by side through all this trouble, whose family is together. Your families don’t stay together if you’re not a good person, if you’re a bad person, if you’re

If you’ve done something wrong, families tend to break apart. You’re a good man. Could you just give us a little bit of information about those two aspects of your background?

Good question. Thank you, Scott. Thank you. I would get deep into it concerning What is a Russian woman? Globally, what is a Russian woman? Why I am here? What American authorities did to me, it was difficult to go through, you know, broken bones, beaten organs on the inside, torture. They wanted to give me a life sentence.

You know, it was very difficult to go through, you know. If Americans would understand who I was, who I was in the Soviet Army, what was my history, who I served, because Soviet appraising, you know, and Russian appraising, they’re different. When they raised kids in Soviet Union, it was, and even some now, love to the motherland,

respect of the elder. This is very important. Respecting to the family, to the mother, to your father, to your wife. Because when I was in jail in the U.S., I was speaking with hundreds and hundreds of people. I heard their stories, destinies and everything. You know, relationships become different. When they found out,

the American guys that were with me, when they found out and I was judged for 20 years, years and dozens of years i called my wife and said she didn’t leave you she didn’t divorce you she says no we don’t have that because a russian woman she’s like a old

um she’s gonna get into the fire house on fire and she’ll stop the horse on the way same way with my wife with my mother they were fighting for me all the time It didn’t matter to them, lifelong sentence. They continued to expect me to be home.

And when they threw me in jail, I had already 20 years announced. And I said, Victoria, you’re young. You know, you need to make sure that you have to put your life in order. She answered me quite tough. She answered, she used some cuss words. I found out that she would follow me to the end.

The American people, not all of them, but a very different structure. I take examples, you know. A husband was three, four, five years in jail, then they divorced. And when I look at them, when I saw their faces, they were like, When I call my wife every day, how is she? She’s okay. We were discussing some things,

and nobody was jealous that a woman was supporting me with any way possible, however she could, just financially, psychology-wise. She was running to the government, finding justice, lawyers, you know. Definitely they had some jealousy, but still, what we went through But the Soviet school and the army, I believe that every man has to go through the army.

It doesn’t matter what country, whether Russia, whether it’s United States, because you give back like a debt to your country, to your motherland. You were in the army, I was in the army. And, of course, I had guys around me who were professional fighters, professional warriors from the army, and there was respect for each other,

respect that every person was paying a debt to the motherland. And what politicians do is a completely different story. You gave an oath, you have to do what you have to do. An example I had before. before they announced me guilty I was waiting for the verdict and the federal

system they have I don’t know how would be probation officer I don’t know how it would be in Russian a give recommendations before the verdict announced by judge for how long they should give me a sentence lifelong 40 50 60 years so when He asked me questions. I had an interview with him.

I answered two or three questions. Then I didn’t want to answer to him. He says, who are you? I’m Konstantin Yerushenko, Russian Federation. And they asked me a question as follows. Who are you in Soviet army? I answered him. OK, here’s the answer. If you have anything against me, send official requests to the Ministry of Defense,

to Russian Federation, and they’ll give you a full detailed answer. And I never said anything else. Of course, according to American laws, with a probation officer, it was a big mistake. Mr. Rakov, the judge, Judge Rakov, he noticed that he said, you have not spoken with a probation officer in details.

I will add to you years of sentence. And I said, if I would answer to him who I was and what I did, he said, then I would violate my constitution and my oath. Give me another 10 years, 20 years, but I gave an oath. I have to keep it. This is a Russian mentality of Russian soul.

I’m a soldier. I’m an ex-soldier. like my wife. We got married in 1992. We take this cross and we carry it, and we must carry it because we are one family. We are one nation, and nation must be united. That’s unclear because people in the U.S., they’re a bit different. They’re not really in agreement much.

