Errenta unibertsala: noizean behin zapatak garbitu behar

Gabriel Aresti- idatzi zuen moduan1,

noizean behin, martxaren poderioz eta indarrez, zenbait zikinketa kasual erortzen zaiku gainera. Eta noizean behin, zapatak garbitzen diren axola-gabetasunarekin berarekin, gainetik mantxa eta zaplastadura hoik kentzen ere ba ditugu. Egun, hori egitera noa. Eta ez dut uste horregatik ezpataz odolik isuriko denik; ez, urak Beotibarko zubi-petik jarioten iraunen du, hala eta guztiz ere.”

Errenta unibertsala da afera (eta ondorioz, euskal progreak).

Udazkenean perretxikoak azaltzen diren bezalaxe, Granada honetan agertzen dira nonahi errenta unibertsalaren zaleak, bereziki ‘ezkerraren’ inguruan.

Badakizue: errenta banatu, lanpostuak banatu, zergekin dirua biltzea gero inbertsioak egiteko, eta ezagunegia den zabor guzti hori.

Gogoratu ondoko hau: Non dago dirua Europar Batasunean?

Zapatak garbitzearen aldera, errenta unibertsalik barik lan bermearen aldekoak gara, aspalditik gainera.

Pavlina Tcherneva-k berriki idatzi duenez, Jeremy Corbin ere alde dago:

Pavlina R Tcherneva@ptcherneva2

Great to hear that @jeremycorbyn pledges a job guarantee. I explain what it is here: https://vimeo.com/83813741  #jobguarantee #decentworkforall

Orain DTM defendatzen duen beste batek, Eric Tymoigne-k are lan gogorragoa ekarri du plazara: Universal Basic Income Is a Neoliberal plot.

Eric Tymoigne@tymoignee3

Universal Basic Income Is a Neoliberal plot to make you poorer http://www.furtherfield.org/features/articles/universal-basic-income-neoliberal-plot-make-you-poorer 

2016 abu. 9

Aipaturiko lan horretan, Universal Basic Income Is a Neoliberal Plot To Make You Poorer4, Universal Basic Income, UBI delakoak ondokoak ekartzen ditu:

(a) Aggravate inequality and reduce social programs

(b) Provide political cover for the elimination of social programs and the privatization of social services

(c) Neoliberal economists endorsed it (Milton Friedman5, Charles Murray6, Cato Institute7)

(d) “Basic Income” Won’t Alleviate Poverty

(e) There Is No Possibility of Another Kind of “Basic Income”

Nahiko eta sobera, baina hemengo progreak ez dira gai horretaz ezer ulertzeko, okerragoa dena, ez dute ulertu nahi. Karitatea gustatzen bide zaie, Paradisura joateko, agian!


5 Ingelesez: “Friedman argues for a “negative income tax” as a means to deliver a basic income. After arguing that private charity is the best way to alleviate poverty, and praising the “private … organizations and institutions” that delivered charity for the poor in the capitalist heyday of the nineteenth century, Friedman blames social programs for the disappearance of private charities

To Friedman and his many powerful followers, the cause of poverty is not enough capitalism. Thus, their solution is to provide a “basic income” as a means to eliminate social programs and replace them with private organizations.

6 Ingelesez: “Charles Murray, another prominent libertarian promoter of UBI, shares Friedman’s views. In an interview with PBS, he said: “America’s always been very good at providing help to people in need. It hasn’t been perfect, but they’ve been very good at it. Those relationships have been undercut in recent years by a welfare state that has, in my view, denuded the civic culture.” (…)

Murray adds: “The first rule is that the basic guaranteed income has to replace everything else — it’s not an add-on. (…)

7 Ingelesez: “To the Cato Institute, the elimination of social programs is a part of the meaning of Universal Income. (…) the Institute defines UBI as “scrapping the existing welfare system and distributing the same cash benefit to every adult citizen without additional strings or eligibility criteria”.”

Utzi erantzuna

Zure e-posta helbidea ez da argitaratuko. Beharrezko eremuak * markatuta daude