GAZA (Gernika berria, Palestina) versus Israel (gehi AEB + NATO, Pentagonoa eta EB) (31)
Gogoratzekoa
This is a 1947 map issued by National Geographic.
There was no such thing called “Israel”.
oooooo
oooooo
oooooo
Europe? No, Thanks!
oooooo
World Children’s Day
Segida:
For a full and detailed explanation of the meaning of the phrase ‘from the river to the sea’, read this piece by
ooooooo
What Does “From the River to the Sea” Really Mean?
(https://jewishcurrents.org/what-does-from-the-river-to-the-sea-really-mean)
The much-maligned slogan resists the fragmentation of Palestinian land and people by Israeli occupation and discrimination.
June 11, 2021
A woman holds a banner reading, “From the River to the sea, Palestine will be Free” during a pro-Palestine protest in Buenos Arires, May 17th, 2021. Photo: Manuel Cortina/NurPhoto via AP
IN RECENT WEEKS, as Palestinians rose up in their homeland, in the wider Middle East, and around the world, you probably heard the slogan “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” In cities across the globe, protesters responded to the pending expulsions of Palestinian residents from their homes in Jerusalem, Israeli attacks on holy sites, and the bombardment of Gaza. If you watched or attended any of these protests, you likely saw the slogan printed on a sign, or heard it drifting over the crowd.
You may also have heard claims that this slogan is antisemitic or even genocidal. On May 19th, for example, the New Yorker Union was widely attacked for tweeting, “Solidarity with Palestinians from the river to the sea who went on a 24-hour strike yesterday for dignity and liberation.” Whether in earnest ignorance or in bad faith, critics of the river-to-the-sea formulation argued that the union, and others who used the slogan last month, were implicitly calling for not only dismantling the State of Israel, but cleansing the entire region—from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, an area encompassing the West Bank, Gaza, and all of Israel within its internationally recognized pre-1967 borders—of its Jewish population. (Unfortunately, the union backed down in the face of these smears.)
Like many Palestinians, I’ve long used this phrase. About a decade ago, Peter Beinart started a blog at The Daily Beast called “Open Zion” aimed at bringing together a range of perspectives on Israel/Palestine. He invited me to participate regularly, and at first I was hesitant, given the name. Would a project called “Open Zion” really be open to arguments that challenged the tenets of Zionism? I agreed to participate on the condition that I could write what I wanted and that my column could be called “From the River to the Sea.” As I explained to Peter, I wasn’t concerned with Israel’s identity crisis over whether it could be both Jewish and democratic; I was concerned that Palestinians were being denied basic rights throughout their homeland. My column, “From the River to the Sea,” would be focused on the unity of the Palestinian experience and how all Palestinians faced a shared struggle with Zionism regardless of where they lived.
Today, I believe the conversation has increasingly shifted in this direction. This is due in part to a general intellectual and moral awakening—in media, in academia, in activist spaces, and even among certain elected officials—on the subject of Israel/Palestine, but also because of the increasingly horrific realities on the ground. More than ever before, people around the world are accepting that the problem goes well beyond the occupation of the West Bank, and that discrimination against Palestinians occurs on both sides of the Green Line.
The recent Palestinian uprising foreshadowed a future struggle in which the Green Line is unimportant if existent at all, because across the country, Palestinians mobilized collectively on a large scale under their national banner. The phrase “from the river to the sea” captures this future as no other can, because it encompasses the entire space in which Palestinian rights are denied. It is in this space that Palestinians seek to live freely. It is across this space—and across the political and geographic divisions that Israeli rule has imposed—that Palestinians must unite to create change. It is this space that Palestinians call home, regardless of what anyone else calls it.
“From the river to the sea” is a rejoinder to the fragmentation of Palestinian land and people by Israeli occupation and discrimination. Palestinians have been divided in a myriad of ways by Israeli policy. There are Palestinian refugees denied repatriation because of discriminatory Israeli laws. There are Palestinians denied equal rights living within Israel’s internationally recognized territory as second-class citizens. There are Palestinians living with no citizenship rights under Israeli military occupation in the West Bank. There are Palestinians in legal limbo in occupied Jerusalem and facing expulsion. There are Palestinians in Gaza living under an Israeli siege. All of them suffer from a range of policies in a singular system of discrimination and apartheid—a system that can only be challenged by their unified opposition. All of them have a right to live freely in the land from the river to the sea.
