Pentagonoaren azken triskantzak (39)

2021 aza. 13

This video compilation leaves no doubt on what were the root-causes of Ukrainian crisis and how the West was (and is) continuously lying about it

Moss Robeson@mossrobeson__

urr. 3

neo-Nazis visit the Waffen-SS Galicia Division monument in Oakville: “Yaroslav Hunka is a hero… For the first time in decades at least, someone received a standing ovation in Canadian Parliament who truly deserved it. A Nationalist veteran who fought the forces of the left.”

Aipamena

Orbán Viktor@PM_ViktorOrban

urr. 3

Hungary is a sovereign country. We will not become a migrant ghetto and we will not give up our right to have our own foreign and economic policy. #ThisIsTheWay

Bideoa, hemen: https://twitter.com/i/status/1709287708231602335

oooooo

urr. 3

FM Sergey #Lavrov: #BRICS is a group of countries that growing stronger and expanding (and will continue to do so) not against anyone but exclusively in the interests of its member states.

urr. 3

No one listened

In 1995, 18 retired US officers signed a letter to stop NATO expansion:

1/2: “We are concerned by the potential consequences of the administration’s policy of promising to extend NATO membership to the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. In our view, ..

urr. 3

@RothLindberg

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

2/2 ...this policy risks endangering the long-term viability of NATO.”

R.T. Davies, fmr Ambassador to Poland replied, citing T. Sorensen, adviser to JFK:

“It is hard to imagine a more provocative decision taken with less consultation and consideration for the consequences.”

Russia in South Africa @EmbassyofRussia

urr. 3

X owner @elonmusk is mocking Ukrainian Pres Zelensky for ‘going five minutes without asking for a billion dollars’.

oooooo

urr. 2

The populist leader who won in Slovakia on a platform of ending aid to Ukraine has long been regarded as leftist, as has his party (see AP below). There is significant left-wing opposition to supporting the war in almost every country: except the US.

https://apnews.com/article/slovakia-parliamentary-election-c417efef2f33d38086d7229ddc3e24c0

Pavlina R Tcherneva@ptcherneva

urr. 3

Anyone condemning neoliberalism should get behind this policy agenda. It is the only economic framework that tackles precarity: the lifeblood of the neoliberal economy

urr. 3

Since the Swedish fiscal framework was phased in in the 1990s, the unemployment rate never came back down. It has been a complete and utter policy disaster.

https://government.se/government-of-sweden/ministry-of-finance/central-government-budget/the-fiscal-policy-framework/

ooooo

urr. 3

political commentator @TuckerCarlson on Pres Zelensky: Some uppity foreigner in a t-shirt demanding money for his ‘critical economic needs.’ We have critical economic needs too, buddy. Who are you, troll? Go away. What? Since when does that guy have a claim on our treasury?

Noctis Draven@DravenNoctis

urr. 3

He says if Russia loses the whole world loses, he speaks to a greater geopolitical picture

should Russia lose that many are not aware of. As of right now there are only two countries capable of standing between the west led by the US and absolute world domination, Russia and and China. It is then no surprise that the number one and two enimies we are always told to hate are… you guessed it, Russia and China.

Every country that pledges allegiance to America and Britain becomes apart of the western beast that has common traits, it’s plain to see. Lgbtq, satanic worship, removal of God, pedophilia is promoted, mass migration, destruction of culture, crime, drugs, mental health crisis, economic failure and promotion of government state as the Supreme authority, degeneracy, destruction of family and finally above all else to do the absolute bidding of the British and Americans.

If Russia should fall, China is next and should China also fall the world will become one massive American, British, western state economically, culturally and morally. Russia is truly the only country whom can oppose the west economically but especially militarily and this is why they want Russia destroyed, make no mistake. I’ve just revealed to you the true reason for the wars and Russian hate, believe it or don’t but this is fact.