I think we’re a little bit more united. In Soviet Union, we had a phrase, the family is a cell of the society. So each family would be tough and strong. in the cities and the villages, then as we grow, the cells grow. We will be victorious. We will be undefeatable. When people have differences, disagree,

but you can see it on your own what takes place in the world. Countries are divided. Nations are divided on the different reasons. Look, Ukraine, one nation, one nation, what to fight about? Belarusians, Ukrainians, Russians. But on some reasons, nationalism gets the head up and other reasons. They continue to do this division work.

It’s like a bombing division work. And they wash out the minds of young people. But when you have education in the family, appraising in the family, Soviet appraising in Russia. Like we do, we call it in the army where we have a right political appraising. The youth must understand that money is not the number one thing.

The number one is your mother, father, your wife, your husband, your country, your nation. If any person, whether it’s U.S. or United States or Ukraine or in Europe, people would understand that division. It’s not going to bring to anything else, to any good case.

Well, thank you very much for sharing that. I just want to say I’m deeply impressed with your wife, but that also reflects on you. The fact that a woman stands with her man in times of trouble speaks volumes about the quality of the people you are, and it also speaks volumes about the quality of the Russian peopl
As you said, she’s a Russian woman, so I’m deeply impressed by that. It’s a shame you had to go through this, and I’m deeply sorry. that my government was involved. Let’s talk about this for a second. Why did they come after you? It’s a rhetorical question. You weren’t a criminal. They manufactured a case.

If you were a criminal, a real criminal, when they arrested you, they would have put handcuffs on you and flown you away. Instead, they isolated you, they beat you, they tortured you. Why? Because they want to invent a crime. They want to make you testify. They falsified information at your trial. The whole works. Why?

As you said, you’re a small cog in a big chain. Tragically, you got caught up in a political process of demonizing the Russian Federation, the Russian people, the Russian government, to show the American people that the Russians are bad. So they manufactured a case against you.

And the reason why this is important isn’t just to highlight the human tragedy and the inefficiencies of American justice, but our presidents, your president and my president, are going to meet on Friday, tomorrow, to try and talk about improving U.S.-Russian relations. But to improve U.S.-Russian relations, we need to do more than have our presidents meet.

We need to resolve the fundamental problems that lead America to do what they did to you. This isn’t about a miscarriage of justice. Of course it is. You were in prison, though. You saw prisons full. of American citizens where there’s been a miscarriage of justice. We’ve talked about the need for reform. Let’s push that aside.

This is about building trust between Americans and Russians. How could you ever trust America again? How could you ever trust America again, given what they did? And that’s a fundamental question, because if we can get you to trust us again, there’s hope to repair our relations. But the damage that was done to yo

has been done collectively to the Russian nation by the United States in a number of ways. The sanctions we put on, the accusations that we made. We accused your president of kidnapping children. A manufactured case, it happens all the time. From your perspective, is there a possibility to restore trust between the Russian people and the American people?

What needs to happen so that we can live together, trust one another? Because I would never condemn you if you looked at me in the eyes and said, I will never trust another American again. I have no faith in the American people. You have every right to say that.

Is there hope for good relations between Americans and Russians?

You know, I would divide that. Trust who? Structures, authorities, or trust the nations. Big difference. I have a lot of friends in America, great American friends, and Afro-Americans, white Americans.

Latinos,

good people, great people, they were raised in U.S., no more people, excellent people, and I have trust for them. But my personal point of view, now, at this moment, I would not, the structures of the U.S. government, I would not trust, I will not trust special forces, because they have not changed. Special services, they didn’t change.

And I’m glad that Mr. Trump, when I was in jail, I saw a lot of political shows. I watched every day what was happening inside American society. And if I would be American, I would be a Republican, more adequate people there in that party than a Democrat. But now I look what Trump does. Yes,

attempts maybe not to stop war, but for some kind of economical tasks,

all the sanctions that are now on Russia.

They are faced against back.

They go back. It’s like a boomerang. It goes back to American people. It’s about price, how prices form. There’s a lot of products and materials that we export to U.S. And now sanctions and American people hurt due to that. Concerning trust, I would divide that. I would separate that. American people, yes, I can trust them.