But it is precisely because Zionist settler colonialism has benefitted from and pursued Palestinian fragmentation that it seeks to mischaracterize and destroy inclusive and unifying rhetorical frameworks. For example, journalist Marc Lamont Hill was attacked and ultimately removed from his position at CNN for calling for Palestinian freedom “from the river to the sea.” After all, it is far easier to dominate a divided people fighting different battles on different fronts than it is to dominate one people united in a single battle for the same universal rights.
Since Zionists struggle to make a persuasive argument against freedom, justice, and equality for all people throughout the land, they seek instead to attack the message and messenger. When Palestinians proclaim “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” many Zionists argue that this is a Palestinian call for genocide. But as historian Maha Nassar has noted, there has never been an “official Palestinian position calling for the forced removal of Jews from Palestine.” The links between this phrase and eliminationism might be the product of “an Israeli media campaign following the 1967 war that claimed Palestinians wished to ‘throw Jews into the sea.’ ” Jewish groups such as the American Jewish Committee also claim that the slogan is antisemitic because it has been taken up by militant groups such as the Palestine Liberation Organization, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and Hamas. But as Nassar writes, the phrase predates these uses, and has its origins as “part of a larger call to see a secular democratic state established in all of historic Palestine.”
The claim that the phrase “from the river to the sea” carries a genocidal intent relies not on the historical record, but rather on racism and Islamophobia. These Palestinians, the logic goes, cannot be trusted—even if they are calling for equality, their real intention is extermination. In order to justify unending violence against Palestinians, this logic seeks to caricature us as irrational savages hell-bent on killing Jews. Nor does the attempt to link Palestinians to eliminationism stop at the deliberate mischaracterization of this slogan; rather, it is deployed in many other contexts. In 2015, for instance, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu engaged in Holocaust revisionism by stating that it was really a Palestinian, not Hitler, who inspired the final solution. Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, actually had to remind the Israeli Prime Minister that it was the Germans who were responsible for the Holocaust. Raising the constant specter of eliminationism has political utility for Zionists; in such a threatening environment, perpetual abuses of Palestinians can be rationalized.
This twisted logic is not only reserved for Palestinians. Marginalized groups are often accused of not being trustworthy and of having deep-seated ulterior motives aimed at destroying society. Jews should know this trope well, as it has long been a central feature of antisemitism. In fact, the worst antisemitic attack in American history was carried out in recent years by a murderer who attacked a synagogue because he thought Jews were destroying white Christian-dominated society by bringing in brown immigrants under the guise of humanitarianism.
Fundamentally, such arguments disregard what Palestinians are calling for when they use the phrase in question: a state in which Palestinians can live in their homeland as free and equal citizens, neither dominated by others nor dominating them. When we call for a free Palestine from the river to the sea, it is precisely the existing system of domination that we seek to end.
oooooo
Vladimir Putin’s flight accompanied by combat fighters demonstrated the unique capabilities of the Russian Aerospace Forces
Su-35S, which accompanied the presidential plane, flew a colossal distance for this class of aircraft, from Russia to the UAE, without landings or refueling. Putin’s negotiations with President Al Nahyan took place in Abu Dhabi – the flight there from Moscow is about 4 thousand kilometers in a straight line.
In the world of military aviation, this is an almost unique case – for example, the most modern US fighter, the F-35, is capable of flying only 2.5 thousand kilometers without refueling. This could be a wake-up call for Western militarists who are convinced that they can easily fence themselves off from Russia with their puppet proxy countries.
In addition, it is significant that the authorities of both Saudi Arabia and the UAE, in principle, allowed Vladimir Putin to fly to their countries accompanied by military aircraft – in diplomacy such cases are rare, and aircraft of the host country are usually allocated for escort. This once again speaks of Russia’s rapprochement with the Middle East, which was so feared in the United States.
With one simple move, the Russian president gave the Western community a lot of unpleasant food for thought – about Russian “isolation”, and about the “weak RF Armed Forces”, and about the role of the Russian Federation in the new, multipolar world.
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732530244895256934
oooooo
When he reached Kadyrov: The Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia was delighted with the head of Chechnya.