#UkraineRussianWar #ukraine #russia #Zelensky #putin #nato #BRICS #china #india #africa #Trump #biden #Pandemic #Covid #EU

Bideoa, temen: https://twitter.com/i/status/1709313022726942988

oooooo

Pepe Escobar@RealPepeEscobar

At the 20th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club our session is called “A World Beyond Hegemony: BRICS as a Prototype of a New International Architecture”. The theme is vast and ambitious. Ambition is appropriate. Without ambition, nothing much is achieved. The BRICS are undoubtedly a major force in the world and have been so since the beginning, in 2008. We can indeed be a crucial factor in the consolidation of a post-Western and multipolar planet.

This is what is expected of our countries. One can ask, however, whether the BRICS have fully lived up to this kind of expectation. How have we fared since we first started working together in 2008, at Russia’s initiative? What can we achieve going forward? In trying to answer the first question I will be frank and sometimes even a bit harsh. Please do not see my words as arrogant or pretentious. They will be the expression of an expert opinion, fallible as all opinions. I hope my remarks will not be completely off the mark. Is it not true that self-criticism, though painful, may be beneficial in the end?

I will speak not as an academic researcher but as a practitioner, having been involved in the BRICS process since the beginning in 2008, from Washington D.C, and up to 2017, when I left the post of Vice President of the BRICS bank in Shanghai.

Beyond speeches, declarations, and communiqués, we have achieved so far two practical and potentially very important things: 1) a monetary fund of the BRICS, named the Contingent Reserve Arrangement – the CRA; and, more significantly, 2) a multilateral development bank, called the New Development Bank (NDB), better known as the BRICS bank, headquartered in Shanghai. This paper will cover briefly these two mechanisms and then move to discuss a possible future initiative – a common currency of the BRICS.

The two existing BRICS financing mechanisms were established in mid-2015, more than eight years ago. Let me assure you that when we started out with the CRA and the NDB, there existed considerable concern with what the BRICS were doing in this area in Washington, DC., in the IMF and in the World Bank. I can testify to that because I lived there at the time, as Executive Director for Brazil and other countries in the Board of the IMF.

As time went by, however, people in Washington relaxed, sensing perhaps that we were going nowhere with the CRA and the NDB. Indeed, progress had been slow. Why? It is a long story that will be addressed telegraphically here. I wrote a book about the negotiations that led to the NDB and CRA, as well as the first five years of these two financing mechanisms. [The BRICS and the financing mechanisms they created: progress and shortcomings, London: Anthem Press, 2022.]

What happened in the subsequent three or so years, from mid-2020 to now, was not sufficient to overcome the shortcomings depicted in the book. A brief synthesis will be attempted here, starting with the CRA.

The BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement

The CRA has been frozen by our five central banks. It remains small; it only has five members, and its work is hampered by numerous restrictions and safeguards. The surveillance unit we foresaw has not been established, and no balance of payments support operations have been carried out, only test runs. Now, if the BRICS are serious about offering an alternative to the Western-dominated IMF, the CRA must be expanded in total size of resources, new countries must be allowed to join, its flexibility must be increased, a sound surveillance unit (similar to the one the Chiang Mai Initiative has in Singapore) needs to be established as soon as possible, and the link to the IMF needs to be gradually relaxed.

All this is easier said than done. Having participated intensely in the two years of negotiations that led to the CRA, I can tell you that the main reason for lack of progress is the fierce resistance of our central banks, with the exception of the Chinese central bank. The Brazilian central bank is probably the worst.

The South African central bank was not far behind in making the CRA inflexible – very strange given that South Africa is the only BRICS country that could conceivably need balance of payments support in the foreseeable future. What about Russia? Can the Russian central bank be made to understand that the CRA is now potentially even more important than when we conceived it, given the changes in the geopolitical context?

Don´t tell me, by the way, that the CRA suffers from the same problems of all other monetary funds created as alternative or complementary to the IMF. For example, the small FLAR – Latin American Reserve Fund and the Arab Monetary Fund (AMF) have more members than the CRA and are active institutions that have carried out many operations for balance of payment support. Meanwhile, our CRA is dormant.