But you have to tell the truth about what’s happening, because all these American channels, NBC, Fox News, CNN, and et cetera, has manipulators, strong manipulators, especially channels of Democratic Party, CNN, NBC, and so on. Fox News, you can maybe understand a little bit. But the other channels, no. They change, they twist the facts. Partial truth is given.

Partial truth is not given. And when they ask me, as a Russian who was in the Russian Federation, regular Americans that lived in the United States all their life, fully seriously said, Do you have mobile phones in Russia? Do you have AC? People are seriously asking me. I was shocked, because what do you mean?

Mass media says we don’t have those things. We are wearing these crazy hats. We have nothing. Of course, I’m paraphrasing, but that’s what they say in the movies and the news. They constantly keep saying that. And if to be more open, at least in informational way,

then the trust will be bit more between the countries and also the higher levels. What do you mean a state, an authority? It’s a support for the nation. And if the nation will understand what takes place, they will support. And then the authority through mass media brainwashes the nation. Of course, then, that’s what we see.

America was open until the 80s.

until Reagan came in. It was open country, 70s, 60s. It was beautiful country. And where did it go? It went down. Democracy? There is no democracy in the United States. The human rights? None. Big question. Election system, whoever pays more, that’s the one who wins. Who are the voters? The people are not voting.

Some kind of part of a small part of the nation. Even the election, this two-party system, big questions towards that system.

The picture of your opinion is very depressing. But as an American, I can identify exactly with what you’re saying. If I take what you said at face value, though, there’s no hope. What you’re saying is that no matter what our leaders do tomorrow in Alaska, there’s no hope because America is fundamentally broken. You can’t trust the system,

and the American people appear to be unable to change the system because the system won’t let it be changed. I don’t disagree with your analysis, but as an American citizen, it’s not my job to sit back and cry. It’s not my job to go, oh dear, everything’s bad. It’s my job to fix the system.

And we can’t fix the system if we, for instance, commit suicide by going to war with Russia, because a war with Russia would be the end of the world. And so what I’ve been doing is trying to promote the idea of peace between Russia and the United States to prevent a war. In order to do that,

I have to change the mindset of the American people. You saw it. When you say you’re a Russian, do you have flushing toilets? Do you have washing machines? You have refrigeration? You have roads? Cars that use gas? I mean, the ignorance of the American public about the reality of Russia is very real.

And that’s one of the things that I’ve been trying to do is capture the Russian reality and bring it back to the United States. There’s a lot of work to be done, and I will continue to do that work. But we need Russia’s help. So I’m asking you,

as a Russian who has been betrayed by the US government, betrayed by the US system, who knows the reality, what can I do to win your trust? Because our leaders will need time. If they make an agreement on Friday to move forward in peace, They’re going to need time to make that happen.

And during that time, the American people need to mobilize in support of the concept of peace. Do we have time? Can you give us that time? Can you learn to be patient with the American people? It’s a question I’m asking you. After everything you’ve gone through, all of the cruelty and the inhumanity that you’ve experienced,

I know you probably will never trust us as a system. But are you willing to trust the American people and have patience for us so that we can change the system.

American people to the nation, yes, we have trust. If you talk to them and open their eyes, they’re fantastic people. You know, they didn’t know me. I was just a simple Russian. They helped me. American citizens, Christians, Christians, Christians, they came to me. They visited me. They gave me help.

But we have to be open if citizens of United States would come to Russia and visit and take a look at who we are, how we live. Not just here. They would go to Ukraine to understand the mentality. Belarus. They would understand who we are, what we do. We are open, very open.

Of course, not all of us. We are an old mass, you know, Americans, you know,

for simple citizens that,

especially from the deep of the country, not like New York or Philadelphia. That’s a different topic to discuss. But, you know, simple workers, people that work at the manufacturing plants in the villages, in the farms, excellent people. They’re hardworking people.

They’re just like you.

Yes, just like me. They’re believers. And faith is number one thing. I believe Christian faith. I don’t care Catholic, Orthodox. There’s Christian faith. So here, faith. Yes, we do have trust to American people, simple citizens, to the government and special services. No. But it’s good that now, you know, all Russians, we’re open. Our president is open.