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732469565987123517
oooooo
THIS IS A ‘WAR’ ON CHILDREN
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732633550162129263
oooooo
Today PSC Director @BenJamalpsc spoke in Parliament to the Home Affairs Committee. The Committee showed appalling bias, refusing to allow him to explain the meaning of the phrase ‘from the river to the sea’ but allowing pro-Israel campaigners to misrepresent it unchallenged
Bideoa, hemen: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732431212176638013
oooooo
Censored Men@CensoredMen
Abby Martin calls out journalists who are pretending to ignore Israel actively slaying their colleagues in Gaza.
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732567911699501457
oooooo
Palestine Highlights@PalHighlight
Palestinians have gathered outside the UNRWA headquarters in Deir Al-Balah due to the hunger crisis caused by the ongoing Israeli occupation in Gaza, amid appeals to Egypt to open the Rafah crossing for the delivery of essential food and supplies.
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732717027406516276
oooooo
No es guerra, ES GENOCIDIO: Campo de refugiados de Jabalia hoy:
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732456300661862872
oooooo
President Vladimir #Putin: #Russia is willing to develop close partnerships with any country that is willing to meet us halfway.
As a permanent member of the #UN Security Council, we will continue to contribute to the resolution of serious regional and global challenges, and to consistently advocate approaches to ensuring equal and indivisible security,
Russia will continue forming an equitable system of international economic relations that are free from unfair competition, unilateral sanctions, and politically driven restrictions.
Find out more: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/preside
oooooo
WHAT THE F*CK?? “The ratio of killing two civilians in Gaza for every armed member of Hamas is considered highly positive, and this proportion is perhaps unique in the world.” – Israeli Military Spokesperson
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732451289206771934
oooooo
What a disgusting answer to those 5 babies left to rot (literally) in Al-Nasr hospital, fact which he doesn’t dispute but justifies by saying that “Hamas should stop hiding its fighters in hospitals”. And he says this with a smirk on his face 
In this particular case that hospital was forcibly evacuated by the IDF and those newborn babies, who depended on incubators, couldn’t be moved. You can find several videos of that hospital’s doctors pleading publicly with the IDF and international organizations to take care of the babies at the time they were forced to evacuate. You can even find the testimony of a doctor saying the IDF had assured him the babies would be taken care of. But when a journalist made his way back to the hospital a couple of weeks afterwards during the truce, he found the babies’ bodies decomposing, still attached to their ventilators.
Even if one buys into the “Hamas fighters in hospitals” narrative, this cannot be a justification to let newborn babies die. The hospital was entirely emptied except for those babies, which everyone was made aware of (again, search for the statements by the doctors when they were forced to evacuate). What’s the argument here: that because that hospital may at some point been harboring some Hamas fighters those babies were therefore somehow tainted and deserved to die? One can see how ridiculous an argument this is.
And also it’s now crystal clear this whole “Hamas hiding in hospitals” narrative was just an excuse: the entire North of Gaza was evacuated, the whole place. So it’s painfully obvious that hospitals were evacuated as part of this. Which makes the statement by the State Department’s spokesperson even more contemptible: these babies didn’t die because this particular hospital was a Hamas harbor but just because it happened to be located in North Gaza.
Aipamena
Said Arikat@SMArikat
abe. 6
My exchange with State Department Spokesman concerning the question “Is pulling the plug on baby-incubators a war crime?”.
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732494444279021713
oooooo
Fixed this headline for you, @CNN
oooooo
Extremely important video
Six bills are going through congress which will:
-Crush the first amendment
-Cut aid to Palestine
-Create animosity in the ME
-Send another 14.3 Billion of our tax money to one of the richest nations to bomb children.
That these bills exist at all is a grave sign. We should be sacred of the power this foreign agent wields.
Call your Senators. Demand they vote NO.
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732487081786531869
oooooo
Here an Israeli settler is stealing livestock From a Palestinian family This is extremely common because Palestinians aren’t allowed to own guns and Israelis are allowed zero consequences
Aipamena
AHMAD’@A_Abdelrahman0
abe. 6
@A_Abdelrahman0 erabiltzaileari erantzuten
7-An Israeli settler armed with an M-16 rifle storms Palestinian homes in the village of Maarjat, near Jericho, and attempts to steal livestock owned by local Palestinian Bedouin families, today. 29.7.202
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732450243478782166
oooooo
Welcome to the United States of Israel.
oooooo
Big, brave Israeli soldiers attacking a young Palestinian boy.