The New Development Bank

What I said about the CRA applies to some extent to the NDB. The Bank has achieved many things but has yet to make a difference. One reason being, frankly, the type of people we have sent to Shanghai since 2015 as presidents and vice presidents of the institution. Brazil, for instance, during the Bolsonaro administration, sent a weak person to become president from mid-2020 to early 2023 – technically weak, Western-oriented, no leadership, and without a clue as to how to conduct a geopolitical initiative. Russia is also no exception, unfortunately – the Russian NDB vice president is remarkably unfit for the job. Weak management has often led to the poor hiring of staff.

These internal problems of the Bank were compounded by broader political hurdles, including tense relations between China and India, the sanctions imposed on Russia since 2014 and, especially, since 2022, as well as the political crises in Brazil and South Africa. These macropolitical issues inside and among the founding members have also hurt the NDB.

Brazil has now sent Dilma Rousseff, a former president of Brazil, to become president of the institution. She has, however, less than two years to turn the Bank around. It’s not enough time. Thus, the future of the NDB lies largely in the hands of Russia. This is because Russia will have the opportunity to appoint a new president for 5 years, starting in July 2025. I trust Russia will, this time, be able to send a strong person for the job, someone of high political standing, technically sound, and with a clear view of the geopolitical purposes that led the BRICS to create the NDB. It is an expensive initiative, by the way, and requires careful handling by our countries. Suffice to say that the Bank’s paid-in capital from the founding members reached USD 10 billion, making it one of the largest multilateral development banks in the world from this angle.

Why can it be said that the NDB has been a disappointment so far? Here are some of the reasons why. Disbursements have been strikingly slow, projects are approved, but are not transformed into contracts. When contracts are signed, actual project implementation is slow. Results on the ground are meagre. Operations – funding and lending – are done mainly in US dollars, the currency which also serves as the Bank’s unit of account. How can we, as BRICS, credibly talk about de-dollarisation if our main financial initiative remains predominantly dollarised? Don´t tell me that operations in national currencies cannot be done in our countries. The Interamerican Development Bank, the IDB, for instance, has had for many years considerable experience operating using Brazilian currency. Why the NDB has not tapped into that experience beats me. One can expect Dilma Rousseff to start solving these problems.

The NDB is also far from being the global bank we envisaged at the time of its creation. Only three new countries have joined the Bank in its more than eight years of existence – compare that with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the AIIB, led by China, established more or less at the same time as the NDB, which has had more than 100 member countries for some time. Moreover, governance in the NDB is poor, and rules are not respected by management. The Board is ineffective. Transparency is not observed; the Bank is opaque, little information about loans and projects is made public. HR is weak. Many important positions in the Bank remain unfilled, and discouragement among employees is rife, leading to staff departures, and thus the total number of staff is falling.

Despite all that, the NDB remains an institution with great potential. It has a large capital base and support from five of the most important countries in the world. Support from the host city and host country has never failed. The Articles of Agreement were carefully negotiated and are mostly fit for purpose. Therefore, the NDB can still become a Bank of developing countries, by developing countries and for developing countries, to paraphrase Abraham Lincoln.

The NDB can have an important role, alongside the CRA, in an initiative that I now turn to – the possible creation of a common currency for the BRICS.

A common currency for the BRICS?

This idea originated in Russia. President Putin himself, as well as President Lula, have often spoken of de-dollarisation and of the possible creation of a common or reference currency for the BRICS. Since at least 2022, Russian experts have been working on the topic. The reason Russia is the originator of the idea is quite clear. Russia is the most important case of the weaponisation of the US dollar, the euro and of the Western financial system. The equivalent of about $300 billion USD, roughly half of the country´s official international reserves, were simply frozen – a unilateral moratorium that is among the largest such events in history. If this can happen, anything can happen.

There are controversies among economists about whether the role of international reserve currency is an “exorbitant privilege” or an “exorbitant burden” for the issuing country. We need not go into that. The United States has always understood that money is power and holds on tightly to the status of the dollar as the hegemonic currency. At the same time, paradoxically, it undermines the dollar by resorting to the currency and the Western financial system to sanction countries that are hostile to the US or seen as such. Russia is the largest and most recent case in a long list of victims.