You want to talk to us? Come on over. Let’s talk. Let’s sit down at the table. Let’s have negotiations to regulate all the questions, solve all issues. So now we come to the point where we can’t go on. If the war takes place, It’ll be a catastrophe.

So we, in any case, we have to have a two-side relationship at the highest level. Change the system, that’s a completely different question, especially in the United States. And I always tell Americans, get off your knees, get off your knees, take a look, take your ride that is given to you by the country and fight.

But people are really, really afraid by the system itself.

Well, the fear comes from ignorance. When you’re ignorant of something, you’re afraid of it because you don’t understand it. In America today, as you learned, we have Russophobia and we’re afraid of Russia because we’re ignorant of Russia. We don’t understand Russia. I’ve been working very hard over the course of the past several years to try and

come to Russia, to learn from Russia, to capture the Russian experience and bring it back to the United States. As you may know, last year, I was supposed to come to Russia to speak at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. And the U.S. government took my passport and refused to let me travel to Russia because they

were afraid of my work. They were afraid that if I actually talked to the Russians, learned about Russia, brought it back, that the people would become mobilized and seek to change the system. And in August, a year ago, They sent 40 FBI agents into my home to raid my home, to intimidate me,

to accuse me of being a Russian agent. They criminalized free speech. I was simply talking about peace, peace between Russia and United States. But merely talking about peace became a crime. One of the interesting things is they charged me with manipulating the elections. Well, what is a citizen supposed to do?

A vote is a manipulation of the election. If you are saying something that I don’t agree with, I’ll vote for the other person. And I’m allowed to say why I’m voting against them. I was saying that we need to promote peace with Russia, but I was accused of trying to manipulate the election on behalf of Russia.

No, it was on behalf of the American people. But I started a program to promote this, and they called it a Russian program. Russia had nothing to do with this program. But it was a, I did a coin. to help promote the idea, to encourage the vote.

What would you do to save democracy, save America, save the world through your vote in November? This is the project that the United States government said the Russian government was behind. No, this is my project. But I decided to bring this coin with me to Russia because I do want to make it a Russian project.

Not because you’re telling me to, but because I’m asking you to help me create peace. This has been an outstanding conversation. It’s absolutely essential that we continue these conversations. And I’d like to offer you this coin as a gesture of gratitude for everything you’ve done for all the sacrifice you’ve made, all the suffering you’ve done.

But more importantly, by joining me here today to have a conversation about peace and the potential of friendship. What we’re doing here today, every American should be doing with Russians, learning about each other. And once we do that, we become empowered with knowledge. And when you have knowledge, you’re not afraid.

And when you’re not afraid, you can take the action. So thank you very much for joining me today. in this edition of the Russia House. It’s been an absolute honor and privilege to talk with you.

The main idea of what you said has to be understanding between the people, among the people. The more we visit each other, I invited a lot of people. I said, come on over, guys. Visit me. Come to me. Come to see me in Russia. I had guests from Europe. I showed them who we are, what we are.

Come, stay at my house. Look how we live. Go to the shops. Walk the streets, villages, cities. Take a look. If there will be more exchange, then there will be great understanding. And there wouldn’t be the problems that we have now between the countries. Good thing that you have a possibility to come to Russia.

You see the reality. I have a friend in America, a great friend. When he came first time to Russia and he found out what is Russia, what is Europe, what kind of people live here, more open, more trust. and communication, you know, communication between the people. And then everything else would follow and build itself between two countries.

Thank you very much that you invited me.

Thank you very much. And I want to thank the audience for joining us here today on this special edition of the Russia House. It’s been facilitated by the National Unity Club, who helped bring Konstantin here to speak today. And I want to thank our hosts, the TASS News Agency, for providing us this wonderful platform.

And I want to thank you for watching. Thank you.

oooooo

Utzi erantzuna

Zure e-posta helbidea ez da argitaratuko. Beharrezko eremuak * markatuta daude