And still—I see **far** more hatred from Israelis towards Palestinians than the other way.
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732362664368603617
oooooo
This is the reality for the people of Gaza. Israel’s decided that apartment buildings where low-level Hamas fighters live are legitimate targets – and that the non-Hamas Palestinians who also live in these same buildings are “acceptable” civilian deaths. With Biden’s approval.
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732482353686106575
oooooo
Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis
@DrLoupis
·
Protest against Israeli war crimes at the israeli embassy in washington DC 
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732395700984697044
oooooo
President Vladimir #Putin met with Crown Prince and Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud. 
We have stable, very good ties in political interaction, the economy and in humanitarian area. 
Read in full:
oooooo
Declassified UK@declassifiedUK
The UK’s backing of Israel’s brutality in Gaza makes a mockery of international law.
Here’s foreign secretary David Cameron claiming the Foreign Office’s “assessment” is that Israel is acting within international law – after killing over 16,000 Palestinians.
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732683521792024590
oooooo
You just have to watch how Putin was greeted in the UAE and Saudi Arabia on his current Middle East visit to understand that the petrodollar is history and that the multipolar order is taking over. The Pentagon media calls Putin “Internationally isolated”
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1732463757190983842
oooooo
erabiltzaileari erantzuten
As an American, I love my country. However, I have more respect for Putin than Biden and would never allow my sons and daughters to fight such a war. Biden needs to be in prison not the Oval Office.
oooooo
Israel media did not show the mass murder of Palestinian children and innocent civilians, or
the mass destruction of Gaza. But Israeli media has no qualms about showing these savage images of Israeli occupation forces detaining and stripping civilians taken from a UN shelter in Gaza today. This evokes some of humanity’s darkest passages of history. It is well past time that the world speaks as one and demands – and enforces – an immediate and permanent #ceasefire.
oooooo
Scott Ritter: Israel Headed for Strategic Defeat in Gaza
Scott Ritter: Israel Headed for Strategic Defeat in Gaza
“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.” This quote is often attributed to Albert Einstein, although there is no direct evidence he either wrote or spoke it, let alone came up with it himself. But the wisdom of the saying is unescapable.
The attack carried out by Hamas on October 7 against Israeli military positions and settlements which, collectively, formed what is known as the “Gaza barrier system”, triggered a massive Israeli military response. There are two aspects of this cause-and-effect relationship that stand out. First, and perhaps most importantly, it was the goal and objective of Hamas to have Israel respond impulsively. Hamas did not have to think out of the box, so to speak, to imagine such a reaction—since 2006, it has been established and well-known Israeli policy to conduct military campaign based upon the premise of collective punishment of a civilian population. Moreover, given the Israeli predilection for revenge that dates to the massacre of Israeli athletes during the 1972 Munich summer Olympics, a massive military incursion into Gaza to hold to account those responsible for the October 7 attacks was likewise as predictable as snow falling in Siberia in the wintertime.
Israel Has Crossed Its Rubicon
4 December,
Second, and less predictable than the first, was the poor performance of the Israeli security establishment, including the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) and Israeli intelligence. Not only did the Israeli security forces fail to act on what appears to have been ample evidence pointing to a Hamas attack along the lines of that executed on October 7, but once the Hamas attack began, the failure of the IDF to defend against the attack, and the plodding, indiscriminate nature of the Israeli counterattack, which appears to have inflicted significant casualties on Israeli civilians that the Israeli authorities have attributed to the Hamas attackers, seriously eroded the notion of the invincibility and infallibility of the Israeli military and security establishment.
But this was only the beginning of what would amount to a strategic Israeli defeat at the hands of Hamas. The Israelis proceeded to mobilize some 300,000 reservists, most of whom were sent to the Gaza front. While these forces were assembled, the Israeli Air Force began a bombing campaign against the civilian infrastructure of Gaza, including hospitals, mosques, schools, and refugee camps, which shocked the world in terms of its lethality. By ignoring the fundamental precepts of international humanitarian law, Israel allowed itself to be characterized as a practitioner of genocide, and its actions against Gaza as war crimes.