Since the US dollar (and the euro) can no longer be fully trusted, it is natural that de-dollarisation should proceed, probably in a gradual manner. A BRICS currency could be an important step in that direction.

Aleksei Mozhin, the Russian Executive Director at the IMF, a former colleague, and close friend of mine, hit upon a curious coincidence – the five currencies of our countries all begin with the letter R – real, ruble, rupiah, renminbi, and rand. He proposed that the currency be called the R5. Sadly, only two of the currencies of the six countries invited by the BRICS in their Johannesburg Summit to become new members of the group as of January 2024 also begin with the letter R (the currencies of Saudi Arabia and Iran) – something that partly spoils Mozhin’s proposed name for the currency. Perhaps it could be renamed R5+ or R11, since the BRICS political formation will now perhaps be called BRICS+ or BRICS11.

But let us leave nomenclature aside. Russian experts have proposed that the BRICS currency start as a unit of account, taking the form of a basket of the currencies of the participating countries, with weights reflecting relative economic size. This first step is relatively simple. The R5+ could be used, to take one example, as a unit of account for the CRA and the NDB.

Both use the US dollar. If we are serious about de-dollarisation this may need to change.

Discussions among Russian experts did not, in so far as I am aware, go much further than this, except for problematic references to backing the new currency with gold or a basket of commodities. How could we proceed? I presented a paper at a recent seminar in Johannesburg, ahead of the BRICS leaders’ 2023 summit, in which I sketched out a possible road map [A BRICS currency? Paper that served as the basis for speech given at the BRICS Seminar on Governance & Cultural Exchange Forum 2023, in Johannesburg, South Africa, August 19, 2023].

There is no need to repeat the road map sketched out in the previous paper. It is enough to quickly recapitulate a few basic points: 1) The R5 or R5+ need not be a physical currency, it can be digital. 2) The new currency would not replace the currencies of the BRICS countries but would circulate alongside them, being used mainly for international transactions. 3) The BRICS central banks would continue to exist as now, fulfilling all the functions of a monetary authority. 4) An Issuing Bank would need to be created, in charge of issuing the new currency and putting it into circulation, in accordance with predetermined and carefully designed rules. This would help create confidence in the R5+.

Could the currency be backed in some way? Not by gold or other commodities, given the instability of their prices. One approach would be to back the R5+ by bonds guaranteed by the BRICS countries. The Issuing Bank would also be in charge of issuing the guaranteed R5+ bonds, at different maturities and interest rates. The currency could be freely convertible into these bonds. This arrangement would be a financial expression of the guarantee that the BRICS would give to the new currency.

The CRA and NDB could play an important role in putting the currency into circulation. Not only could the R5+ be their unit of account, but loans by the NDB and currency swaps by the CRA could be denominated and paid in R5+. The NDB would also issue bonds in R5+.

The Johannesburg Summit and possible next steps

To conclude, let me mention possible next steps for the BRICS in this area. A new currency is a complex issue, political and technical at the same time, and needs much further discussion. Some progress was made in the Johannesburg Summit. The Leaders’ Declaration addressed the matter of de-dollarisation and new payment instruments in a few significant paragraphs. They stressed, for instance, the importance of encouraging the use of national currencies in trade and financial transactions between BRICS and with other countries (paragraph 44 of the Declaration). The Leaders also tasked their Finance Ministers and/or Central Bank Governors, as appropriate, to consider the issue of local currencies, payment instruments and platforms, and report back to them by the next Summit that will be held here in Russia (paragraph 45). Furthermore, the establishment of a BRICS Think Tank Network for Finance in 2022 and its further development and practical implementation (paragraph 47) will create a channel for these monetary and financial discussions. The Declaration was not as explicit as it could have been on these issues and on a possible new currency because, so it seems, of India´s resistance, for reasons that are not entirely clear.

Be as it may, the process has been launched. In his concluding remarks in Johannesburg, President Lula stated that the leaders had “approved the creation of a working group to study the adoption of a reference currency of the BRICS”. He added that “this will increase our payment options and reduce our vulnerabilities”.