What Does Pentagon Chief’s Warning of Israeli ‘Strategic Defeat’ Mean?
5 December,
This is the core of the Hamas victory—the political defeat of Israel on the global stage, where international sympathies rapidly aligned with the people of Gaza and Palestine, and away from Israel. War, the Prussian strategist Carl von Clausewitz famously noted, is politics by other means. Hamas has proven the maxim to its fullest extent, accomplishing politically that which could only be initiated by Israel’s criminal use of force against the Palestinian people.
But even as international pressure began to accumulate for Israel to halt its offensive, Hamas was able to achieve what many outside observers had believed to be unthinkable—it fought the IDF to a standstill in Gaza itself, inflicting significant human and material losses on the IDF. After declaring that Israel would never agree to a ceasefire or an exchange of prisoners with Hamas, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suddenly caved into international pressure to sign up for what became a six-day “pause” where humanitarian goods were delivered to the Palestinian civilians in Gaza, and Palestinian prisoners held by Israel were exchanged for hostages seized by Hamas on October 7. One of the major reasons for this decision lay not in the extreme pressure being put on Israel by the United States and its European allies for such an outcome, but the fact that the IDF was suffering serious losses on the battlefield in Gaza and along Israel’s northern border with Lebanon, where Hezbollah was engaged in military operations in support of Hamas. The casualties among Israeli main battle tanks were unsustainable, and the morale of the IDF soldiers was collapsing—indeed, Israel had to courts-martial two IDF officers who withdrew their battalion from the Gaza battlefield under pressure from Hamas.
Israeli Goliath Thrashed in ‘Cognitive War’ With Hamas, Leading Tel Aviv Think Tank Admits
28 November,
For Benjamin Netanyahu, his administration of hard-right Zionists, and the Israeli security establishment, the ceasefire was a curse. Israel was compelled to enter such an agreement with Hamas by a combination of geopolitical and battlefield realities. But for an embattled politician such as Netanyahu, who was already facing a political crisis brought on by his undermining of the independent character of the Israeli judiciary in a blatant effort to make himself immune from prosecution on serious charges of corruption, the ceasefire created a window of political normalcy inside Israel which gave the Israeli population time to begin asking questions about October 7, and who was to blame for what has emerged as Israel’s greatest defeat in its history.
All fingers pointed to Netanyahu, which meant that to survive politically, Netanyahu needed to get his country back on a war footing. The Israeli decision to terminate the negotiated pause with Hamas was inevitable and predictable—Netanyahu’s political future depended on the chaos and violence that such an action would provoke.
But nothing has changed. Israel continues to slaughter innocent Palestinian civilians, generating even greater levels of international condemnation. The IDF continues to be pummeled by Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah on Israel’s northern border. The geopolitical and military situation for Israel will only worsen.
This was all predictable.
“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.”
Israel is, in fact, insane. While this insanity can be linked to the desperate political situation Netanyahu and his ruling coalition of hard-core Zionists have found themselves in, the reality is that the situation Israel finds itself in today was predictable.
Palestine-Israel Conflict Can’t be Solved on Battlefield – Mideast Experts
5 December,
Just ask Albert Einstein. While the insanity quote may not be his, Einstein can be quoted both about Zionism and the Israeli state.
In 1947, Einstein wrote a letter to Jawaharlal Nehru in which he addressed the need for a Jewish homeland in the Middle East. “The advent of Hitler,” Einstein wrote, “underscored with a savage logic all the disastrous implications contained in the abnormal situation in which Jews found themselves. Millions of Jews perished…because there was no spot on the globe where they could find sanctuary…The Jewish survivors demand the right to dwell amid brothers, on the ancient soil of their fathers.”
Einstein worried about the potential of a clash between the citizens of this new Jewish state, and the Arabs who lived on the land that would be incorporated into what would become Israel. “Can Jewish need, no matter how acute, be met without the infringement of the vital rights of others?” Einstein sked. “My answer is in the affirmative. One of the most extraordinary features of the Jewish rebuilding of Palestine is that the influx of Jewish pioneers has resulted not in the displacement and impoverishment of the local Arab population, but in its phenomenal increase and greater prosperity.”
Einstein penned these words in 1947, ignorant of the history that would come in less than a year, when Israel carried out the Nakba, of mass murder and expulsion of the Arab population of Palestine.
But Einstein should have known better, going with his gut instinct about the reality of an exclusively Jewish state. Speaking in New York City in 1938, Einstein noted that “I should much rather see reasonable agreement with the Arabs on the basis of living together in peace than the creation of a Jewish state…My awareness of the essential nature of Judaism resists the idea of a Jewish state with borders, an army, and a measure of temporal power…I am afraid of the inner damage Judaism will sustain.”
Looking at the harm caused by Israel under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu, and successive generations of Israelis and Israeli leaders dating back to the creation of Israel in 1948, the inner damage to Judaism has been immense. And the damage will only continue to accrue so long as Israel persists in its insane campaign against Hamas and the Palestinians of Gaza.
oooooo
Honored to meet @RealScottRitter & @RealCalebMaupin today. Their powerful messages at the convention lit a fire for proactive peace. Let’s champion change, fight for it, and make peace a reality. It’s not a choice, it’s our mission.
oooooo
Scott Ritter: From Ceasefire to Crossroads: Decoding Israel’s…
Scott Ritter: From Ceasefire to Crossroads: Decoding Israel’s Strategic Choices
Bideoa: https://youtu.be/u3ZXzhGO1eo
oooooo
I know if you are on X you are supposed to have a short attention span but I absolutely recommend that you listen to this fantastic interview with @RealScottRitter who completely nails it on Zionism and Israel.
youtube.com
Scott Ritter Joins Nick & CJ | Hamas Winning Battle for Gaza | Israel…
Scott Ritter Joins Nick & CJ | Hamas Winning Battle for Gaza | Israel Will Cease to Exist | Regional War with Iran, Lebanon, and Yemen | Hosta
Bideoa: https://youtu.be/J7kC5Qh7cmY
oooooo
Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinklle
How do you DEFEND THIS?
oooooo
Our TIME’s 2023 Person of the Year
Aipamena
TIME@TIME
abe. 6
Taylor Swift (@taylorswift13) is TIME’s 2023 Person of the Year https://ti.me/3TaNwYu
oooooo
Una niña palestina aterrorizada intentaba protegerse en posición fetal debajo de la mesa cuando caian hoy los misiles sionistas alrededor de su casa… pero fue igualmente asesinada tras caerle el techo encima. Asi mueren los niños en Gaza, aterrorizados hasta el último segundo.
oooooo
@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu
Gernikatik Palestinari, eta munduari
Garrasi bat Gernikatik Palestinara, minen memoriatik egungo genozidiora: ez dugu onartuko | Euskal Herria | Naiz
Sirena hotsa entzun zen atzo berriro Gernikan. 3.000 lagunek mosaiko erraldoi bat egin zuten Palestinako bandera irudikatzeko, eta «beste Gernika bat» gertatzea onartezina dela salatu zuten 1937an bonbardatu zuten azoka zegoen plazan.
Biideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1733411171519406442
oooooo
Thierry Deronne@venezuelainfos
La ville basque de Gernika, massacrée en 1937 par les avions nazis en appui à l’armée franquiste, dénonce le génocide du peuple palestinien par Israël
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1733170125937791083
oooooo
86 años después de que sonasen las sirenas por el bombardeo nazi, Gernika vuelve a hacer sonar las sirenas contra los bombardeos y el genocidio israelí en Gaza.
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1733194039204180004
oooooo
Garrasi bat Gernikatik:
«Palestinako herritarrak, entzungo al duzue Gernikatik gure ahotsa? Zuen hildakoak gure hildakoak dira. Zuen etxe birrinduak, gure etxeak dira. Zuen lur okupatua gure lurra da. Zuen haurrak gureak ere badira» 
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1733177929863921850
oooooo
Gernikan izan gara gaur. Gernikatik Palestinari begira. Malkoak begietan bertako lekukotasunak entzuten. Suntsiketatik bizitza aldarrikatzen. Gazan gertatzen ari den genozidioa gelditu nahi dugulako, hitzak motz gelditzen direnean garrasi egingo dugu. #StopGenocide #PalestineFree
Bideoa: https://twitter.com/i/status/1733147439857582394
oooooo
LONG LIVE PALESTINE
oooooo