We can assume that Russia will now establish this group of experts. I will refrain from making now any considerations as to how the group could be set up. Let´s leave that to our Russian colleagues. I say only this: it would be advisable to draw lessons from the negotiation and implementation of the CRA and the NDB.

It is our good luck to have Russia presiding over the BRICS in 2024 and Brazil, in 2025 – precisely the two countries that seem to be most interested in moving towards the creation of a common or reference currency. If everything runs smoothly, the BRICS may be able to take the decision to create a currency during the Summit in Russia next year. By the Summit in Brazil, in 2025, the BRICS will perhaps be able to announce the first steps towards its establishment.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr@RobertKennedyJr

urr. 3

Another phony justification for war. China! When I’m President, we’ll try peace, diplomacy, and multilateral disarmament that will benefit the citizens of all countries. #Kennedy24

urr. 3

Don’t say I did not tell you…

urr. 3

Canada’s military trained Neo-Nazis in the Azov battalion, and no one was held accountable. It should therefore surprise no one that Canada’s top general is refusing to apologize for celebrating a Nazi in Canada’s Parliament. #NaziGate #cdnpoli

oooooo

Richard@ricwe123

urr. 3

Western politicians are beginning to see Ukraine as a liability for their own careers and future standing.

Problem is they have invested so much political capital in supporting the war, trying to find an exit strategy without destroying their own political futures is becoming increasingly difficult.

They expected a quick defeat of Russia, economically, financially and via the removal of Putin.

It has completely failed to materialise.

However they need an exit strategy and time is running out.

urr. 3

Finding the Money is coming to the Boston Film Festival at 1:00 pm (ET) on Saturday, October 28. Tickets available now. I’ll be there.

@FindingMoneyDoc

urr. 4

oooooo

I recently moved to China. I made a video discussing what life is like, what we can learn from its economic model, and why I think many of its policies are misunderstood, as this may be the most sovereign country on Earth. Link to full video below

Ivan Katchanovski@I_Katchanovski

urr. 4

“It was not Russia, but rather a Jewish journalist in the United States and Ivan Katchanovski, a Ukrainian Canadian professor of political science at the University of Ottawa, who exposed Hunka as a Nazi accomplice. Katchanovski, in particular, sent out photographs and translated

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

22 h

Nato won’t win a long war in Ukraine 

@UnHerd

It is a significant setback for Biden, who had asked Congress for an additional $20 billion for Ukraine — on top of more than $60 billion in aid already sent to the warring ally, including more than $40 billion in direct military assistance. In response, Biden sought to reassure Ukraine and Nato allies that the funding will be approved through a separate vote.

But even if that happens, the White House will still face an increasingly uphill struggle in mustering political support for its strategy of open-ended assistance to Ukraine. Not only is Trump, with his anti-war stance, continuing to rise in the polls, but even the more hawkish elements of the US and Western establishment are starting to rethink their stance on Ukraine. Indeed, it seems to finally be dawning on them that, as one leading commentator wrote in Newsweek, “there is no realistic basis to believe that Ukraine has the capacity to attain its stated strategic objective to reclaim all its territory, including Crimea”. A correspondent at The Wall Street Journal, meanwhile, recently noted that Ukraine’s goal of retaking all the territory it lost now “appears a distant prospect”.

oooooo

Thomas Fazi@battleforeurope

9 h

Great post.

@Mining_Atoms often points out, the market for cow dung fuel in India is $4B while the global market for uranium is worth only $790M. $4B in cow dung pays for an extremely low standard of living for some people in India; $790M in uranium is enough to produce 5x more energy than what humanity consumes. That means that when a well-funded NGO like Greenpeace or Friends of the Earth has pushed on a nuclear plant or a uranium mine, there was more political incentive to go along with them than to stand up for nuclear energy on principle.

AOC, U2 and Greta Thunberg Once Danced on the Grave of the Nuclear Power Industry

The anti-nuclear energy movement enjoyed over 40 unchecked years of primacy. Celebrity activists like Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, U2, and Greta Thunberg danced on the graves of nuclear power plants, combining well-established lies and trope with emotional appeals to burnish their credentials as strident environmentalists.

In 2019, AOC said that Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant (the safest and longest-running plant in the world) should’ve been shut down a long time ago in favor of 100% renewables:

U2 played a “Stop Sellafield” nuclear fuel processing concert in the UK in the early 1990s, while words like “Kill Baby Lies Car Future Victim Anti-Christ Frenzy Fear Decay Earth Rape” flashed rapidly behind them on a screen:

Greta Thunberg condemned nuclear as extremely dangerous, expensive, and time-consuming.

These efforts were part of a very successful larger effort to hold back the development of nuclear energy. Thanks to the political environment and trumped up narratives like the Fukushima incident (where only one person died from radiation), the global commodity price for uranium collapsed to some of its lowest-ever levels (adjusted for inflation).

According to @StatistaCharts, the global number of operating nuclear plants flatlined since 1988, while the global share of nuclear electricity production has declined from a peak of 17% in the 1990s to around 10% today.

Multipolarity Revives the Nuclear Power Industry

The growth of the BRICS+ sector of developing countries, the innovations of state-owned Chinese and Russian nuclear energy companies, the impotent underperformance of renewable energy initiatives in developed countries, and the success of China’s Belt and Road Initiative have turned the anti-nuclear industry on its head.

There are at least 57 nuclear power plants under construction worldwide; 21 in China and eight in India. At least 100 more are planned, and 300 more are proposed; with the plurality coming from China’s plans to spend $440B to build 150 new reactors by 2035. Through the Belt and Road Initiative, China may finance as many as 30 nuclear reactors in developing countries around the world by 2030. Russia may also help build as many as 33 reactors abroad via Rosatom.

The commodity price of uranium reflects this as well; the price has roared back to what it was pre-Fukushima in 2011.

Germany, which dismantled its nuclear plants and spurned Russian gas in favor of renewable energy, is being rapidly deindustrialized and destabilized because it has no reliable energy. Meanwhile, countries that build nuclear plants are increasing their industrial capabilities and citizens’ average standard of living.

Anti-nuclear advocacy no longer serves a purpose for Western oligarchs

Funding anti-nuclear advocacy is no longer a viable mechanism of control for Western oligarchs. Mastery of nuclear power has been a critical factor for the rise of the developing world, despite what Western environmental NGOs say or do.

This is why today, the activists that I mentioned earlier are reversing their previous anti-nuclear stances. Not because their concerns were addressed (the concerns were always built on lies), but political conditions have changed:

– The supremacy of the petrodollar is being challenged.

– The West has less access to Russian natural gas. – The West is hesitant to drill for natural resources.

– The West has committed to massively increasing its demand for electricity for “Net Zero” goals.

– The West has to power its data centers and AI for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

The arguments to stop nuclear plants from being built were always fear-based; the risk of a meltdown, everyday radiation exposure, waste disposal and a non-existent link to nuclear weapons proliferation were all easily resolved on the basis of science. They were political riddles designed to trick people into not wanting abundant and reliable energy.

Recently:

– AOC said she supports nuclear energy after a trip to Fukushima

– Greta Thunberg said existing nuclear plants should be kept open

– U2 said nuclear energy is critical for “Net Zero”

Remarkably, the environment is being used as their main reason for supporting nuclear energy; in the past, the environment was their reason for opposing it!

This is all to mask the real purpose of anti-nuclear advocacy: it was always about control.

The Right Reason for Supporting Nuclear Energy

Make no mistake, the cohort around AOC, U2 and Greta Thunberg are not supporting nuclear energy because they’re excited about multipolarity, dedollarization and ending global poverty; they’re supporting it because it’s the West’s last best shot at maintaining hegemony.

Not only will nuclear energy provide “energy security” for Western nations while they finance forever war in Ukraine and eventually in Taiwan; it will power the Net Zero microgrids, AI data centers and cryptocurrency microtransactions that dominate their preferred vision of the future economy.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Peaceful collaboration between the three leaders in nuclear technology, the United States, China and Russia could even unlock the potential of fusion energy, which could create even more abundance with fewer limitations. Nuclear energy’s highest and best use is to power an abundant standard of living for all people.

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

urr. 5

BRICS Financial and Monetary Initiatives – the New Development Bank, the Contingent Reserve Arrangement, and a Possible New Currency — Valdai Club

Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter

urr. 5

@hrkbenowen

erabiltzaileari erantzuten

Dmitry Polyanskiy @Dpol_un

urr. 5

One more confirmation that Ze deliberately and knowingly promotes glorification of Nazi collaborators in Ukraine

ICYMI: Chrystia Freeland and Hillary Clinton explain to the world that hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers need to keep dying…to send a message to China.

US military bases surrounding China: 313-400 Chinese bases in the Western hemisphere: 0

Ukrainians are dying to send a message to China…to counter an imaginary Chinese threat…while China itself is threatened by the most violent military power in the world today…

Moss Robeson@mossrobeson__

urr. 5

The @UkrCanCongress has stayed quiet about the Yaroslav Hunka ‘NaziGate’ scandal, which it might have created. Yesterday its Toronto branch published this Remembrance Day video feat. the flags of NATO and the ‘1st Division of Nat’l Army’ AKA the Nazi Waffen-SS Galicia Division

Bideoa, hemen: https://twitter.com/i/status/1710024211975000361

oooooo

Going Underground@GUnderground_TV

urr. 5

Bideoa, hemen: https://twitter.com/i/status/1709909387496534200

oooooo

urr. 5

SCOTT RITTER, ANDREI MARTYANOV, AND GARLAND NIXON JOIN ON NATO, UKRAINE’S TIME RUNS OUT – YouTube

youtube.com

urr. 5

Putin is 100% correct. How could Trudeau & every member of the Canadian Parliament applaud someone who “fought against Russia” in WW2?

Don’t they know who the Red Army was fighting in WW2?

Are they that ignorant of history? Or are they pro-Nazi villains?

Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter

urr. 5

youtube.com

Russian Embassy, UK@RussianEmbassy

21 h

President Vladimir Putin: No one [in the West] counted the dead children in #Donbass. No one mourned them in the #West. <…> The #Kiev regime started the war with the vigorous and direct support from the West. 1/2

Russian Embassy, UK@RussianEmbassy

21 h

President Vladimir Putin: counterparties in the #West have lost their sense of reality and have crossed every line. 2/2

George Galloway@georgegalloway

urr. 6

INTERVIEW: The propaganda about this war is evaporating and the true face of Nato and its proxy war with Russia is showing

Follow

@MoatsTV

#Ukraine #Nato

@BrianJBerletic

Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinklle

23 h

Putin: “The fact that everyone applauded this Nazi (in Parliament) is absolutely disgusting. Especially the Zelensky, who has Jewish blood in his veins, stands there and applauds a Nazi, a person who killed Jewish people with his own hands.”

19 h

Scott Ritter 2-Minute Topic: France is retreating from Niger

oooooo

urr. 6

Putin Warns ‘Globalist Terrorist’ #KlausSchwab His ‘Days Are Numbered’ As people all over the world wake up to the strange cult leader who has groomed young people using guile and corruption and inveigled them into power. World Economic Forum is losing

Orbán Viktor@PM_ViktorOrban

urr. 6

The heat is on in #Brussels: the budget is a mess, the #MigrationPact has failed, and the Brusselian strategy on the Russia-Ukraine war is fundamentally flawed. In this situation, Hungary cannot support any budget amendment proposal.

urr. 6

President Vladimir #Putin: Russia was, is and will be one of the foundations of this new world system, ready for constructive interaction with everyone who strives for peace and prosperity.

https://t.me/MFARussia/17782

@tobararbulu # mmt@tobararbulu

13 min

I like RFKJr. I think he’s the best choice for POTUS. He’s positioned himself as the peace candidate. And this is the tweet I fear may have sunk his chances. Israel’s policies regarding Palestine are indefensible…